Hillary’s Benghazi Massacre Kabuki Theater Testimony

Bunk.  Scripted.  Staged. Theatrics. Lies.  Cover Up.  Obama’s Lawless regime is now beyond any semblance of justice.

Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) was the ONLY Senator aside from Ron Johnson refusing to walk on eggshells or praise Hillary as some kind of  goddess in today’s Soviet theatrics.  Clearly irritated that she had to bring herself down from Olympus to answer smarmy mortals wanting answers to the Obama Regime’s dereliction of duty and treason, Hillary towed the Obama lies over leaving 4 Americans including it’s ambassador to Libya – to be slaughtered by Jihadists back in September.

My only comment was that this was expected after the vain attempt to delay and possibly scrap the hearings altogether post – head-bump SecState.  But on a quick perusal of news video – it is apparent to me that this entire staged event with complicity from the Ruling Class GOP, offered nothing more than pre-screened questions with already-written in-advance answers that Hillary read.  When pressed about the Administration’s official “talking points” about the Benghazi Libya Consulate attack arising from a spontaneous demonstration as a result of a Youtube video – which the Administration maintained for weeks – she says “What difference does it make?”.

To this author – this was spectacular Kabuki theater, playing on the audience of drones this regime knows would support Obama and his regime no matter what happened.  Of course I am not the only one who thinks so.

Scripted.  Staged, and excellently executed propaganda for Obama’s war to annihilate any and all political opposition to his MarxoFascist revolution.  What difference does it make who they abandon, leave to die, kill by drones or sicced upon by female front line soldiers now?

Ameritopia and Obamination is what we have been transformed into.  It will get much, much worse from here on.

Why Libya Cover-Up: Obama Was Arming Al Qaeda & Islamists

Obama has been engaged in gun-walking on a massive scale. Equipping America’s enemies to wage global jihad.

In the aftermath of  9-11-2001, any American working to actively empower, aid, run weapons and guns to Osama Bin Laden, the Taliban or any Al Qaeda associated Jihadi groups would have been seen as having committed high treason against the United States, right?

Well that is EXACTLY what the 44th President, Barrack Hussein Obama, His Heinous – has been doing since he took office.  His regime was not limited to running weapons in Operation Fast & Furious’ gun-walking arming of Mexican drug cartels with American guns, as a way to abolish the Second Amendment and impose gun bans.  His regime was doing the same thing for Al Qaeda and associated Islamist groups in the Middle East to facilitate the “Arab Spring” uprising.

While Obama calls the Middle East uprisings against secular dictators a “fight for Democracy”, the fruit and fact is far from the truth.  In EVERY case that the Obama regime supported, encouraged and it appears now, ARMED the “rebels” against the likes of Libyan dictator Moammar Ghaddafi – actively supporting Al Qaeda Islamist fighters.  From Egypt, to Tunisia to Libya and Yemen – the wake of the “Arab Spring” has installed Islamic Jihadist Theocracies in all those nations.  Nations that were either benign or friendly to the United States and Israel, are now avowed Islamist enemies.  Christians that once existed in these nations, are being systematically exterminated or forced into Islamic conversion as the Copts of Egypt are suffering with reports of church burnings, gang rapes and mass crucifixions in front of Morsi’s presidential palace.

Looking at the FRUITS of whom Obama supported and continues to support in the Middle East, beginning at the outset with his 2009 Cairo speech to the Muslim world – looking back – Obama lit the fuse.  The pattern appears to be that Obama is helping to shape what Islamists are working for: a totalitarian Islamic Caliphate.  Perhaps there is something to the Shia Prophecy about a ‘tall black man’ acting like an Islamic John The Baptist, preparing the way for an Islamic takeover of the globe by dismantling the West from within, arming and empowering Jihadists to take power across the Middle East.  Obama has been instrumental in achieving this Islamist dream.

Obama is not yet done.  He has been working to arm a branch of Al Qaeda Jihadists inside Syria to overthrow the secular dictatorship of Bassar Assad, and that ties directly to the attacks on the Libyan Embassy and the killing of Ambassador Stevens, who was acting in the capacity of an Arms Dealer to Jihad groups in Libya and Syria.

Reports from the Washington Times and Business Insider detail the probable motive in the Libyan Embassy Cover-up that continues to this moment: Obama was engaged in arming Al Qaeda fighters in Syria and elsewhere in the Middle East.

