Monthly Archives: January 2012

Christian Prayers And Protests Will Get You Arrested In NYC

Zero Tolerance for Christians in New York compared to Occupy Protests that dragged on for weeks.   Christians arrested on site for praying against the ban on churches meeting in public places.

In a sickening proof that Amerika is become a hostile land for Christians who are no longer welcome or permitted their free exercise.  Last Thursday New York City arrested 43 pastors and laypersons who dared to defy the Established Secular Order and PRAYED in protest about the city’s new ban on Christian use of public places for worship services that goes into effect February 12.

Police were ordered to arrest them all immediately for criminal trespass.  Apparently New York has a Zero Tolerance policy if you kneel and pray in public and are a Christian, but if you are a secular anarchist who likes to shut down businesses and bridges, do drugs, rape and rob people – then you and your Occupy Wall Street pals will go unmolested by the Police for weeks and weeks, while the media rages in protest on their behalf if any of those scum are arrested for their disruptive and violent behavior.






And If you are Muslim you will get to pray in the streets facing Mecca while blocking traffic to call attention to your protests of America:







But if you are Christian, and are protesting for your Constitutional Right of free exercise from being prohibited by law in public places such as schools, streets and public buildings – if you join hands, kneel and pray – why then – you will be arrested with brute force in moments of your defiance to take a knee and pray.

Christians haves deceived themselves into thinking that injustice and persecution of Christians is something that happens only in far away backward countries.

They would be wrong.  Institutionalized persecution – of which this author has personally witnessed and experienced in a land hostile to Christians, is already having a foundation poured beneath our feet and knees.

It makes no difference who you are if you are Christian, police arrested New York City Councilman and pastor Fernando Cabrera, pastor Bill Devlin, and five others on charges of “criminal trespassing.” Their alleged trespass was kneeling and singing two hymns outside the doors of the New York City Law Department.


THAT earns you jail time.  But if you are protesting rich people and businesses and support Communism – then you can set up tents and shut down bridges and take over public spaces without so much as a shout against you by police.

But take a knee and pray in front of a public building in New York – you will get to enjoy plastic hand restraints and a ride in a paddy wagon to the local lock up.

Welcome to Amerika 2012 – your hope and change has arrived.



Filed under Chrisitan Viewpoint, Culture War, Obama Marxist Tyranny

Ron Paul Does Jane Fonda

The Iranian Mullahcracy absolutely loves Ron Paul, and for Iran’s propaganda war against the West – Ron Paul is a beloved ally of the Islamofascists in Tehran.

As I have consistently noted about Ron Paul, the enemies of the USA love to interview and quote him for their propaganda purposes against this country and the West of whom they seek to either destroy or subjugate to Sharia Law.

One of the major key reasons for my long opposition to this usurper-Republican running for the presidency for the 3rd time, is his absolutely insane and moronic positions regarding foreign policy, notwithstanding his anti-Jew conspiratorialist agenda and past racism that only now, some of his own former associates are beginning to bring to the public’s attention.

As further evidence of what I consider to be Jane Fona-esque treason, whether willful or by clueless idiocy, Ron Paul provides the enemies of the United States, his own anti-American platform and anti-semitic positions to arm themselves with ammunition to wage their own war against the infidel Great and Little Satan.

Ron Paul stated he would have never gone to war against the Nazis, so we can assume he would also not dare raise a hand against the Islamofascist’s in Iran either.  In fact, the Jihadist regime play video of Ron Paul justifying their “right” to make and have nuclear weapons.  This, after Ahmadinejad stated Iran had a right to USE nuclear weapons and promising Israel will be ‘wiped off the map’.  A more dangerous and clueless nut job cannot be found, excepting only that Hussein Obama II runs a close second to Paul’s dangerous insanity.

The enemies of America and the West have an ally in Ron Paul, and the current occupant of the White House.  For the Jihadists, their future seems bright.  God help us all, as blinding brightness may one day visit our cities if either of these two clowns continue in the chair at 1600 Pennsylvania.

Tehran TV Loves Ron Paul

The Iranian regime’s English language propaganda channel, PressTV, has discovered a new American idol: presidential contender Rep. Ron Paul.

PressTV has stepped up its coverage of Paul’s campaign to win the Republican presidential nomination in recent weeks, featuring hisanti-Israel rants, his claim that sanctions against Iran are “acts of war,” his approval of Iran’s nuclear ambitions, and much more.

