The First Amendment is dead as U.S. Attorney says posting anything negative about Islam is a Federal violation of civil rights laws.
The hits from the Obama regime just keep on coming, and coming and coming.
Yesterday it was reported that Obama’s regime (with help from John McCain) is committing treason by arming Al Qaeda-backed rebels in Syria who slaughtered an entire Christian village.
Members of the Free Syrian Army reportedly attacked the Christian-dominated al-Duvair village in Reef on the outskirts of Homs on Monday, where they massacred its citizens, including women and children…The U.S. and other Western governments that are backing the FSA have acknowledged the presence of jihadists but insist that they’re only a small part of the rebel movement. However, al-Qaeda and other Islamic extremist groups have been at the front of the rebel movement since day one of the Syrian war that began two years ago. According to German intelligence, 95 percent of the rebels aren’t even Syrian.
The slaughter was committed as an effort by the Jihadists to implement Sharia Law in Dictator Assad’s formerly secularist Syria.
Why is this issue of concern for us in America? Well, aside from Obama helping to create an Islamic Caliphate in the Middle East, the Obama regime is implementing by default, Sharia right here as part of Federal Law.
U.S. Attorney for the Obama Federalies asserts posting the truth about Jihadists and radical Islamists is now a violation of Federal law. This is defacto implementation of Sharia Law under the guise of protecting ‘civil rights’ for Jihadists and radical Muslims. Interestingly, that application of ‘civil rights laws’ does not extend to Christians. Everyone, including Muslims are free to demonize, denounce and insult Christianity and Christians for their faith and no such criminal violation of ‘civil rights laws’ will be applied or upheld.
Well, I for one will continue to post the TRUTH about Jihadists and radical Muslims until I am forced to stop. And you can be sure, this regime is going to attempt to force us to shut up.
Why do you think they obtained all that data and collected all those e-mails, cell numbers and texts from the press corps?
You need to be asking yourself, ‘how long before speaking ill of homosexuals, or the Democrats or Obama will be made a Federal crime?’ My guess is soon now. This regime has reached the point of power that it believes it can do whatever it wants to do without any consequences. Obama and the MarxoFascist war on the First Amendment and the press has reached the bombardment phase.
Think Hitler versus the Munich Post in the 30′s. Think Soviet, because that is where we have arrived.
From Breitbart today.
US Attorney Bill Killian: Posting Something Mean About Muslims on Social Media Might Be a Criminal Action Under Federal Civil Rights Laws
The First Amendment served us well for a time, but now it’s outdated.
Remember reading that England had arrested a guy for anti-Muslim Twitter postings in the aftermath of the Woolrich slaughter? And remember thinking, “Well, this is America, that can’t happen here”?
Oh yes it can. Obama’s Attorney for the Eastern district of Tennessee wants you to know that if you say something untoward about Muslims, the Federal government may imprison you.
Killian and Moore will provide input on how civil rights can be violated by those who post inflammatory documents targeted at Muslims on social media. “This is an educational effort with civil rights laws as they play into freedom of religion and exercising freedom of religion,” Killian told The News Monday. “This is also to inform the public what federal laws are in effect and what the consequences are.” … Killian said Internet postings that violate civil rights are subject to federal jurisdiction.
The posting he offers as a “for instance” is an egregious one. And yet this country has long protected, absolutely, egregious speech, such as hardcore pornography, for a simple reason: Either you are at liberty to say what you will or you are not. If you are constantly double-thinking every word you might say, for fear of being prosecuted, you are self-censoring, in anticipation of a possible prosecution by the government.
Rather than having a system in which people were constantly worried about imprisonment for speech, our country has evolved a simple bright-line code: Speech of all kinds, with a few exceptions that can be counted on three fingers, is absolutely protected.
Remember, the importance of this bright-line, no-exceptions rule of free speech was preached to us, even when some of us might not have liked it so much, as when hardcore pornography was afforded absolute protection under the First Amendment. In the case of hardcore pornography, it was argued — successfully — that having each artist weigh the possibility of an obscenity prosecution was too much of a burden on his free speech rights, and would have, unavoidably, a chilling effect on speech.
That was the rule then, and that was the rationale.
But now comes the Obama Administration to tell you that Yes, you just might be imprisoned for something you say online, so you’d better Watch What You Say.
Remember when Ari Fleischer said that, without suggesting any kind of legal penalties? Remember how the media freaked out?
But now comes the US Attorney for the Eastern district of Tennessee explicitly telling you that you may be imprisoned if a political appointee decides your political speech has crossed a line.
Somehow, I don’t think Tim Robbins will be portentously howling us that a “chill wind” is blowing across our rights of free expression this week.
“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam”. - Barackus Obamanus I“This is to inform the public what federal laws are in effect and what the consequences are…Internet postings that violate civil rights are subject to federal jurisdiction. That’s what everybody needs to understand,” - Bill Killian Federal U.S. Attorney on behalf of Obama DOJ