The real reason behind Benghazigate

The evidence suggests that the Obama administration has not simply been engaging, legitimating, enriching and emboldening Islamists who have taken over or are ascendant in much of the Middle East. Starting in March 2011, when American diplomat J. Christopher Stevens was designated the liaison to the “opposition” in Libya, the Obama administration has been arming them, including jihadists like Abdelhakim Belhadj, leader of the al Qaeda franchise known as the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group.

Once Moammar Gadhafi was overthrown, Stevens was appointed ambassador to the new Libya run by Mr. Belhadj and his friends. Not surprisingly, one of the most important priorities for someone in that position would be to try to find and secure the immense amount of armaments that had been cached by the dictator around the country and systematically looted during and after the revolution.

One of the places in Libya most awash with such weapons in the most dangerous of hands is Benghazi. It now appears that Stevens was there — on a particularly risky day, with no security to speak of and despite now copiously documented concerns about his own safety and that of his subordinates — for another priority mission: sending arms recovered from the former regime’s stocks to the “opposition” in Syria. As in Libya, the insurgents are known to include al Qaeda and other Shariah-supremacist groups, including none other than Abdelhakim Belhadj.

The report continues to detail that weapons to Al Qaeda included SA-7 MANPAD surface to air missiles – capable to taking down airliners and U.S. military aircraft.  But it is THIS pull quote that hits right to the point of this story:

What cries out for further investigation — and debate in the remaining days of this presidential election — is whether this shipment was part of a larger covert Obama effort to transfer weapons to our enemies that could make the Iran-Contra scandal, to say nothing of Operation Fast and Furious, pale by comparison.

The reasons for the Obama regime to lie, misdirect and re-catagorize what took place at Benghazi is the result of Christopher Stevens’ actual role as arms facilitator and Community Jihadist ‘organizer’ for insurgencies across the Middle East.  Stevens’ last official meeting earlier on the day he was murdered was said to be with an unidentified “Turkish diplomat.” Presumably, the conversation involved additional arms shipments to al Qaeda and its allies in Syria. It also may have involved getting more jihadist fighters into Syria.  According to sources in Egyptian security, Ambassador Stevens was playing a “central role in recruiting jihadists to fight Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria.”

Even Obama Apologist rag the NYT had to concede to the fact that Obama was engaged in arming militant Jihadists, branches of Al Qaeda to Syrian rebels.  As the Business Insider reported: US Weapons Are Going To Hard-Line Jihadists Fighting To Topple The Syrian Regime

Treason seems to be a word that no longer has any application to modern-day America unless the definition is applied to Right Wingers and Conservatives opposed to Obama and the Democrats.  Aiding and comforting Communists and Jihadists was described by the Obama media as improving America’s standing in the world.  Would anyone dare call arming Al Qaeda for use to overthrow regimes that at one time were friendly or benign to the United States, as treason?  No one can be stupid enough to think that arming these Jihadists will not result in those arms eventually being used on Americans – but like Operation Fast & Furious – it appears there is an ulterior motive behind running guns to enemies of there United States.

But run those weapons and aid to Al Qaeda and Jihad groups Obama did, and that appears to be the MOTIVE behind the cover-up of the Benghazi attack and the insistence of blaming the Youtube video for the murder of 4 Americans including Ambassador Stevens.

Obama has provided aid, comfort, funds, arms and impetus to revolution for the purpose of installing an Islamic Caliphate – a beast that no doubt would acquire and use Nuclear weapons with ally Iran against the Great and Little Satan, of whom Obama has worked as a Trojan Horse to tear down from within.

But there are no stones among anyone in Congress to hold such treason accountable to we, the American people.  We, who one day – are going to rue the day Obama betrayed us to our enemies.  How much blood and deaths will result in what Obama has done, is something future history books may put on par with the Holocaust.

Biden Admits Obama Arming Jihadists To Take Over

As in Egypt and Libya – The VP Admits Obama is arming factions of Muslim Brotherhood inside Syria for the purpose of their takeover.

As time continues to breeze by, it is becoming self-evident to this author, that Obama is arming and aiding Jihadists in the Middle East for the apparent purpose of jump-starting the Islamic Caliphate. It was Obama and his handlers who spear-headed the “Arab Spring” overthrow of regimes in Egypt, Libya, Tunisia and Yemen.  Recall that Obama unilaterally, without Congress OR the UN ordered American military force to be used in Libya to aid in the overthrow of Moammar Khaddaffi.  Every secular dictatorial regime, and those Middle East nations who had relatively favorable alliances with Israel and the United States, Obama has worked to destabilize and overthrow.

