Democrats Now Move to Regulate Internet Along with Silencing Talk Radio

 

DOCTRINE TO SILENCE “UNBALANCED RADIO AND WEB SITES”

Stimulus Bill “Gives Authority” of nation’s broadcast and information ‘infrastructure’ to government.

 

American Spectator February 16, 2009

 
Senior FCC staff working for acting Federal Communications Commissioner Michael Copps held meetings last week with policy and legislative advisers to House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman to discuss ways the committee can create openings for the FCC to put in place a form of the “Fairness Doctrine” without actually calling it such. 

Waxman is also interested, say sources, in looking at how the Internet is being used for content and free speech purposes. “It’s all about diversity in media,” says a House Energy staffer, familiar with the meetings. 

“Does one radio station or one station group control four of the five most powerful outlets in one community? Do four stations in one region carry Rush Limbaugh, and nothing else during the same time slot? Does one heavily trafficked Internet site present one side of an issue and not link to sites that present alternative views? These are some of the questions the chairman is thinking about right now, and we are going to have an FCC that will finally have the people in place to answer them.” 

Copps will remain acting chairman of the FCC until President Obama’s nominee, Julius Genachowski, is confirmed, and Copps has been told by the White House not create “problems” for the incoming chairman by committing to issues or policy development before the Obama pick arrives. 

But Copps has been a supporter of putting in place policies that would allow the federal government to have greater oversight over the content that TV and radio stations broadcast to the public, and both the FCC and Waxman are looking to licensing and renewal of licensing as a means of enforcing “Fairness Doctrine” type policies without actually using the hot-button term “Fairness Doctrine.” 

One idea Waxman’s committee staff is looking at is a congressionally mandated policy that would require all TV and radio stations to have in place “advisory boards” that would act as watchdogs to ensure “community needs and opinions” are given fair treatment. Reports from those advisory boards would be used for license renewals and summaries would be reviewed at least annually by FCC staff. 

Waxman and the FCC staff are also said to be looking at ways to ease the “consumer complaint” process, which could also be used along with the advisory boards. 

The House Energy and Commerce Committee is also looking at how it can put in place policies that would allow it greater oversight of the Internet. 

“Internet radio is becoming a big deal, and we’re seeing that some web sites are able to control traffic and information, while other sites that may be of interest or use to citizens get limited traffic because of the way the people search and look for information,” says on committee staffer. “We’re at very early stages on this, but the chairman has made it clear that oversight of the Internet is one of his top priorities.” 

This isn’t just about Limbaugh or a local radio host most of us haven’t heard about,” says Democrat committee member. “The FCC and state and local governments also have oversight over the Internet lines and the cable and telecom companies that operate them. We want to get alternative views on radio and TV, but we also want to makes sure those alternative views are read, heard and seen online, which is becoming increasingly video and audio driven. Thanks to the stimulus package, we’ve established that broadband networks — the Internet — are critical, national infrastructure.

Of course what that means folks, is that because they shoved money in the Marxist Stimulus bill to give greater oversight of internet, radio and cable lines – which means they think the government NOW OWNS them.

In essense, the government has nationalized all information, and are going to decide for us, what we are allowed to hear, read and see.

We think that gives us an opening to look at what runs over that critical infrastructure.” 

Also involved in “brainstorming” on “Fairness Doctrine and online monitoring has been the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank, which has published studies pressing for the Fairness Doctrine, as well as the radical MoveOn.org, which has been speaking to committee staff about policies that would allow them to use their five to six million person database to mobilize complaints against radio, TV or online entities they perceive to be limiting free speech or limiting opinion.

Tyranny is coming fast and furious folks.

By the time a majority wake up, it’s going to be too late to do anything about it.

3 Comments

Filed under Culture War, Musings, Politics

3 responses to “Democrats Now Move to Regulate Internet Along with Silencing Talk Radio

  1. The Limbaugh & Colmes show. Has a ring. Or how about O’Reilly & Olbermann? Or maybe that’s not what they’re talking about.

  2. I enjoyed reading your article entitled “Democrats Now Move to Regulate Internet Along with Silencing Talk Radio.”

    It appears that the Democrats want to take away the freedom of speech by controlling the Internet and silencing talk radio. Since talk radio expresses mostly capitalistic perspectives, the Democratic party is working hard at writing and passing bills designed to permanently incapacitate talk radio.

    Interestingly, the Democratic party wants more Marxist socialist perspectives expressed on the radio.

    Why?

    Because the Democratic party will have an easier time forcing its Marxist socialist agenda on society. Adolf Hitler did this in Germany, and it worked!

    If the Democratic party succeeds in abolishing the freedom of speech, Americans will very quickly lose their overall freedom, thereby becoming slaves.

    There will no longer be a President of the United States. Instead, there will be a Slave Master (dictator) of the United States!

    Hitler did this in Germany, so it can definitely be done in the United States!

    What do you call a government controlled media? A propaganda machine.

  3. Pingback: Adventures in Media Bias | The Barbican

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s