Obama To Crack Down On Anti-Government Groups

AmericanTerrorists

Dissent will not be tolerated as the Federal Beast begins efforts to punish Americans who are part of or support groups that engage in ‘anti-government activities’.

Tyranny.  Despotism.  Totalitarianism.  If you think that is what the federal government has become, you are a criminal and terrorist according to new programs the Obama regime is implementing.

It will soon be a crime to say or even think such things about your government, or read material or support groups that oppose what is going on at Mordor on the Potomac.

First Amendment?  You don’t need it according to government, because speech and ideas contrary to the Narrative of the Federal Beast, are the same thing as murder and terrorism when you dare question government.

In the wake of the armed protest in Oregon by Ranchers that culminated in the ambush and execution of LaVoy Finnicum last week, Obama’s NKVD is suddenly into overdrive to criminalize, and punish what they declare a ‘clear and present danger’ of anti-Obama/Anti-government rule over us little people.

Obama’s Praetorian Pravda Propagandist media obliges Obama’s narrative including his decree that criticizing Islam has no place in America, and published the following this week:

RIGHT-WING EXTREMISTS ARE A BIGGER THREAT TO AMERICA THAN ISIS

…“Law enforcement agencies in the United States consider anti-government violent extremists, not radicalized Muslims, to be the most severe threat of political violence that they face,” the Triangle Center on Terrorism and Homeland Security reported this past June, based on surveys of 382 law enforcement groups.

The problem is getting worse, although few outside of law enforcement know it.

…Billions of words have been written and spoken on violent Islamic extremists. The time has come to do the same for the good old-fashioned Americans who may pose the greatest threat to us all.

…What drives them, according to studies, is not so much ideology as their social network. When friends and associates all proclaim that the government is destroying freedom, or that all Muslims are terrorists, or that minorities are dragging down the country, the social pressure to conform with that opinion is intense.

…How many times have Republican politicians told their followers Obama could be impeached? How many times did they suggest he was a Muslim or wasn’t born in this country? How many times did they say he lied to cover something up in Benghazi? How many times did they say his health care policy included death panels? How many times did they say he was committing crimes or shoving through policies that would kill people?

…Republicans directly—and almost certainly inadvertently—identified themselves as aligned with the dangerous radicals. The Department of Homeland Security produced an analysis saying that violent right-wing extremists posed the greatest terrorist threat to the country—a report since proved true.

…Meanwhile, the right-wing extremists continue their plotting against America

And so, in keeping with Obama’s consistent effort to portray and declare Christian Conservatives and Constitutionalists as domestic terrorists, Obama has instructed his Alphabets to go put on their Iron Fists and crack down on dissenters in the aftermath of the Oregon protest standoff.

Obama’s Feds to toughen fight against Anti-Government “Extremists”

The massive push and narrative to frame Constitutional Conservatives as anti-government terrorists is reaching a fevered pitch of insanity from the Praetorian big media complex. This always precedes actual government programs and policies that are about to be implemented, whether by introduction of legislation, or more commonly today – right before Obama enacts law by decree.   The media purpose with these stories is to mold the minds of the American people to accept the programs and policies that are already prepared and about to be implemented.

I want to take apart portions of the article posted at Yahoo News above, and showcase that what is taking place right now in the wake of the Oregon standoff, is the justification for political cleansing via despotism.

U.S. Eyes ways to toughen fight against Domestic “Extremists”

Extremist groups motivated by a range of U.S.-born philosophies present a “clear and present danger,” John Carlin, the Justice Department’s chief of national security, told Reuters in an interview. “Based on recent reports and the cases we are seeing, it seems like we’re in a heightened environment.”

Notice the use of ‘U.S. born philosophies’.  What that means is ideologies that are NOT ISLAMIC, not foreign, but philosophies born of an American mindset of limited government, Christian principles and resistance against government tyranny and corruption.  That is what the intention of U.S. -borne philosophies means in the context they use it.  Also note that the government has declared people with a mindset that will resist government corruption and tyranny as a “Clear and Present Danger”.  They do not say that about Jihad groups inside the United States, or ISIS or other Muslim groups in any official government policies or papers.  DOMESTIC TERRORISTS/EXTREMISTS are limited to those who do not support the Federal Beast and hold it in contempt and in violation of the Constitutional limits upon it.

Carlin and other Justice Department officials declined to say if they would ask Congress for a comparable domestic extremist statute, or comment on what other changes they might pursue to toughen the fight against anti-government extremists.

Because as in the Soviet Union, acts the State will impose against it’s own people they declare a threat to the state must be kept secret.

The U.S. State Department designates international terrorist organizations to which it is illegal to provide “material support.” No domestic groups have that designation, helping to create a disparity in charges faced by international extremist suspects compared to domestic ones.

Typical Obamanation along the lines of “Income Inequality” and ‘White Privilege”.  “It’s not fair!!!!  American citizens should suffer the same type of criminalization and punishment that international Jihadists do”.

A Reuters analysis of more than 100 federal cases found that domestic terrorism suspects collectively have faced less severe charges than those accused of acting on behalf of Islamic State since prosecutors began targeting that group in early 2014.

Typical Leftist imbecility. Jihadist terrorism is an ACT OF WAR.  American citizens have this thing called The Bill of Rights, which does not permit nor allow the government to treat them as war criminals. Funny when Leftists like Ted Kaczinski and William Ayers bomb post offices and government buildings, the concern over their ‘rights’ is so prominent and apologetic, but comes a dissenter to federal tyranny – then we should kill them the same way we would ISIS foot soldiers on the battlefield.

The counsel, who was appointed last October and has not been named publicly, will identify cases being prosecuted at the state level that “could arguably meet the federal definition of domestic terrorism,” a Justice Department official said.

Which is what the Obama regime is also doing in terms of finding racism and police brutality in state cases, effectively nationalizing policing.  I like how the Counsel Obama has appointed is also a big secret and has not been named.  So much for redress of grievances and holding public officials engaged in any abuse of American citizens accountable.

That would give the department a direct role in more domestic extremism cases.

Again, Obama has nationalized the police forces in this country to do his bidding.

…The government shifted its focus to international terrorism after al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 Americans on Sept. 11, 2001.

Because 3000 American civilians were slaughtered by Muslims in an act of ‘workplace violence’ and Bush acted ‘stupidly’ by going to war against Muslim Jihadists according to the Obama regime.

But in recent years anti-government activists, like those who occupied a wildlife preserve in eastern Oregon last month, have regained prominence.

Because since 2009, just a couple months after Obama took office, his regime has been working tirelessly to declare Right Wing Conservative Christians as domestic terrorists.

rightwingextremists

As law enforcement experts confront domestic militia groups, “sovereign citizens” who do not recognize government authority, and other anti-government extremists

Yes.  Anyone who disagrees with Obama and the Ruling Class Oligarchy in Washington and their policies is now, according to all government documentation – an anti-government extremist.

If you oppose ObamaCare – you are an anti-government extremist.

If you oppose open borders – you are an anti-government extremist.

If you oppose Abortion – you are an anti-government extremist.

If you oppose homosexual marriage – you are an anti-government extremist.

If you oppose Obama’s rule by Executive Orders/Actions – you are an anti-government extremist.

If you oppose an activist judiciary – you are an anti-government extremist.

If you do not believe in Climate Change – you are an anti-government extremist.

If you oppose giving Iran nuclear weapons – you are an anti-government extremist.

If you do not think Islam is a religion of peace – you are an anti-government extremist.

If you oppose a worthless, treasonous Republican party leadership – you are an anti-government extremist.