While it is being said in political talking points that Obama is aiding “democracy” in the Middle East – that is PURE UNMITIGATED Bovine Excrement.  Obama ignored aiding legitimate student democracy protesters in Iran in 2009, that led to their eventual slaughter by Ahmadinejad’s regime after he let them twist in the wind and abandoned them.  Since then, Obama is hands-off on Iran.  Nothing is being done to stop their march to nuclear weapons and Ahmadinejad’s promise to wipe Israel off the map.   No, Obama is NOT about change in the Middle East for democratic purposes that will benefit America and the West.  Instead it is the exact opposite.  In every instance of Obama’s meddling in the Middle East, it has led to a vacuum filled rapidly by the Muslim Brotherhood and agents of Al Qaeda.

Obama himself, well I think there may be something to the Shia prophecy that states a tall black man will assume power in the West, destroy her from within and herald the Great Islamic Caliphate. After all, it’s not surprising Obama wears a ring he has had since his college days that is engraved with the inscription ‘There Is No God But Allah”.

It appears that the next nation to become part of the Jihadist takeover of the Middle East, is Syria.  And according to the Vice President – Obama is aiding the same insurgency that led to the debacle in Egypt and Libya.  Perhaps the consequences will be even worse, because just this morning – there is news that these SAME ACTIVISTS JOE BIDEN ADMITTED OBAMA IS AIDING – seizing a missile base in Syria.

Syria activists: Jihadists seize missile base

Videos posted online Friday, apparently shot inside air defense base near Aleppo, show fighters linked to al-Qaeda participating in overnight battle, inspecting lines of large missiles

These are Al Qaeda Jihadists – the ONLY faction in Syria fighting against Assad’s regime.  The regime Obama is working to replace with these same Al Qaeda/Muslim Brotherhood insurgents that Biden admits is receiving “training and other aid”, perhaps even using our military to assist in that goal.

As in Libya – there are some sources that cite Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has confirmed Obama has deployed American military force to the region.

Daniel Greenfield has again picked up on the subtle admission hidden right in front of our faces.

Biden Admits Obama is Arming Muslim Brotherhood to Take Over Syria

This is ridiculous and it should be an incredibly damning statement. It’s shocking to me that this has not been picked up.

VICE PRESIDENT BIDEN: Let — let — let me — you don’t go through the U.N. We are in the process now and have been for months in making sure that help, humanitarian aid, as well as other aid and training, is getting to those forces that we believe, the Turks believe, the Jordanians believe, the Saudis believe are the free forces inside of Syria.

What Biden said in his debate with Ryan is that Saudi Arabia and Turkey, both Islamist countries, and Jordan which is a pawn, determine which Syrian rebels get “other aid”, presumably weapons, and the training to use them.

That Obama is arming and training, directly or indirectly, the Syrian rebels, would be an important revelation in and of itself. Biden’s dismissal of the UN, after years of Democratic whining about Bush’s unilateralism, should also excite comment, but most significantly Biden admits that our view of who should get them derives from the view of Turkey’s Islamist government and Saudi Arabia’s even more Islamist regime. Saudi Arabia is as bad as Pakistan and Turkey is being run by an Islamist party that is backing the Muslim Brotherhood to take over Syria. Both consider Hamas a legitimate group, and yet Obama has decided to make his plan for regime change in Syria subservient to what the Saudi and Turkish lobbies tell him to do.

This is near confirmation that Obama is arming and training the Muslim Brotherhood to take over Syria.

In probably the worst choice of words imaginable, Biden talks of, “working hand in glove with the Turks, with the Jordanians, with the Saudis and with all the people in the region attempting to identify the people who deserve the help so that when Assad goes and he will go, there will be a legitimate government that follows on, not an al-Qaida-sponsored government that follows on.”

This isn’t just backing rebel fighters, this is fairly open regime change. Al Qaeda can do quite a bit of damage, but they can’t take over Syria. Even a buffoon like Biden knows that. Syria isn’t Mali or Afghanistan. But the Muslim Brotherhood can take over Syria. And when the Muslim Brotherhood takes over a country, like the Taliban they provide a safe haven for Islamic terrorist groups.

