Why Libya Cover-Up: Obama Was Arming Al Qaeda & Islamists

Obama has been engaged in gun-walking on a massive scale. Equipping America’s enemies to wage global jihad.

In the aftermath of  9-11-2001, any American working to actively empower, aid, run weapons and guns to Osama Bin Laden, the Taliban or any Al Qaeda associated Jihadi groups would have been seen as having committed high treason against the United States, right?

Well that is EXACTLY what the 44th President, Barrack Hussein Obama, His Heinous – has been doing since he took office.  His regime was not limited to running weapons in Operation Fast & Furious’ gun-walking arming of Mexican drug cartels with American guns, as a way to abolish the Second Amendment and impose gun bans.  His regime was doing the same thing for Al Qaeda and associated Islamist groups in the Middle East to facilitate the “Arab Spring” uprising.

While Obama calls the Middle East uprisings against secular dictators a “fight for Democracy”, the fruit and fact is far from the truth.  In EVERY case that the Obama regime supported, encouraged and it appears now, ARMED the “rebels” against the likes of Libyan dictator Moammar Ghaddafi – actively supporting Al Qaeda Islamist fighters.  From Egypt, to Tunisia to Libya and Yemen – the wake of the “Arab Spring” has installed Islamic Jihadist Theocracies in all those nations.  Nations that were either benign or friendly to the United States and Israel, are now avowed Islamist enemies.  Christians that once existed in these nations, are being systematically exterminated or forced into Islamic conversion as the Copts of Egypt are suffering with reports of church burnings, gang rapes and mass crucifixions in front of Morsi’s presidential palace.

Looking at the FRUITS of whom Obama supported and continues to support in the Middle East, beginning at the outset with his 2009 Cairo speech to the Muslim world – looking back – Obama lit the fuse.  The pattern appears to be that Obama is helping to shape what Islamists are working for: a totalitarian Islamic Caliphate.  Perhaps there is something to the Shia Prophecy about a ‘tall black man’ acting like an Islamic John The Baptist, preparing the way for an Islamic takeover of the globe by dismantling the West from within, arming and empowering Jihadists to take power across the Middle East.  Obama has been instrumental in achieving this Islamist dream.

Obama is not yet done.  He has been working to arm a branch of Al Qaeda Jihadists inside Syria to overthrow the secular dictatorship of Bassar Assad, and that ties directly to the attacks on the Libyan Embassy and the killing of Ambassador Stevens, who was acting in the capacity of an Arms Dealer to Jihad groups in Libya and Syria.

Reports from the Washington Times and Business Insider detail the probable motive in the Libyan Embassy Cover-up that continues to this moment: Obama was engaged in arming Al Qaeda fighters in Syria and elsewhere in the Middle East.

The real reason behind Benghazigate

The evidence suggests that the Obama administration has not simply been engaging, legitimating, enriching and emboldening Islamists who have taken over or are ascendant in much of the Middle East. Starting in March 2011, when American diplomat J. Christopher Stevens was designated the liaison to the “opposition” in Libya, the Obama administration has been arming them, including jihadists like Abdelhakim Belhadj, leader of the al Qaeda franchise known as the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group.

Once Moammar Gadhafi was overthrown, Stevens was appointed ambassador to the new Libya run by Mr. Belhadj and his friends. Not surprisingly, one of the most important priorities for someone in that position would be to try to find and secure the immense amount of armaments that had been cached by the dictator around the country and systematically looted during and after the revolution.

One of the places in Libya most awash with such weapons in the most dangerous of hands is Benghazi. It now appears that Stevens was there — on a particularly risky day, with no security to speak of and despite now copiously documented concerns about his own safety and that of his subordinates — for another priority mission: sending arms recovered from the former regime’s stocks to the “opposition” in Syria. As in Libya, the insurgents are known to include al Qaeda and other Shariah-supremacist groups, including none other than Abdelhakim Belhadj.

The report continues to detail that weapons to Al Qaeda included SA-7 MANPAD surface to air missiles – capable to taking down airliners and U.S. military aircraft.  But it is THIS pull quote that hits right to the point of this story:

What cries out for further investigation — and debate in the remaining days of this presidential election — is whether this shipment was part of a larger covert Obama effort to transfer weapons to our enemies that could make the Iran-Contra scandal, to say nothing of Operation Fast and Furious, pale by comparison.