The Iranian government channel portrays Ron Paul as an American hero, and brings on conspiracy theorists masquerading as political “analysts” to laud him for  “challenging the American establishment” and the “corporate neo-conservative Zionist consensus,” that cabal of Jews, banksters, and Reagan Democrats who in Tehran’s eyes (and in the eyes of these Ron Paul supporters) run the world.

It’s a script taken almost word-for-word from the infamous anti-Semitic forgery,The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Headlining one montage of Ron Paul sound bites denouncing U.S. support for Israel, PressTV reveals that President Obama has issued a “Ron Paul ‘kill order.’

This dramatic claim was “revealed” in a “secret letter sent to Prime Minister Putin by Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda” released to the press by the Russian Federal Security Service, better known during Cold War days for wanton fabrications and disinformation campaigns.

The purported letter “contains a warning that United States President Barack Obama has issued an executive-level ‘kill order’ against U.S. Congressman Ron Paul over fears this charismatic politician, who many believe could capture the Republican Presidential 2012 nomination, is about to expose to all Americans what can only be described as the largest mass theft in human history,” PressTV breathlessly explains.

Of course, “‘kill order’ is a metaphor for silencing down Congressman Ron Paul in the mass media as if he doesn’t exist,” the network hastens to add.

No contemporary U.S. political leader has been so in sync with Tehran as Ron Paul. Here are just a few of the recent Ron Paul sound bites on Iran and U.S. policy toward Iran prominently featured by PressTV:

“Just think of how many nuclear weapons surround Iran. The Chinese are there, the Indians are there, the Pakistanis are there, the Israelis are there, the United States is there. All these countries—China has nuclear weapons! Wouldn’t it be natural that they might want a weapon? Internationally, they’d be given more respect… They have no evidence that they are working on a weapon. “Paul blasts US policy on Iran, Aug. 12, 2011.

“I think we’re looking for trouble because we put these horrendous sanctions on Iran… Sanctions against Iran are definite steps toward a US attack.” “Iran sanctions ‘acts of war’: Ron Paul,” Dec. 31, 2011; “Ron Paul raps US hostility toward Iran,” Jan. 7, 2012.

“Iran’s leader, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, had never mentioned any intention of wiping Israel off the map.” Quick Facts: Ron Paul on US Foreign Policy, Dec. 24, 2011.

“Iran is not a physical threat to us. They do not have capabilities. The stories you might hear about them being on the verge of a nuclear weapon is not true by our CIA and by the United Nations. They are not on the verge of it.” Quick Facts: Ron Paul on US Foreign Policy, Dec. 24, 2011.

“Who are they [Iran] going to bomb? If they had one or two bombs, they are going to bomb Israel? Israel has 300 of them! And our submarines all around there passing and everything else.” Quick Facts: Ron Paul on US Foreign Policy, Dec. 24, 2011.

“I think they’re acting in self-defense… That is a gross distortion of this debate that they’re on the verge of a nuclear weapon.” Ron Paul defends his anti-war policies, Dec. 16, 2011

“At least our leaders and Reagan talked to the Soviets. What is so terribly bad about this? Countries you put sanctions on, you are more likely to fight them. I say a policy of peace is free trade, stay out of their internal business. Do not get involved in these wars and bring our troops home.” Ron Paul blasts US policy on Iran, Aug. 12, 2011

A Google search of—their U.S. website—returned 349 stories about Ron Paul, the overwhelming majority of them from this past year. The network’s Iranian website,, had more than 1,020 stories featuring Ron Paul.

A similar search of the U.S. website revealed significantly lower numbers for the other GOP candidates, with 242 hits for Mitt Romney, 211 for Newt Gingrich, 119 for Rick Santorum, 103 for Rick Perry, and 95 for Michele Bachmann.

By comparison, a Google search of “Hitler” got 509 hits on, while a search for “Barack Obama” got 3,600.

PressTV’s passion for Ron Paul also can be seen in their choice of headlines.

Paul’s anti-war call attracts GOP ears

Ron Paul ‘challenges US establishment’

Ron Paul’s surge

Iowa voters bring anti-war message into the mainstream

Ron Paul: “We don’t need Patriot Act”

Ron Paul holding Iowa lead in new PPP poll

This last entry publicizes a robo-call survey by Democratic Party polling outfit Public Policy Polling, which touts its “highly accurate polling across the country”on its website. Of course, that particular poll, conducted just days before the Iowa caucuses, was dramatically off, given that Ron Paul placed third after Romney and Santorum essentially tied for first.