If you consider the Democrat Party to be nothing but Marxists and Communists – you are an anti-government extremist.

If you support Ted Cruz, Donald Trump or Ben Carson for President, you are an anti-government extremist.

See how that works?  That is what the entire cabal in DC think of you if you hold any of the above opinions or beliefs.

…”A different standard is being applied to Muslims than to other people,” said Daryl Johnson, a former counterterrorism expert at the Department of Homeland Security

Oh boo-hoo-hoo!  Poor widdle Muslims, who are engaged in efforts to blow up civilians, fly planes into skyscrapers and behead infidels have a different standard being applied than ‘other people’.

…Domestic groups enjoy greater constitutional protections because being a member of those groups, no matter how extreme their rhetoric, is not a crime.

So Obama seeks to change that, and this article is helping to pave the way for that to happen.

Prosecutors can bring “material support” terrorism charges against defendants who aren’t linked to groups on the State Department’s list

So what that means is, if you have a subscription to a web site service, sent in funds to a discussion forum to offset bandwith charges, or belong to an online group that opposes anything government does – YOU CAN AND WILL BE CHARGED with ‘material support’ to domestic terrorists.  That is what the intent is of this effort is.

“These guys have every right to have off-center political views,” he said. “But when they made affirmative steps to blow up an actual federal facility… we thought it was an important place for us to go and prosecute.”

Oh really?  Like William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, who actually blew up federal facilities and killed people???  Like those kinds of people with ‘off center’ political views??

I didn’t think so.  They serve as celebrated advisors to Obama and hold Professorships at the University of Chicago.

“Off center political views” means everyone who doesn’t sport with and agree with the Federal government and Obama.

A genocide is coming and indeed is being prepared by this government against the citizens they consider political and domestic enemies.

3 Comments

Filed under Obama Marxist Tyranny

Obama Begins Imposing Defacto Sharia Law In the USA

Obama-Sharia

America is being colonized by our enemies at the hand of Obama and the Democrat Party who are imposing Sharia Law right under our noses.

Obama routinely criticizes Christians and the Christian faith, while at every opportunity he preaches the glories and benefits of Islam.   The Bitter Clingers he so despises should be prohibited and punished for criticizing Islam according to his own words. It is nothing new for Obama.  A year ago he used a Christian Prayer Breakfast to call for curbs on criticism of Islam.  This is a consistent trait with our first Islamic leader who pretended to be Christian in order to deceive the nation he intends to gift to the Caliphate as a slave state.

Yesterday His Heinous, wannabe Caliph Barrack has decreed at a radical Mosque that criticism of Muslims “has no place on our country”, as if by Dictatorial Decree he can simply abolish the inalienable right to free speech and religious exercise.  And while he is not yet able to simply say “so it shall be done” and make it so, Obama has instructed his regime to begin imposing one of the major tenets of Sharia Law which is to abolish any criticism of Islam and criminalize it.

Obama: Criticism of Muslim Americans “Has No Place In Our Country” 

…[Obama] lectured Americans – as always – on our own intolerance, the glories of Islam, and how if we just gaze longingly into his eyes, our souls will be set free of the baser matter surrounding them….Muslims account for only about 1 percent of the U.S. population but account for about half of terrorist attacks since 9/11. That means Muslims in the United States are about 5,000 percent more likely to commit terrorist attacks than non-Muslims.”But statistics are Islamophobic, so Obama merely ignored them. Instead, he focused on the “inexcusable political rhetoric against Muslim Americans that has no place in our country,” lamenting “the threats and harassment of Muslim Americans have surged.” No statistics, just anecdotal evidence, followed….Obama continued, “We have to be consistent in condemning hateful rhetoric and violence against everyone. And that includes against Muslims here in the United States of America.”

The First Amendment protects the freedom of speech no matter that Muslims consider any criticism of their religion as ‘hateful rhetoric’.  But that doesn’t matter to Obama, because Sharia Law trumps the Constitutional limits on government infringing on an inalienable right.

See, Obama is pushing what was introduced by his Attorney general Loretta Lynch back in December:

Loretta Lunch Vows to Prosecute Those Who Use “Anti-Muslim” Speech

The day after a horrific shooting spree by what appears to be a radicalized Muslim man and his partner in San Bernardino, California, Attorney General Loretta Lynch pledged to a Muslim advocacy and lobbying group that she would take aggressive action against anyone who used “anti-Muslim rhetoric” that “edges toward violence.”

…Lynch said her “greatest fear” is the “incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric” in America and vowed to prosecute any guilty of what she deemed violence-inspiring speech.

In the mind of Muslims, Obama and the Muslim Brotherhood members that dominate Obama’s Cabinet, any criticism of Islam or Muslims is automatically deemed an act of violence, because that is what Sharia Law dictates.  In fact, in an Islamic State, criticism of any aspect of Islam is an automatic death sentence.  In Dhimmitude states (slave states subjected to Islam) criticism of Islam by nonbelievers is mandated to be a criminal act. And of course, this is EXACTLY what Obama and the Democrat Party are imposing by fiat upon a nation being colonized into a Dhimmi state.

DEMOCRATS MOVE TO CRIMINALIZE CRITICISM OF ISLAM

House Resolution 569 condemns “violence, bigotry, and hateful rhetoric towards Muslims in the United States.”

 

And of course in keeping with Obama’s policy that if Congress does not do his bidding, he will act unilaterally on his own – he has instructed his Attorney General to implement a UN program that supplants local police forces with UN/Global police policies, of which all impose various aspects of Sharia law.  Now you know why Obama has used the Ferguson and Baltimore Riots as a pretext to put local police forces under the control of the Federal government.  Because this is all about the imposition of Dhimmitude upon a nation he hates and is in the process of destroying.

Did Obama’s ‘Strong Cities’ Initiative Put US Under Islamic Law?

Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced a new worldwide law enforcement initiative, the Strong Cities Network, to be set up in certain American cities. What this actually is is the UN plan for global police, using the Department of Justice. It’s the overriding of American law by the Obama administration in conjunction with the UN, without Congressional input.

What’s the initiative all about? Officially, it’s to prevent and combat “violent extremism in all of its forms” without linking it “with any particular religion, nationality or ethnic group.” The emphasis is on inclusiveness, collaboration, and non-discrimination. Although it doesn’t mention any specific religion, using the language of Obama-speak, its goal of “building social cohesion and resilience to violent extremism” actually means peacekeeping between Muslims and non-Muslims, “mostly by making sure that non-Muslims don’t complain too loudly about, much less work against, rapidly expanding Muslim populations and the Islamization of their communities,” according to Pamela Geller.

This is a reasonable interpretation. Instead of “building social cohesion,” the flood of Islamic refugees and immigrants are destroying social unity in Western nations; yet they’re being welcomed by governments despite public outcry. And the FBI recently sent out a bulletin to law enforcement warning of attacks against Muslims by “militia extremists,” even though there’s no proof of any imminent attacks. In DHS reports, we’ve also seen the Obama administration target conservatives such as Christians, gun-owners and pro-lifers as dangerous.

So Obama is being consistent: Islam good and wonderful – Christians are hateful bitter clingers and dangerous.  Everything must be done to make sure America is as vulnerable as he can make it, and criminalize those who dare point out the dangers of what Obama is doing and with whom he is empowering and protecting.

Couple what His Heinous said yesterday at the mosque and what his regime is imposing via all these ‘initiatives’ and policies that harass and target American Christian and Conservative groups with the following news that Obama has ordered immigration laws to be ignored and border agents to “stand down”, and clearly brethren SOMETHING WICKED THIS WAY COMES.  But we cannot say that for much longer if Obama gets away with what he is doing.