The reasons for the Obama regime to lie, misdirect and re-catagorize what took place at Benghazi is the result of Christopher Stevens’ actual role as arms facilitator and Community Jihadist ‘organizer’ for insurgencies across the Middle East.  Stevens’ last official meeting earlier on the day he was murdered was said to be with an unidentified “Turkish diplomat.” Presumably, the conversation involved additional arms shipments to al Qaeda and its allies in Syria. It also may have involved getting more jihadist fighters into Syria.  According to sources in Egyptian security, Ambassador Stevens was playing a “central role in recruiting jihadists to fight Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria.”

Even Obama Apologist rag the NYT had to concede to the fact that Obama was engaged in arming militant Jihadists, branches of Al Qaeda to Syrian rebels.  As the Business Insider reported: US Weapons Are Going To Hard-Line Jihadists Fighting To Topple The Syrian Regime

Treason seems to be a word that no longer has any application to modern-day America unless the definition is applied to Right Wingers and Conservatives opposed to Obama and the Democrats.  Aiding and comforting Communists and Jihadists was described by the Obama media as improving America’s standing in the world.  Would anyone dare call arming Al Qaeda for use to overthrow regimes that at one time were friendly or benign to the United States, as treason?  No one can be stupid enough to think that arming these Jihadists will not result in those arms eventually being used on Americans – but like Operation Fast & Furious – it appears there is an ulterior motive behind running guns to enemies of there United States.

But run those weapons and aid to Al Qaeda and Jihad groups Obama did, and that appears to be the MOTIVE behind the cover-up of the Benghazi attack and the insistence of blaming the Youtube video for the murder of 4 Americans including Ambassador Stevens.

Obama has provided aid, comfort, funds, arms and impetus to revolution for the purpose of installing an Islamic Caliphate – a beast that no doubt would acquire and use Nuclear weapons with ally Iran against the Great and Little Satan, of whom Obama has worked as a Trojan Horse to tear down from within.

But there are no stones among anyone in Congress to hold such treason accountable to we, the American people.  We, who one day – are going to rue the day Obama betrayed us to our enemies.  How much blood and deaths will result in what Obama has done, is something future history books may put on par with the Holocaust.

Obama Lied; Lied; Lied – While Americans Died

Emails to White House prove Obama was informed the Libyan Embassy Attack was the work of Jihadists TWO HOURS after attacks began.

The lies began from the moment the 6 hour attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi had claimed the lives of 4 Americans and continues in various forms right up to this moment.  From the Outset – His Heinous Obama and his regime,  thrust an obscure Youtube Video as the cause for two embassy attacks on the anniversary of 9-11.

The Won has wavered little from that stance, ranting in the days and weeks after the attack about the video being the cause of a spontaneous riot whose blame was on free speech in America.  The State Department had Hillary Clinton running television ads in Pakistan apologizing for the Youtube video and disavowing any government involvement with the video.  Even during the debates, Obama tried to ‘school’ Romney that he acted on the information that he had available ‘at the time’, which up until now – Obama has asserted was the responsibility of the video that caused an unforeseen circumstance they had ‘no control over’.

The suspicion of cover-up and lies by this entire regime on up to Obama himself has finally reached a point that Obama’s media cannot cover for him any longer.  A set of internal emails have surfaced that declare that the group Ansar al Sharia claimed responsibility of the attack in Benghazi in real-time virtually as the raid played out on September 11^th.  Obama knew at minimum TWO HOURS after the attack began that it was an Al Qaeda-linked Jihadist attack on our embassy.

So why did Obama let those Americans die?  They were watching the attacks in real-time via a drone that hovered above the embassy, yet did not call in assets from anywhere to assist in saving the Ambassador and American staff.  They watched this attack take place over the 7 hour siege.  They let them die, then almost immediately – began blaming the video for the attacks.  Obama strode out and THANKED the Libyans for doing the “right thing by taking the Ambassador to the hospital” when video and testimony suggest Stevens had been gang-raped, choked to death and then his body was dragged through the streets by thugs shouting ‘Allu Ackbar!”.

