Can We Awaken From This MarxoFascist Totalitarian Nightmare?

A prophetic but chilling warning about how America is repeating the history of past Republics by accepting and preferring  a totalitarian form of government.

“…Whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and … accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. ” The Declaration of Independence.

Many Americans are awakening to a reality that the country they once knew is gone, replaced by a “Progressive” Marxist/Socialist Oligarchy.  The past week reveal that the Obama regime has used the government’s agencies to wage war on Americans, silence Christians and Conservative groups, spy on the media and private citizens, harass citizens who attempt to involve themselves in politics, and punish political opposition to the ‘fundamental transformation’ Obama is imposing on the country.

Ambassador Alan Keyes asks a question this author has been asking since 2008 – can this country awaken itself from it’s stupor?  Can this nightmare of a totalitarian Marxist state be stopped? Or are we too late and comfortable with it already??

Methinks it’s the latter.  A majority clearly prefer tyranny to liberty, and yet they will call it freedom.

Totalitarian Subversion- Can we Awaken from the Nightmare?

Whatever Obama, Hilary Clinton, Susan Rice and other Obama faction officials were seeking to achieve with their lies about the terrorist murders of U.S. officials in Benghazi; whatever the full extent of the ideologically motivated political abuses at the IRS, one thing is clear. Except for mindless apparatchiks, thoughtlessly loyal to the Obama cult, (like Chris Matthews and Al Sharpton, for example) no sane person can now consider it crazy or irrational to distrust the words and actions of those presently controlling the U.S. government. These scandals show the self-serving ‘chutzpah’ of Obama’s snide dismissal of people who “warn of government as nothing more than some separate, sinister entity that’s at the root of all our problems….They’ll warn that tyranny [is] always lurking just around the corner. You should reject these voices.”

In one respect, Obama’s words ring true. Tyranny isn’t just around the corner. It is already upon us. Its forces are not yet confident enough to employ the ‘Gestapo’ tactics routinely associated with socialist dictatorship. But they have obviously been using their control of the Federal bureaucracy to repress and intimidate individuals and grassroots organizations, preoccupying their time and depleting their resources. Should we be encouraged by the fact that these abuses are now being openly discussed and decried? Only if the stir actually leads to actions that effectively curtail them, while establishing am oversight mechanism that assures continually formal and public scrutiny, to make sure that they cannot be repeated without an immediate outcry.

But what if no such action is taken? Inaction is likely, given the collaborative mindset of the GOP leaders in the U.S. House, and the Obama faction’s solid majority in the U.S. Senate. If it happens these abuses will recur in a more virulent form. And they will spread, like an infection treated with an inadequate course of antibiotics. People will realize that the abuses are still in train, and that their elected officials have done nothing to reduce each individual’s vulnerability. Increasingly tinged with fear, the angry public reaction against the abuses will wane. Spreading from one individual to another, as episodes of abuse proliferate, this individual fear will gradually intensify until it dominates the public mind. This is the way tyranny subverts peace of mind.

Is this part of the reason the Obama faction volunteered these revelations? Is it part of the reason elements of the elitist faction are so willing to air this dirty laundry? If no effective controls are put in place, the result could generate a corrosive atmosphere of fearful expectation, that predisposes people to forestall abuse by submitting to those responsible for it. Was it from wise precaution against this corrosion of the spirit of liberty that, unlike Barack Obama, America’s founders saw it as ”…proper to take alarm at the first experiment on our liberties”; and went on to praise the “free men of America” who “did not wait till usurped power had strengthened itself by exercise…They saw all the consequences in the principle, and they avoided the consequences by denying the principle.” (James Madison, Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments)

Barack Obama is a man whose ruthless ideological consistency leads him to disdain the natural rightness of human life, in its most affecting and helpless form. For example, his advocacy of unconstrained access to abortion is so extreme that he countenanced infanticide in order to assure it. He understood and frankly accepted that this ruthless position was a necessary consequence of the logic that justifies so-called “abortion rights”. The heartily soul destroying effect of his logical extremism was recently revealed at trial, in the jocular morbidity of Kermit Gosnell, who now stands convicted of such murders.