BORDER AGENTS ORDERED TO STAND DOWN, ‘MIGHT AS WELL ABOLISH IMMIGRATION LAWS’

In a shocking reversal of policy, U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents are being told to release illegal immigrants and no longer order them to appear at deportation hearings, essentially a license to stay in the United States, a key agent testified Thursday.

Obama reinstates ‘catch-and-release’ policy for illegal immigrants

The Obama administration has revived the maligned illegal immigrant “catch-and-release” policy of the Bush years, ordering Border Patrol agents not to even bother arresting and deporting many new illegal immigrants, the head of the agents’ labor union told Congress on Thursday.

Brandon Judd, president of the National Border Patrol Council, said Homeland Security was embarrassed by the number of illegal immigrants not showing up for their deportation hearings, but instead of cracking down on the immigrants, the department ordered agents not to arrest them in the first place — meaning they no longer need to show up in court in the first place.

Mr. Judd said the releases are part of President Obama’s “priorities” program, which says he’s only worried about illegal immigrants who came across after Jan. 1, 2014. Mr. Judd said illegal immigrants without serious criminal convictions on their record only have to claim they came before 2014 — without even needing to show proof — in order to be released without ever being arrested.

“Immigration laws today appear to be mere suggestions,” Mr. Judd testified to the House Judiciary Committee’s immigration subcommittee. “That fact is well known in other countries.”

2 Comments

Filed under Illegal Insurgency, Obama Marxist Tyranny, War On Jihadists

Understanding The Islamic Caliphate

sharia in texas

ISIS, Al Qaeda, Al Nusra, The Muslim Brotherood, they among many groups are working to implement the same exact thing: An Islamic Reich that will rule the world.

The news media fawns and hails Obama a Hero of Religious liberty because His Heinous has publicly visited one of the most radical Mosques in the country today and denounced Christian Americans for having a “Distorted impression of Muslims”.

Not so you insufferable Taqiyya-spouting Trojan Horse of an Occupier of the White House.

Some of us are able to judge the fruits of Islam’s push to create a Caliphate, and what its’ followers do once they exist in numbers in any society.

ShariaRape

Some of us understand that nearly every single terror attack in the last 20 years was committed by Muslims in the cause of Caliphate.

boston-bombingWTC-9-11

Some of us understand what the Muslim world is attempting to create, regardless of sect, group or Jihadist affiliation.  Some of us understand what Sharia under a Caliphate is, and what happens to anyone and everyone affected by it.

Islamrape victim

Most in the West have a modest understanding that Hitler’s Nazi regime and Stalin’s Communist Empire were hell-bent on conquering the world for their totalitarian dream state and installed horrors and holocausts on the peoples they ruled and conquered.

Most do not understand that Jihadist Islam seeks to do the same; conquer the world under the black flag of Islam and install horrors and holocausts on the peoples they rule and conquer under the Islamic Caliphate.

We are already watching what they are doing in their post-migration invasion of Europe.

So here’s an easy-to-read lesson by Daniel Greenfield at the Sultan Knish blog about what the Caliphate was, what a Caliphate is, why all these Jihad groups are working for that end, and what it will mean for everyone in the world.

Because establishing a Caliphate is every single Muslim’s goal to achieve on earth. It’s the main tenet of the Islamic faith: to conquer by the sword and subjugate all people on earth.

StagesforCaliphate

Understanding the Caliphate Curve

Daniel Greenfield – The Sultan Knish Blog

A report by the Tony Blair Faith Foundation found that the Syrian rebels were mostly Islamic Jihadists and that even if ISIS were defeated there were 15 other groups sharing its worldview that were ready to take its place.

And that’s just in Syria. 

The official ISIS story, the one that we read in the newspapers, watch on television and hear on the radio, is that it’s a unique group whose brand of extremism is so extreme that there is no comparing it to anything else. ISIS has nothing to do with Islam. Or with anything else. It’s a complete aberration.

Except for the 15 other Jihadist groups ready to step into its shoes in just one country.

Islamic Supremacist organizations like ISIS can be graded on the “Caliphate curve”. The Caliphate curve is based on how quickly an Islamic organization wants to achieve the Caliphate. What we describe as “extreme” or “moderate” is really the speed at which an Islamic group seeks to recreate the Caliphate.

ISIS is at the extreme end of the scale, not because it tortures, kills and rapes, but because it implemented the Caliphate immediately. The atrocities for which ISIS has become known are typical of a functioning Caliphate. The execution of Muslims who do not submit to the Caliph, the ethnic cleansing and sexual slavery of non-Muslims are not aberrations. They are normal behavior for a Caliphate.

The last Caliphate, the Ottoman Empire, was selling non-Muslim girls as sex slaves after the invention of the telephone. A New York Times report from 1886 documented the sale of girls as young as twelve, one of them with “light hazel eyes, black eyebrows and long yellow hair”. An earlier report from the London Post described Turks, “sending their blacks to market, in order to make room for a newly-purchased white girl”. This behavior is not a temporary aberration, but dates back to Mohammed’s men raping and enslaving non-Muslim women and young girls as a reward for fighting to spread Islam.

The ISIS behaviors that we find so shocking were widely practiced in even the most civilized parts of the Muslim world around the time that the Statue of Liberty was being dedicated in New York City.

To Muslims, the end of slavery is one of the humiliations that they had to endure because of the loss of the Caliphate. Europeans forced an end to the slave trade. The British made the Turks give up their slaves. The United States made the Saudis give up their slaves in the 1960s. (Unofficially they still exist.) When the Muslim Brotherhood took over Egypt, its Islamist constitution dropped a ban on slavery.

The Muslim Brotherhood is on the moderate side of the Caliphate curve not because it doesn’t want to bring back the Caliphate, it does, or because it doesn’t want to subjugate non-Muslims, it does, but because it wants to do so gradually over an extended period of time using modern political methods.

But whether you take the long road along the Caliphate curve or the short one it still ends up in the same place. Everyone on the Caliphate curve agrees that the world, including the United States, must be ruled by Muslims under Islamic law and that freedom and equal rights for all must come to an end.

ISIS is just doing right now what the Muslim Brotherhood would take a hundred years to accomplish.

We are not at war with ISIS. We are at war with everyone on the Caliphate curve. Not because we choose to be, but because like Hitler’s Thousand Year Reich or Communism’s vision of one world under the red flag, the Caliphate is a plan for imposing a totalitarian system on us to deprive us of our rights.

The Nazis and the Communists had a vision for the world. So do the Islamic Supremacists who advocate the restoration of the Caliphate. All three groups occasionally played the victim of our foreign policy, but they were not responding to us, they were trying to bring about their positive vision of an ideal society.

Nazi, Communist and Islamist societies just happen to be living nightmares for the rest of us.

No one on the Caliphate curve is moderate. Some on the Caliphate curve are just more patient. They put up billboards, create hashtags and try to ban any criticism of their ideology as Islamophobic. But that’s just Caliphatism with a human face. And that makes them a much more dangerous enemy.

ISIS is in some ways our least dangerous enemy. We haven’t defeated ISIS, because we haven’t even tried. Instead Obama fights a war in which 75 percent of strikes on ISIS are blocked and leaflets are dropped 45 minutes before a strike on oil tankers warning ISIS to flee. If we were to fight ISIS by the same rules as our wars in the last century, the Islamic State would have been crushed long ago.

