There is a reason I have a vitriolic disdain for anyone touting the Alex Jones “Neocons are the devil” and “9-11 was an inside job” garbage.
The creep who shot up the Holocaust Museum and killed a guard yesterday was not some Right-Wing Christian kook as the media is trumpeting. – Von Brunn is a lunatic 9-11 Truther Leftist who hates Conservatives, Bush, McCain and Jews.
These Truthers are Leftists, not Conservatives, even though they pretend to be Conservatives and give lip service to liberty. They need to be as vociferously opposed and combated as you would any raving Marxist who seeks to subjugate you.
Imbeciles like Von Brunn are the same kind of morons who have routinely threatened me with death for refusing to support Ron Paul or going bezerk when challenging their “truth” about 9-11.
Beware of this ideology masquerading as truth. It’s anti-semitic Leftist hatred cloaking itself in the mantle of freedom, same as Obama’s drones are doing.
Leftists are enemies of liberty.
But the media is going to continue to demonize Conservative Christians as responsible for this, and like the Tiller slaying, the State Media is going to pound this home, when in fact it is one of their own ideological conspiratorial sycophants who did the killing yesterday.
Holocaust Museum shooter von Brunn a 9/11 ‘truther’ who hated ‘neo-cons’, Bush, McCain
The man accused of opening fire at the Holocaust Museum in Washington, DC on June 10, James W. von Brunn, left a trail of unhinged writings around the internet.
The anti-semitism of von Brunn is the first thing one notices when visiting these bizarre websites. However, like those of most “white supremacists”, many of von Brunn’s political views track “Left” rather than “Right.” Clearly, a re-evaluation of these obsolete definitions is long overdue.
For example, he unleashed his hatred of both Presidents Bush and other “neo-conservatives” in online essays. As even some “progressives” such as the influential Adbusters magazine publicly admit, “neoconservative” is often used as a derogatory code word for “Jews”. As well, even a cursory glance at “white supremacist” writings reveals a hatred of, say, big corporations that is virtually indistinguishable from that of anti-globalization activists.
James von Brunn’s advocacy of 9/11 conspiracy theories also gives him an additional commonality with individuals on the far-left.
None of this will surprise readers of Jonah Goldberg’s bestseller Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Change , which clearly demonstrates that “fascism” of the kind advocated by the British National Party (BNP) and the likes of James W. von Brunn is just as likely to reflect “leftwing” views as “rightwing” ones.
In fact, anti-semitism is something the New Left and the “Far Right” have had in common since the 1980s, which is why so many former leftists like David Horowitz defected from one side to the other during the Reagan era and beyond. It also helps explain the otherwise baffling alliance between the Left and radical Islam.
That this shooting occurred shortly after President Obama’s former mentor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, blamed “the Jews” for his lack of access to his former parishioner is a troubling confluence of events as well.
Pingback: Rev. Wright in reference to speaking to Obama: Them Jews aren’t going to let him talk to me | Fire Andrea Mitchell!
I’m a conservative but I also believe 9/11 was an inside job and I admire Alex Jones.
Von Brunn didn’t walk into the holocaust museum and shoot people because he thinks they were responsible for 9/11, he walked in there and shot people because he was against Jews. It doesn’t matter what religion or political views this guy had, HE WAS CRAZY.
Also…unless somebody is violent…we all have the right to our own perspectives and opinions. We are all responsible for our own ACTIONS we take.
Again, his 9/11 views did NOT have anything to do with the reason he shot and killed those people. Neither did his other religious or political stand points.
Tell that to the news media and the politicians who keep insisting that this maniac was a “right wing Christian extremist” and that talk radio assisted this creep in his deadly deed.
He was no Christian.
He was no Conservative.
He was a raving Leftist Lunatic – having more in common with the anti-war/Code Pink and the Christian Identity Anarchist Marxist movements than with anyone on the Right wing spectrum.
But that is not what is being drummed into the public’s ears by the media and the political class.