Maybe It’s Fuzzy History, The Unmitigated Liar That Is Obama

I’ve had several willingly-duped self-proclaimed “Christians” try and laud the “honesty” of Barrack Obama as a refreshing ‘change’ from the dishonesty of Clinton or McCain.  When you cite source facts of Obama’s blatant dishonesty whether it is his association with the Black Liberation Pastor Jeremiah Wright and his church, or his flip-flopping statements about Iran, the Obama worshippers simply roll their eyes over into cognitive dissonance mode, and stick their fingers in their ears while shouting “I can’t hear your racist hatred la, la, la, la, la.”

I guess I now understand exactly how it was that an enlightened people fell under the spell of a genocidal madman in Germany lo some seventy years ago.  They just reinforce the Swiftonian adage that tells us that “There are none so blind as those who refuse to see”.

The terrifying thing to consider is that we’re electing a person to the most powerful office in the world, not choosing an American Idol champion for our entertainment pleasure. Unfortunately, it seems today that Americans champion style over substance; looks over integrity; and the ability to lie smoothly and soothe itching ears.  Character matters, because contrary to what the ideologues and Apologists will tell you – the honesty and integrity of a person is going to translate to what they actually DO in that office.

Some say Obama is an empty suit.  Just a typical anti-American Liberal radical spewing the same liberal hippie radicalism he learned at college.  ABC’s Jake Tapper calls Obama a “One man gaffe machine”. Given what we have learned about Obama, we might as well be electing Kruschev and Castro to the Presidency.  After all, both the Soviets and Castro were masters at rewriting and inventing history to serve their own aims of achieving and maintaining power.

This weekend, Obama treated us to his version of history in attempting to equate himself a patriot as opposed to the anti-American radical he is. In a speech on Memorial day in Las Cruces, NM Obama said:

 

“My grandfather marched in Patton’s army, but I cannot know what it is to walk into battle like so many of you,” he told a small group of veterans here

Obama also spoke about his uncle, who was part of the American brigade that helped to liberate Auschwitz.

 

For all of the identity politics waged by Obama over his blackness – suddenly due the venue, Obama is suddenly White again??

Which Uncle was this supposed to be?  Obama’s mother was supposedly an only child.

Was this the same “Crazy uncle” that Obama says was in everyone’s attic when attempting to deflect questions about his association with Jeremiah Wright?  Or is this “Crazy Uncle” who was the first in Patton’s Army to liberate Auschwitz akin to Disney’s Pete’s Dragon?

If Obama had the audacity of foresight to Wiki the liberation of Auschwitz – he would have learned that it was the SOVIETS who liberated Auschwitz in January 1945 – not Patton’s Army.  But hey – who are we to argue historical facts when Obama is in the midst of rewriting history like Stalin did?

Now I’m sure the Apologists and willingly-duped messiah worshippers of Obama will automatically state that “Obama misspoke” and “made a mistake”, and I’m sure we should chalk it up to the same kind of mistake he made when saying his White grandmother was a “typical white woman afraid of black men” when his account of the incident he was referring in his book “Dreams of my Father” indicated she was being stalked by a panhandler. Details, details.

As Little Green Footballs notes:

But what kind of “mistake” is it to make up an (apparently) nonexistent uncle, and attribute heroic actions to this nonexistent person that they could not possibly have performed? And what kind of person would give a speech to veterans on Memorial Day—and make up a phony war story?

Definitely not just a gaffe; rather, a deliberate attempt to invoke the name of Auschwitz for political gain.

Of course before anyone in the Mainstream press tries to do any actual investigative journalism – Obama’s Spin meisters are once again telling us what Obama really meant to say:

Bill Burton says [Obama’s] great uncle was a member of the 89th Infantry Division that liberated the Ohrduf camp, part of Buchenwald and, according to the Holocaust Museum, the first concentration camp liberated by U.S. troops.

The soldier in question, Burton said, is Obama’s grandmother’s brother, who’s still alive.

 “Senator Obama’s family is proud of the service of his grandfather and uncles in World War II – especially the fact that his great uncle was a part of liberating one of the concentration camps at Buchenwald. Yesterday he mistakenly referred to Auschwitz instead of Buchenwald in telling of his personal experience of a soldier in his family who served heroically,” Burton says.