A insta-Caliphate like ISIS isn’t hard to beat. The global networks of Al Qaeda employing more conventional terror tactics are a trickier force because they are embedded within the stream of Muslim migration. And the Muslim Brotherhood is the trickiest of them all because it is so deeply embedded within Muslim populations in the West that it represents and controls those populations.

What ISIS accomplishes by brute force, the Muslim Brotherhood does by setting up networks of front groups. Both ISIS and the Brotherhood control large Muslim populations. ISIS conquers populations in failed states. The Muslim Brotherhood however exercises control over populations in the cities of the West. We could bomb Raqqa, but can we bomb Dearborn, Jersey City or Irvine?

This is where the Caliphate curve truly reaches its most terrifying potential.

The original Islamic expansionism was so devastating not because it managed to seize control over the hinterlands of Arabia, but because it conquered and subjugated civilized cities such as Alexandria, Constantinople, Jerusalem, Athens and Delhi. ISIS envisions repeating these conquests and more, but if it succeeds it will not be because of its military strategy, but because it targets have been colonized.

We can destroy ISIS tomorrow, but we will still be in an extended war with a hundred other groups who all have a vision for restoring the Caliphate. This war will never end until we crush their supremacist agenda by demonstrating that we will never again allow such a horror to exist on this earth. As long as Muslim groups hold out hope for a restoration of the Caliphate this war, in its various forms, will go on.

We are not at war with an organization, but with the idea that Muslims are superior to non-Muslims and are endowed by Allah with the right to rule over them, to rob them, to rape them and enslave them. ISIS is the most naked expression of this idea. But it’s an idea that everyone on the Caliphate curve accepts.

Until we defeat this racist idea, new Islamic groups will constantly keep arising animated by this vision. Wars fueled by supremacist beliefs have historically only ended when the illusion of superiority was destroyed by utterly defeating and humiliating the attackers. It worked with Japan and Nazi Germany.

Our war now will not end until we destroy the supremacist faith in the Caliphate curve.

4 Comments

Filed under War On Jihadists

Denial And Normalcy Bias In The Face Of Tyranny

LaVoy FInnicum

Lavoy Finnicum’s shooting death has fostered an argument among self-described Patiots over whether or not he had it coming and deserved it, or if it is just another example of a totalitarian state we are comfortable with.

I’m reading it all over the place on Conservative discussion forums and blogs: the argument whether the ambush and shooting death of Lavoy Finnicum and the arrest of Ammon Bundy and the other protestors in Oregon was justified. The arguments are downright vicious and threatening of themselves and they reveal several things about the situation in America that does not bode well for Liberty and private property to exist much longer in a nation that has grown comfortable with tyranny.

As an observation, I find it interesting that there was no division among the Democrat Left over the actions of Michael Brown, Black Lives Matter, The New Black Panthers or Occupy Wall Street protesters who actually engaged in acts of criminality, mayhem, intimidation, death and destruction.  Instead they were in lock-step support of those groups and actions, whose leaders were all invited to the White House for pow-wows with Obama and given legitimacy by the media and a vast expanse of the populace.

No such unanimous support is found among a vast expanse of the ideological “Right” or the Patriot movement over the Bundy’s efforts to stand against federal tyranny over private property rights.  Not saying there should be, but I do find it interesting that the domestic enemies of the Constitution and republicanism are not divided over their banner men.  Conservatives, not so much.

Rather than getting into semantics over actions Finnicum made in his final moments, I want to share a larger point I made about why there was even a protest against the Federal Beast in Oregon to begin with.  That point is this: NONE of this would have ever happened had the Federal Beast been adhering to it’s limits within the bounds of the Constitution. A rancher family would not be imprisoned for doing what was necessary on their own land to protect their home from a lighting fire.

Sadly, few wanted to discuss that, and those that did sound no different than the politicians in D.C. that have empowered tyranny to become a staple that the American people are now comfortable with.

We are witnessing just more of what Jefferson wrote when he penned in the Declaration all experience has shown that men are disposed to suffer evil, while evils are sufferable rather than abolish the forms to which they have become accustomed.

In response to a statement that declared Finnicum’s actions mistakes that justified his execution, I made the point that when a tyrannical government no longer has any legitimate moral authority and is busy imposing tyranny and arresting and executing citizens it declares terrorists – at what point should we realize that it is better to die fighting than begging on our knees for mercy from a despotic beast?

Why do we refuse to recognize tyranny at the hand of the Beast in Washington?

That was when the scourge of Normalcy Bias and Denial revealed how entrenched it is in the minds of those we assume are on ‘our side’.

The reply was that Finnicum was completely wrong on every count of his actions that resulted in his shooting death.  It is wrong they said, to evade a roadblock, no matter the circumstance.  No matter who it is in uniform, or why they are there – one must always comply with the directives given.

So I asked in an analogy, that if this was 1774 would we be writing that the Colonists at Lexington Green acted completely wrong? That they should have never been on the Common and never assembled in formation against the British Regulars after that first command from Pitcairn to disarm and disperse? That they should have NEVER fired that first shot at a superior British force and NEVER should have resisted when the British regulars charged with bayonets and skewered John Parkers men?

I stated I was curious as we denounce those who actually stood in defiance of tyranny as being stupid. Had the Colonists lost Concord, I am sure the historical analysis would be about the same as it is being levied against Bundy and Finicum right now.

The fact they stood at all should be of primary importance to consider, rather than the tactical error they may have made leaving the refuge in the first place. At some point we have to resist, because the longer it takes for us to do so, the less chance we have to preserve what liberty we have left, and eventually our own lives.

Evading ambushes are not grounds for surrender either as some suggest.

The fact is, much of the Revolutionary War was a series of ambushes set up by the Redcoats, and there are myriad examples during the War of Independence of Washington’s miraculous escapes from one set of ambushes after another.

At some point, we have to begin wrapping our minds around the fact that the State is imposing despotism upon us. We are being ambushed every day by the cabal in DC: laws passed in the middle of the night in thousand-page bills that not a single representative has read that abolish by fiat your inalienable rights under mountains of regulatory control over every aspect of your life and property.

Do we surrender to it, or resist it?

Because that is where we have arrived, whether we would admit it or not. Resistance or acceptance.

Good men doing nothing in the face of evil and tyranny has come about as the result of denying we even suffer those things. At least those folks in Oregon made an effort, and the policies of tyranny being imposed by the Fedzilla in Washington has a few more folks aware of what is being done with impunity to the folks who raise your steaks and hamburgers.

Let’s not kill the reason there was an armed protest in Oregon to begin with, by declaring what they did as stupid and foolish. Because if we do, any just cause to resist what is being systematically done to us will perish before it is ever born. And that is EXACTLY what Mordor on the Potomac wants to make sure of.

The reply I received to that argument is what prompted me to discuss it here on this blog.  I was told that this was not Lexington and it is not 1776, that the Colonists did not have a Constitution to protect them, and we do.  They went on to make the following points which almost completely ignore the tyranny we currently are comfortable with:

We do not have federal troops quartered in out houses. 

No. We have a surveillance Police State where every movement we make and every transaction and correspondence we partake in, is collected by the government for unspecified purposes under the guise of ‘security’. We cannot use our own property without permission from the State and nearly every activity we engage in is regulated and requires license.

We have representation from the politicians and people we elect to office. 

Really?   The last 10 years more than illustrate the fact that we do not have any representation in DC.  Because the moment we send someone we think will serve our interests and UNDO dictatorial and Unconstitutional infringements on our Rights and the Rule of Law, they are corrupted by the Ruling Class into supporting their Statist Agenda and empowering the Beast even further.