Given his calculated fanaticism, Obama is just the type to deploy the heartless bureaucratic, police and military forces of government against citizens whose only crime is to exercise the rights that are their birthright, under God and the Constitution. Today public attention focuses on the IRS, abused to attack the resources and curtail the political activity of those who oppose the design for despotism. Soon and very soon it will be the IRS and the police, abused to attack free speech and the free exercise of religion. Then it will be Homeland security and local police forces, under the guise of anti-terrorist martial law, abused to arrest and detain evangelical Christians, Catholics, homeschoolers, and those who exercise their 2^nd Amendment rights. Then it will be OBama’s fondly imagined domestic army, as large and well-funded as the military, moving against States whose officials who refuse to acquiesce in the unconstitutional abridgment of the residual sovereign rights guaranteed to the States, respectively, and to the people, by the U.S. Constitution’s 10^th Amendment.

Please don’t make the mistake of believing that this design for despotism is exclusively the sinister ambition of Democrats like Obama. For years I tried to warn people in the GOP about Obama’s commitment to totalitarian communist approaches to politics and economics. For years I tried to help them recognize his rejection of the principles whereby the requirements of God-endowed right limit the just powers of government. For years I inveighed against his pro-abortion extremism; his disdain for the God-endowed rights of the natural family; his hostility to America’s international and national security requirements.

I gradually came to realize that the leadership of the Republican Party is incapable of responding effectively to Obama’s treacherous betrayal of constitutional self-government, or even admitting it. Why? Because that leadership is itself in the grip of forces that differ from Obama only in the more openly self-serving style of their betrayal. They purport to represent and speak for the large plurality of Americans loyal to the Constitution. They pretend to respect the ideas of God-endowed unalienable rights and limited government from which the Constitution derives. But they have in fact abandoned every goal of political life except the successful pursuit of governmental power, and the self-aggrandizing abuses it makes possible.

In the WND article published on Friday I argued that, because the IRS “overturns the priority of natural right over humanly instituted authority”, it is a design woven into the fabric of tyranny. In similar fashion, because it has substituted power for justice as the end of civil society, the elitist faction’s sham two-party system is also a design woven into the fabric of tyranny. When America’s founders framed our form of government, they did so with justice in view (see Federalist #51). Institutions like the IRS and the elitist faction’s sham two-party system are like viruses. Though written in the language the founders used, they have been introduced into the program of American government in order to rewrite its code for a different purpose. They exist, as it were, to reweave the whole cloth of American life. They are part of a phalanx of similarly viral mechanisms, including now the public schools, and much of the news and entertainment media, that have been transformed from factors of liberty into engines of elitist totalitarian indoctrination and control.

This is, in the tactical sense, the realization of the Antonio Gramsci’s comprehensive vision of totalitarian, socialist, political subversion. We can awaken from it, as from a stifling nightmare, but only if we are willing to exert our minds to see all its fabrications for what they are. Only then will we cease to be manipulated and subdued by the delusory hopes and fears they represent.

Hillary’s Benghazi Massacre Kabuki Theater Testimony

Bunk.  Scripted.  Staged. Theatrics. Lies.  Cover Up.  Obama’s Lawless regime is now beyond any semblance of justice.

Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) was the ONLY Senator aside from Ron Johnson refusing to walk on eggshells or praise Hillary as some kind of  goddess in today’s Soviet theatrics.  Clearly irritated that she had to bring herself down from Olympus to answer smarmy mortals wanting answers to the Obama Regime’s dereliction of duty and treason, Hillary towed the Obama lies over leaving 4 Americans including it’s ambassador to Libya – to be slaughtered by Jihadists back in September.

My only comment was that this was expected after the vain attempt to delay and possibly scrap the hearings altogether post – head-bump SecState.  But on a quick perusal of news video – it is apparent to me that this entire staged event with complicity from the Ruling Class GOP, offered nothing more than pre-screened questions with already-written in-advance answers that Hillary read.  When pressed about the Administration’s official “talking points” about the Benghazi Libya Consulate attack arising from a spontaneous demonstration as a result of a Youtube video – which the Administration maintained for weeks – she says “What difference does it make?”.

To this author – this was spectacular Kabuki theater, playing on the audience of drones this regime knows would support Obama and his regime no matter what happened.  Of course I am not the only one who thinks so.

Scripted.  Staged, and excellently executed propaganda for Obama’s war to annihilate any and all political opposition to his MarxoFascist revolution.  What difference does it make who they abandon, leave to die, kill by drones or sicced upon by female front line soldiers now?

Ameritopia and Obamination is what we have been transformed into.  It will get much, much worse from here on.

It Will Get Ugly

Civil conflict is coming and even being pushed by the Obama regime.  History teaches Marxists often kill millions of their own people in political purges.  Are we next?

Reblogging an essay written by Erik Rush at CFP, because he nails and encapsulates where we are and where everything is going.  He sees what I do and articulates it well.  We need to brace ourselves and prepare for what is to come by the hand of the Marxist regime in power.