That might be enough to stave off the mainstream media – but this is not the first time Obama was “mistaken” about his uncles or grandfather’s service in WWII.

In 2002, during an anti-war speech Obama said:

My grandfather signed up for a war the day after Pearl Harbor was bombed, fought in Patton’s army. He saw the dead and dying across the fields of Europe; he heard the stories of fellow troops who first entered Auschwitz and Treblinka. He fought in the name of a larger freedom, part of that arsenal of democracy that triumphed over evil, and he did not fight in vain.

I guess since 2002, no one has bothered to help little Barry clean up his understanding of history, or his family’s role in it.

Perhaps in his quest to takeover America’s highest office, Obama might try the audacity of telling the truth – but methinks he is every bit the congenital liar that his Democrat Presidential Predecessors were, if not moreso.

Obama is more than an empty suit.  He is a pathological liar.

Do we really want someone with this kind of ability to BS while maintaining relationships with America-hating terrorists and radicals with the reins to the Presidency?

God be merciful, and give us a president we need, and not a president we deserve.

17 Comments

Filed under Politics

17 responses to “Maybe It’s Fuzzy History, The Unmitigated Liar That Is Obama

  1. gasdocpol

    THE IRAQ WAR WAS BASED ON LIES. McCAIN WANTS TO PERPETUATE THE RESULT OF THOSE LIES.

    EVEN IF WHAT YOU SAY IS TRUE ABOUT OBAMA LYING, WHAT DAMAGE HAVE THOSE LIES COST ANYONE ?

    THE LIES YOU ATTRIBUTE TO OBAMA ARE TRIVIAL AT BEST.

  2. invar

    The damage of Obama’s lies are going to cost American lives in the long run, along with what is left of our liberty, our sovereignty and wealth if he is elected President by kool-aid drinking Obama worshippers such as yourself.

    Obama is a Saul Alinsky Marxist. Either you are totally ignorant of this fact, don;t much care if he is, or you are one yourself.

    In which respect – we have nothing to discuss.

    Both Marxists and Jihadists are allowed to lie in order to get away with deceiving the ‘Useless eaters’ and the ‘Infidels’.

    Obama is just one giant lie that can read a teleprompter.

  3. gasdocpol

    Bush/Cheney/McCain lies have already cost an astronomical amount in lives, money and international crediblility in the short term and predictibly in the long term.

    It is your opinion that “Obama’s lies” are going to cost. That is uproven rhetoric at best.

  4. invar

    I. Please cite for us these specific “lies” you assign Bush/Cheney/McCain and please spare us the stupid and silly mantra about “no WMD’s in Iraq” since every Democrat from Clinton to Gore to Kerry acknowledged their existence before 2001.

    If you have any shred of honesty yourself, you will have to admit you are a shill of unproven rhetoric and MoveOn.org talking points at best.

    II. In regards to “international credibility”, given the UN’s stellar example with Darfur and other gross ineptitude of containing terror and genocide, true Americans can give a rat’s arse about our “credibility” with the “rest of the” international socialists in the world.

    In short, Americans are not governed by what other cesspools of tyranny and woe think about us, or their sycophants in Socialist Europe do.

    We’ve seen what irrelevance and incompetent corruption those regimes are plagued with.

  5. gasdocpol

    BUSH/CHENEY LIED WHEN THEY SAID THAT IT WAS NECESSARY TO INVADE IRAQ.

    I ALMOST NEVER OPEN THE EMAIL THAT I RECEIVE FROM MOVEON.ORG

    IF THE USA WOULD INVOLVE ITSELF IN A CONSTRUCTIVE WAY IN THE UN, IT WOULD BE MORE EFFECTIVE.

  6. invar

    BUSH/CHENEY LIED WHEN THEY SAID THAT IT WAS NECESSARY TO INVADE IRAQ.

    Cite sources, statements, facts and evidence that clearly showcase that they lied about the necessity of removing Sadaam’s regime.

    I ALMOST NEVER OPEN THE EMAIL THAT I RECEIVE FROM MOVEON.ORG

    “Almost never…”

    Speaks volumes about your credibility.

    You’re a shill, exactly as I suspected.

    IF THE USA WOULD INVOLVE ITSELF IN A CONSTRUCTIVE WAY IN THE UN, IT WOULD BE MORE EFFECTIVE.