We do not have a King.

Tell that to Obama, the Democrats, the Judiciary and the GOP leadership that allow him to act like a king with impunity.

and we have a Judicial System, and a Constitution, and a Bill of rights.

Meaningless and ineffective against the velvet coup that usurped them all. Lawlessness has not been rectified or stopped. We have nothing to show for turning the House and Senate over to those who promised to stop this fundamental Marxist transformation of the country, except that the very people and party we empowered, handed a defacto dictatorship over to the Federal Beast on a silver platter, and those of us screaming about it have been held in contempt by the same.

Our recourse has been limited to voting for Establishment cronies, and those with eyes to see are about to discover just how much our redress of grievances has been eliminated in the coming months given all the hints and clues coming out of the mouths of the Ruling Class.

The colonists had none of those things.

No. They had a religious and moral foundation with an innate understanding of where their natural born rights came from and recognized that as soon as the king sets himself up above the Moral Law, he ceased to have any legitimacy and unkinged himself in the tyrant, upon which they had a duty to resist and throw off. We have none of those things today.

I can appreciate the wishful thinking that so many continue to insist on in terms of where we are as a Constitutional Republic and what is left of our rights.

I no longer share those views.

The evidence each day is overwhelming that the very institutions they think safeguard our God-given rights, are corrupted beyond redemption, repair or restoration. The rot is to the core. The institutions cited as proofs there is no tyranny, exist to serve the State, not the individual; serve a Fascist gravy train, not independent Capitalists.

Their faith in the courts is as misplaced as those who assert electing the next politician is going to save us.  Obama and the Democrats did not spend the last decade stacking the courts with Marxist/Maoist/Leftist Radicals by mistake or accident. And those are LIFETIME appointments, most of them.

Lavoy is just one more in a litany of victims of a tyrannical state that with each day is growing to the point it will by necessity consume absolutely everything in order to sustain itself and will not tolerate any dissent or allegiance to anything but itself.

What is disconcerting to me, is that on many of the same fora that complain that no one is doing anything to try and stop the tyranny being imposed upon We The People by the Ruling Class Oligarchs in DC, are the same that castigate and denounce the minute few who actually do.

It seems Denial and Normalcy Bias has neutered the Patriot movement itself regarding whether or not absolute despotism is being imposed against what remains of liberty in this country.

And no wonder.  A people who no longer recognize sin and evil, are not a people who will recognize tyranny and despotism either.

 

4 Comments

Filed under Obama Marxist Tyranny

Now We Know The Reason The GOP Establishment Is “Warming Up” To Trump

TrumpDealer

Trump says he will work with Leftist Democrats, will make ‘great deals’ with them.

One of the reasons why outsiders have been polling well in this cycle is because the electorate is pissed-off and sick and tired of the GOP Party Establishment making ‘deals’ with Obama and the Democrats and handing them their entire agenda to send the country off-the-cliff into Marxist Socialism with wide-open borders to the third world.

Along comes Trump – who talked the talk of someone who would fight back and do the very things our so-called representatives have refused to do: STOP and undo the Leftist/Marxist/Islamist Agenda that Obama and the Democrats have imposed on the country.

Then the Ruling Class and their apparatchiks in the Establishment Media went on a massive blitzkrieg to destroy Trump, doing everything from suggesting he was a criminal to a wannabe Hitler.  It is why it was baffling that these same Establishment types have suddenly done an about-face and publicly said in the last week they can ‘work with Trump’.

Now we know why.

For those of us scratching our heads as to how and why the GOP Party Establishment would suddenly do an about-face and embrace Trump, The Donald goes ahead and lets us all know the actual reason why:

 

There you have it.  He will work with the Democrats, just like McConnell, McCain, Graham, Boehner, Ryan and the rest of the Establishment have said they would do, and did.

In fact Trump said yesterday that the GOP Establishment “Likes me more than nasty guy Ted Cruz”.  How and why is that suddenly a PLUS for a guy who originally fashioned himself as an opponent of the GOP Establishment and won the YUUUGE following he has garnered??

Making America great again?  No.  Trump will do no such thing if the ‘art of the deal’ is what he thinks the Presidency is all about.  Making deals to ‘get along’ is what got us into this mess in the first place Mr. Trump.

‘Working with’ the very people and party that have destroyed the country is exactly what the GOP Establishment has already done.  Why make deals with Leftists and the very inside cabal that his mobs of followers think he is going to defy?  What sense does that make?  Does Trump not understand the fact that the Left NEVER compromises their Agenda, NEVER surrenders any ground and ALWAYS requires our sides’ capitulation for any ‘deal’ to be struck??

Will Trump ‘make deals’ and work with with ISIS, Al Qaeda and Iran for the sake of ‘getting along’?  His recent spate of comments in the last few days is not comforting and raises MAJOR red flags. Apparently, getting a deal and getting along is more important than standing on fundamental principles according to The Donald.

Must be more of those ‘New York Values” he fancies.  You know, the kind that made avowed Communist Bill DeBlasio the Mayor of New York.

I don’t think the desperate mobs of people supporting Trump are listening to what he is actually saying beyond entertainment sloganeering.  Trump said on 60 Minutes, he was going to replace ObamaCare with UNIVERSAL – SINGLE PAYER health care.

Donald Trump said that “Obamacare is a disaster” and that he plans to repeal it and replace it with a government-funded universal healthcare plan.

Government-funded ‘universal healthcare’??????????????

Forget the ‘bone’ he threw about ‘private plans’ and ‘negotiating with different companies’ because a government-funded single payer healthcare system cannot, and will not permit a free-market system competing with the government and the cronies who are going to be making bank in such a system.

No WONDER the Establishment Ruling Class is suddenly embracing Trump!  That proposal is the very Soviet system that ObamaCare was designed to usher-in after it destroyed the health insurance industry.  Trump is simply going to hand Obama, Pelosi and Schumer the gift that the Fabian Socialists have intended to do for 100 years, that even Obama himself couldn’t do right away.

Trump will ‘make a deal’ and hand them what they have wanted as their brass ring in a single swoop.

And not a wrinkle of concern from his supporter base.

Of course Trump knows the mob he leads, and he, himself said – he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose a single supporter. Joke or not, there is truth to that statement.

But what if Trump shoots the very reason why he garnered so much support in the first place?  It remains to be seen whether his supporters are just a seig-heiling mob that want him as a political messiah, or whether or not they actually give a crap about the issues Trump says he was going to “fix”.

Alarmingly, there is a pattern to Trumps statements that should garner concern.  Trump keeps talking about making deals as President, as if the Executive branch exists for the sole purpose of making deals instead of executing the Laws of the Land and upholding the Constitution, which is NOT NEGOTIABLE.  Trump may very well think the Constitution negotiable if getting a ‘deal’ ‘trumps’ standing on the very foundational principles that made America what it once was.

The Donald cannot make America ‘great again’ with a mindset like that.  For a President we need a faithful Administrator not a Monty Hall gameshow host.

 

Trump: I’ll Work With Democrats

Tuesday, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said if he were president, he would work with  Democrats including House Minority Leader Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY).

…“Well, I think that I’m going to be able to get along with Pelosi. I think I’m going to be able to — I’ve always had a great relationship with Nancy Pelosi, I’ve never had a problem.” Trump said.

…Hey, look, I think I’d be able to get along well with Schumer, Chuck Schumer. I was always very good with Schumer. I was close to Schumer in many ways. And it’s important to get along. It’s wonderful to say you’re a maverick and you’re going to stand up and close up the country, and all other things, but you have to get somebody to go along with you.