Biden said a lot of stupid things during the debate, but this may be the worst of them all. And the worst part is that it’s all true.

Obama Declares At UN: The Future Must Not Belong to Practicing Christians

“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam”. -Barrack Obama 9-25-12

Since all Islam demands everyone recognize Mohammed as God’s true prophet – for the Salafists, sufis and shia – anyone who does not acknowledge the prophet is considered not only an infidel – but slander the prophet by their refusal to submit to him.

Obama knows this having been raised a Muslim in Indonesia.  His speech at the UN was an all-out assault on not only freedom of speech, but of faith.  In cleverly cloaked words to deceive ignorant Americans, key phrases ping the ears that the Muslim world will understand what Obama really means.  While the media will parrot that Obama was condemning ‘extremism’, the fact remains that Islam itself is extremism.  His words paint a target on the First Amendment, Free Speech and right to religious exercise – all targets of Obama AND Sharia Law proponents.

As Kevin DuJan notes at Hillbuzz -

Today, Obama spoke out against free speech and wished for a world where those who criticize Islam will be punished (or even executed) worldwide. 

Let’s be really clear about this, folks:  the man sitting in the Oval Office thinks it’s a good idea for global blasphemy laws to be enacted to serve a worldwide state religion, ISLAM.

As DuJan rightfully notes, Obama had published in his ‘memoirs’ ‘Dreams From My Father’, that if the political winds shifted against Islam, he would stand with Muslims.  That is more than apparent since Obama enabled the Jihadist Islamists to take power in Libya, Egypt, Tunisia and other places in the Mid East and has done NOTHING to punish the Islamists who attacked our embassies and killed the U.S. Ambassador to Libya and 4 other Americans.

Instead, Obama slammed Free Speech rights in the US, blamed a video on Youtube and apologized to the Muslim world in TV ads running in Pakistan and elsewhere.

I cannot state it any better than Erick Erickson did at Red State.

The Future Must Not Belong to Practicing Christians

In his speech to the United Nations General Assembly today the President of the United States declared that the future does not belong to practicing Christians. Already, the media and the left are in full denial, probably based on their general lack of understanding of theology. This would have been a gaffe had Mitt Romney said it. But with Barack Obama, he’s just speaking bold truths. His bold truth declares that the future does not belong to practicing Christians.

Pay careful attention to what he says.

The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. Yet to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated, churches are destroyed, or the Holocaust is denied. Let us condemn incitement against Sufi Muslims, and Shiite pilgrims. It is time to heed the words of Gandhi: “Intolerance is itself a form of violence and an obstacle to the growth of a true democratic spirit.” Together, we must work towards a world where we are strengthened by our differences, and not defined by them. That is what America embodies, and that is the vision we will support.

Now, that’s the full paragraph so no one can claim I took him out of context.

But consider this.

It is an orthodox Christian belief that Mohammed is not a prophet. Actual Christians, as opposed to many of the supposed Christians put up by the mainstream media, believe that Christ is the only way to salvation. Believing that is slandering Mohammed. That’s just a fact. If you don’t believe me, you go into the MIddle East and proclaim Christ is the way, the truth, and the life and see what happens to your life.

Then Barack Obama went on to say “Yet to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated, churches are destroyed, or the Holocaust is denied.” Note he says we cannot “slander the prophet of Islam” but it’s only the image of Christ in the next sentence — not actually Christ himself desecrated. If this is so, why does Barack Obama’s government continue funding the National Endowment for the Arts, which funds Christ in piss, the Virgin Mary painted in dung, etc.?

Now, in point of fact, this is a major difference between Islam and Christianity. Christ came to this world as an enemy of the world and expected to be impugned. He also tells his followers that they should expect to be impugned. There is joy in being persecuted for following the Risen Lord. In Islam, if you impugn Mohammed, you get a fatwa on your butt.

And then there is the first amendment. The President of the United States tried to have it both ways in his speech.

I know there are some who ask why we don’t just ban such a video. The answer is enshrined in our laws: our Constitution protects the right to practice free speech. Here in the United States, countless publications provoke offense. Like me, the majority of Americans are Christian, and yet we do not ban blasphemy against our most sacred beliefs. Moreover, as President of our country, and Commander-in-Chief of our military, I accept that people are going to call me awful things every day, and I will always defend their right to do so. Americans have fought and died around the globe to protect the right of all people to express their views – even views that we disagree with.