Now it Gets Ugly


Americans are confused. I realize that’s probably the understatement of the year, but I am referring not to the apparent insensibility of those who continue to support President Barack Obama, but to the perplexed state of those who are attempting to make sense out of the election outcome itself, as well as events that have taken place since. In short, it is mind-boggling that the man was re-elected considering the shape America is in, and his being the most dismal record of any President in American history.

The craven but successful ploy on the part of the administration to defer addressing the issue of Benghazigate until after the election is evident, unless one is a consumer of the establishment press (mainstream media). The American public is being encouraged to focus upon the romantic dalliances of fallen CIA Director General David Petraeus with a predatory publicity hound, and obscure emails between an ugly Middle Eastern-American socialite, the publicity hound, and another general. This, I suppose, would be in lieu of focusing upon the effluvia of lies being fire-hosed from the mouths of President Obama and his administration vis-à-vis the events of September 11, 2012, in Benghazi, Libya.

These deceptions have been so blatant and so outlandish that I can only describe them as surreal. At House and Senate intelligence committee hearings this week, intelligence officials ostensibly tried to explain their deportment on September 11 as regards the reported pleas for aid leading up to and through the attack on the consulate in Benghazi. Meanwhile – with help in distraction from the press – the administration continues to purvey contradicting accounts of whether or not aid was requested by slain Ambassador Christopher Stevens and CIA operatives, while at the same time attempting to clarify that very matter.

Obama’s faux chivalry in his defense of UN Ambassador Susan Rice

During a recent press conference, Obama was unable to answer a correspondent’s question addressing whether he had attempted to render aid to the beleaguered personnel in Benghazi on September 11. His obfuscation would have been taken as the mutterings of a mental defective were it any other individual. Obama’s faux chivalry in his defense of UN Ambassador Susan Rice, who blanketed the media with the fairy tale tying the Benghazi attack and other Middle East uprisings to an anti-Islam video, was rife with petulance, comical challenges, and self-contradiction. One can almost hear the scrambling of feet as White House and intelligence operatives scurry to prepare their CYA briefs.

Now, Americans who made an effort to educate themselves as to the origins, nature, and designs of this President are asking themselves if half of the electorate are really that intellectually compromised, so unaware of the dynamics of the last four years they appear to be. It is painfully obvious at this point that those who don’t have a handle on Barack Obama being a committed Marxist are either dangerously deluded or stupid; there’s no middle ground here.

Obama’s intention has always been to raze America to the ground and supplant our system with the Marxist paradigm

Obama’s intention has always been to raze America to the ground (in the operative sense), and supplant our system with the Marxist paradigm. This has become exponentially more apparent only days after his re-election, yet, not an eyebrow is raised when he casually addresses the press using rhetoric right out of Marx’s The Communist Manifesto and Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals. Now he claims to have a mandate to raise taxes to the tune of over $1 trillion to fund a cyclopean government that is already about to collapse in on itself.

And what of the election, our bewildered non-Obama voters wonder. Did the President steal it? A Chicago voting machine technician now claims he observed that machines he was called to service were not counting votes for GOP nominee Mitt Romney. This is an error he claims never occurred when someone voted for Obama. The anecdotal evidence of voter fraud and election machine malfunctions is boundless, and at this writing, there are still congressional races that remain undecided.

Stolen the election via voter and technical fraud

Let us presume for a moment that Obama did steal the election via voter and technical fraud. Let’s also consider the possibility that he doesn’t care who knows. He’s not going to leave the smoking gun and body to be found, just some bloody drag marks. This way, engaged, patriotic Americans will be certain of his crime, but the uninformed and the deluded will not.

Let’s consider further who Obama is – that committed Marxist who wishes to replace our representative republic with a Marxist collective. What have such people done with their political enemies in the past? Typically, they kill or imprison them – and large numbers are of no moment. If Obama has been intent upon orchestrating a scenario whereby government intercession to suppress civil unrest will become “necessary,” then anything to engender tension and strife domestically is a win for him. This he has already done economically and through class warfare.

Thus, I believe that this president would find mass demonstrations by factions enraged over a stolen election simply delicious.

Mass Layoffs in America

In case you haven’t noticed, the US is also moving into another round of mass layoffs, due to companies’ attempts to balance their books in the wake of the looming Obamacare implementation. Hostess, the 80-year-old maker Twinkies, Ding Dongs and Wonder Bread, just announced it will close its doors and lay off 18,500 workers. Many Obama crony corporations held back their announcements of layoffs until after the election. These layoffs are being framed by the left as evil corporations’ “revenge” for Obama’s re-election, which I am sure is calculated to further enflame public sentiments.