1 Comment

Filed under Media Bias, Politics

The Harbingers That Scream America’s Days Are Numbered

DoomProtests

Open borders, promotion of state totalitarianism, acceptance of Communism, a negative replacement birthrate, and a blind eye to Islam have sealed our fate.

Let me just say it: America is toast.  As is Western Civilization itself.

It’s committed suicide.  Just as every single Republic and Democracy that has come before ours has done.  What remains is a fragile shell that keeps up an appearance of strength and stability.   It masks the rot that has hollowed out the foundations and guts of a nation and people.  As a result: a perverse and wicked people denounce what was once foundational and celebrate what is anathema to our foundations;   institutional corruption exists at all levels of society;  an oppressive government is empowered under false promises to restore what once was.

We are witnessing the collapse of the civil society.

Our leaders have already abandoned the Constitution and replaced it with a defacto federal dictatorship.  Faith in the institutions that maintained liberty are now abandoned as corruption has eviscerated them of legitimacy.

We are about to discover just how thin the veneer of this shell of civilization really is.  Anarchy is being sown in the streets.   Violence at the hands of cherished ‘minorities’ are ignored by the media, while the targeted races and religions are shamed into silence and capitulation of ideas hostile to their own existence.  Seeds of genocide are being planted.  A Christian culture and civilization that created an unparalleled time of prosperity, education, wealth and relative stability in a hostile world, has been abandoned and is being abolished.  It is being dismantled.   What is being erected to replace it will be remembered as a time of horror unlike any ever recorded in human history.  Scripture tells us that if God does not intervene in this near future ahead of us – no flesh, no person, no living thing would survive (Matthew 24:21-22).

The self-loathing liberal Socialism/Marxist political religion that makes up a majority of the body politick in the West, including America have enslaved themselves to meddlesome utopian totalitarian statism to provide all their desires at the expense of liberty without a shred of responsibility.  At the same time, they have made themselves wholly ignorant, impotent and helpless in the face of a rising beast in the world.  A Beast whose armies of barbarians have already invaded their lands by invitation of their blind leaders who seek dependents to their welfare states for permanent political power.  Barbarians that their people willfully ignore and lie to themselves about because Political Correctness is the only ‘truth’ they believe in.

America and the West are literally walking to their own slaughter and demise.  Few however, believe that and most assume via false bravado that somehow Americans will rise up and do what is necessary to restore liberty.

They are dead wrong.

There are several harbingers that reveal the experiment in Constitutional liberty has already failed.

First, and most notable: the majority of this people cannot even agree on what the definition of liberty itself is.  The biblical principles that established the concept of liberty as the Founders intended, are no longer understood or accepted by a people that have abandoned the faith of their forbears.   Freedom today simply means one gets to do whatever one wants, at the expense of someone else.  Americans no longer have a common foundation that established our culture, and have been indoctrinated to LOATHE their culture, race and religious history.

Second: an exponentially growing number of the populace sees nothing wrong with Communism, applauds totalitarianism and hates the very engine of freedom and liberty in terms of wealth, success, private property and Capitalism.

The plain truth is that America could have survived a Marxist, Jihad-arming despot like Obama.  But America cannot survive the millions of our populace that made him their king and embrace a totalitarian ideology he has made policy by virtual decree. Freedom of religion, speech and press are things that a near-majority in colleges and high schools across the country want regulated or abolished.

According to Pew Research Center, 40 percent of Americans aged 18-34 are in favor of government censorship of speech that they say is “offensive to minority groups.”  1st Amendment?  They see no need for it.  They ridicule those who cite it, if their beliefs are in contradiction to theirs.

In such an environment, telling the truth about Islam, crime and black ghetto thugs, or Open Border Immigration or Barrack Hussein Obama – is not only ignored and disregarded, they desire to empower government to forbid, ban and regulate such ‘speech’ itself if it opposes or contradicts their indoctrinated worldview.  They want their ‘safe space’ from even knowing opposing views exist.   George Orwell would be surprised at how quickly and intently his literary warning about totalitarianism has advanced in the once-free Republic that is falling before your eyes.

End WhitePrivilege

America’s First Amendment ‘Obsession’ Is ‘Expression Of White Supremacy’

According to a columnist for the Duke University student newspaper, America’s “obsession with the First Amendment” is really just “an expression of white supremacy.”

“I am thinking about how an urgent and overdue conversation about racism—on our campus and across our country — has been derailed by a diversionary and duplicitous obsession with the First Amendment,” graduate student Bennett Carpenter wrote in university newspaper The Chronicle. “I am thinking about how quickly the conversation has shifted from white supremacy to white fragility — and how this shift is itself an expression of white supremacy.”

Apparently unaware of the irony of using a newspaper column to call for restrictions on free speech, Carpenter argued that Americans give too much deference to the First Amendment and should focus more on censoring violent speech.

“Words hurt as much as actions; indeed, words are actions,” he declared. “Within the context of white supremacy, any distinction between a defaced poster, a racist pamphlet and legal or extralegal murder can be only of degree.”

Ari Cohn, a lawyer with the Foundation for Individual Rights In Education, first noticed the article, which ran on Tuesday with the title “Free speech, Black lives and white fragility.”

 

Did you comprehend the real intent behind Carpenter’s view of Amerika?  Free speech is only okay so long as you don’t say anything he disagrees with because in so doing, if you are white, you commit the equivalent of ‘murder’.  He has just suggested empowering government to criminalize speech and belief he and the Left disagree with.

It is interesting that Bennett Carpenter and his tutors have volunterred themselves to be the ones to decide for us untermench what the changing definition of violent speech shall be.  You can read and hear it nearly every day now.  ‘White privilege’, ‘The 1%’ and the other assorted garbage coming out of the mouths of these Red Diaper babies are the harbingers of a genocide they are already in bloodlust for.  How can a people co-exist in a society where your very beliefs and skin color are grounds for punishment?

You can’t.

Those who intend you harm will tell you what they intend to do if you’ll just listen to them.  And they are telling us.  LOUDLY.

Statists like Carpenter, have been groomed to support a totalitarian state by the very colleges and school systems you paid huge sums to indoctrinate America’s kids. And, as if a phase 1 of an insidious plot were being finalized – I realize such people who applaud this Leftist totalitarianism will be the very same people who will embrace the Islamic top-down totalitarianism once it begins to assert itself over a population.

Nature abhors a vacuum.  As Christianity shrunk, Secular Hedonism and Statism rapidly replaced the bulwarks of Western Civilization.  As the rot spreads and the thin shell of  our institutions themselves collapse resulting in another vacuum,  another totalitarian top-down system is already in-place to fill it.  But that system has a zealous tyrannical religious core that the current one does not.

syrian refugees

Third:  A Negative Replacement Birthrate combined with massive Alien Immigration without assimilation into a distinctive American culture guarantees we will be either bred out of existence or conquered by sheer numbers from within.

Think that impossible?  How many of you cannot find jobs because you cannot speak Spanish?  How many items do you now buy whose labels are bi-lingual?  Why is preference given to non-citizens from Mexico and South America and now “Syrian refugees” over those of us Americans born here?

These are similar questions Europeans were asking themselves 20 years ago in regards to migrants from Muslim nations in Africa and the Middle East that were put into their welfare programs.

This final harbinger is already producing bitter fruit that is tangible to anyone willing to see the truth without running to their ‘safe space’.

