Obama Regime Threatens Action Against State of Kansas If It Dares Enforce Pro Gun Law.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder says any state law that defends the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution and  ’overrides’ any Federal Gun Law is null and void and ‘unconstitutional’.

Remember when we learned last week that the Obama regime will decide what laws to enforce and which to ignore?  Well, it seems that if any state DARES to try and protect the Bill of Rights and the Constitution from Federal edicts that abolish the Constitution by default, the Obama regime will spring immediately into action (even though they are still dragging their feet on Benghazi) – and prepare to take immediate action against any state daring to defy His Heinous and the MarxoFascist agenda.

Kansas overwhelmingly voted for and enacted SB102 - The Second Amendment Preservation Act, declaring that the federal government has no power to regulate guns manufactured, sold and kept only in Kansas.  The legislation signed Tuesday also applies to ammunition made, sold and kept in the state. The new law took effect at the end of last week and makes it a felony for a federal agent to enforce any law, regulation, order or treaty regulating such items.

The Obama regime however will have none of this.  In record time – Eric Holder fired off an angry letter to Governor Brownback asserting that it is “UnConstitutional” for the State of Kansas to interfere with any Federal “Law” that violates the Constitution.

The stage is being set for an eventual confrontation and Constitutional crisis.  I have said repeatedly that in any Marxist takeover of a society – there must be violence and bloodshed blamed on the opposition of the new regime – so that the iron fist of tyranny can be ‘legally’ imposed and the political opposition eliminated – by force most often.

Given the statements of Obama officials and policy makers towards Christians and ‘Red states’ – we are already in the midst of a cold civil war in this country.  The question becomes, who has the willpower to act against what they see as a threat?  The Obama MarxoFascist Regime, or Constitutional Christian Conservatives Obama and his Ruling Class have labeled ‘domestic terrorists’ and ‘monsters’.

Breitbart has the story.

Holder Threatens Kansas Over New Gun Law

Kansas Governor Sam Brownback received a letter today from Attorney General Eric Holder threatening action against the state should it enforce SB102, the pro 2nd Amendment law Brownback signed into law last month.

The new law declares that the federal government has no power to regulate guns manufactured, sold and kept only in Kansas.

Any act, law, treaty, order, rule or regulation of the government of the United States which violates the second amendment to the constitution of the United States is null, void and unenforceable in the state of Kansas.The legislation made it a felony for a federal agent to enforce any law, regulation, order or treaty regulating  ammunition made, sold and kept in the state because the federal government does not “interstate commerce” authority over such items.

The law became effective only a week ago, but already Holder has leapt into action, firing off a letter to the governor of Kansas threatening to take “all appropriate action including litigation if necessary” to prevent the state of Kansas from protecting the 2nd Amendment. (Amazing for a guy who didn’t even know about his own department’s gun-running operation, Fast and Furious until months after a border patrol agent was killed by one of its guns.) But when a state passes a law he doesn’t like - this Attorney General is FAST!

“In purporting to override federal law and to criminalize the official acts of federal officers, SB102 directly conflicts with federal law and is therefore unconstitutional.”

“Under the Supremacy Clause…Kansas may not prevent federal employees and officials from carrying out their official responsibilities.  And a state certainly may not criminalize the exercise of federal responsibilities.  Because SB102 conflicts with federal firearms laws and regulations, federal law supercedes this new statute; all provisions of federal laws and their implementing regulations therefore continue to apply.”

Michael Boldin, founder of the Tenth Amendment Center, pointed out the flaws in Holder’s reasoning at Right Side News:

1. Kansas is NOT purporting to criminalize the exercise of constitutional federal responsibilities.  On the contrary, the bill criminalizes what the state has determined is unconstitutional.   It is the position that such federal acts are indeed a violation of the Constitution.  No matter how much Eric might believe it to be otherwise, his view is obviously not universal – especially in Kansas.

2. The Supremacy Clause.  Holder takes the position that all tyrants do – that everything they do is authorized, anything to the contrary – worthless.  But Holder is wrong.  The Supremacy Clause doesn’t say that “any law in conflict with federal law” is void.  It says that only those laws “in pursuance” of the constitution are supreme.  The new Kansas legislation, again, takes the position that such federal acts are not constitutional, and therefore not supreme.

3. Historical Precedent.  The 1850 Fugitive Slave Act was a federal law that basically required all states in the north to act as slave catchers for black people claimed as property in the South.  It’s one of the most disgusting acts in American history.  A number of northern states passed laws similar to the new Kansas law, criminalizing federal agents for attempting to kidnap people in their states.    Although the feds still claimed the same kind of authority that Eric Holder has claimed today, they didn’t have the manpower to enforce.  Read more about that here.    As an aside, if Holder would like to take the position that such resistance to federal slave laws was wrong, he’s welcome to publicly state that.

There is also a precedent to fighting federal gun control laws and winning.

After the Brady bill was signed into law in the nineties,  Arizona Sheriff Richard Mack sued the Clinton administration claiming the federal government had overstepped its bounds. The case found its way to the U.S. Supreme Court, and Sheriff Mack won.