We do so not because we support hateful speech, but because our Founders understood that without such protections, the capacity of each individual to express their own views, and practice their own faith, may be threatened. We do so because in a diverse society, efforts to restrict speech can become a tool to silence critics, or oppress minorities. We do so because given the power of faith in our lives, and the passion that religious differences can inflame, the strongest weapon against hateful speech is not repression, it is more speech – the voices of tolerance that rally against bigotry and blasphemy, and lift up the values of understanding and mutual respect.

I know that not all countries in this body share this understanding of the protection of free speech. Yet in 2012, at a time when anyone with a cell phone can spread offensive views around the world with the click of a button, the notion that we can control the flow of information is obsolete. The question, then, is how we respond. And on this we must agree: there is no speech that justifies mindless violence.

Just words, Mr. President? You say “there is no speech that justifies mindless violence,” but all last week you condemned a ridiculous video trailer for a movie that does not exist. Your government ran advertisements in Pakistan denouncing the video. What of free speech, Mr. President? Last week you were saying the violence was understandable given the offensive film and this week you are trying to claim it was mindless.

Oh wait, you did it again in the same speech where you said “there is no speech that justifies mindless violence”:

At times, the conflicts arise along the fault lines of faith, race or tribe; and often they arise from the difficulties of reconciling tradition and faith with the diversity and interdependence of the modern world. In every country, there are those who find different religious beliefs threatening; in every culture, those who love freedom for themselves must ask how much they are willing to tolerate freedom for others.

That is what we saw play out the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world.

Time and again the President of the United States tries to have it both ways.

But are they just words?

The fact is, many religions do not recognize Mohammed as a prophet. In the widest swath of Islam, that denial is, in and of itself, slander. So what exactly are you saying Mr. President?

As an exit point, with all of President Obama’s statements on tolerance in his speech, we should remember that tolerance is really not a Christian virtue. As Archbishop Chaput of Philadelphia noted, “We need to remember that tolerance is not a Christian virtue. Charity, justice, mercy, prudence, honesty — these are Christian virtues. And obviously, in a diverse community, tolerance is an important working principle. But it’s never an end itself.” The Archbishop also noted that evil preaches tolerance until it is dominate and then it seeks to silence good. That’s not a statement that the President is evil in any way, shape, or form, but we should be mindful when the secular world demands tolerance for all, tolerance for all means we cannot have standards of faith to live by, because those standards obviously require we be intolerant of sins this world has embraced.

Jihad Egyptian President Issues Conditions for American Surrender To Islam

Obama to release Gitmo Jihadists, then condemn American Christian before the UN, while Egyptian President issues more demands on America.

In the wake of a media-ignored week of worldwide American castration by Jihadist Islam, the punches from the Trojan Horse that is the Obama regime keep on coming.

Breitbart reports that Obama will release 55 Jihad terrorists from Guantanamo Bay this week:

Obama is about to release or transfer 55 Gitmo prisoners, despite reports that the Libyan believed to be behind the killing of US Ambassador Christopher Stevens was a former Guantanamo inmate transferred to Libyan custody.

Breitbart also reports Obama will condemn an American Christian before the world and denounce his supposed film ‘Innocence of Muslims” at the UN this week.  John Nolte reports:

Not only are we seeing the White House and State Department call more attention to the Mohammed-mocking “Innocence of Muslims” than any terrorist network ever could’ve hoped for, but the President’s indefensible scapegoating of the film and filmmaker to draw attention and blame away from U.S. security failures apparently knows no bounds.

On top of all that, Flopping Aces does an ace job – of tying together all  the existing and confirmed news stories to piece together the fact that the Muslim Brotherhood Egyptian President, is issuing demands for American capitulation and surrender to Islam – that Obama himself is making possible.

They note the story that Obama is now taking defacto orders from Morsi of Egypt as the Islamist spells out terms for US/Arab relations.

Egypt’s new Islamist president, Mohamed Morsi said the United States needed to fundamentally change its approach to the Arab world, showing greater respect for its values and helping build a Palestinian state, if it hoped to overcome decades of pent-up anger.

A former leader of the Muslim Brotherhood and Egypt’s first democratically elected president, Mr. Morsi sought in a 90-minute interview with The New York Times to introduce himself to the American public and to revise the terms of relations between his country and the United States after the ouster of Hosni Mubarak, an autocratic but reliable ally.