So let them riot – the Tea Party, the Occupy movement, the New Black Panther Party, white supremacists, the Girl Scouts – all of them! With the press running interference, and only a quarter or so of Americans cognizant of who he really is and what he’s doing, Obama will only have to kill say, ten or twenty million Americans to force the capitulation of the rest. By the standard of Marxists past, that’s not too terrible a price.

 

The Obama Marxist Coup Begins In Earnest?

Obama fires/replaces military Commanders who may have defied his orders to Stand Down and abandon Americans in Benghazi.

News from late last week, but was lost in the hysteria over Frankenstorm Sandy.  Obama may have begun a purge of those military brass who he feels do not toe his line – especially when they involve following his orders that result in the abandonment and death of Americans.

Orders in the military are regarded as almost holy writ, and the chain of command followed without question.  But this is not ancient Rome and Obama is not yet Caesar in the minds of many – but he may be in the beginning phase of a purge of military brass not beholden to his every whim.

What happens when good men, raised on following orders are given orders to abandon and leave Americans to die at the hands of our avowed Jihadist enemies? Some may argue they are rightfully fired/court martialed and removed for disregarding orders.  But if moral law is a motivating factor in carrying out orders – defying them would indicate an immoral order was ignored or not followed.

Such an appearance of evil may be the case with a four-star General involved in the African theater of operations or AFRICOM, on 9-11, 2012 when the American mission in Benghazi came under attack.

Gateway Pundit reported on Saturday that Obama had removed and replaced General Carter Ham, who was head of AFRICOM on that September 11, and General Joseph Dunford of the Marine Corps.  There was also a Rear Admiral of a Carrier Strike Group recalled, but it seems that may be on matters unrelated to Benghazi.

rumor making the rounds is that Barack Obama replaced General Carter Ham at AFRICOM after the general made a move to help the US security officials at the Benghazi consulate and annex. Ham was replaced by Gen. David Rodriquez on October 18….

General [Carter] Ham as head of Africom received the same e-mails the White House received requesting help/support as the attack was taking place. General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had a unit ready.

General Ham then received the order to stand down. His response was to screw it, he was going to help anyhow. Within 30 seconds to a minute after making the move to respond, his second in command apprehended General Ham and told him that he was now relieved of his command.

As the lie and cover-ups of the Benghazi debacle by Obama’s regime begin to unravel – it is being noted for the record here, that General Ham’s account of events surrounding the 9-11 attacks in Benghazi do not square with SEVERAL adamant claims of Obama, his State Department and his propaganda media machine trying their damnedest to protect and exonerate Obama from the scandal.

In an interview with state Representative Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) General Ham told him directly on explicit questioning that he was NEVER ordered to save men in Benghazi:

Did we have resources in the area? The answer is “yes”.
Did we have proximity? The answer is “yes”.
Why we didn’t send in some of those assets? The general said he was not requested to do so. Meaning someone higher up than a 4-star General made the call to stand down and not send aid to help the Americans under attack in Benghazi.

While Obama and his regime refuse to address or answer ANY questions about the Benghazi attacks, citing it is investigating the situation – Jay Carney let it slip that  Obama’s inaction on the Benghazi situation now extends to his inaction on the supposed investigation taking place. The administration has still not made clear what exactly is being investigated, or the extent of the investigation. And President Obama doesn’t much care, as Carney said “He (Obama) has not participated in the investigation”.

So what we know for certain is that General Ham says that he was never asked to send assets to rescue Americans in a U.S. Mission under attack by Jihadists in Libya, and that he is now relieved of that command. Speculation over this appearance of evil since there is no truth or clarifications coming from Obama – is simply leading to more and more ugly suppositions.  Mine, is that Obama is conducting a purge of those military brass that aren’t going to go along with his coup.

Classified Cable Reveals Embassy In Libya Warned Obama A Month Before Attack

The U.S. Mission in Benghazi convened an “emergency meeting” less than a month before 9-11, stating Embassy could not defend against Al Qaeda “coordinated attack”.

After Obama left Americans to die by the hands of Al Qaeda Jihadists whom he was arming with weapons and funds, a massive cover-up with complicity of the media continues.  It seems only ONE news outlet is willing to cover the story of Obama’s complicity of assassination of his own ambassador and Americans who defied orders to ‘stand down’ to rescue the mission staff.