“There’s still hope and local sovereignty, state sovereignty, state’s rights is the solution. We’ve got to have local officials that tell the federal government there’s just a few things you’re not going to do here,” Mack said at a gun rights event at an American Legion in Lima, Ohio, last February.

“If we have local officials, sheriffs and state representatives and governors nullifying what the federal government is doing it’s all proper, it’s all constitutional, and it is completely in line with state sovereignty and the 10th Amendment.”

“The 10th Amendment guarantees this process that we’re about today. Acting on the powers of the states we can keep this movement peaceful and effective and put the federal government back where they belong,” Mack concluded.

UPDATE: 5-4

KANSAS TO PROSECUTE FEDERAL AGENTS WHO ATTEMPT TO ENFORCE FEDERAL GUN CONTROL LAWS

Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback just signed into law a statute that “bars the federal government from regulating guns and ammunition manufactured and stored within Kansas state lines.”

Moreover, the new law makes it a felony for federal authorities to attempt to enforce federal gun control laws, treaties, or rules related to firearms within Kansas state lines. Federal agents would not be arrested but will be prosecuted on “a complaint-and-summons basis.”

Naturally, U.S. Attorney general Eric Holder is furious. Already he has sent a letter to Brownback promising, “The United States will take all appropriate action, including litigation if necessary, to prevent the State of Kansas from interfering with the activities of federal officials enforcing the law.”

Holder cites the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, which gives supremacy to federal laws over state laws.

Kansas, however, is citing the Interstate Commerce Clause, “contending that Washington has no right to regulate guns that were made in Kansas and never cross state lines.”

The play Kansas is making is to keep its gun business within the state, which they believe nullifies the federal government’s legal right to regulate. Guns and ammunition would be manufactured, stored, and sold only in Kansas.

Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach, a former constitutional law professor, helped to write the law and says that the bill is not symbolic; it was written carefully and with the purpose of surviving a court challenge.

Using cherry-picked suspect polls, Democrats and their media have now entered month six of a relentless, self-defeating campaign. So bitter and humiliated are they over the Senate loss of Toomey-Manchin, they have forgotten that the gun debate is always a plus for Republicans and a loser for Democrats.

For proof of how badly the political right wants to keep the gun control issue alive, look no further than the law the state of Kansas just passed to intentionally provoke this fight. Furthermore, look at the flurry of similar bills currently being proposed in 28 states.

DHS Training Video: White Gun Owners Portrayed As Terrorists

DHS Website contains ‘training video’ for deputized agencies.  Appears to be ‘conditioning’ for upcoming gun confiscation/demonization of white gun owners.

Very disturbing video straight from DHS website – they use it to help train all of the deputized agencies during a crisis, even hospital administrators, media faces, everything and everyone that would be involved in such an event.

The date of the video is unknown, but the video description links to the DHS website featuring documents that were uploaded in 2009 and 2012.

The DHS has long been suspected of gearing up to fight Americans. The agency has released documents describing conservatives, libertarians, people who distrust the federal government, people who oppose illegal immigration, who oppose the Federal Reserve and who support gun rights, among other things, as potential terrorists and “domestic extremists.”

The agency has further stoked fears by purchasing nearly 2 billion rounds of mostly hollow point ammunition, 7,000 fully automatic assault rifles, nearly 3,000 mine-resistant MRAP vehicles and$2 million worth of paper targets depicting Americans, including women and children.

Last month, Arkansas State Fusion Center Director Richard Davis admitted that the DHS spies on “anti-government” Americans.

Today Breitbart reports that the GAO (Governemnt Accounting Office) is investigating the reasons WHY the DHS has ordered more hollow-point ammunition than our military, holding more than 260 million rounds in stock for roughly 70,000 government agents authorized to use such arms:

Investigating The DHS Ammo Purchases

Republican Rep. Jason Chaffetz, who chairs one of the House oversight subcommittees, held a hearing to find out why the Department of Homeland Security has been ordering so much ammunition. 

“It is entirely … inexplicable why the Department of Homeland Security needs so much ammunition,” Chaffetz said at the hearing.

He revealed that the department currently has more than 260 million rounds in stock.

He said the department bought more than 103 million rounds in 2012 and used 116 million that same year — among roughly 70,000 agents.

Comparing that with the small-arms purchases procured by the U.S. Army, he said the DHS is churning through between 1,300 and 1,600 rounds per officer, while the U.S. Army goes through roughly 350 rounds per soldier… He noted that is “roughly 1,000 rounds more per person.”

Now, according to US News Washington Whispers, the GAO is looking into the ammo purchases.

The congressional investigative agency is jumping into the fray just as legislation was introduced in both the Senate and the House to restrict the purchase of ammo by some government agencies (except the Department of Defense). The AMMO Act, introduced Friday, would prevent agencies from buying more ammunition if “stockpiles” are greater than what they were in previous administrations.

Head to US News for the rest. You won’t want to miss the “Lionel Commentary” on the DHS Ammo Splurge.

Comply With Police State – Lose Your Rights, Assert Your Rights – You Will Be Punished

Combat Vet arrested in rural Texas and gun illegally confiscated in another random example of the Amerikan police state.