Flopping Aces notes that the overall pattern from Egypt is to 1.) demand the US accept Islam as its own rule, 2.) calling for the suspension of free speech in the US and to put on trial anyone who offends them. 3.) Egyptian Cleric Safwat Higazi states: ‘One Of The Tenets Of The Muslim Brotherhood… Is The Islamic Caliphate And The Ruling Of The World… The Day Will Come When We Will Be The Masters Of The World’

Obama’s response to these demands given his actions this past week and this coming week appears to be unconditional surrender, complete with bow.  Obama is stretching all our necks to the sword of Jihadist Islam.

DELIBERATELY.

Obama To Free World Trade Center Terrorist, Will Return Him to the Islamists In Egypt.

Egyptian Islamists visited White House on numerous occasions, followed by Embassy Attacks and now Obama Regime to release Blind Sheik.

 

The media has had a blackout on reports that the Islamists in Egypt have been visiting the White House and requested that Obama release one of the most heinous convicted Jihad terrorists in our custody.  Back in June, Rep. Peter King (R) NY who sits as Chair of the Department of Homeland Security Committee demanded to know from Obama officials why the administration allowed Hani Nour Eldin, a self-proclaimed member of a  designated terrorist organization to enter the United States unimpeded and attend meetings inside the White House with senior-level Obama administration and State Department officials.  King sent a letter to Janet Napalitano demanding answers to serious questions that went unanswered.

Then on the 11th Anniversary of the 9-11 attacks, American embassies in Egypt and Libya were attacked and 4 Americans were killed, including the U.S. Ambassador to Libya. The Obama regime insisted it had no warnings of the impending attacks and continues to insist the attacks were caused by a YouTube video.   In response to the Jihad attacks and acts of war on America’s embassies, Obama directed the U.S. government to take into custody – a U.S. man involved in making the video whom Obama stated last night was a “shadowy figure”.  For Obama’s regime, clamping down on American free speech rights to impose defacto Sharia law in the United States, is the proper response to Jihadist terror.

While Obama’s regime insists it had no intelligence about any threats to our embassies, Fox News has obtained a 3 page DHS letter warning two days before the 9-11 attacks, that Jihadists in Egypt demanded that the Blind Sheik be released, or they would “burn the embassy down with everyone in it.”

The Sept. 9 statement said “the time has come for a strong movement from you, O sons of Egypt, to release the detained” sheikh. “Let your slogan be: No to the American Embassy in Egypt until our detained sheikh is released.” 

It continued: “Starting now, let the faithful among you form follow-up committees in charge of taking the necessary measures to force America to release the sheikh — even if it requires burning the embassy down with everyone in it.” 

Obama ignored those warnings, as did his State Department.  Apparently deliberately so – because Obama now appears that he will cede to Islamist demands and direct the State Department to release the Egyptian sheik who is the WTC bombing mastermind.  Breitbart reports that the US State Department is now actively negotiating with Egyptian President Morsi’s government about transferring Omar Abdel-Rahman from US custody to Egyptian custody.

Citing health reasons, this brings to mind a similar situation when Scotland released the Pan Am 103 bombing mastermind Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi to Libya where he was welcomed home as a hero, and did not die ‘within weeks’ as was cited as the reason for his release.

Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy believes the deal to release Rahman has already been reached by the administration, and they are just waiting until after the election to announce it. McCarthy believes this is why the DOJ so strongly ruled out Rahman’s “release” but said nothing against his “transfer.”

A group of Congressional leaders released a copy of a letter sent to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Attorney General Eric Holder expressing “concern” about the possible release of Omar Abdel Rahman after it was learned the the State Department was in negotiations with Muslim Brotherhood Egyptian President Morsi to secure his release to Egypt.

This is more than incompetence from the Obama regime – this is deliberate aiding and abetting of Jihadists, while imposing defacto Sharia Law on American citizens.

Prelude To The End of America

Radical Islam and today’s progressive, postmodern leftists–led by the current President of the United States, sadly-share the same philosophical premises as any run of the mill suicide bomber.

Kudos to Dr. Sanity for stating the only sane thing that can be said when taking the events of the past week, and this Regime’s actions into consideration – and arriving at a sum of where it is all going to end up.

Reblogging her blog, because the truth needs to be read by as many as possible, if for nothing more – than as a witness.