This is beyond incompetence, it appears nearly deliberate, a sacrifice on the altar of militant Jihadists whom Obama backed in the overthrow of Libyan dictator Moammar Gaddafi.

At minimum, the dereliction of duty from Obama on down through Hillary Clinton’s State Department should be cause for impeachment or resignation.  At worst – this entire fiasco and cover-up story was for the purpose of Obama attempting to create a fictional narrative – citing the ‘video’ as a way to keep the  attackers unawares of Obama’s hunt for them – and wala!  ’October Surprise’ attack on the Al Qaeda-linked group to bolster his sinking poll numbers and diffuse the scandal.

Now the scandal breaks even wider and more pointed, depending on whether the rest of Obama’s media lackeys will continue to cover for him or try to salvage what little is left of their integrity as Fox News and others run with the story that Obama KNEW it was Jihadists within two hours of the six hour attack.

Now we know what and when he knew it. The only thing left to guess is WHY he let it happen and WHY he lied about it – boldfaced for over a month.

White House told of militant claim two hours after Libya attack: emails

and

Emails show the Obama administration knew Ansar al Sharia was behind the attack in Benghazi

Fox has obtained a set of internal emails which declare that the group Ansar al Sharia claimed responsibility of the attack in Benghazi virtually as the raid played out on September 11^th.

Ansar al Sharia has been declared by the State Department to be a an al Qaeda affiliated group. The emails were sent by the State Department to across a variety of redacted national security platforms including the White House Situation room, the Pentagon, the FBI, the Director of National Intelligence and the State Department. Fox is told that approximately 300-400 national security figures received these emails in real time almost as the raid was playing out and concluding. Fox is told that figures directly receiving these emails work directly underneath the nation’s top national security, military and diplomatic officials.

The first email indicates that Ambassador Chris Stevens and other personnel were “in the compound safe haven.”

The timestamps on the emails are all eastern time and often include the subheading SBU…which is shorthand for “Sensitive But Unclassified.”

The redacted email address @nss.eop.gov is the White House Situation address. The email address extension @dni.gov is the an extension that goes to figures working under the Director of National Intelligence.

The first email was sent at 4:05 pm et with the subject line “U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack (SBU).”
It goes on to say “The Regional Security Officer reports the diplomatic mission is under attack. Embassy Tripoli reports approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well. Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and four COM personnel are in the compound safe haven. The 17^th of February militia is providing security support.

The operations Center will provide updates as available.”

The second email came at 4:54 pm.

The subject line is “Update 1: U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi (SBU)

“(SBU) Embassy Tripoli reports the firing at the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi has stopped and the compound has been cleared. A response team is on site attempting to locate COM personnel.”

The third email came at 6:07 pm and was sent to a different email list, but still includes the White House Situation room address.

This email contains the key subject line that reads “Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack (SBU).”

This is the link to the al Qaeda-affiliated organization.

Obama Declares At UN: The Future Must Not Belong to Practicing Christians

“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam”. -Barrack Obama 9-25-12

Since all Islam demands everyone recognize Mohammed as God’s true prophet – for the Salafists, sufis and shia – anyone who does not acknowledge the prophet is considered not only an infidel – but slander the prophet by their refusal to submit to him.

Obama knows this having been raised a Muslim in Indonesia.  His speech at the UN was an all-out assault on not only freedom of speech, but of faith.  In cleverly cloaked words to deceive ignorant Americans, key phrases ping the ears that the Muslim world will understand what Obama really means.  While the media will parrot that Obama was condemning ‘extremism’, the fact remains that Islam itself is extremism.  His words paint a target on the First Amendment, Free Speech and right to religious exercise – all targets of Obama AND Sharia Law proponents.

As Kevin DuJan notes at Hillbuzz -

Today, Obama spoke out against free speech and wished for a world where those who criticize Islam will be punished (or even executed) worldwide. 

Let’s be really clear about this, folks:  the man sitting in the Oval Office thinks it’s a good idea for global blasphemy laws to be enacted to serve a worldwide state religion, ISLAM.