    Oh really? Who do you think FUNDS the most inept and corrupt organization ever created by man?

    Care to explain the UN oil for food scandal?

    How about those 17 useless resolutions given to Sadaam before 2003 – remember, the very ones that we were constructively “involved in” during the 1990’s when Clinton deferred our foreign policy to the UN??

    Thanks for demonstrating the collective intelligence and critical thinking skills of a turnip.

    But hey – that’s what comrades are for in your ideology, aren’t they?

  7. gasdocpol

    BUSH/CHENEY DID NOT WANT US TO INVADE IRAQ?

    I JUST IMAGINED IT? LOL

    GET A DICTIONARY AND LOOK UP THE WORDS “ALMOST” AND “NEVER”.

    IF YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE ABOVE CONCEPTS , I WILL NOT ATTEMPT TO DISCUSS THE UN.

  8. invar

    Can we be merciful and chalk you up to simply senile, or must we assume willful ignorance and cognitive dissonance on your part?

    BUSH/CHENEY DID NOT WANT US TO INVADE IRAQ?

    I aksed you to cite and provide specifics to back up your charge that they LIED.

    You respond with the above inane question without providing any facts to back up your claim that Bush and Cheney lied.

    I’ll attempt to ask you again – EXACTLY, what evidence do you have to either prove or suggest with any certainty that Bush-Cheney LIED to the American people about why we needed to go into Iraq? Give me the quotes, sources and instances that showcase that they deliberately lied in order to mislead as I have showcased evidence of Obama’s deliberate attempts to lie and mislead.

    GET A DICTIONARY AND LOOK UP THE WORDS “ALMOST” AND “NEVER”.

    I’m astounded by your inability to comprehend simple sentences, or plain English.

    The fact you spout MoveOn. org talking points reveals that you have opened enough of their e-mails or read enough of their propaganda to regurgitate it like a puppet.

    IF YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE ABOVE CONCEPTS , I WILL NOT ATTEMPT TO DISCUSS THE UN.

    You make me laugh.

    Remember, voting day is on WEDNESDAYS.

  9. gasdocpol

    INVAR

    Bush/Cheney said that we needed to invade Iraq.

    DO YOU DENY THAT?

    It is now apparent that WE DID NOT NEED TO INVADE IRAQ.

    Bush/Cheney implicitely and explicitly said that Iraq had at least something to do with 9/11 and that Iraq posed an imminent danger to the USA.

    THERE HAS BEEN NO EVIDENCE THAT IRAQ HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11 AND IRAQ DID NOT POSE AN IMMINENT THREAT TO THE USA.

    That leaves us with two possibilities :

    1. Either Bush/Cheney sincerely believed that Iraq had something to do with 9/11 and was an imminent threat to the USA THEREFORE BUSH/CHENEY WERE STUPID AND INCOMPETENT

    OR

    2. BUSH /CHENEY LIED.

    Personally, I think that they were carrying out the imperialistic,Neoconservative/PNAC agenda to gain control of Iraqi oil. (that is based on reading the direct accounts of O’Neill, Wilkerson and Clark who were in the GW Bush White House , the PNAC website before it was taken off the Internet last week, the Downing Street Memo and other sources)*

    Re: Moveon.org. If my words so closely resemble their words , maybe they are reading my blogs and are quoting me. As I said , I almost always erase their emails without even looking at them.

    * Add to the accounts given by GW Bush Treas. Secretary Paul O’Neill and Counter -insurgency Czar Richard A. Clark and Lawrence Wilkerson, Colin Powell’s Chief of Staff

    -The forthcoming book of Bush Press Secretary, Scott McClellen who reveals the deceit of the Bush/Cheney White House.

    Inability to comprehend simple sentences and plain English?

    1. I hold the following degrees; BS, MD, MBA

    2. I was board certified in my specialty when I practiced medicine. That involves 4 years of post-doctoral work and an oral and written exams (in English)

    3. I held a reserve commision as a line officer in the Naval Reserve before I went to med school.

    4. I can understand even fairly complex sentences in plain French.

    5. I can, sometimes, even understand simple sentences in Spanish and German.

    There is the distinct possibility that you are wrong in believing Bush/Cheney.