PRELUDE TO THE END OF AMERICA

I never thought I would see the day that Liberty itself was crucified on the altar of political correctness; but I can now see the outline of the cross on the horizon:

On a day when Egypt is appeasing its mob by issuing arrest warrants for the people responsible for the film (a capital offense there, do note), this is what’s running in the biggest paper in Los Angeles. Turns out the author, Sarah Chayes, is a former assistant to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, which is no surprise. As Matt Welch notes, lately the strongest pressure on private citizens to limit their criticism of Islam has come from the top of the Pentagon. Bob Gates called Terry Jones when he first threatened to burn a Koran to ask him to stand down, then Martin Dempsey called him again a few days ago when the Mohammed movie broke big. Not content with asking citizens not to make Islamists mad, Chayes wants to blow a hole through the First Amendment using Supreme Court precedent so that they can be compelled to shut up.

The disgusting and fundamentally anti-American article from the LA Times referenced above, follows Administration thugs coming in the middle of the night to bring the blasphemer in for questioning; as a General in the U.S. Military calls some pastor to discuss his tendency to burn Korans.

Those of us who have noted over the years the cozy, ideological relationship between the political left and radical Islam are not surprised by this behavior (see here and here as only two examples–and there are many more on this blog). It makes perfect metaphysical, epistemological and ethical sense, since Radical Islam and today’s progressive, postmodern leftists–led by the current President of the United States, sadly-share the same philosophical premises as any run of the mill suicide bomber. Only their behavior has not yet escalated to the violence of the bomber, since they do not yet have to resort to violence to achieve their sharia.

Make no mistake, however, this is the prelude to the end of America. A prelude to the end of the precious IDEA that is America.

In less than 4 years, the Bill of Rights is well on its way to being supplanted by Islamic blasphemy laws with the purpose of restricting free speech; while at the same time all the President’s men and women are intent on limiting the rights of Christians to practice their religion in the public sphere; and turning a blind eye to Iran’s dream of a world without Israel or the Jews.

The progressive dream of a “living, breathing Constitution” that can change with the whim of a future dictator can now be seen to personify that document so that it can once and for all be distorted, maimed and even murdered by the postmodern elite.

Mitt Romney is excoriated by a Rodeo Clown Media because he dared to speak several Truths (about dependence on government by almost half of the US population; and the unremitting Palestinian and Arab hatred of Jews and Israel) that no one in the medial or on the left wants to hear.

When Truths are gleefuly proclaimed as gaffes; when Islamic terrorism in Egypt and Libya and around the globe is treated as if it were a criminal matter, instead of a matter of national security; when speaking out against Islam in the United States of America is treated as a possible crime by our own government; when our “free” media thinks the big story is Mitt Romney’s daring to criticize Supreme Leader Obama when our Libyan Ambassador and others are murdered and the black flags of Al Qaeda fly over US embassies around the world; when you have a privileged, entitled jackass like Sandra Fluke (who demands that you pay for her birth control) highlighted and celebrated by a major political party–then you know that the American idea of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is coming to a catastrophic an end, not with a bang, but a whimper.

The very essence of America is what is at stake this November.

It may already be too late to turn things around. I hope not. Four years ago, I would never have thought it possible, but now I think that it is more than probable. We have been dragged to the edge of a moral, political, and economic cliff.

If Barack Obama were running against a dishrag, I would vote for the dishrag.

Blood on Their Hands

No Marines.  No live Ammunition.  Obama and Hillary Clinton responsible for the ROE that left U.S. embassies without the means to defend themselves.

While Obama and his media get shrill in insisting that a silly video on Youtube is responsible for the attacks at U.S. Embassies in Egypt and Libya that left four Americans dead and the embassies in ruins, Breitbart reports that it was Hillary Clinton’s orders establishing new State Department Rules of Engagement for Libya, signed by the Secretary of State after the fall of Khadafi’s regime, that severely compromised the safety and security of murdered Ambassador Stevens and all American diplomatic staff in Libya.  In addition, those ROE Clinton signed, prohibited the Marines from providing security at any U.S. installation in Libya.

On Friday, Breitbart News said it filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the State Department to secure a copy of the State Department Rules of Engagement for Libya.   They conclude the State Department will stonewall their request, and resist release of the document until after the election. They go on to state they assert its contents will be just too damaging because the country will be able to see Hillary Clinton’s signature on the document that served as Ambassador Chris Stevens’s death warrant.