By comparison, PressTV coverage of Newt Gingrich is almost  exclusively negative, with headlines such as these:

Newt Gingrich calls Mitt Romney “a liar”

Newt Gingrich: History of anti-Islam slurs

Watchdog files FEC complaint against Newt Gingrich

Occupy protesters heckle Newt Gingrich at Iowa event

Most of the other GOP candidates are given the Gingrich treatment by PressTV editors. Rick Santorum gets blasted for declaring “there is no Palestine,” Michele Bachmann for saying she would “bomb Iran,” and Perry for just about everything, most recently his debate pledge to “reinvade Iraq.”

This autumn, before the Republican field thinned out, PressTV aired an unsigned commentary titled “Romney, Cain or Perry nomination an absolute disaster for America” that featured a viciously satirical Mitt Romney flip-flopper video—two weeks before the Obama campaign released their own version!

In recent weeks, however, their coverage of Romney has become more factual and less charged, perhaps because Iran’s leaders expect him to win the GOP nomination and possibly become president of the United States.

While PressTV gives some coverage to economic issues—especially any factoid suggesting that poverty is on the rise in the United States—it frequently highlights Ron Paul’s refusal to see the Islamic regime in Iran as a potential threat, his pledge to bring American troops home from overseas, and especially his anti-Israel stance.

PressTV editors introduce a montage of Ron Paul debate clips with the ominous onscreen title, “Do you know why the Israel lobby and Neocons hate US Congressman Ron Paul?”

“We’ve been at war in Iran a lot longer than 1979. We started it in 1953, when we sent in a coup and installed the Shah in a coup, and the blowback’s been going on ever since 1979 because we just plain don’t mind our own business. That’s the problem,” Paul says in one of these clips.

“We don’t even have a treaty with Israel. Why do we have this automatic commitment that we’re going to send our kids and our money endlessly?” he says in another.

Anti-Israel theme:

The Tehran regime owns PressTV and controls its content, so its emphasis on finding politicians and “experts” who oppose any form of pressure on Iran is understandable. Some readers, however, may find its proclivity for airing anti-Semitic and anti-Israel rants more troublesome.

Many of Ron Paul’s talking points get repeated by the pro-Tehran conspiracy theorists who populate the PressTV airwaves. In the oxygen-free reaches they appear to inhabit, Ron Paul would become the next president of the United States if only the “Zionist lobby” would let him win.

“Paul is pulling around second in Iowa and is being considered a very serious contender by many,” a PressTV anchorwoman says. Then in all seriousness, she asks Mark Dankof, a self-declared political analyst, “Will the Zionist lobby let him win?”

Dankof, who is a frequent guest on PressTV shows, explains that Ron Paul will lose because of the Jews. “If Paul should be successful early on in a couple of primaries or a couple of caucuses then I think the shrill voices in the Israeli-controlled American media will begin to become more aggressive in attacking him,” he says. Zionist lobbies demonizing Ron Paul, Dec. 3, 2011

PressTV touts Dankof as a “former U.S. Senate candidate,” a “political commentator,” or “political analyst” as a way of plumping his resumé. The subterfuge is typical, and Dankof is reliably pro-Tehran, pro-Ron Paul and anti-American—lumping Barack Obama in the same basket as George W. Bush.

But what about his credential as a former U.S. Senate candidate? Dankof claims on his website that he was the “nominated candidate of the Constitution party” in Delaware in 2000. It turns out, however, that the Constitution Party never held a formal nominating process or a party primary, and that Dankof essentially nominated himself to run in that year’s U.S. Senate race.

“Anybody can be a candidate just by filing the forms,” said Howard Phillips, Conservative Party founder and long-time standard bearer. “Mark was never anointed by the Constitution Party; he decided to run by himself.”

Dankof is typical of the type of rabidly anti-Israel, borderline anti-Semitic commentators PressTV relies on. Other regulars include the likes of Philip Giraldi, an ex-CIA officer who regularly denounces Israeli policies as “manifestly evil;” Paul Sheldon Foote, who promotes Holocaust deniers; and a bevy of left-wing, “anti-war” bloggers and 9/11 “truthers.”

Nisa Islam Mohammad, a staff writer for the Nation of Islam’s Final Call newspaper and a member of the Washington Association of Black Journalists, devoted an entire 25-minute segment of her “American Dream” magazine show to the Zionist lobby effort to “destroy” Ron Paul.