Despite the continuing insistence that Obama’s regime had ‘no reliable intel’ of the danger the U.S. Mission in Libya, Catherine Herridge at Fox News uncovers a top secret cable sent almost a MONTH before the 9-11 attacks in Libya whereby the mission’s RSO Security officer stated that the Consulate could not withstand a coordinated attack by Al Qaeda Jihadists whom had training camps in Benghazi.

Obama and the State Department knew  Al Qaeda Jihadist groups were operating in Benghazi.  A flurry of intelligence reports were sent after the fall of Gadhaffi’s regime after a June 6 bomb attack on the Benghazi mission’s security wall and an attack on a Red Cross shelter followed by other assassinations by identified Jihad groups operating in the mountain areas around Benghazi.

Obama’s regime did nothing to reinforce or secure the Mission, even after actual attacks in June.  It kept a ‘minimalist’ position, most likely to facilitate the Fast & Furious -styled arming of Jihadist groups that Obama designated as ‘rebels’ against the Secular Dictatorships in the Arab world whom Obama was working to overthrow.  Reports that the Benghazi mission was serving as an arms cache depot to funnel SAMs/MANPAD surface-to-air missiles and guns to Jihadist ‘rebels’ in Syria adds to the suspicion that Obama let Ambassador Stevens die to bury and cover up his regime’s involvement in treason.

Classified cable warned consulate couldn’t withstand ‘coordinated attack’:

The U.S. Mission in Benghazi convened an “emergency meeting” less than a month before the assault that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans, because Al Qaeda had training camps in Benghazi and the consulate could not defend against a “coordinated attack,” according to a classified cable reviewed by Fox News.

The U.S. Mission in Benghazi convened an “emergency meeting” less than a month before the assault that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans, because Al Qaeda had training camps in Benghazi and the consulate could not defend against a “coordinated attack,” according to a classified cable reviewed by Fox News.

Summarizing an Aug. 15 emergency meeting convened by the U.S. Mission in Benghazi, the Aug. 16 cable marked “SECRET” said that the State Department’s senior security officer, also known as the RSO, did not believe the consulate could be protected.

“RSO (Regional Security Officer) expressed concerns with the ability to defend Post in the event of a coordinated attack due to limited manpower, security measures, weapons capabilities, host nation support, and the overall size of the compound,” the cable said.

According to a review of the cable addressed to the Office of the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the Emergency Action Committee was also briefed “on the location of approximately ten Islamist militias and AQ training camps within Benghazi … these groups ran the spectrum from Islamist militias, such as the QRF Brigade and Ansar al-Sharia, to ‘Takfirist thugs.’” Each U.S. mission has a so-called Emergency Action Committee that is responsible for security measures and emergency planning.

The details in the cable seemed to foreshadow the deadly Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. compound, which was a coordinated, commando-style assault using direct and indirect fire. Al Qaeda in North Africa and Ansar al-Sharia, both mentioned in the cable, have since been implicated in the consulate attack.

In addition to describing the security situation in Benghazi as “trending negatively,” the cable said explicitly that the mission would ask for more help. “In light of the uncertain security environment, US Mission Benghazi will submit specific requests to US Embassy Tripoli for additional physical security upgrades and staffing needs by separate cover.”

This is almost a MONTH before the attacks.  Obama’s State Department under the direction of Hillary Clinton were well aware of the threat Al Qaeda and other Jihadi groups posed to the Mission, and as always – Obama’s regime REFUSES to answer questions about this unravelling scandal – instead sticking to a massive lie and narrative.

While the administration’s public statements have suggested that the attack came without warning, the Aug. 16 cable seems to undercut those claims. It was a direct warning to the State Department that the Benghazi consulate was vulnerable to attack, that it could not be defended and that the presence of anti-U.S. militias and Al Qaeda was well-known to the U.S. intelligence community.

In a three-page cable on Sept 11, the day Stevens and the three other Americans were killed, Stevens wrote about “growing problems with security” in Benghazi and “growing frustration” with the security forces and Libyan police. The ambassador saw both as “too weak to keep the country secure.”

Fox News asked the State Department to respond to a series of questions about the Aug. 16 cable, including who was specifically charged with reviewing it and whether action was taken by Washington or Tripoli. Fox News also asked, given the specific warnings and the detailed intelligence laid out in the cable, whether the State Department considered extra measures for the consulate in light of the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks – and if no action was taken, who made that call.

The State Department press office declined to answer specific questions, citing the classified nature of the cable.