As DuJan rightfully notes, Obama had published in his ‘memoirs’ ‘Dreams From My Father’, that if the political winds shifted against Islam, he would stand with Muslims.  That is more than apparent since Obama enabled the Jihadist Islamists to take power in Libya, Egypt, Tunisia and other places in the Mid East and has done NOTHING to punish the Islamists who attacked our embassies and killed the U.S. Ambassador to Libya and 4 other Americans.

Instead, Obama slammed Free Speech rights in the US, blamed a video on Youtube and apologized to the Muslim world in TV ads running in Pakistan and elsewhere.

I cannot state it any better than Erick Erickson did at Red State.

The Future Must Not Belong to Practicing Christians

In his speech to the United Nations General Assembly today the President of the United States declared that the future does not belong to practicing Christians. Already, the media and the left are in full denial, probably based on their general lack of understanding of theology. This would have been a gaffe had Mitt Romney said it. But with Barack Obama, he’s just speaking bold truths. His bold truth declares that the future does not belong to practicing Christians.

Pay careful attention to what he says.

The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. Yet to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated, churches are destroyed, or the Holocaust is denied. Let us condemn incitement against Sufi Muslims, and Shiite pilgrims. It is time to heed the words of Gandhi: “Intolerance is itself a form of violence and an obstacle to the growth of a true democratic spirit.” Together, we must work towards a world where we are strengthened by our differences, and not defined by them. That is what America embodies, and that is the vision we will support.

Now, that’s the full paragraph so no one can claim I took him out of context.

But consider this.

It is an orthodox Christian belief that Mohammed is not a prophet. Actual Christians, as opposed to many of the supposed Christians put up by the mainstream media, believe that Christ is the only way to salvation. Believing that is slandering Mohammed. That’s just a fact. If you don’t believe me, you go into the MIddle East and proclaim Christ is the way, the truth, and the life and see what happens to your life.

Then Barack Obama went on to say “Yet to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated, churches are destroyed, or the Holocaust is denied.” Note he says we cannot “slander the prophet of Islam” but it’s only the image of Christ in the next sentence — not actually Christ himself desecrated. If this is so, why does Barack Obama’s government continue funding the National Endowment for the Arts, which funds Christ in piss, the Virgin Mary painted in dung, etc.?

Now, in point of fact, this is a major difference between Islam and Christianity. Christ came to this world as an enemy of the world and expected to be impugned. He also tells his followers that they should expect to be impugned. There is joy in being persecuted for following the Risen Lord. In Islam, if you impugn Mohammed, you get a fatwa on your butt.

And then there is the first amendment. The President of the United States tried to have it both ways in his speech.

I know there are some who ask why we don’t just ban such a video. The answer is enshrined in our laws: our Constitution protects the right to practice free speech. Here in the United States, countless publications provoke offense. Like me, the majority of Americans are Christian, and yet we do not ban blasphemy against our most sacred beliefs. Moreover, as President of our country, and Commander-in-Chief of our military, I accept that people are going to call me awful things every day, and I will always defend their right to do so. Americans have fought and died around the globe to protect the right of all people to express their views – even views that we disagree with.

We do so not because we support hateful speech, but because our Founders understood that without such protections, the capacity of each individual to express their own views, and practice their own faith, may be threatened. We do so because in a diverse society, efforts to restrict speech can become a tool to silence critics, or oppress minorities. We do so because given the power of faith in our lives, and the passion that religious differences can inflame, the strongest weapon against hateful speech is not repression, it is more speech – the voices of tolerance that rally against bigotry and blasphemy, and lift up the values of understanding and mutual respect.

I know that not all countries in this body share this understanding of the protection of free speech. Yet in 2012, at a time when anyone with a cell phone can spread offensive views around the world with the click of a button, the notion that we can control the flow of information is obsolete. The question, then, is how we respond. And on this we must agree: there is no speech that justifies mindless violence.

Just words, Mr. President? You say “there is no speech that justifies mindless violence,” but all last week you condemned a ridiculous video trailer for a movie that does not exist. Your government ran advertisements in Pakistan denouncing the video. What of free speech, Mr. President? Last week you were saying the violence was understandable given the offensive film and this week you are trying to claim it was mindless.