    It is also conceiveable that I am wrong about Bush/Cheney. There are some questions to which I do not pretend to have a complete answer- immigration for example. There are others to which I have an opinion but I admit that it is debateable-abortion for example.

    I have not started out with one loyalty and then tried to rationalize it. I have voted for as many Republicans as Democrats over the years. I even voted for Bush the Elder in 1988.

    The conclusions that I have reached are my own. I do not read moveon.org because I do not think that they are objective.

  10. invar

    Bush/Cheney said that we needed to invade Iraq.

    DO YOU DENY THAT?

    Nope. We’re there, are we not?

    It is now apparent that WE DID NOT NEED TO INVADE IRAQ.

    Apparent to whom? Liberals and anti-war morons?

    Is it a good thing Sadaam is gone or not?

    Why do Leftists always support despotic genocidal madmen that hate the U.S. over our own country?

    Is their twisted ideology more important than liberty?

    I guess it is.

    Bush/Cheney implicitely and explicitly said that Iraq had at least something to do with 9/11 and that Iraq posed an imminent danger to the USA.

    THERE HAS BEEN NO EVIDENCE THAT IRAQ HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11 AND IRAQ DID NOT POSE AN IMMINENT THREAT TO THE USA.

    Finally, a meager effort to answer my question with MoveOn.org /Michael Moore talking points.

    Now, here’s the plain truth –

    1. We invaded Iraq for the specific cause that Sadaam was in gross violation of 17 UN resolutions and our 1991 Cease Fire that HIS REGIME signed.

    2. Sadaam declared Jihad on America in 1999, two years after Osama Bin Laden did the same, for Bill Clinton’s Cruise Missile attack on Baghdad after Sadaam kicked out UNESCO and the IAEA inspectors.

    We did nothing about Bin laden. After 9-11, it would have been criminal to do the same with Sadaam.

    3. Sadaam repeatedly ‘lit up’ and fired on U.S. aircraft patrolling the UN’s No Fly Zone in Iraq.

    Those three reasons alone are justification for our invasion and removal of Sadaam.

    4. Given our shock on 9-11, nothing was going to be left to chance, and the notion of a state supplying Jihadists with WMDs was and is a very real threat. Especially considering that Jihadists were given the blessing by ruling Imams in Saudi Arabia to use nukes and kill 10 million Americans.

    Why the Administration refused to engage the Democrats and the Left that were giving grief over being in Afghanistan is beyond me. Must be that “compassionate Conservatism” crap. Bush obviously decided to stick with the threat of WMDs as the public support crux when simply trumpeting the fact that we can not risk another 9-11 from another Jihad-declaring regime supplying Binny’s delivery boys with something with more punch than civilian airliners.

    The fact Sadaam was in violation of our 1991 Cease Fire was obviously not enough for the public to support what General Schwartzkopf said needed to be done back in 1991.

    Personally, I think that they were carrying out the imperialistic,Neoconservative/PNAC agenda to gain control of Iraqi oil.

    Riiiight. That’s why oil is $130 bucks a barrel and our economy is tanking down the tubes, and since 1991, we have not requisitioned ONE FREAKING BARREL OF OIL from Iraq.

    You need to find some new talking points, those MoveOn.org ones are worn out.

    If my words so closely resemble their words , maybe they are reading my blogs and are quoting me.

    Thanks for confirming what I have suggested. An anti-American/Anti-war Leftist stooge, or shill for the same. MoveOn.org or not. One of you is quoting the other – which makes you both traitors to the country in my estimation.

    The forthcoming book of Bush Press Secretary, Scott McClellen who reveals the deceit of the Bush/Cheney White House.

    Yay – ANOTHER disgruntled ex- WH staffer pissed off that he was fired for being incompetent decides to make some bucks by sounding like Code Pink and people like you.

    1. I hold the following degrees; BS, MD, MBA,

    Terrific. I’m grossly unimpressed. You’re not only the inspiration for MoveOn.org, you’re a typical Commie-lib Academic.

    It is true that stereotypes exist because there is truth in them.

    I can understand even fairly complex sentences in plain French.

    Also explains a lot about what we suspected.

    I can, sometimes, even understand simple sentences in Spanish and German.

    Yes, yes… it is obvious you hold an affinity for European Socialists. We figured as much.

    There is the distinct possibility that you are wrong in believing Bush/Cheney.