Obama Gives America The Finger Over Benghazi

Obama says “We leave nobody behind, we make sure we respond as a nation and remind ourselves that whenever an American is in need…we’re providing the help that’s necessary” – unless of course it is Americans under fire by Jihadists in Libya – in which case he denied help and left them to die.

In what is undoubtedly an incredible defiant flick of a middle finger at an outraged America over the abandonment of Americans under fire by Jihadists in Libya – Obama makes the deliberate and offensive statement that “We leave nobody behind” in regards to his voter constituency in the Northeast suffering the destruction from Frankenstorm Sandy.

Contrast that with his actions on September 11th of this year.  Obama downplayed the murder of four Americans in Libya, including the Ambassador by immediately blaming the terrorist attack on a YouTube video. He then jetted off to Vegas for a fundraiser within hours after he learned of the murders, and the dragging of the bodies through the streets of Benghazi – of whom Obama himself ‘thanked’ – lying to the American people for taking their bodies to the hospital for treatment when the Jihadists were shouting “Allu Ackbar!” and dragging Ambassador Steven’s body through the streets.

But for Obama’s Katrina – His Heinous turns Air Force One around from a campaign trip to Florida to appear “Presidential”, and during a non-campaign campaign stop at the Red Cross, he flagrantly fingers the nation and says something his administration obviously didn’t believe during the seven-hour attack on our consulate in Benghazi: That when an “American is in need… we leave nobody behind”.

Such hubris disdain for America that this creep of a man dares say such a thing when it is being learned that THE WHITE HOUSE – left Americans behind to die by the hands of Jihadists in Libya. Either Obama himself, or his surrogate Presidentress Valerie Jarrett, DENIED THREE TIMES, the plea for help from Navy Seals Tyrone Woods, Glen Doherty and Sean Smith who were painting a laser on a Jihad motar team firing on the compound in the desperate hope close air support in the area would fire on the enemy.  But we now know that whatever aid assets could have been dispatched to Benghazi in the 7 hour standoff – they were all told to “STAND DOWN”.  No help came, and 4 Americans were killed by the Jihadists, the Ambassador himself reportedly gang-raped before his body was paraded through the streets.

What is plain here is Obama is showing us his hatred and disdain for our interest and demands to discover the truth behind the massacre in Benghazi.  This petulant man-child is letting his absolute disgust of America show through his supposed words of comfort to his voting constituencies in New York, New Jersey and other Northeast blue states solidly in the tank for him.

For his voters suffering from the storm – Obama says: “We leave nobody behind”.  But for Americans under fire from Islamic Jihadists in Libya, whom Obama has been ARMING with weapons and orchestrating a Fast & Furious -styled gun walking operation to Al Qaeda operatives in Syria, Obama leaves them to die.  Then Obama says to America: “F.U.” in an incredible hubris act of disgusting proportions.

Leaving Americans behind and abandoned is nothing new for Obama.  He ignored and disregarded disasters in many Red States over his tenure.  He ignored KY and AR after an ice storm totally destroyed the electrical infrastructure in 2009.  He ignored and abandoned Nashville, TN after an historic flood buried the city in 2010.  Not a word or declaration of disaster for Texas afire in 2011.  Abandonment of Alabama and the Southeast after a super outbreak of tornadoes devastated cities like Tuscaloosa, Cullman,  & Hackleburg in the Spring of 2011.  Same for the tornadic disasters for Indiana and KY in 2012.  But for appearances and his voting constituency in the Northeast – Obama feigns total concern and involvement, giving America the finger and lying to our face that we ‘leave no one behind’.   When the 3 AM phone call came at 5 PM – Obama left our people alone, abandoned and sacrificed to die at the hands of the Jihadists he helped to overthrow Libya with.

Obama and his regime have the blood of these abandoned Americans on his hands.  But for votes to keep him in power – Obama will not “leave them behind”.

Why Libya Cover-Up: Obama Was Arming Al Qaeda & Islamists

Obama has been engaged in gun-walking on a massive scale. Equipping America’s enemies to wage global jihad.

In the aftermath of  9-11-2001, any American working to actively empower, aid, run weapons and guns to Osama Bin Laden, the Taliban or any Al Qaeda associated Jihadi groups would have been seen as having committed high treason against the United States, right?

Well that is EXACTLY what the 44th President, Barrack Hussein Obama, His Heinous – has been doing since he took office.  His regime was not limited to running weapons in Operation Fast & Furious’ gun-walking arming of Mexican drug cartels with American guns, as a way to abolish the Second Amendment and impose gun bans.  His regime was doing the same thing for Al Qaeda and associated Islamist groups in the Middle East to facilitate the “Arab Spring” uprising.