That is to be expected.  Especially after the Obama/Hillary Clinton State Department told reporters Friday afternoon that it won’t answer any more questions about the Sept. 11 attack on the consulate in Benghazi.

What makes hypocritical matters worse, is that the Obama regime has their own personal Praetorian guards, while our embassies have none as it is also reported that Ambassador Chris Stevens did not have a Marine detail in Benghazi, Libya. But White House Senior Advisor and Obama confidante Valerie Jarrett has a full Secret Service detail for her coming vacation in Martha’s Vineyard.

Absolutely No Shame. Disgusting.

Obama uses dead Americans slain in Libyan Embassy attack as backdrop prop for campaign speech.

Regime triples down on attacking YouTube video as cause for the uprising in the Middle East and Embassy Attacks, even after Libyan officials confirm the attacks were planned in advance.

Obama regime is using this to impose defacto Sharia law in America, and criminalize anyone who dares to ‘offend’ Muslims.

Lies, Lie Lie – Obama Regime Insists Attacks on Embassies Result of Video

Precedent now set for Feds to criminalize any public expression deemed hostile to Islam as a national security threat.

‘This is not a case of protests directed at the United States writ large or at U.S. policy, this is in response to a video that is offensive to Muslims….a film that we have judged to be be reprehensible and disgusting.’ – White House Spokesman Jay Carney 9-14-12

The morning press briefing by the White House doubled down on the shared narrative it has with Al Qaeda and the Islamists in Egypt and Libya – that the coordinated attacks and assassination of U.S. Ambassador Stevens was the result of an offensive video on YouTube that had been posted since July, and not the result of the 11th Anniversary of 9-11.

The idea that such a skilled multi-pronged heavy-weapon attack on the U.S. Embassies in Egypt and Libya was a spontaneous reaction to a questionable video is laughable.  Myriad sources reveal that the attacks were planned long in advance to commemorate the 9-11 Anniversary. CNN noted it first, followed by a detailed report by CBS.  Libyan officials themselves confirm that the attacks were planned in advance.  U.S. Congressman Mike Rogers (R) MI stated that the attacks were pre-planned and coordinated, not the spontaneous result of a mob upset over a video.  Reports exist that Al Qaeda coordinated the attacks and that it’s leader, Ayman Al Zawahiri ordered the death of the U.S. Ambassador.

The precision of the attacks, the assault teams that knew where the safe house was where Christopher Stevens was taken – are not the actions of a spontaneous enraged mob.  That was clearly cover for the planned act of war by Al Qaeda working in concert with the Muslim Brotherhood that now runs Egypt and Libya.  The Brotherhood that Obama put into power.

The video is clearly a ruse, and potentially a hoax issue to cover for the narrative that both Jiahdists AND the White House want the world to accept: insulting Islam is what caused the violence and such insults must be stopped.

 

For Americans, how the Obama regime is handling this crisis, is akin to having Al Qaeda storm the White House and raising the black flag of Islam over America.

The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff already called to “ask” U.S. Pastor Terry Jones to disavow the film.  The regime also told YouTube to remove the video from it’s site.    Yesterday, the federal government outed and named the supposed maker of the video deemed responsible for the uprising in the Middle East while Obama’s Justice Department is beginning a criminal investigation of this film.

Not letting any crisis go to waste in imposing tyranny on Americans, Obama’s regime has gone into overtime to work on what Rep. Michelle Bachman (R)MN said was the Obama government ‘Enforcing Islamic Speech Codes‘on Americans.  She cited efforts Obama has undertaken at the behest of Islamic leaders to ‘purge’ any negative references to Islam from all government policies and documents.

“Last October, many prominent Islamic organizations wrote a letter to the White House,” Bachmann said, “where they urged our White House to do a complete purge from any federal training materials from references to the ideology of Islam to ensure that all trainers in our U.S. military, our FBI and other U.S. security agencies be retrained so they would be brainwashed in political correctness toward Islam. That’s enforced Islamic speech codes here in the United States. And all done with the help of our president and secretary of state.”

What is evident, is that the Obama regime is using the same narrative that the Islamists are using and mobilizing the federal government of the United States to demonize and criminalize anything that is offensive to Muslims from public expression.  A defacto imposition of Sharia Law by no less than the White House.