“Texas Congressman Ron Paul is campaigning to become the president of America,” she starts off. “But you might not know that if you just watch mainstream media. Why is he omitted? Why wasn’t he invited to the Republican Jewish Coalition’s forum for presidential candidates?”

The answers, of course, can be found in the title of her show. Why Israel lobby and neocons hate Ron Paul, Dec. 26, 2011

To Tehran’s conspiracy-minded political leaders, Ron Paul is a natural ally.

1 Comment

Filed under Politics

It’s Official: It’s The Obama Dictatorship

Defying the Constitutional Separation of Powers, Obama declares he will act without Congress by Executive Order if we do not give him what he demands.

We tried warning you America, back in 2007 and 2008 what a dangerous dictatorial wannabe the Marxist Barrack Hussein Obama would be.  This week, fresh from a 4 million dollar taxpayer-funded holiday in Hawaii, Obama’s real despotic face comes out to play.

And America will cheer it’s first dictator.

Putting all pretenses aside, Hussein Obama II, declares himself first dictator of Amerika by not only appointing Richard Cordray to head the consumer finance agency as a recess appointment – WHEN CONGRESS WAS NOT IN RECESS.  Apparently for the purpose of setting a precedent so he can do the same thing in appointing a crony to the FHFA so he can announce that he will give away free mortgages to “his people”.    Obama then defiantly told a cheering crowd of brainwashed public high schoolers that when Congress does not act the way he wants them to, he will act on his own.  A defiant declaration of a true imperial presidency,  Obama publicly decrees his intents making himself defacto king, emperor and dictator of this newfound Marxist State of Amerika:

Many are focusing on Obama’s blatant in-our-face move to appoint Cordray as a ‘recess appointment’ when Congress was actually in session.  A lawless act to be certain, but one being given cover by the media and the Obama Red House legal whores who prostitute the law to make the Constitution say what it does not and abolish what it plainly says.  They are already stating defiantly that Obama has authority to make appointments whenever he wants to – without Congressional approval as the Constitution prescribes.

What I keyed into more than the act itself, is Obama’s defiant statement he will act without Congress, and the subsequent clarifications by his regime that Obama is “No longer constrained by Washington” – which, when taking what Obama truly intends to do to this country at face value – means that in Obama’s estimation – he is no longer constrained by the limits and bounds of the Constitution.  He is ABOVE the Constitution in his mind; above the law.  Which of course is nothing new with Obama, since he already revealed in 2001 that he viewed the Constitution as a charter of ‘negative liberties’ that prohibited what the government can do to you or for you to create ‘social justice’.

Here, review what he said yourself:

Now that was back in 2001, and those of us warning the American people what Obama was, and what he intended to do was roundly ignored – so it is no surprise to those of us who know what kind of creature Obama is – that his Marxist gloves are finally coming off, and like all Dictators establishing their permanent rule over their people, Obama will assert he is acting on behalf of the people for their benefit.

Here, some more clarification that Obama considers himself now a monarch and a dictator:

Obama Aides Say He Will Bypass Congress And Focus On Executive Orders During Reelection Campaign, “At Least Two Or Three Per Week”…

Let me note a few pertinent quotes and expound on what is going on here.

…Barack Obama enters his fourth year in office having calculated that he no longer needs Congress to promote his agenda.

There you go, despite the what the Constitution itself says about the Separation of Powers and the Executive’s inability to make laws and pass taxes by decree – Obama says he doesn’t need Congress (our representatives) to pass his agenda.

 …the White House says, Obama’s political fate will no longer be tied to Washington.

Which actually means Obama’s political fate will no longer be tied to the rule of law.  He will make his own fate, by making his own rules and passing out money and gifts as he sees fit.  From each according to their ability TO EACH according to their need as Obama sees fit.

“Now that he’s sort of free from having to put out these fires, the president will have a larger playing field. If that includes Congress, all the better,” said Josh Earnest,White House deputy press secretary. But, he added, “that’s no longer a requirement.”

There’s the admission again, which again ties into his statements to WBEZ in 2001.  Obama is no longer bound by Constitutional requirements.  He no longer considers himself constrained by the Rule of Law or by Congress.  We have the man himself, and his regime TELLING US, that Hussein Obama is in fact, from this moment forward, our Dictator.

Aides say the president will not turn his back on Congress completely in the new year. He is expected to once again push lawmakers to pass elements of his jobs bill that were blocked by Republicans last fall.