The America of Mayberry and Andy Taylor is apparently dead and buried.  Todays society has more in common with East Germany or the Soviet Union in terms of where oppression is going.

If you dare to take a hike with your son, even it’s a rural backwater of some kind – you better be helpless and disarmed if there be any law enforcement nearby.  For you will be stopped, questioned who, what, why,where, and when of yourself – and if you dare assert your rights – well, bad things will happen to you and you can kiss your guns goodbye.  Just as it did Army Master Sergeant. C. J. Grisham recently experienced himself.

“We’re exempt from the law” is not a phrase you want to hear from law enforcement in a constitutional republic as they manhandle you to the ground because they simply deem you a threat.  Nor do you want to hear a supposed police officer tell you that the law ‘doesn’t apply in this day and age as they handcuff you and assert that having a weapon is an automatic illegality unless otherwise ‘demonstrated’ suggesting that anyone owning a gun makes you dangerous.  And of course, when asked what laws you are being arrested for breaking – the police will not answer you and simply make one up when they process you.

It’s a sad day when an American hero, a combat vet states what is now the obvious truth: “If you comply, you’re giving up your rights; if you don’t, you’ll be punished.”

Texas Soldier Arrested for ‘Rudely Displaying’ Weapon

I just got off the phone with Army Master Sergeant. C. J. Grisham, a serving American soldier and veteran of the the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, who recently was illegally disarmed by the Temple Police Department while out for a walk with his son.

“We live out in the country in Texas, near Temple,” he told me. “My son and I were on a ten-mile hike so that he could earn his hiking merit badge – it’s the last badge he needs to become an Eagle Scout.” But half way into the hike, Grisham said, “a police officer pulled up.” Initially, he was “cordial” and he “asked what we were doing.” Grisham told him. “Then he looked at my rifle. I carry a rifle any time I walk around because there are feral hogs and cougars and things like that.”

From here, things took a turn for the worse.

“‘Where you going with that rifle?’ he asked me. I said, ‘does it matter? Am I breaking any laws?’” Then, he says, the officer “grabbed the rifle without telling me – but it was attached to me. My immediate reaction as a combat veteran was to grab it back and then take a step back. I asked him what he was doing. So he pulled his gun on me. Then I thought about my son, so I put my hands off my gun and he told me to move over to the car. Luckily my son had the video camera to document the hike for his merit badge. I told him to turn it on.”

The video of the incident is below. I’d recommend you watch the whole thing. Note the officers’ ignorance of the rules they are there to uphold, the suggestion that the law doesn’t apply in this “day and age,” and the persistent claim that American citzens are presumed to have their weapons illegally unless otherwise demonstrated. Note the officer’s claim that merely owning a gun makes someone dangerous. Note the conflation of a soldier in a war zone with a citizen in rural Texas. Note the presistent refusal to explain what law Grisham has broken.

Particularly chilling is the officer’s telling Grisham that a police officer is “allowed to” carry a weapon, but that Grisham is not — despite Grisham’s having a permit. “We’re exempt from the law” is not a phrase you want to hear from law enforcement in a constitutional republic.

In an interview today, I asked Grisham why he thought the officer behaved in this way. “I don’t know,” he said “It’s not the law. You can’t go around taking guns without probable cause or a reasonable suspicion that someone is about to commit a crime. A lot of what the officers said is illegal, against Texas law, against national precedent, against Supreme Court decisions. I was legally exercising a right, especially in Texas where we have a right to carry weapons openly, and I have a concealed-carry permit. I wasn’t looking to make an issue out of it. I go up to Austin for Second Amendment rallies with my AR [rifle] all the time. But here in the country? Ultimately, it happened because I stood up to a police officer. I support the police. I’m on the public safety committee. But I also know that when I’m stopped by a police officer, I don’t have to say anything unless I’m accused of committing a crime. I’m not being a prick. I don’t think it was the gun initially, I think it was that my reaction hurt his ego.”

I suggest that this creates a Catch-22: If you comply, you’re giving up your rights; if you don’t, you’ll be punished. He agrees.

I ask what ”rudely displaying a firearm” means. ”There’s no such wording,” Grisham tells me. “I couldn’t find the word ‘rude’ in the penal code at all. You can openly carry a rifle as long as it’s not threatening. If it’s slung across your shoulder, it’s not threatening. When you point a gun at somebody then you’re breaking the law. But just walking around with a gun strapped in front of you is not threatening in any manner.”

What happens next? “I still don’t have my guns back and they took my concealed-carry license. I’m not accused of a gun crime, so there’s no reason for them to have my guns right now and the problem is that, what’s happened in the past with other soldiers is that the prosecutors will try and get the soldiers to agree to the police dropping the charges if they confiscate the gun — to have the charges dropped at the expense of their gun. This is a workaround loophole for gun confiscation.”

Does this happen to soldiers a lot? I ask. ”Yes, this has happened several times in this area. To Staff Sergeant Nate Samson, for example. He had to fight these guys for ten months. The charges were dropped, but he has no justice. He doesn’t have a lot of money to fight them. I have a pretrial hearing on May 29. The police are dragging their feet, not releasing the video. They’re waiting as long as they can — playing hard to get. . . . The reason I’m aggressive on this is that, in the military, if this happens, they initiate a flag that halts your career. You can’t take leave, you can’t be promoted, can’t receive awards or decorations. I am supposed to move to new base in July. I can’t do that. I’ve been on active duty for 18 and a half years and it’s got my career on a hold.”