While Obama calls the Middle East uprisings against secular dictators a “fight for Democracy”, the fruit and fact is far from the truth.  In EVERY case that the Obama regime supported, encouraged and it appears now, ARMED the “rebels” against the likes of Libyan dictator Moammar Ghaddafi – actively supporting Al Qaeda Islamist fighters.  From Egypt, to Tunisia to Libya and Yemen – the wake of the “Arab Spring” has installed Islamic Jihadist Theocracies in all those nations.  Nations that were either benign or friendly to the United States and Israel, are now avowed Islamist enemies.  Christians that once existed in these nations, are being systematically exterminated or forced into Islamic conversion as the Copts of Egypt are suffering with reports of church burnings, gang rapes and mass crucifixions in front of Morsi’s presidential palace.

Looking at the FRUITS of whom Obama supported and continues to support in the Middle East, beginning at the outset with his 2009 Cairo speech to the Muslim world – looking back – Obama lit the fuse.  The pattern appears to be that Obama is helping to shape what Islamists are working for: a totalitarian Islamic Caliphate.  Perhaps there is something to the Shia Prophecy about a ‘tall black man’ acting like an Islamic John The Baptist, preparing the way for an Islamic takeover of the globe by dismantling the West from within, arming and empowering Jihadists to take power across the Middle East.  Obama has been instrumental in achieving this Islamist dream.

Obama is not yet done.  He has been working to arm a branch of Al Qaeda Jihadists inside Syria to overthrow the secular dictatorship of Bassar Assad, and that ties directly to the attacks on the Libyan Embassy and the killing of Ambassador Stevens, who was acting in the capacity of an Arms Dealer to Jihad groups in Libya and Syria.

Reports from the Washington Times and Business Insider detail the probable motive in the Libyan Embassy Cover-up that continues to this moment: Obama was engaged in arming Al Qaeda fighters in Syria and elsewhere in the Middle East.

The real reason behind Benghazigate

The evidence suggests that the Obama administration has not simply been engaging, legitimating, enriching and emboldening Islamists who have taken over or are ascendant in much of the Middle East. Starting in March 2011, when American diplomat J. Christopher Stevens was designated the liaison to the “opposition” in Libya, the Obama administration has been arming them, including jihadists like Abdelhakim Belhadj, leader of the al Qaeda franchise known as the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group.

Once Moammar Gadhafi was overthrown, Stevens was appointed ambassador to the new Libya run by Mr. Belhadj and his friends. Not surprisingly, one of the most important priorities for someone in that position would be to try to find and secure the immense amount of armaments that had been cached by the dictator around the country and systematically looted during and after the revolution.

One of the places in Libya most awash with such weapons in the most dangerous of hands is Benghazi. It now appears that Stevens was there — on a particularly risky day, with no security to speak of and despite now copiously documented concerns about his own safety and that of his subordinates — for another priority mission: sending arms recovered from the former regime’s stocks to the “opposition” in Syria. As in Libya, the insurgents are known to include al Qaeda and other Shariah-supremacist groups, including none other than Abdelhakim Belhadj.

The report continues to detail that weapons to Al Qaeda included SA-7 MANPAD surface to air missiles – capable to taking down airliners and U.S. military aircraft.  But it is THIS pull quote that hits right to the point of this story:

What cries out for further investigation — and debate in the remaining days of this presidential election — is whether this shipment was part of a larger covert Obama effort to transfer weapons to our enemies that could make the Iran-Contra scandal, to say nothing of Operation Fast and Furious, pale by comparison.

The reasons for the Obama regime to lie, misdirect and re-catagorize what took place at Benghazi is the result of Christopher Stevens’ actual role as arms facilitator and Community Jihadist ‘organizer’ for insurgencies across the Middle East.  Stevens’ last official meeting earlier on the day he was murdered was said to be with an unidentified “Turkish diplomat.” Presumably, the conversation involved additional arms shipments to al Qaeda and its allies in Syria. It also may have involved getting more jihadist fighters into Syria.  According to sources in Egyptian security, Ambassador Stevens was playing a “central role in recruiting jihadists to fight Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria.”