Oh how mighty White of His Heinous!  In other words, Obama will not ignore Congress entirely, he will again PUSH Congress to give him what he wants, but if they don’t – he will just do it himself.  We the People, can just go to hell.

If those efforts fail, the White House says, Obama’s re-election year will focus almost exclusively on executive action.

Translation – if Obama does not get what he wants, he will rule by decree and be a law unto himself.  Does the word Sedition have no meaning any longer unless applied to anyone defying Obama or the Ruling Class?

Earnest said Obama will come out with at least two or three directives per week, continuing the “We Can’t Wait” campaign the administration began this fall, and try to define Republicans in Congress as gridlocked and dysfunctional.

And this guy says that Obama will make two or three decrees per week, imposing his will by decree, just like a king would on his subjects.

Will ANYONE stand up against this seditious tyranny?   Or is it too late for us and liberty in this nation?  Already the Media is fawning over themselves, marveling at Obama’s display of ‘executive power’ (that he does not have).

But I have more ominous concerns tied to Obama’s actions than just a defacto decree of dictatorship. That Obama is a wannabe tyrant is no secret here.  There is something worse and more sinister to all of this.

Recall the NDAA Act – Obama signed into law in the last hours of 2011.  Recall that Obama himself ordered Democrats to strip language that would exempt American citizens from the indefinite detention clauses in the act.  Every dictator coming to power requires he eliminate his opposition, and he will do so via either brute force or under the color of legality which is upheld by brute force.

Then in the next breath Obama announces drastic cuts in our military forces (nearly in half) while Iran threatens war, and China prepares to extend her power as she builds aircraft carriers and new warships.  While some suggest Obama is playing to his anti-war Code Pink base, that Obama has on his own authority – decided to abolish the doctrine that America be ready and able to fight two wars on two theaters at once is obsolete – is beyond simple ignorance.

Then couple that news today with Obama’s statement when he signed the NDAA act regarding our nuclear weapons:

Obama to share nuclear missile secrets with Russia –   Of course the moment that happens, you can be sure they will then sell it to China, who may then gift it to her ally North Korea, and then perhaps into the hands of the Iranians also an ally of both Russia and China.

I assume Treason no longer has any meaning except for those the regime has targeted for elimination.

What I find ominous, is not a usual power-mad dictatorial intent in Obama.  Power for oneself, even permanently usually involves ensuring the nation exists to serve the despot.  What Obama is doing, would indicate someone who wants power for oneself, not for the purpose of perpetual rule for himself – but to preside over the destruction of that which he hates.

I am beginning to wonder aloud if indeed the Shia and Sunny prophecy from Islamic hadiths of a “Tall black man in the West” comes to power and presides over the destruction of the infidel nations, does not apply to Obama.

Which is why this blog has routinely referred to His Heinous as NerObama.  About the closest dictatorial despot one can find in history to what Obama will become infamous for.


Filed under Obama Marxist Tyranny

Rant Of The Week

A Post Iowa Caucus in-your-face celebration

This was so good, it has to be shared.  H/T and kudos to Alan Levy and the Conservative patriots at FReepers!

Thanks for making my morning jovial!


Alan Levy


I must say, the 2012 Iowa Caucus was magnificent.

ABSOLUTELY magnificent.

You see, the good guys won for a change.

Mitt Commie failed and Jew hater Ron Paul was delivered a staggering defeat.

Now, before we get started, let’s get a few things clear. Number one, I don’t shill for candidates. I have my favorite candidate and you have yours. In this column, I will never tell you who to vote for. I will always tell you who I think is pond scum (like Mitt Commie, like former Obama syocphant Jon Huntsman, and last, and certainly least, Stormfront candidate Ron Paul), but I will never tell you who to vote for. (You’re an adult, I trust you’ll act accordingly.) Number two, I am fully aware that the Iowa Caucus is not that big of a deal. There’s no need to remind me of that. (If you don’t believe me, ask President Huckabee.)

The failure of Mitt Commie was mind boggling. Here was a guy with a campaign budget that was bigger than the GDP of El Salvador, who had been campaigning since John McLame’s whimpering defeat in 2008, and had a cable news station (FNC, aka the Fox Neocon Channel) in the tank for him, and has a super PAC to do his hatchet work for him…….and yet……..he barely beat Rick Santorum by 8 votes. Yep, you read that right, 8 measly votes. (It should be noted, that until very recently, Rick Santorum’s campaign was being ignored by everyone not named Mark Levin and had 68 cents and pocket lint to its name.) Even uglier for Mitt Commie was the fact that he was unable to drive a wooden stake into the heart of nemesis Newt Gingrich’s campaign. Despite being carpet bombed by Romney’s PAC operatives and Establishment hacks, Gingrich placed a respectable fourth and lived to fight another day. In other words—Mitt Commie choked.