Oh wait, you did it again in the same speech where you said “there is no speech that justifies mindless violence”:

At times, the conflicts arise along the fault lines of faith, race or tribe; and often they arise from the difficulties of reconciling tradition and faith with the diversity and interdependence of the modern world. In every country, there are those who find different religious beliefs threatening; in every culture, those who love freedom for themselves must ask how much they are willing to tolerate freedom for others.

That is what we saw play out the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world.

Time and again the President of the United States tries to have it both ways.

But are they just words?

The fact is, many religions do not recognize Mohammed as a prophet. In the widest swath of Islam, that denial is, in and of itself, slander. So what exactly are you saying Mr. President?

As an exit point, with all of President Obama’s statements on tolerance in his speech, we should remember that tolerance is really not a Christian virtue. As Archbishop Chaput of Philadelphia noted, “We need to remember that tolerance is not a Christian virtue. Charity, justice, mercy, prudence, honesty — these are Christian virtues. And obviously, in a diverse community, tolerance is an important working principle. But it’s never an end itself.” The Archbishop also noted that evil preaches tolerance until it is dominate and then it seeks to silence good. That’s not a statement that the President is evil in any way, shape, or form, but we should be mindful when the secular world demands tolerance for all, tolerance for all means we cannot have standards of faith to live by, because those standards obviously require we be intolerant of sins this world has embraced.

Jihad Egyptian President Issues Conditions for American Surrender To Islam

Obama to release Gitmo Jihadists, then condemn American Christian before the UN, while Egyptian President issues more demands on America.

In the wake of a media-ignored week of worldwide American castration by Jihadist Islam, the punches from the Trojan Horse that is the Obama regime keep on coming.

Breitbart reports that Obama will release 55 Jihad terrorists from Guantanamo Bay this week:

Obama is about to release or transfer 55 Gitmo prisoners, despite reports that the Libyan believed to be behind the killing of US Ambassador Christopher Stevens was a former Guantanamo inmate transferred to Libyan custody.

Breitbart also reports Obama will condemn an American Christian before the world and denounce his supposed film ‘Innocence of Muslims” at the UN this week.  John Nolte reports:

Not only are we seeing the White House and State Department call more attention to the Mohammed-mocking “Innocence of Muslims” than any terrorist network ever could’ve hoped for, but the President’s indefensible scapegoating of the film and filmmaker to draw attention and blame away from U.S. security failures apparently knows no bounds.

On top of all that, Flopping Aces does an ace job – of tying together all  the existing and confirmed news stories to piece together the fact that the Muslim Brotherhood Egyptian President, is issuing demands for American capitulation and surrender to Islam – that Obama himself is making possible.

They note the story that Obama is now taking defacto orders from Morsi of Egypt as the Islamist spells out terms for US/Arab relations.

Egypt’s new Islamist president, Mohamed Morsi said the United States needed to fundamentally change its approach to the Arab world, showing greater respect for its values and helping build a Palestinian state, if it hoped to overcome decades of pent-up anger.

A former leader of the Muslim Brotherhood and Egypt’s first democratically elected president, Mr. Morsi sought in a 90-minute interview with The New York Times to introduce himself to the American public and to revise the terms of relations between his country and the United States after the ouster of Hosni Mubarak, an autocratic but reliable ally.

Flopping Aces notes that the overall pattern from Egypt is to 1.) demand the US accept Islam as its own rule, 2.) calling for the suspension of free speech in the US and to put on trial anyone who offends them. 3.) Egyptian Cleric Safwat Higazi states: ‘One Of The Tenets Of The Muslim Brotherhood… Is The Islamic Caliphate And The Ruling Of The World… The Day Will Come When We Will Be The Masters Of The World’

Obama’s response to these demands given his actions this past week and this coming week appears to be unconditional surrender, complete with bow.  Obama is stretching all our necks to the sword of Jihadist Islam.

DELIBERATELY.

Obama To Free World Trade Center Terrorist, Will Return Him to the Islamists In Egypt.

Egyptian Islamists visited White House on numerous occasions, followed by Embassy Attacks and now Obama Regime to release Blind Sheik.