I ask about his son. “I’ve tried to tell my son that this isn’t normal; that police officers don’t walk around doing this. He’s developed an unrealistic fear of police officers. We were bowling yesterday and he freaked out when a police officer walked in. He’s traumatized by the incident — seeing a gun pulled on his dad. I’m proud of him for his reaction. He’s doing well . . . we sit down and talk to our kids about the Constitution and guns and safety. My son can use every single weapon I have in the house from the AK-47 to .38 special.”

Is it particularly bad at the moment? ”I think so, yes. All the attention that the media and the politicians are giving to ‘assault weapons’ — I insist that none of my guns are ‘assault’ anything – is causing people to call and complain about seeing one. And instead of saying, ‘hey there’s nothing to be afraid of,’ they go out and hassle legal gun owners. Law enforcement have a duty to recognize that if someone is lawfully carrying a weapon then you should leave them alone. Who cares what somebody complains about?”

Exploiting Tragedy To Abolish Our Rights Reaches New Low

Obama and his media use the parents of murdered children as puppets to push for infringements on America’s Second Amendment.

While shameless is now synonymous with the name Obama, each day it seems there is yet a new low established.  This week during the Presidential Radio Address, Obama trots outFrancine Wheeler to push for Obama’s gun control agenda – playing on the heart strings of a compassionate people in order to get them to accept surrendering an essential freedom for a utopian dream of safety.

Karl Denninger gives an incredible rant about this today – and while his language is terse and pointed, he perfectly illustrates the real rage every American should have for the exploitation of that tragedy and the parents to fulfill Obama’s war on liberty.

Obama And Francine Wheeler’s New Low

I rarely go after private citizens in my column.  Today I’m going to make an exception and the reason is that this person inserted themselves, on their own volition, into an attempt to violate every man, woman and child’s fundamental right to life.  By doing so they have turned themselves into public figures and as such lose any such pretense of “privacy” in their opinion nor do they have a legitimate shield from the equally-public response by those who they offend.

I speak of Francine Wheeler, specifically, who Obama trotted out this morning like a puppet to try to press for more “gun control.”

“I feel Ben’s presence filling me with courage for what I have to do – for him and all the others taken from us so violently and too soon,” Wheeler said in the address, which was broadcast on radio stations and streamed on the Internet.

…..

“But that’s only the start,” Wheeler said. “They haven’t yet passed any bills that will help keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people. And a lot of people are fighting to make sure they never do.”

Listen up, you incompetent and defective sack of meat – your son is dead because you are unfit to be parents.

You sat silently by while your state and our nation erected signs telling people who are criminally insane where they can find the maximum number of defenseless people to murder.

….You, Mrs. Wheeler, having willingly and intentionally refused to take responsibility for your acts of omission and commission that led to your son being murdered by a madman now have the audacity to stand in front of the nation and demand that everyone else give up their children to murderous goons as well.

…It is now manifestly clear from the evidence that the murderous bastard who took those lives in Newtown methodically studied mass killings over an extended period of time and sought to get the “high score”, much like I seek to do so in a game of pinball.

But his game was killing innocent people.

This murderous bastard began his killing by murdering his mother, and then literally over her dead body removed her firearms to be used in his shooting spree.  This occurred, we know from the official record, after he was turned down to buy his own guns because he didn’t want to wait two weeks to commit his horrific crime.

He wanted to murder now.

If these simple facts are not all you need to know about so-called “gun control” then you’re severely mentally challenged and are manifestly unfit to be a parent or even a citizen of this nation.  A person who is willing to murder their own mother doesn’t give a damn about any law you can pass, no matter what it is.  There is no law and no regulation that will stop such a person from committing their hideous crime.  You can only hang a man once, and thus once the option to murder has been elected no law bars any aspect of his conduct.

This is simple logic and that it has escaped you labels you as either incompetent or worse, someone who is willing to literally sacrifice your own offspring for political purpose.

Each and every person who has supported so-called “gun control” measures that disarm peaceable citizens with the simple desire to be left alone and who are willing to defend themselves and those who are smaller, less-powerful and younger than the thugs who would take their lives have made a mistake.

Those who do so now, in the light of day of the facts, are willful co-conspirators with the evil bastards that we produce in our society.  And yes, we make these Frankensteins and we must live with that.

….These monsters go into schools, theaters and shopping malls precisely because we emblazon them with signs telling these murderous bastards that nobody inside is capable of defending themselves.  We state in bright lights and bold text that we the “law-abiding citizens” have intentionally forfeited the ability to put down the murderous thug that seeks to take our life and those in our charge.

You, Mr. and Mrs. Wheeler, are directly responsible for this as are any of the rest of we the people who have allowed this crap go on and cheered on the erection of those signs and the passage of those laws.