Meanwhile, in Red Skull Ron Paul’s Fourth Reich, the Paultards are tickled Code Pinko.(Either that, or they’re stoned out of their minds yet again.) They think their Fuhrer has won a great victory over the “neocon bankster Zionist war mongers” by placing third. In actuality, this is a resounding, Stalingrad-like defeat for Herr Doktor. See, Iowa laws allow anyone to change their party affiliation at the door of any caucus and vote. So in theory, every liberaltarian, every Green, every 9/11 Truther, every Neo-Nazi, every malcontent, and every so-called “independent” in the state of Iowa could have showed up and dragged the Surrender Monkey’s carcass across the finish line. But they didn’t. Despite the “money bombs”, the “spamming”, the “trolling”, making pests of themselves on talk radio shows, and other Brownshirt-like behavior, RuPaul (H/T: Mark Levin) and his flunkies have failed and failed big time. Third place in a contest whose rules favor you is a complete and utter joke, much like saying Herr Doktor is a Conservative.

Let me repeat: No, I’m not shilling for anyone (as of yet, I’m still undecided) and yes, I know Iowa’s not that big of a deal. However, a win’s a win and I’ll take ’em any way I can get ’em. If you don’t win, you can’t keep it classy and say things like this:


1 Comment

Filed under Politics

Anyone But Ron Paul

While Obama is a threat to our domestic liberties, Ron Paul’s non-interventionist views are beyond dangerous.  They are suicidal.

Perhaps it’s fitting to note what the Second President of the United States said about Democracies in view of Ron Paul’s standing in the polls:

“There is never a democracy that did not commit suicide”. – John Adams

Of course spending ourselves into oblivion with welfare programs that grow the tyrannical state was most likely the intent of the warning Adam’s gave, Ron Paul would make national suicide a literal application by prostrating us before our enemies and blaming ourselves for any acts of war waged on us by expanding militant Islam.

In a companion piece to what I wrote in yesterday’s blog, Gary Bauer nails what we true Conservatives understand about Ron Paul, and his insane and dangerous views in a very hostile world that he pretends does not exist unless provoked first by America. And as Gary Bauer notes, Ron Paul is far more radical than even Obama is on matters of security for this nation.  In fact, much of Paul’s lambasting of Conservatives is right out of the Obama playbook.  No wonder so many fringe Leftists support Ron Paul.

If it’s down to Obama and Ron Paul, national suicide would seem a certainty in our future.

Look for the Ronulan Mob Zombie Hordes to descend in vain attempts to justify their vaunted savior’s lunatic positions.  They will most likely start by declaring Bauer a “NeoCon” and dismiss everything out of hand.  Such as it has been since 2007.


Anyone But Ron Paul for President

Gary Bauer

Some of the most indelible images from September 11, 2001, are of video footage of cheering Muslim crowds in the streets of Ramallah and East Jerusalem as news of the attacks swept across the Middle East.

Is there any doubt that if Ron Paul is elected President, his inauguration will elicit similar jubilation in the cities of America’s worst enemies?

Words such as “noninterventionist” and “isolationist” have been used to describe Paul’s foreign policy views.  A more apt word is “dangerous.”

I like the Texas congressman’s opposition to Big Government.  But his foreign policy and national security views are so dangerous that they should disqualify him for the presidency.

It is tempted to compare Paul’s foreign policy views to those of President Obama.  Both seem to enjoy stressing America’s sins, real and imagined, and both naively believe a little diplomacy is all that’s needed to appease rogue regimes such as Iran.

Like Obama, Paul wants terrorists caught in the U.S. to be treated not as enemy combatants but as common criminals.  Also like Obama, Paul supported the building of a mosque near Ground Zero in New York City, insisting that opposition to its construction was “all about hate and Islamophobia.”

But Paul’s foreign policy views are much more radical than Obama’s.  Paul disapproves of Obama’s drone strikes on terrorists, and would shutter U.S. military bases abroad.  Paul says he would not have ordered the killing of Osama bin Laden.  You’d be hard-pressed to find one in a million Americans who would agree with that.