Let’s look at this very harbinger unfolding across Europe.  You will conclude the same thing I did – it’s formerly Christian Secular people have committed self-extinction.  Not only because they have embraced Communistic governing systems, but mainly because they have a shrinking birthrate while at the same time  they have surrendered their cultures to an invasion of hostile migrants put into welfare who have no desire to assimilate, but dominate.

Simple math lays out the fact that Europe has already become Eurabia.

We have allowed our own posterity to be indoctrinated into a hostility of the very rights, freedoms and liberties that made America, AND we have imported by the tens and tens of millions – those spiritually, mentally and physically hostile to the same.

These harbingers scream at us that America’s days are truly numbered.

It’s Still the Demography, Stupid

Mark Steyn

Most people reading this have strong stomachs, so let me lay it out as baldly as I can: Much of what we loosely call the Western world will not survive this century, and much of it will effectively disappear within our lifetimes, including many if not most Western European countries. There’ll probably still be a geographical area on the map marked as Italy or the Netherlands–probably–just as in Istanbul there’s still a building called St. Sophia’s Cathedral. But it’s not a cathedral; it’s merely a designation for a piece of real estate. Likewise, Italy and the Netherlands will merely be designations for real estate. The challenge for those who reckon Western civilization is on balance better than the alternatives is to figure out a way to save at least some parts of the West.

The argument was straightforward. The western world is going out of business because it’s given up having babies. The 20th century welfare state, with its hitherto unknown concepts such as spending a third of your adult lifetime in “retirement”, is premised on the basis that there will be enough new citizens to support the old. But there won’t be. Lazy critics of my thesis thought that I was making a “prediction”, and that my predictions were no more reliable than Al Gore’s or Michael Mann’s on the looming eco-apocalypse. I tried to explain that it’s not really a prediction at all:

When it comes to forecasting the future, the birthrate is the nearest thing to hard numbers. If only a million babies are born in 2006, it’s hard to have two million adults enter the workforce in 2026 (or 2033, or 2037, or whenever they get around to finishing their Anger Management and Queer Studies degrees). And the hard data on babies around the Western world is that they’re running out a lot faster than the oil is. “Replacement” fertility rate–i.e., the number you need for merely a stable population, not getting any bigger, not getting any smaller–is 2.1 babies per woman. Some countries are well above that: the global fertility leader, Somalia, is 6.91, Niger 6.83, Afghanistan 6.78, Yemen 6.75. Notice what those nations have in common?

Scroll way down to the bottom of the Hot One Hundred top breeders and you’ll eventually find the United States, hovering just at replacement rate with 2.07 births per woman. Ireland is 1.87, New Zealand 1.79, Australia 1.76. But Canada’s fertility rate is down to 1.5, well below replacement rate; Germany and Austria are at 1.3, the brink of the death spiral; Russia and Italy are at 1.2; Spain 1.1, about half replacement rate. That’s to say, Spain’s population is halving every generation. By 2050, Italy’s population will have fallen by 22%.

Enter Islam, which sportingly volunteered to be the children we couldn’t be bothered having ourselves, and which kind offer was somewhat carelessly taken up by the post-Christian west. As I wrote a decade ago:

The design flaw of the secular social-democratic state is that it requires a religious-society birthrate to sustain it. Post-Christian hyperrationalism is, in the objective sense, a lot less rational than Catholicism or Mormonism. Indeed, in its reliance on immigration to ensure its future, the European Union has adopted a 21st-century variation on the strategy of the Shakers, who were forbidden from reproducing and thus could increase their numbers only by conversion.

That didn’t work out too great for the Shakers, but the Europeans figured it would be a piece of cake for them: “westernization” is so seductive, so appealing that, notwithstanding the occasional frothing imam and burka-bagged crone, their young Muslims would fall for the siren song of secular progressivism just like they themselves had. So, as long as you kept the immigrants coming, there would be no problem – as long as you oomphed up the scale of the solution. As I put it:

To avoid collapse, European nations will need to take in immigrants at a rate no stable society has ever attempted.

Last year, Angela Merkel decided to attempt it. The German Chancellor cut to the chase and imported in twelve months 1.1 million Muslim “refugees”. That doesn’t sound an awful lot out of 80 million Germans, but, in fact, the 1.1 million Muslim are overwhelmingly (80 per cent plus) fit, virile, young men. Germany has fewer than ten million people in the same population cohort, among whom Muslims are already over-represented: the median age of Germans as a whole is 46, the median age of German Muslims is 34. But let’s keep the numbers simple, and assume that of those ten million young Germans half of them are ethnic German males. Frau Merkel is still planning to bring in another million “refugees” this year. So by the end of 2016 she will have imported a population equivalent to 40 per cent of Germany’s existing young male cohort. The future is here now: It’s not about “predictions”.

On standard patterns of “family reunification”, these two million “refugees” will eventually bring another four or five persons each from their native lands – or another eight-to-ten million. In the meantime, they have the needs of all young lads, and no one around to gratify them except the local womenfolk. Hence, New Year’s Eve in Cologne, and across the southern border the Vienna police chief warning women not to go out unaccompanied, and across the northern border:

Danish nightclubs demand guests have to speak Danish, English or German to be allowed in after ‘foreign men in groups’ attack female revellers

But don’t worry, it won’t be a problem for long: On the German and Swedish “migrant” numbers, there won’t be a lot of “female revelry” in Europe’s future. The formerly firebreathing feminists at The Guardian and the BBC are already falling as mute as battered wives – saying nothing, looking away, making excuses, clutching at rationalizations… Ten years ago, I wrote:

The problem is that secondary-impulse societies mistake their weaknesses for strengths–or, at any rate, virtues–and that’s why they’re proving so feeble at dealing with a primal force like Islam.

“Multiculturalism” was less an immigration policy than an advertisement of our moral virtue. So the really bad thing about New Year’s Eve is not that Continental women got groped and raped by coarse backward “migrants”, but that all these gropes and rapes might provoke the even more coarse and backward natives. I did all the gags a decade ago:

The old definition of a nanosecond was the gap between the traffic light changing in New York and the first honk from a car behind. The new definition is the gap between a terrorist bombing and the press release from an Islamic lobby group warning of a backlash against Muslims.

And so it goes ten years on. We’re beyond parody now. A decade back, I noted:

Then September 11 happened. And bizarrely the reaction of just about every prominent Western leader was to visit a mosque: President Bush did, the prince of Wales did, the prime minister of the United Kingdom did, the prime minister of Canada did . . . The premier of Ontario didn’t, and so 20 Muslim community leaders had a big summit to denounce him for failing to visit a mosque… But for whatever reason he couldn’t fit it into his hectic schedule. Ontario’s citizenship minister did show up at a mosque, but the imams took that as a great insult, like the Queen sending Fergie to open the Commonwealth Games.

Nobody makes that mistake these days. Six Canadians working for a Quebec Catholic humanitarian organization repairing schoolrooms in Burkina Faso get slaughtered by Muslim terrorists, and the Prince Minister skedaddles to a mosque run by a woman-hating loon to hold the moment of silence.

Like I said, I did all the jokes way back when, and it’s not so funny after ten years. My thesis was straightforward: a semi-Muslim France will not be France; it will be something other, and – if you happen to value things like freedom of speech and women’s rights – it will be something worse:

Can a society become increasingly Islamic in its demographic character without becoming increasingly Islamic in its political character?