 

The media has had a blackout on reports that the Islamists in Egypt have been visiting the White House and requested that Obama release one of the most heinous convicted Jihad terrorists in our custody.  Back in June, Rep. Peter King (R) NY who sits as Chair of the Department of Homeland Security Committee demanded to know from Obama officials why the administration allowed Hani Nour Eldin, a self-proclaimed member of a  designated terrorist organization to enter the United States unimpeded and attend meetings inside the White House with senior-level Obama administration and State Department officials.  King sent a letter to Janet Napalitano demanding answers to serious questions that went unanswered.

Then on the 11th Anniversary of the 9-11 attacks, American embassies in Egypt and Libya were attacked and 4 Americans were killed, including the U.S. Ambassador to Libya. The Obama regime insisted it had no warnings of the impending attacks and continues to insist the attacks were caused by a YouTube video.   In response to the Jihad attacks and acts of war on America’s embassies, Obama directed the U.S. government to take into custody – a U.S. man involved in making the video whom Obama stated last night was a “shadowy figure”.  For Obama’s regime, clamping down on American free speech rights to impose defacto Sharia law in the United States, is the proper response to Jihadist terror.

While Obama’s regime insists it had no intelligence about any threats to our embassies, Fox News has obtained a 3 page DHS letter warning two days before the 9-11 attacks, that Jihadists in Egypt demanded that the Blind Sheik be released, or they would “burn the embassy down with everyone in it.”

The Sept. 9 statement said “the time has come for a strong movement from you, O sons of Egypt, to release the detained” sheikh. “Let your slogan be: No to the American Embassy in Egypt until our detained sheikh is released.” 

It continued: “Starting now, let the faithful among you form follow-up committees in charge of taking the necessary measures to force America to release the sheikh — even if it requires burning the embassy down with everyone in it.” 

Obama ignored those warnings, as did his State Department.  Apparently deliberately so – because Obama now appears that he will cede to Islamist demands and direct the State Department to release the Egyptian sheik who is the WTC bombing mastermind.  Breitbart reports that the US State Department is now actively negotiating with Egyptian President Morsi’s government about transferring Omar Abdel-Rahman from US custody to Egyptian custody.

Citing health reasons, this brings to mind a similar situation when Scotland released the Pan Am 103 bombing mastermind Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi to Libya where he was welcomed home as a hero, and did not die ‘within weeks’ as was cited as the reason for his release.

Former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy believes the deal to release Rahman has already been reached by the administration, and they are just waiting until after the election to announce it. McCarthy believes this is why the DOJ so strongly ruled out Rahman’s “release” but said nothing against his “transfer.”

A group of Congressional leaders released a copy of a letter sent to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Attorney General Eric Holder expressing “concern” about the possible release of Omar Abdel Rahman after it was learned the the State Department was in negotiations with Muslim Brotherhood Egyptian President Morsi to secure his release to Egypt.

This is more than incompetence from the Obama regime – this is deliberate aiding and abetting of Jihadists, while imposing defacto Sharia Law on American citizens.

The Islamic Post-American World

What a Post-American world looks like, Islamic leaders tell us that the only way we will have peace is if we let them decide what sections of the Bill of Rights we get to keep.

Daniel Greenfield hits another one out of the park:

The left has a choice to make. They can either choose Americanism or the Koran, and for the most part they have made their choice. And we need to make ours. This is not a debate over policies, but over basic freedoms. This is not a conflict over what percent of taxes we will be paying, but whether we will have even the most basic civil rights left by the time that the international order of savages and murderers, and their transnational representatives, are done with us.

Sultan Knish Blog: Anti-American Savages of the Post American World

Investigation: Obama Funding Mosques Around The World At U.S. Taxpayer Expense

United States investing millions to refurbish mosques as a good-will effort to Jihadist regimes and radical Muslim groups in the Middle East.

Oh no, Obama is not Muslim they insist.   But at every turn – we find Obama either funding, orchestrating or enabling Jihadist Islam to gain an upper hand in the world.