    I believe what our enemies say and do, not what our government says to assuage the politically-correct.

    Bush has been an unmitigated disaster as president on every front EXCEPTING the war on Jihadist Islam. It is the only thing besides giving me a tax cut that I agreed with him on.

    The conclusions that I have reached are my own. I do not read moveon.org because I do not think that they are objective.

    Funny that your talking points and theirs are nearly identical.

    I do not pretend to be objective.

    Neither do they.

    Which is fine. At least the lines of demarcation between real Americans and those who tear the nation down and spit on our troops is clear.

  11. gasdocpol

    1. IRAQ DID NOT ATTACK THE usa AND WAS NO THREAT TO THE USA

    2. 4080 DEAD AMERICANS AND 13,000 MAIMED FOR LIFE AND 3 TRILLION DOLLAR COST OF THE WAR WAS NOT WORTH IT TO US.

    3. MAYBE BUSH HAD A PRETEXT FOR CREATING THE MESS BUT NO JUSTIFICATION IN MY VIEW.

    4. YOU IMPLIED THAT I WAS NOT CAPABLE OF UNDERSTANDING ENGLISH AND YOU ATTEMPTED TO INSULT ME.

    5. THE WORLD WOULD BE A BETTER PLACE IF GW BUSH HAD NOT BECOME PRESIDENT EVEN IF THAT MEANT THAT SADDAM WERE STILL AROUND.

    6. I DO NOT SPIT ON THE TROOPS BUT GW BUSH SURE GOT A LOT OF THEM KILLED NEEDLESSLY

    7. LOL

  12. invar

    1. IRAQ DID NOT ATTACK THE usa AND WAS NO THREAT TO THE USA

    We said the same stupid thing about Bin Laden in the mountains of Afghanistan on 9-10-01 too.

    Funny how you Imbeciles conveniently forget the fact that using your current criteria of how Sadaam’s Iraq was “no threat” to us, Bin Laden’s Al Qaeda was an even lesser possible threat.

    Interesting how real life trumps your silly theories, except your theories get innocent Americans killed.

    4080 DEAD AMERICANS AND 13,000 MAIMED FOR LIFE AND 3 TRILLION DOLLAR COST OF THE WAR WAS NOT WORTH IT TO US.

    3,000 dead American civilians in less than two hours’ time in the face of madmen intent on jump starting a clash of civilizations in order to take over the world, was more than worth the sacrifice and money according to my Marine Hero nephew who WAS THERE.

    Thank God morons like yourself were irrelevant during the 1940’s because I am sure you idiots would be screaming the same thing after our losses at Normandy and Operation Market garden.

    You’re a disgrace.

    MAYBE BUSH HAD A PRETEXT FOR CREATING THE MESS BUT NO JUSTIFICATION IN MY VIEW.

    Your view is as worthless as Tokyo Rose’s was.

    THE WORLD WOULD BE A BETTER PLACE IF GW BUSH HAD NOT BECOME PRESIDENT EVEN IF THAT MEANT THAT SADDAM WERE STILL AROUND.

    Thanks for making my entire point about you.

    I DO NOT SPIT ON THE TROOPS BUT GW BUSH SURE GOT A LOT OF THEM KILLED NEEDLESSLY

    What do you think you just did?

    You’re slime just like your ideological compadres at MoveOn.org, and you I would spit on if nothing more than to show my utter contempt for traitors such as yourselves who spit on our troops and their mission DAILY.

    If anyone is responsible for getting them killed, it’s people like you, that embolden the Jihadists who post your sickening opinions on their Jihadist websites and declare that their victory is nearly complete.

    You provide all the aid and comfort our enemies need.

  13. Snicker. If he’s willing to lie to get into the office, then he’s willing to lie when he gets the office. This guy is a communist dirtbag. And for those mind numbed hippies so stoned on bad acid and dope thinking he’s the second coming, just wait until the second year of Black Jimmy Carter and the morons in Congress. I hope “y’all” enjoy that $12.999 for regular unleaded as we all hug tress and kiss the earth.

    Swamp time is a comin…….

  14. gasdocpol

    Iraq was not responsible for 9/11.

    al Qaeda was and was not in Iraq.

    Richard A. Clark and the CIA warned Bush and Rice repeatedly about Bin laden and Al Qaeda. Condi stopped Clarke from reporting to the principals of the Security Council.