And now, to make matters worse, you are exploiting the blood of your dead son to expand those prohibitions rather than end them, to expand the places and times where a murderous bastard can take life without being effectively and immediate deterred by a peaceable citizen who willing to defend him or herself and others, including those who are too small or weak to do so on their own.

…Recently MSNBC’s Melissa Harris-Perry claimed that “children do not belong to their parents.”  Well now there’s everything I need to know about why we’ve lost our individual set of balls when it comes to parenting and the responsibility that arises with it!

Read the entire rant at Link.

Feds Setting Up Framework To Arrest Sheriffs Who Will Not Enforce Obama Dictates

The Secret Service being groomed to arrest and remove elected Sheriffs who refuse to enforce “Federal Laws” that infringe on Constitutional Rights.

Hypocrisy at work.  While Obama has instructed his Justice department to ignore federal laws Obama disagrees (i.e.: DOMA and Immigration enforcement) – a new framework is being set up for Obama to create his Praetorian Guard and give them powers to arrest and remove elected Sheriffs across the country that have publicly stated they will refuse to enforce any unconstitutional gun grabs and other federal edicts coming from Washington D.C..

The chessboard is set – the pieces are moving, and Americans have no clue what is about to happen to them.

This would be an act of war by the Executive on the Federalism Compact established in our nation since it’s Founding.  An act of war on sovereign states themselves.  The next step Obama would follow would be the precedent set by Lincoln, and raise troops to invade his own country to force all to submit to MarxoFascist tyranny.

Only in this case he will use the Secret Service and whatever other Federal Alphabet goons he will craft into his own private army answerable only to himself.

War is coming, whether we walk willingly into the boxcars for death camps or die resisting – war is coming.  Our foundational document teaches us that when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce us under absolute Despotism, it is our right, it is our duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for our future security.

The time is growing ever shorter to hope for that outcome versus the nightmare history of every other Marxist regime of the last century-plus.  A history littered with the mass graves of millions who died by the hands of their own Leftist overlords.

 

Federal Framework Being Set Up To Arrest Sheriffs

Colorado, and apparently Texas (next) are being targeted with an attempt to set up a federal authority framework that will enable Secret Service agents (not just those guarding the president), and others of the U.S. Secret Service including uniformed division officers, physical security technicians and specialists, and other ‘special officers’, to arrest and remove an elected sheriff for refusing to enforce the law (or anyone breaking the law).

The bills being introduced defines law as including any rule, regulation, executive order, court order, statute or constitutional provision.

Why are they doing this? Here’s why…
It would establish federal authority police powers in a State, enabling an enforcement arm reporting directly to the president (Secret Service).

It would enable the president / executive branch to theoretically override the actions and preventative measures that are now being taken by many States throughout the country who are trying to preserve 2nd Amendment gun rights and who are prohibiting the enforcement of unconstitutional law passed by Congress or pushed by executive order.

As some of you may know, a growing list of sheriffs (more than 340 so far) across the country have expressed that they will not enforce a Washington mandate that clearly violates the Second Amendment.

Many State laws to preserve gun rights are gaining momentum. States include Montana, Ohio, Kentucky, Idaho, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona, Michigan, Utah, and New Mexico.

However, in Colorado, Senate Bill SB-13-013 has evidently just passed, and is now ready to be signed by the governor, giving police powers and arrest authority to the federal/executive branch of government (Secret Service) within the State. In Texas a similar bill has just been introduced in the State legislature.

The president and vice-president Biden have been actively pursuing state legislatures and pushing for passage of the bills. Obama is scheduled to visit Colorado in just a few days. “Colorado is a pawn for the Obama-Biden plan,” and then on to the next… at least those that won’t fall into line.

It is a full court press by the federal government to empower themselves even further by inserting themselves as police authority within the state, to eliminate opposition.

…thought you’d like to know

Media: White-Gun-Owning-Patriots Are A Terror-Threat

Using the SPLC slander against White, Constitution-minded Americans as a springboard, the L.A. Times warns the government to watch and act against American Conservative patriots.

In every account of the history of genocidal and Socialist despotic regimes follows a similar pattern of actions.  They are directed at the groups and peoples the rising regime targets as opposition, and they do so to groom the population and prepare their citizens to accept the eradication of undesirable people and groups from their utopian societies.

In every instance of genocide perpetrated against a nation’s own people by its government – a common pattern is followed.   It begins with the demonization of the peoples and groups the government wants to eliminate.  They are often classified as threats to the people and the security of the state. In the history of both the Nazi and Soviet oppression – the peoples and groups those regimes exterminated and killed were referred to by political officers and their propaganda media machines as ‘extremists’, lower than human, Neanderthals, and threats to the security of everyone else.  They were blamed for economic woes and suffering the rest of the population was suffering.

Events transpire that are blamed on those groups to further the cause of actions the government enacts against them.  Rights are then limited and stripped from these targeted groups by the force of new laws. Criminalization follows, including disarmament of said peoples and groups. Then, the rounding up – arrests and disappearances of peoples begins.  Recent history is filled with the mass graves of people killed by their own government that grew into a tyranny with the full applause of the people led to hate the targets of the government.