Paul’s foreign policy views would stand out even in a field of the most liberal Democrats. In fact, Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich, perhaps the most left-wing presidential candidate ever, has said he and Paul “agree tremendously on international policy.”  Paul says he’d consider naming Kucinich to his Cabinet—perhaps as head of a newly formed “Department of Peace.”

But Paul’s views of America and its place in the world go beyond the liberal appeasement of Obama or Kucinich.  In fact, in their sheer conspiratorial lunacy, they align more closely with Obama’s former pastor and mentor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

Consider both Wright’s and Paul’s reaction to 9/11.  Wright described the attacks as “America’s chickens coming home to roost,” and said of America’s government, “We’re the same as al-Qaeda.”

Paul has said that America’s foreign policy was a “major contributing factor” to the attacks, and he allegedly wanted to vote against authorizing war in Afghanistan.  Both Wright and Paul are conspiracy theorists.  According to a former longtime aide, Paul suggested that the attacks may have been coordinated by the CIA or that the Bush administration knew about the attacks ahead of time.  Paul has claimed that 9/11 caused “glee in the administration because now we can invade Iraq.”  He has also suggested that Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, was responsible for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

Wright has claimed that the U.S. government manufactured the AIDS virus to kill black people.  And Paul has allegedly written that the government is “lying” about the threat of AIDS.

Both Wright and Paul are radically anti-Israel.  Wright has called the state of Israel “illegal” and “genocidal.”  He gave a lifetime achievement award to radical Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, an anti-Semite who Wright said “truly epitomized greatness.”

According to his former aide, Paul “wishes the Israeli state did not exist at all.”  The ex-adviser said Paul “sides with the Palestinians, and supports their calls for the abolishment of the Jewish state, and the return of Israel, all of it, to the Arabs.”

Paul has also said he would not have intervened in World War II if Japan hadn’t attacked the U.S., even against Hitler’s Germany to prevent the Holocaust.  This, he insists, somehow fits into a foreign policy based on the Golden Rule.

Paul rarely criticizes President Obama, but has a disturbing tendency to slander his country and fellow Republicans.  He has charged that America has declared “war on 1.2 billion Muslims,” and accused Michele Bachmann of hating Muslims and Rick Santorum of hating gays.  This extremist does the conservative cause an injustice by playing into the Left’s worst false stereotypes of Republicans.  No wonder Paul derives much of his support from the fringe Left.

Many Paulites say they support him for his economic policy views, while dismissing his foreign policy extremism.  But they should realize that in the highly improbable case that Paul becomes President, he would, as Commander-in-chief, have much power to enact his national security agenda and much less influence over economic policy.

By regularly casting America as the world’s villain and by advocating the abandonment of our alliances and the abdication of our duties around the world, a Ron Paul presidency would cheer our enemies, demoralize our friends and guarantee a decline in our national security.


Filed under Politics

Ron Paul: Deliberately Misleading And Far More Dangerous To America’s Security Than Obama

Ron Paul runs political ads asking “How would we feel if China had bases in Texas?” as a pretext to espouse his Isolationist platform.  His ads are dangerously misleading.

Jimmy Carter’s appeasement of Ayatollah Rullah Khomeni that led to the Islamic takeover of Iran and thus erasing an ally and creating an eternal enemy may end up being mild compared to the lunacy and foreign policy ideas of Ron Paul.

The mob zombie hordes of Neo-Con-stitutionalists, quasi Leftists and anti-war pacifists gorge on the slabs of blame-America first and pro-Islamist Apologetics, Ron Paul tosses their way.  In the end, Jimmy Carter will seem to be a lion and a Goliath in comparison to Ron Paul should by some incredible miracle, he ever win the office he is seeking for the third time.  In fact, Ron Paul may be more detrimental to our national security than even Dear Leader Obama.

After all, Ron Paul asserts that he strenuously does not believe the United States had any business getting involved in fighting Hitler in WWII. He expressed to longtime aide Eric Dondero countless times, that ‘saving the Jews,’ was absolutely none of our(America’s) business and asserts when pressed, that “FDR knew about the attacks of Pearl Harbor weeks before hand, and that WWII was just ‘blowback,’ for Woodrow Wilson’s foreign policy errors, and such. ”

This is consistent with Ron Paul’s current insanity in the face of the global rise of militant Islam and the 9-11 Jihad attacks.  As with blaming FDR with knowing in advance the Pearl Harbor attack, Ron Paul asserts the crackpot Alex Jones/Truther view that G.W. Bush knew of the 9-11 attacks in advance, and was “gleeful” for the loss of 3,000 lives as a pretext to invade Iraq.  It’s bad enough Ron Paul badmouths America on a routine basis, it’s even worse (and I say treasonous) when he goes on enemy State television, to denounce America and our foreign policy so it can be used by the Islamofascists in Iran a justification propaganda to prepare and to wage war on “the Great and little Satan”.