    Invading Iraq was at the top of the Bush agenda from his first cabinet meeting.

    Gas prices have gone up during the GW Bush administration.

    I was 6 at the time of the Normandy invasion . I was cheering for our side.

  15. invar

    Iraq was not responsible for 9/11.

    Irrelevant.

    Sadaam was a greater threat than was posed by Bin Laden on 9-10-01, yet Bin Laden managed to kill 3,000 Americans in moments.

    We were correct not to afford Sadaam a chance to do the same or worse.

    al Qaeda was and was not in Iraq.

    You can leave your MoveOn.org talking points at home.

    Sadaam not only FUNDED Jihadists, he helped TRAIN them in Salman Pak:

    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/gunning/interviews/khodada.html

    Richard A. Clark and the CIA warned Bush and Rice repeatedly about Bin laden and Al Qaeda. Condi stopped Clarke from reporting to the principals of the Security Council.

    You mean the same Richard Clark that waved off and ignored the warnings of an impending attack by Bin Laden on our embassies in Kenya and Tanzania?

    The same Richard Clark and CIA that dropped the ball on Bin Laden and sat deaf and mute even AFTER Al Qaeda nearly sunk the Cole in Yemen??

    THE Richard Clark, an advisor to Bill Clinton that admitted that he turned down an extradition offer by the Sudanese to deliver Bin Laden in 1996?

    Listen to his own words here: http://archive.newsmax.com/audio/BILLVH.mp3

    The UN SEC Council is a joke and a sham. Clark had 8 years of active Al Qaeda intel, why the hell did HE not report it to the Sec. Council during his tenure?

    You need to read beyond the Democrat Underground and watching Michael Moore for news and information.

    Invading Iraq was at the top of the Bush agenda from his first cabinet meeting.

    12 years of UN violations by Sadaam. 17 Resolutions violated. 1 U.S. Cease Fire he was in breach of.

    Invading Iraq would have been at the top of MY list if I had a first cabinet meeting.

    Gas prices have gone up during the GW Bush administration.

    The President is not an Emperor. We have this thing called a Congress that passes fiscal, tax and policy issues.

    Gas prices have gone up because Congress has impeded our ability to drill and refine our own oil for the last 30 years, making us dependent on foreign oil.

    I was 6 at the time of the Normandy invasion . I was cheering for our side.

    You were wiser then than you are now.

  16. Chris

    Not going to get into the massive pissing contest that is apparently occuring here btu I am going to state some facts that Liberals can’t do.

    Iraq under Saddam killed hundreds of thousands of ethnic Kurds in Northern Iraq. He ordered the deaths of ANY and ALL political enemies he had in Iraq. He used mustard and ceran gases against the Iranians in the war with them. He onvaded Kuwait for no reason other then greed. He put a price tag on George Bush Seniors head. He repeatedly threatened to remove Israel from the map. These are all legit and discussed reasons by the so-called mainstream media. Are any of these reasons not worth the lives of our servicemen and women in Iraq? I am a former Marine and I have personally lost six brothers in Iraq and I can tell you myself that those men have not died in vane. The liberals of this country are slowing destroying America, they are a cancer that is slowing decaying our very moral fabric. I am sickened when I see people like Cindy Sheehan and George Soros given the time of day to even fart on my TV but they are allowed by the media to openly bash our military, our commander-in-chief, our field commanders?

    Obama is a tool, he will lead this country into places God Fearing, gun-toating Americans have feared for years. He will have us all paying for uninsured people, illegal immigrants, gay marriages, not to mention learning Arabic cause he will ensure we are assimilated into the jihadists culture.

    I for one and saddened and sickened when I see my nation in 10 years, I do not see a land of the free, I see a land of the impoverished, I see a land of the sick, the wounded. I see a land of a bunch of Socialist hippies smoking pot and singing Hezbollahs (insert your favorite jihad group here)praises. I see a land of diminished skills, a land of undefended borders. I see a land that bows to the international community before it bows to its own citizens. I see a very hard road for every American if Obama is elected. We will all remember September 11th, but we will remember Obamas Inaugeration Day in the same hideous light.

    That is all I have to say.
    May a merciful GOD smile one this once proud nation once again.

  17. Taylor

    Over all they are all liars.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s