While still drumming up a zeitgeist against guns and the 2nd Amendment, Obama’s media says it is time to abandon and abolish the Constitution because it is old, archaic and ‘downright evil’.
The masks and pretenses are off. So too I assume will be the gloves in the not too distant future. The MarxoFascists/Progressives in the Regime and it’s media are now bold suggesting treason as a matter of intellectual superiority. The NY Times published an Op-ed 3 weeks ago – being repeated on CBS this weekend – that the Constitution has outlived it’s usefulness and should be abandoned and/or abolished altogether. As the gun control debate rages, look for this meme to be repeated more often by Obama’s stooges in the media to counter the advocates and “cultists’ who champion the 2nd Amendment.
Constitutional law professor at Georgetown Michael Seidman, who teaches our kids about the Constitution – blames all the woes of our failed government and regime on the Constitution itself. He calls our Foundational law ‘archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil’. He suggests ‘disobedience’ to the Constitution, meaning Obama and the Left should simply ignore it and only give it a passing acknowledgment when it comes to free speech, and only do so out of respect – not obligation.
Seidman seeds the meme that Obama himself has subtly suggested over the years; that the Constitution induces bondage and has made us slaves. Indeed Obama himself stated that the Constitution “Is a charter of NEGATIVE liberties”, lamenting the provisions that restrict government’s power and suggested that it should be rewritten so it can tell government what to do on behalf of the people.
To me, this published advocation of treason reveals the actual intent at work by Obama and the MarxoFascists.
Now we know why and how it is, that this regime in power via fraud ignores the Constitution so willingly – and works tirelessly to infringe and abolish those parts of the law they disagree and hate. This same media now calls anyone advocating gun rights as a ‘2nd Amendment Cultist’ – and that same disdain for the rest of the Constitution is now in our faces and was just sworn in to high office.
By LOUIS MICHAEL SEIDMAN
Link to Op-Ed article allowed only.
CBS actually gives this treason advocate a platform in which to spew this suggestion, as the meme and forced zeitgeist of propagandists for the MarxoFascists now openly sow the seeds for the push to disregard and abolish the Constitution and MSNBC has followed.
For those who do not wish to poison their ears listening to this treason – here’s just a snippet of what this ‘professor’ is teaching our kids at Georgetown:
I’ve got a simple idea: Let’s give up on the Constitution. I know, it sounds radical, but it’s really not. Constitutional disobedience is as American as apple pie. For example, most of our greatest Presidents — Jefferson, Lincoln, Wilson, and both Roosevelts — had doubts about the Constitution, and many of them disobeyed it when it got in their way.
To be clear, I don’t think we should give up on everything in the Constitution. The Constitution has many important and inspiring provisions, but we should obey these because they are important and inspiring, not because a bunch of people who are now long-dead favored them two centuries ago. Unfortunately, the Constitution also contains some provisions that are not so inspiring. For example, one allows a presidential candidate who is rejected by a majority of the American people to assume office. Suppose that Barack Obama really wasn’t a natural-born citizen. So what? Constitutional obedience has a pernicious impact on our political culture. Take the recent debate about gun control. None of my friends can believe it, but I happen to be skeptical of most forms of gun control. I understand, though, that’s not everyone’s view, and I’m eager to talk with people who disagree.
But what happens when the issue gets Constitutional-ized? Then we turn the question over to lawyers, and lawyers do with it what lawyers do. So instead of talking about whether gun control makes sense in our country, we talk about what people thought of it two centuries ago. Worse yet, talking about gun control in terms of constitutional obligation needlessly raises the temperature of political discussion. Instead of a question on policy, about which reasonable people can disagree, it becomes a test of one’s commitment to our foundational document and, so, to America itself.
This is our country. We live in it, and we have a right to the kind of country we want. We would not allow the French or the United Nations to rule us, and neither should we allow people who died over two centuries ago and knew nothing of our country as it exists today. If we are to take back our own country, we have to start making decisions for ourselves, and stop deferring to an ancient and outdated document.