PressTV in Iran had a field day with the excerpts from this interview, emboldening the Islamist regime’s covert war against American troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

What I do not know is, if Ron Paul was a clueless idiot to allow himself to be used by an enemy for their purposes against us; or if he willingly gave aid and comfort to the Ahmadinejad regime and his mullahs with his views that are played in Iran as evidence to wage war on the United States and our allies. In either case, this 2009 interview alone is evidence that Ron Paul is actually more dangerous to our national security than even Obama’s pandering to Marxist states.

Ron Paul, as accused – is a militant Pacifist and ardent Isolationist.  His own aide confirmed that fact.  His Mob Zombie Hordes play with his words to insist he is a Constitutionalist, when he is nothing of the sort.  He is an espoused Libertarian, and always had been, running on the Republican ticket so as to deceive what he really is,  because it is the only way he can win elections.

To those who claim Ron Paul is simply a strict non-interventionist,  Ron Paul is the lunatic who expressed to his staffers after the 9-11 attacks, that he opposed any and all military retaliation.  According to his former aide, Paul “expressed no sympathies whatsoever for those who died on 9/11, and pretty much forbade us staffers from engaging in any sort of memorial expressions, or openly asserting pro-military statements in support of the Bush administration.”

It’s not about being non-interventionist with Ron Paul – it’s about his being horrifyingly naive, clueless and ignorant of the real world outside of what he, himself thinks motivates people.

I continue to be baffled why the GOP leadership continues to allow this Libertarian-kook Ron Paul to run as a member of their party, because his presence and purpose seems to be to divide the Conservative vote, and throw the election back to Obama in 2012.  He wants the office too badly, and is vaunted as a political savior by too many clueless idiots who simply think Ron Paul will “tear it all down”, which is what they desperately want.

Coach Kevin Collins notes the dangerous deception of Ron Paul’s ads, wondering aloud how the Islamist enemies will use this ad for their purposes.  Well coach, this is not the first rodeo for Ron Paul’s interviews to be used by our Jihadist enemies.  It is yet another consistent fact of Ron Paul’s unfitness to hold public office.


It is hard to say who, other than our Islamist enemies, benefits from Ron Paul’s slick ad asking, “What if China had bases in Texas?” Paul uses it to promote his delusional view of the world and certainly fools some well-meaning but ill-informed Americans. Those who don’t want us to fight with our hands tied behind our back are easy prey for the gibberish Paul is selling because this ad blurs the lines between the frustrating manner we have prosecuted the war on terror and the very valid reasons for entering into it to begin with.

Many Americans who understand the appallingly halfhearted way the war in Viet Nam was “fought” have an understandable predisposition toward believing we are fighting a “civil war” or “meddling in the affairs of other countries” when we take proactive measures in fighting our war on terror. Paul knows this and shamelessly plays on it for votes.

 Nevertheless, implying there is no difference between Viet Nam and the current war on terror is as addle brained as saying there is no difference between night and day.

Because it was largely true that nothing when North Viet Nam and the Chinese attacked South Viet Nam, would not have brought that war to our shores, does not in any way mean a “live and let live” policy toward the Islamist will insure our safety – just ask the Spanish train bombing victims about that.

Paul’s misguided foreign policy would have us deny the threat of Islam based on the implied notion that we can treat Iran and organized Islamist terror groups as if they are just another group of Nazis speaking a different language. The Nazis did not want to destroy our way of life; they wanted to take over our way of life. The Islamists don’t want to take over our way of life they want to murder every one of us and spit on our way of life.

In its Verses of The Sword, the Koran instructs Islamist to cheat lie steal in order to ultimately murder all infidels for merely living. It says nothing about putting these things into practice only if attacked by the West.   Ron Paul either doesn’t understand this at best; or doesn’t want his supporters to understand this at worst.    

 Slick ads that cloud the differences between the enemies of the 1940s and the enemies we face today do nothing to keep us safe; on the contrary they lull us into a false sense of security. Shame on you Ron Paul; shame on you.


Filed under Politics