All of it legal.  All of it in full view of the citizenry who either disregard or applaud it.

Genocides are made possible by the acceptance and promotion of the demonization of the peoples the government has declared to be a security threat to the state.

And every single day, the Left in America – engages in the same tactics as the genocidal regimes of the past. They leave the familiar Satanic fingerprints that lead to the criminalization and exterminations of countless peoples the government declared an enemy because of their political or religious ideology.  Last week, it was the L.A. Times who jumped on the bandwagon to help promote the fear and loathing of Conservative patriotic gun-owning Americans to the low-information crowd.

Peril from ‘patriots’

The U.S. needs to keep a close watch on the growing threat of home-grown extremist groups.

(Excerpt – read the full sickening screed at link)

There are, in increasingly frightening numbers, cells of angry men in the United States preparing for combat with the U.S. government. They are usually heavily armed, blinded by an intractable hatred, often motivated by religious zeal.

They’re not jihadists. They are white, right-wing Americans, nearly all with an obsessive attachment to guns, who may represent a greater danger to the lives of American civilians than international terrorists.

…most patriot activity consists of venting steam by meeting with like-minded Neanderthals and firing off blog posts threatening civil war. Yet such blather tends to get under the skin of the Timothy McVeighs of the world. These groups should be closely monitored, with resources adequate to the task, even if it means shifting some homeland security money from the hunt for foreign terrorists.

Quote The Constitution, Have Your Guns Confiscated “We Are In Hitler’s America”

Police arrest a homeschooling mother, charged with ‘terroristic threats’ and confiscate her firearms after she quoted the Constitution at a tax-protest in NJ.

It’s easy to achieve gun confiscation in Obama’s Amerika.  Don’t believe me? Just ask Eileen Hart.  Daughter of survivors of Hitler’s Holocaust is experiencing a foretaste of oppression and tyranny in a land we all assumed was the home of the free.

Hart, her husband and 7 year-old daughter were protesting a mandatory tax reassessment of her home at the Gloucester Community Center in New Jersey, where she was arrested and told to turn over her guns after she says she was reading the Constitution and peacefully protesting what she said was an arbitrary and unfair increase of her tax burden.

On the accusation of Appraisal Systems, Inc. representative Andrew Colavecchio, authorities arrived to arrest Hart at her home.  The Police Complaint states Hart began screaming publicly that she would return with a gun, but there is no other witness corroboration of that claim.  Hart says Colavecchio became outraged when Hart referred to him as a “pencil pusher” as she was removed from the public forum after she began reading the Constitution’s protections against what she claims was infringement on her private property rights.  She states he followed her into the parking lot in a rage and took down her license plate and exclaimed “Let’s see if you can pay your taxes now!”.  She arrived home to find a phalanx of police surrounding her house and she was taken into custody on Colaveccio’s accusation that she said she was returning to the forum “with a gun”, an accusation she vehemently denies. She says she was handcuffed to a chair and charged with ‘terroristic threatening’. The police then demanded she surrender her firearms, even though they had no warrant to seize anything.

“If quoting the Constitution makes me a terrorist, we are in Hitler’s America,” Hart is reported to have said.

The Blaze recounts the details and Hart’s assertion that she was falsely accused and arrested for merely standing up for her Constitutional Rights.

Schumer’s Mandatory “Background Check” Bill Will Make Felons Of Most Gun Owners

The MarxoFascist Juggernaut of disarming gun owners in America reaches the next level with Senate Bill 374

The Truth About Guns has details of a bill being shoved through by Chuck Schmuck Schumer (Marxist-NY) that joins the avalanche of federal and state efforts to disarm the American people.

Today Bloomberg covers a story about California seizing guns as it’s residents lose their right to keep arms.  As with the California precedent, Schumer’s effort also sets the stage for a Federal Registry, that will no doubt be used in like manner.

BREAKING: Details of Shumer’s Mandatory Background Check Bill (S. 374)

We’ve finally gotten a look at Chuck Shumer’s proposed mandatory background check bill, and the truth is that this thing is ridiculous. The bill is overly broad, has some crazy penalties, and cracks the door WIDE open for government abuse. The full text of the bill is here, and since it’s in that terrible bill-speak legalese, I’ll try to summarize it for you . . .

The main provision of the bill is that any transfer of a firearm, no matter how fleeting, needs to go through an FFL and the transferee needs to have a background check performed through the NICS system. There are some exceptions, but they aren’t very good ones. Page 11 starts off the meat and potatoes for those following along at home.

In order to qualify for an exception to the rule of all transfers going through an FFL, the following requirements must be met:

1. The temporary transfer takes place at the owner’s house
2. The gun can’t be moved from the property
3. The transfer must last less than 7 days

There’s also a poorly worded exception for hunting and “sporting purposes,” as well as gifts to family members. What that means is if you go on a trip for more than 7 days and leave your guns at home unattended with a roommate, its now a felony under this law. And if I’m reading this right, this applies if you leave your guns with your spouse, but don’t transfer them as a gift.

There’s also no exception for lending guns to friends for the afternoonon the range. I regularly loan out my older competition guns to friends who want to compete in local matches, as the guns can be expensive and its easier to figure out if competition shooting is right for you if you can give it a try. Under this new bill, that would be illegal.