This ought to be the left’s issue. I’m a conservative–I’m not entirely on board with the Islamist program when it comes to beheading sodomites and so on, but I agree Britney Spears dresses like a slut: I’m with Mullah Omar on that one. Why then, if your big thing is feminism or abortion or gay marriage, are you so certain that the cult of tolerance will prevail once the biggest demographic in your society is cheerfully intolerant? Who, after all, are going to be the first victims of the West’s collapsed birthrates?

And so it goes, on the streets of the most “liberal” “progressive” cities on the planet.

A few weeks before The Wall Street Journal published my piece, I discussed its themes at an event in New York whose speakers included Douglas Murray. Douglas was more optimistic: He suggested that Muslim populations in Europe were still small, and immigration policy could be changed: Easier said than done. My essay and book were so influential that in the decade since, the rate of Islamization in the west has increased – via all three principal methods: Muslim immigration, Muslim birthrates of those already here, Muslim conversion of the infidels. David Goldman thinks aging, childless Germany has embraced civilizational suicide as redemption for their blood-soaked sins. Maybe. But it is less clear why the Continent’s less tainted polities – impeccably “neutral” Sweden, for example – are so eager to join them. As I wrote:

Permanence is the illusion of every age. In 1913, no one thought the Russian, Austrian, German and Turkish empires would be gone within half a decade. Seventy years on, all those fellows who dismissed Reagan as an “amiable dunce” (in Clark Clifford’s phrase) assured us the Soviet Union was likewise here to stay. The CIA analysts’ position was that East Germany was the ninth biggest economic power in the world. In 1987 there was no rash of experts predicting the imminent fall of the Berlin Wall, the Warsaw Pact and the USSR itself.

Somewhere, deep down, the European political class understands that the Great Migrations have accelerated the future I outlined way back when:

Can these trends continue for another 30 years without having consequences? Europe by the end of this century will be a continent after the neutron bomb: The grand buildings will still be standing, but the people who built them will be gone. We are living through a remarkable period: the self-extinction of the races who, for good or ill, shaped the modern world.

It’s the biggest story of our time, and, ten years on, Europe’s leaders still can’t talk about it, not to their own peoples, not honestly. For all the “human rights” complaints, and death threats from halfwits, and subtler rejections from old friends who feel I’m no longer quite respectable, I’m glad I brought it up. And it’s well past time for others to speak out.

 

8 Comments

Filed under Obama Marxist Tyranny, War On Jihadists

All-Of-A-Sudden

IslamicHorse

Obama’s fruits showcase a deliberate pattern of High Treason and treachery.  We are given over to strong delusion, to believe lies as the nation chooses to remain blind to what is happening right in front of it.

I read an interesting entry on one of the discussion forums I peruse from time to time from a fellow with the moniker of Sierra D.  He put together a very cogent series of ‘suddenlies’ that have grown to prominence or are happening under the Obama regime we currently suffer under.

These all-of-a-suddenlies when check marked together create a very disturbing picture about what is transpiring under our very noses.

As I meditated on his observations,  there were a number of additional facts and issues that more than bolstered his point and I thought it important enough to share what he shared, and add a few other all-of-a-suddens that I recalled to illustrate the fruits of Obama in regards to our safety and security as a nation.

So thanks to Sierra D for inspiring us to think about the larger question you pose: WHY?

All Of A Sudden

Before Obama there was virtually no outlandish presence of Islam in America.

• All of a sudden, Islam is taught in schools and is required study.  Christianity and the bible are banned in schools.

• All of a sudden we must allow prayer rugs everywhere and allow for Islamic prayer in schools, airports and businesses.

• All of a sudden we must stop serving pork in prisons, public places and institutions.

• All of a sudden we are inundated with law suits by Muslims who are offended by American culture.

• All of a sudden we must allow burkas to be worn everywhere even though you have no idea who is covered up under them.

• All of a sudden Muslims are suing employers and refusing to do their jobs if they personally deem it conflicts with Sharia Law.

• All of a sudden Muslim training compounds are popping up throughout the USA.

• All of a sudden the Attorney General of the United States vows to prosecute anyone who engages in “anti-Muslim speech”.

• All of a sudden, Jihadists who engage in terrorism and openly admit they acted in the name of Islam and ISIS, are emphatically declared they are NOT Islamic by our leaders and/or their actions are determined NOT to be terrorism, but other nebulous terms like ‘workplace violence’.

• All of a sudden, White Men are declared to be the greatest terror threat to the country by our leaders, even while ISIS and Al Qaeda promise attacks inside the USA.

• All of a sudden, it becomes Policy that Secular Middle East dictators that were benign or friendly to the West, must be replaced by Islamists and the Muslim Brotherhood.

• All of a sudden our troops are withdrawn from Iraq and the middle east, giving rise to ISIS.

• All of a sudden, America has reduced it’s nuclear stockpiles to 1950 levels, as Obama’s stated goal of a nuke-free America by the time he leaves office continues uninterrupted.

• All of a sudden, a deal with Iran must be made at any cost, with a pathway to nuclear weapons and HUNDREDS of BILLIONS of dollars handed over to fund their programs.

• All of a sudden America APOLOGIZES to Muslim states and sponsors of terror worldwide for acts of aggression, war and sabotage THEY perpetrate against our soldiers.

• All of a sudden, the American Navy is diminished to 1917 pre-World War I levels of only 300 ships. The Army is at pre-1940 levels. The Air Force scraps 500 planes and planned to retire the use of the A-10 Thunderbolt close air support fighter.  A further draw down of another 40,000 military personnel is in progress.

• All of a sudden half of our aircraft carriers are recalled for maintenance by Obama rendering the Atlantic unguarded, NONE are in the Middle East.

• All of a sudden Obama has to empty Guantanamo Bay of captured Jihadists and let them loose in Jihad-friendly Islamic states.  He demands to close the facility.

• All of a sudden America will negotiate with terrorists and trade FIVE Taliban commanders for a deserter and Jihad sympathizer.

• All of a sudden there is no money for American poor, disabled veterans, jobless Americans, hungry Americans, or displaced Americans but there is endless money for Obama’s “Syrian refugee” resettlement programs.

• All of a sudden Obama fills the Federal Government with Muslims in key positions.

• All of sudden there is an ammunition shortage in the USA.

• All of a sudden, the most important thing for Obama to do after a mass shooting by two Jihadists, is disarm American Citizens.

Given all of the above, ask yourself this question; why is it suddenly so important for Obama to disarm Americans?  Especially in the aftermath of the San Bernardino Jihad attack?

My answer: Because a disarmed country is ripe for takeover by the Muslim Army that Obama is importing into the United States.

Remember this?

 

Perhaps the ‘civilians’ he was referencing in his mind, are the millions he has imported into this country?  Sharia Law requires  Muslims ‘police themselves’ and enact laws that punish anyone who ‘slanders Islam’.  Recall that AG Loretta Lynch has stated to make it a FEDERAL CRIME and prosecute anyone who engages in anti-Muslim speech.  That is the imposition of defacto Sharia Law, no matter how they attempt to spin it.

63afc-slander-prophet-islam-mohammad-barack-hussein-obama-muslim

Obama can’t do these things legally, so he issues decrees he deems ‘legal’ and empowers his Alphabet agencies to carry out his orders.   Diminishing guns in the hands of American citizens is one way America can be subjugated to Islam.

By his fruits you will know him. Obama’s actions speak far beyond his words.

Obama won’t even say the words “Islamic Terrorist”

Does anyone bother to ask WHY?

If you have, and you know the answer – WHY do we turn a blind eye to the fact that we have an Islamist sympathizer and traitor as leader?

36 Comments

Filed under Obama Marxist Tyranny, War On Jihadists