His State Department was responsible for leaving American Embassies unguarded, and hiring local security – loyal to Jihadists to protect them and American staffers.  They ordered U.S. guards to be unarmed, carrying no live ammunition.  Obama’s regime joins the chorus of Islamists that insist a silly YouTube video incited the attacks that just so-happened to occur spontaneously on the anniversary of 9-11.  The federal government of the United States is going after the makers of the video, taking into custody – one of them for questioning.  Obama is  refusing to meet with Israel’s Prime minister, but is instead meeting the Muslim Brotherhood president next week.

Now we learn Obama’s State Department has been using millions of our tax dollars to restore and remodel mosques in the Middle East.

Breaking from Pat Dollard.com

A Channel 2 Action News investigation found that the State Department is sending millions of dollars to save mosques overseas. 

…The State Department declined a Channel 2 Action News request for an interview. We wanted to ask why are we using tax dollars to refurbish religious buildings overseas. The State Department did send Channel Two Action News an e-mail saying that they are fighting Islamic extremism by building relationships with Islamic leaders.

…“We are rebuilding mosques to support the radicals, not to support the moderates. We are building mosques to issue fatwas of death against people like me,” said Darwish.

….Your tax dollars also fund computers and mosques in places like Tajikistan and Mali. At an ancient mud brick mosque in Mali, the State Department has provided Internet service and computer equipment to local imams.

While this is outrageous considering events of the past week, it is nothing new for Obama.  In 2010 – the Obama regime sent radical Imama Feisal Abdul Rauf - the mastermind of the Ground Zero Mosque, on a trip through the Middle East on our dime, to “foster greater understanding” of Islam and Muslims in the U.S.

Drones for Obama insist that this program is to aid in the repair of ‘cultural heritage sites’ throughout the world, and that this program began under Bush.  That’s not accurate.  The program began under Bill Clinton and was funded by Congress during Bush’s first term.  The specific funding of Mosques appears to be directed since 2009.

So much ‘separation of church and state’.  That obviously only applies to Christians and Jews.

Blood on Their Hands

No Marines.  No live Ammunition.  Obama and Hillary Clinton responsible for the ROE that left U.S. embassies without the means to defend themselves.

While Obama and his media get shrill in insisting that a silly video on Youtube is responsible for the attacks at U.S. Embassies in Egypt and Libya that left four Americans dead and the embassies in ruins, Breitbart reports that it was Hillary Clinton’s orders establishing new State Department Rules of Engagement for Libya, signed by the Secretary of State after the fall of Khadafi’s regime, that severely compromised the safety and security of murdered Ambassador Stevens and all American diplomatic staff in Libya.  In addition, those ROE Clinton signed, prohibited the Marines from providing security at any U.S. installation in Libya.

On Friday, Breitbart News said it filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the State Department to secure a copy of the State Department Rules of Engagement for Libya.   They conclude the State Department will stonewall their request, and resist release of the document until after the election. They go on to state they assert its contents will be just too damaging because the country will be able to see Hillary Clinton’s signature on the document that served as Ambassador Chris Stevens’s death warrant.

That is to be expected.  Especially after the Obama/Hillary Clinton State Department told reporters Friday afternoon that it won’t answer any more questions about the Sept. 11 attack on the consulate in Benghazi.

What makes hypocritical matters worse, is that the Obama regime has their own personal Praetorian guards, while our embassies have none as it is also reported that Ambassador Chris Stevens did not have a Marine detail in Benghazi, Libya. But White House Senior Advisor and Obama confidante Valerie Jarrett has a full Secret Service detail for her coming vacation in Martha’s Vineyard.

Video: Gunmen Attacking Embassy Shouting They Were Sent By Islamist Egyptian President

Video raises the possibility that the attacks on American Embassies in Libya and Egypt were planned and coordinated with Egypt’s Government

Walid Shoebat reports from an Arabic video that Egyptian TV broadcast, that gunmen attacking the U.S. embassy were shouting to Egyptian security staff defending the embassy that they were sent by Egyptian President Mursi, the Muslim Brotherood’s newly ‘elected’ president that Obama helped put into power.

Shoebat.com states the following:

There have been questions raised about whether the attack on the U.S. Embassy in Libya was done in conjunction with the attacks on the Embassy in Cairo. This video brings us closer to answering that question. In fact, it not only points to the same attackers but possibly to Egyptian President Mohamed Mursi himself.