It also appears that it would be illegal to hand a firearm to someone other than the owner, effectively killing range trips with friends.

I quote from the bill the definition of “transfer” includes:

shall include a sale, gift, loan, return from pawn or consignment, or other disposition

Broad much? The only exception appears to be handing a gun to a potential buyer to evaluate and lending guns at a shooting range but ONLY IF:

at a shooting range located in or on premises owned or occupied by a duly incorporated organization organized for conservation purposes or to foster proficiency in firearms and the firearm is, at all times, kept within the premises of the shooting range;

So, only facilities where the stated purpose in the incorporation documents is conservation (hunting) or firearms proficiency. And if you’re shooting on your own private property, or on BLM land, ANY lending of guns EVEN IN THE PRESENCE OF THE OWNER for recreational shooting would be illegal.

As one of the provisions designed to “alleviate the fears” of the gun-owning public, it looks like there’s a provision in here that permanently sets the price of all FFL transfer fees to the same amount. That number will be set by the Attorney General, which these days is still Eric Holder. The current speculation is that this FFL fee will be used to do what the NFA tax was originally designed to do — make buying or transferring a gun so expensive that almost no one can do it.

In addition to the transfer requirements, it also makes it a federal felony to fail to report a lost or stolen firearm. If the gun isn’t reported to the authorities within 24 hours, that’s a 5-year stretch in a federal pokey you just earned yourself.

The bill also specifically removes the ability for people with state permits to skip the NICS check. Currently in Texas, those with a concealed handgun license can purchase a gun without a NICS check as they’ve already passed a more stringent background check than NICS provides. This puts more strain on the FFL as well as the NICS system.

As written, this bill is a trainwreck. It creates felons out of people who may not have been aware that their roommate (on their month long trip through Asia) even owned a firearm, much less that there was one in the house. It allows the government to regulate the price of background checks, enacting a mandatory fee (read tax) to be paid every time you want to exercise a right guaranteed by the Second Amendment, and lets the government set the fee at whatever level they choose with no recourse. It also creates de facto registration through the NICS checks as well as the paperwork preservation requirements already in place.

You don’t have to pay a fee to vote, as the supreme court ruled that unconstitutional. But for Chuck Shumer, its okay to charge a fee to exercise your Second Amendment right. And he’ll tell you how much to pay.

MarxoFascist Democrat: Assault Weapons Ban “Just The Beginning”

Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), a member of the Democratic Party’s leadership in the House of Representatives, says that plans for an assault weapons ban and private-sales background checks were only the beginning of a broader gun control agenda.

They openly admit it.  It was never just about ‘assault weapons’.  It is about the ability of American citizens to defend themselves.

They are going to keep pushing and pushing and pushing until they achieve the total abolishment of our right to keep and bear arms, Second Amendment be damned.

This coming from the same Communist who said that the goal of ObamaCare was to run health insurance companies out of business.

The Obama Stooge reveals the plan for gun control to Jason Mattera whom she does not recognize as a Conservative journalist who manages to secure the agenda by asking a few pointed questions:

 

“Progressives” On The Path To Slaughter and Genocide.

A people no longer governed by God are ruled by the tyranny of men.  Harbingers of oppression are already evident as the regime in power arms itself against the American people.

We are told in scripture not to be ignorant of the Devil’s devices (II Corinthians 2:11).  I believe, as our Founders did – this includes being aware of the designs and intents of evil men in power doing Satan’s bidding, and preparing oneself spiritually and physically for such devices being employed.

I often say that history is an excellent teacher, and the fruits of every single Socialist/Marxist/Communist leader and regime totally unhinged from scripture and the rule of law – results in such regimes engaging in the wholesale slaughter and genocide of their own people whom they consider to be enemies of their ideology of the supremacy of the state – the collective.  They are anti-God, anti-Biblical and always redefine morality to fit their twisted utopian views, which they always sell to the gullible as ‘justice’.

History teaches that madmen that become part of genocidal regimes always reveal their intentions to do such slaughter in the years and decades before they achieve power.  If Europe had read and understood Hitler’s Mein Kampf, the Holocaust may never have happened.  But people often think that such assumptions of attributed evil are nonsense in the days before a holocaust is initiated.  Such genocides always occur within the spectrum of misery, a collapsed economy, near-starvation and woe among their populations.

Often such misery is created by the very people who use it to transform a society into a despotic one.  A desperate people will sell their birthrights for a bowl of soup.  Handouts from the state and the promise of bread are powerful capitulators to tyrants.  This is dangerous when such handouts are being promoted by people with plans to kill their opposition.  The cabal whom groomed and anointed Obama to power have a history of encouraging mass killing.   William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn were terrorists who were engaged in open warfare upon America.  The professors at Columbia and Occidental where Obama said he attended college whom were part of Obama’s grooming actually planned to exterminate tens of millions of Americans as far back as the 1980s.

Then we have the state arming itself in the name of security while at the same time – working furiously to disarm the American people.  Connecting-the-dots of where this all may lead does not take a college graduate, only someone who knows a little history and can discern the hints within the language of the ‘progressive’/MarxoFascist movement of the American Left.