Even Obama Apologist rag the NYT had to concede to the fact that Obama was engaged in arming militant Jihadists, branches of Al Qaeda to Syrian rebels.  As the Business Insider reported: US Weapons Are Going To Hard-Line Jihadists Fighting To Topple The Syrian Regime

Treason seems to be a word that no longer has any application to modern-day America unless the definition is applied to Right Wingers and Conservatives opposed to Obama and the Democrats.  Aiding and comforting Communists and Jihadists was described by the Obama media as improving America’s standing in the world.  Would anyone dare call arming Al Qaeda for use to overthrow regimes that at one time were friendly or benign to the United States, as treason?  No one can be stupid enough to think that arming these Jihadists will not result in those arms eventually being used on Americans – but like Operation Fast & Furious – it appears there is an ulterior motive behind running guns to enemies of there United States.

But run those weapons and aid to Al Qaeda and Jihad groups Obama did, and that appears to be the MOTIVE behind the cover-up of the Benghazi attack and the insistence of blaming the Youtube video for the murder of 4 Americans including Ambassador Stevens.

Obama has provided aid, comfort, funds, arms and impetus to revolution for the purpose of installing an Islamic Caliphate – a beast that no doubt would acquire and use Nuclear weapons with ally Iran against the Great and Little Satan, of whom Obama has worked as a Trojan Horse to tear down from within.

But there are no stones among anyone in Congress to hold such treason accountable to we, the American people.  We, who one day – are going to rue the day Obama betrayed us to our enemies.  How much blood and deaths will result in what Obama has done, is something future history books may put on par with the Holocaust.

Blood on Their Hands

No Marines.  No live Ammunition.  Obama and Hillary Clinton responsible for the ROE that left U.S. embassies without the means to defend themselves.

While Obama and his media get shrill in insisting that a silly video on Youtube is responsible for the attacks at U.S. Embassies in Egypt and Libya that left four Americans dead and the embassies in ruins, Breitbart reports that it was Hillary Clinton’s orders establishing new State Department Rules of Engagement for Libya, signed by the Secretary of State after the fall of Khadafi’s regime, that severely compromised the safety and security of murdered Ambassador Stevens and all American diplomatic staff in Libya.  In addition, those ROE Clinton signed, prohibited the Marines from providing security at any U.S. installation in Libya.

On Friday, Breitbart News said it filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the State Department to secure a copy of the State Department Rules of Engagement for Libya.   They conclude the State Department will stonewall their request, and resist release of the document until after the election. They go on to state they assert its contents will be just too damaging because the country will be able to see Hillary Clinton’s signature on the document that served as Ambassador Chris Stevens’s death warrant.

That is to be expected.  Especially after the Obama/Hillary Clinton State Department told reporters Friday afternoon that it won’t answer any more questions about the Sept. 11 attack on the consulate in Benghazi.

What makes hypocritical matters worse, is that the Obama regime has their own personal Praetorian guards, while our embassies have none as it is also reported that Ambassador Chris Stevens did not have a Marine detail in Benghazi, Libya. But White House Senior Advisor and Obama confidante Valerie Jarrett has a full Secret Service detail for her coming vacation in Martha’s Vineyard.

U.S. Ambassador Reportedly Raped & Sodomized Before Being Killed

Mob of Libyans that Obama praised for taking Ambassador Stevens to the Hospital, raped him before dragging his body through the streets.

“Libyans acted responsibly by carrying Steven’s body to the hospital…” – Barack Hussein Obama, 9-12-12

If the foreign news reports from the Middle East are correct, the Libyans whom Obama praised for “acting responsibly” before taking his body to a hospital, reportedly raped him before he was killed.

The Washington Times picked up a story from Lebanon’s Tayyar  news organization from an AFP source that states that murdered Ambassador Christopher Stevens, was raped by his captors before being killed.  The Libyan Free Press also televised the story:

UPDATE: Hmmmm – how convenient for Youtube to yank the Libyan TV video from their site.  Wonder if Youtube got a call from the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff like American pastor Terry Jones did, and was “asked” to take down potentially offensive (and truthful) material?

Obama’s State Department earlier on Wednesday apologized to Muslims that they were offended by ‘irresponsible” Americans exercising their right to free speech, as the ’cause’ of the attacks is reported to have been due outrage over a Youtube video that insults the Prophet Mohammed.  That spin does not hold water when it is being learned that these attacks were planned well in advance and the video being used as cover to suggest the attacks were spontaneous.  Also learned was that the same Libyan Security forces that Obama praised so highly in his short address, gave up consulate personnel including Stephens, to the Islamists who ended up murdering them.

All of this happened nearly at the same time Obama was giving an address to salute the Arab Forum on 9-11 Tuesday.

What can be said better than the following picture that best describes the last few days with Obama?