Fast forward to the 1:15 mark in this video (if you don’t understand Arabic). Watch as the raw footage of a firefight in Benghazi is taking place. The news report loops the relevant portion of an exchange between gunmen, in which one can be heard, saying, ‘Don’t Shoot us! We were sent by Mursi’!

Obviously, that would mean at least two separate groups of gunmen in Libya are loyal to the President of Egypt.

All this with news that the Marines guarding the embassies were forbidden to possess live ammunition – a horrifying picture is emerging about what is taking place in the Middle East: Obama is enabling and providing help and cover to Jihadists and Muslim militants taking over the Middle East.

Obama certainly looks to fulfill the Shiite prophecy that states a tall black man would be instrumental in helping to destroy the West.

 

Obama Regime Apologizes To Muslims For American Free Speech, Then Sics U.S. General on Christian Pastor

U.S. Embassies Attacked, Obama Regime apologizes for free speech  ’offending muslims’, White House disavows apology but then General from Joint Chiefs sent to intimidate U.S. Pastor into disavowing a film lampooning Muhammed.

It’s gone surreal and over the cliff.  But now Obama and his media can blame a ‘fundamentalist U.S. Christian’ for what occurred in Egypt and Libya*, instead of fundamentalist Muslims with Jihad on the brain.

On the 11th Anniversary of 9-11 – two carefully planned attacks on the U.S. embassies in Egypt and Libya took place that cost the lives of 4 Americans, one of whom was the U.S. Ambassador by the very ‘revolutionaries’ Obama supported during the ‘Arab Spring’ to overthrow Mubarak and Gaddaffi and replace them with The Muslim Brotherhood – the father of Al Qaeda.

The U.S. Flag was ripped down, and the black flag of Al Qaeda and Jihad was raised over the U.S. Embassy.

The attacks were ‘blamed’ on a trailer for a stupid and ridiculously bad movie that lampoons Muhammed that was released in July on YouTube.

Obama’s State Department responded by releasing an “Apology” to Muslims for American free speech that offends Muslims.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Obama appeared for a very short set of remarks on Wednesday morning, where he praised the Jihadists by stating; “Libyans acted responsibly by carrying Steven’s body to the hospital…” – which by most pictures look no different than when Islamic enemies parade the dead bodies of Americans like trophies through their streets.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Later the White House disavowed that apology after an uproar on social media and talk radio over the apology.  But then, Reuters reported shortly afterward that General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the U.S. military’s Joint Chiefs of Staff, spoke with American Pastor Terry Jones, who publicly endorsed the parody film – and called him by phone on Wednesday, “asking  him to withdraw his support for the film.

Pastor Jones you may remember, was the Christian who burned copies of the Quran in protest of Jihadist Islam and sparked an international uproar over his planned public burning of Islam’s holy book.  The Obama media has already linked Pastor Jones to the silly trailer and movie that makes fun of Mohammed, and now apparently the U.S. military is involved to ‘dissuade’ an American citizens endorsement of such a movie.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I don’t know about you – but far worse than apologizing for and condemning American free speech – that the Obama regime has the CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF call a private citizen in an attempt to intimidate him into disavowing a stupid movie he said he supports should frighten ANYONE who supports a right to free expression and speech.  So I guess Christians can now expect to get calls from Obama’s military when we give opinions about issues Obama does not like and that Muslims might find ‘offensive’ from now on.

Obama still hasn’t had time to send anyone to comfort the families of the 14 troops killed in Afghanistan last week, but he has time to send an American General to intimidate an American pastor for supporting a film that they contend is offensive to Muslims.

How about films offensive to Christians?  For that matter, how about ACTIONS from Jihadist enemies that OBAMA PUT IN POWER that committed an act of war against an American embassy??

America – you elected a Trojan Horse for President – and it shows.

 

*UPDATE: Obama’s MSNBC has just suggested that the Justice Department charge American pastor Terry Jones with accessory to murder of the U.S. Ambassador at the hands of Jihadists in Libya.  Stunning considering CNN has stated that the citation of the silly Youtube film was a ‘diversion’ to an attack planned in advance on the embassy.