Obama’s recent angered invectives and demagoguery of his political opponents over the budget ‘sequester’ that he, himself created – are fruits of a man and regime about to unleash hell upon the American people and their perceived enemies.  Obama’s defacto Presidente Valerie Jarrett said the following:

 

“Hell to pay”.  Perhaps in the form of hollow-point bullets being and armed drone strikes used against American citizens?

Sound preposterous?  Not if one knows the history of the ideology that is the religion of the “Progressives” and their political messiah in Obama and his regime now in power.

There is a good blog assessment based on all the evidence, statements, speeches, papers and actions of the Obama regime and it’s cabal now in power, and we would do well to heed the admonition and warning.  It restates the plain truth of what should become a mantra among those Americans who wish to remain free, and unmolested by the state.

 

THEY WILL KILL YOU

 

May I reiterate a point I made a bit ago?

Maybe it’s the drone white paper. Killing Americans willy-nilly because some “highly informed” political official deems them dangerous, or it’s too “burdensome” for government to get, you know, judicial or Congressional review…

Progressives will always end up mass murdering their fellow citizens.

Let me say that again.

PROGRESSIVES ALWAYS END UP MASS MURDERING THEIR FELLOW CITIZENS.

The only exceptions are those that are blessedly removed from office before they are able to gather enough power to execute such orders.

Progressives are collectivists are socialists are communists are tyrants & dictators.

PROGRESSIVES ALWAYS END UP MASS MURDERING THEIR FELLOW CITIZENS.

When I say the names Stalin, Hitler, Mao, today’s Progressive apologists say something like, “Oh, they were monsters, OUR progressives-collectivists-socialists-communists aren’t doing that!”

Well, Stalin didn’t do it either. Until he could. Then he did.
Lenin didn’t do it. Until he could. Then he did.
Hitler didn’t do it. Until he could. Then he did.
Pol Pot didn’t do it. Until he could. Then he did.
Castro didn’t do it. Until he could. Then he did.
Che Guevera didn’t do it. Until he could. Then he did.
Mao didn’t do it. Until he could. Then he did.
Ho Chi Min didn’t do it. Until he could. Then he did.
Kim Jong Il didn’t do it. Until he could. Then he did.

Woodrow Wilson didn’t do it, because there was that pesky Constitution, that back then, people actually believed in. (Trust me. It’s the only reason he didn’t.) He DID put people in prison for speaking out against the war or his government. Because he could.

Franklin Roosevelt didn’t do it. But he did put thousands of Americans into concentration camps. Because he could.

Barack Øbama’s just starting slow. He’s picking off individual fellow-citizens in other countries. (And, of course, anyone else who happens to get caught in the line of fire.) Because he can.

Can he? Are we really going to allow that? Are we really going to permit this?

PROGRESSIVES ALWAYS END UP MASS MURDERING THEIR FELLOW CITIZENS.

It’s a law of nature.
It’s the logical conclusion of their way of thinking.

In the beginning a progressive will lie, cheat, steal, destroy, smear, ruin, in order to force his vision of “utopia” down the throats of people who don’t want it. Because he believes he knows better than they.

A progressive will continue to use the same tactics throughout his life. What others want or prefer means nothing to him. He has decided what’s best for others and will move the world to make sure it is imposed upon them.

As his power increases, his tactics become more overt, aggressive and violent.

And of course, any threat to his power is a threat to the “good of the collective” and the Utopian dream. And it must be mercilessly snuffed out for the good of all.

In order to impose his will on everyone else, it is necessary to rule them all with a iron fist. And ultimately the only way to do that is to use extreme violence.

And there will always be some troublesome people who are just ruining it for everybody else. Who just won’t go along. Who are dissenters and disrupters. Enemies of the peace. Enemies of the people. Enemies of the collective and their dreams of Utopia.

And for the dream to survive and come to fruition, such people must be eliminated.

It’s the law of the nature of Progressives.

It’s evident in their ready impulse to silence voices that disagree with them. An example is their enthusiasm for a Talk-Radio “Fairness Doctrine”. The fact that there is one place in the culture that actually has the audacity to speak full-throated Conservatism/Libertarianism is utterly unacceptable to them.

That Academia, the entire Media, all of Entertainment, and the Music industry (with the exception of some country singers) are in lockstep with their Progressive propaganda is not good enough. No one must be allowed to dissent. There must be NO voices questioning their message. All other voices must be silenced. All enemies must be neutralized.

It’s evident in their PC charges of “racism” “homophobia”, designed for no other reason than to shut opposition down. To shut you up.

That’s all Political Correctness is: Progressives’ attempt to silence voices and ban ideas they don’t like  and don’t want anybody to hear.

And those behaviors, friends, are the first steps of the eventual Stalinian mass-murderer.

Yes. That’s extreme. But it’s also true.

Every progressive is an incipient mass murderer. Most just don’t have the opportunity to mature into their full potential.

Progressives use whatever nasty bits of power and corruption they can accumulate. If it’s a little, they smear you. If it’s a lot, they kill you.

DO. NOT. DOUBT. ME.