Obama: ISIS Has “Legitimate Grievances” Biden: “Christians Commit Violence In The Name Of The Bible” Obama: “Islam Not Responsible For Terrorism”

Obama says terrorists need jobs and opportunities; America must “Lift up the voice of tolerance” adding “Muslims are unfairly targeted with suspicion”

The Trojan Horse Traitor in the White House doubled-down on his regime’s appeasement and support of Jihad terrorists including ISIS.  Obama once again turned all admonitions into his communist manifesto asserting that “violent extremists” (Jihad terrorists) need jobs and “opportunities” because “resentments fester” and “extremism grows when millions are impoverished”.   So in one speech Obama justifies ISIS and atrocities committed in the name of Islamic jihadists by saying they have ‘legitimate grievances’ while out of the other side of his mouth – says Islam has nothing to do with terrorism.

Obama insisted that ISIS is NOT ISLAMIC while at this very same event at the White House the day before, Joe Biden declared that “Extremists commit violence in the name of the bible”.

Obama warned that Muslims are unfairly regarded with suspicion, insisting “we must raise the voice of tolerance” in the US and beyond.  A dichotomy of the absurd since Obama himself equated the mass beheadings of Christians by ISIS with the Crusades , lecturing us that atrocities are committed in the Name of Christ at the National Prayer Breakfast two weeks ago.  Isn’t it interesting that Obama will easily state that violence is committed in the name of Jesus but will never utter the truth that terrorism is being committed in the name of Mohammed?  That is because Obama himself is aiding and abetting the rise of the two emerging Islamic Caliphates, whereupon all this insanity, appeasement and misdirection is intended to abolish any resolve to stand against the Islamic State’s march on the world.

So the official position of the United States is that Jihadists need jobs and economic opportunity or muslims will join a jihad.  In other words, we cannot judge what ISIS is doing with the beheadings and mass murder as evil because these jihadists have “legitimate grievances”.

As insane as that sounds, that is exactly what Obama meant, along with the subtle references that Christians and the Bible are the world’s REAL terrorists.

Obama’s ridiculous “White House Countering Violent Extremism Summit” circus, is simply a venue to publicly appease Jihadist Islam while bashing Christians and “Right Wing militias”.  At his “summit” Obama invited known Islamic Terrorists and supporters of Jihad to attend with group representatives having links to ISIS.  On this platform Obama loudly insisted that we will never be at war with Islam saying “These terrorists are desperate for legitimacy and all us have a responsibility to refute the notion that groups like ISIL somehow represent Islam”.  Except that ISIS itself is called “The ISLAMIC STATE” and is conquering territory for the EXPRESS PURPOSE of establishing an Islamic State that will wage jihad across the globe and impose Islam on the world at the edge of the sword.

It is becoming self-evident that Obama is an Apologist for Jihadists and given his words and actions, is potentially an agent for the Caliphate himself.

 

Obama says world should address ‘grievances’ that terrorists exploit

Obama defended his administration’s approach to the terror threat at a White House summit Wednesday, standing by claims that groups like the Islamic State do not represent Islam — as well as assertions that job creation could help combat extremism.

Obama, addressing the Washington audience on the second day of the summit, said the international community needs to address “grievances” that terrorists exploit, including economic and political issues.

…“We do have to address the grievances that terrorists exploit including economic grievances,” he said.

He also said no single religion was responsible for violence and terrorism, adding he wants to lift up the voice of tolerance in the United States and beyond.

…Obama also called on Muslim leaders to “do more to discredit the notion that our nations are determined to suppress Islam, that there is an inherent clash in civilizations.”

Obama acknowledged that some Muslim-Americans have concerns about working with the government, particularly law enforcement, and that their reluctance “is rooted in the objection to certain practices where Muslim-Americans feel they’ve been unfairly targeted.”

He said it was important it make sure that abuses stop and are not repeated and that “we do not stigmatize entire communities.” He also said it was vital that “no one is profiled or put under a cloud of suspicion simply because of their faith.”

Unless of course you are Christian.  Then this regime will slander the entire faith, and declare Christians to be extremists and terrorists.

 

 

 

ATF To Ban Non-Lead Ammo At Same Time EPA Plans To Ban Lead Ammo

Federal agencies looking to employ a pincer move designed to ban just about all ammunition from public sale, because if they cannot ban the guns, they opt instead to ban the ammunition that feeds them.

More details and follow-up from the efforts the Obama regime is making to classify .223 ball ammunition as ‘armor piercing’ at the same time we learn the EPA is making moves to ban lead ammunition.

You know, when the Redcoats came to seize the ammunition stores of the Colonists at Lexington and Concord – a war of independence from tyrants resulted.  Today, when attempting to do the same thing utilizing a heinous federal bureaucracy, America yawns as plans to disarm them move forward with frightening speed.

 

A Pincer Movement on Ammunition

The ATF is one side, and the EPA is the other.

(Snippets from this story follow – go to link to read the full article)

As it wanes, the Obama administration grows bold, and even reckless, on matters that send a thrill up the leg of its most leftward supporters. Its new attack on so-called armor-piercing ammunition — which is, in reality, a very broad attack on ammunition across the board — is a dangerous and destructive example of the administration’s late-days slide into rule-by-decree.

…In 1986, Congress revised the Gun Control Act, inserting prohibitions against the manufacture and import of “armor-piercing ammunition.” Armor-piercing ammunition does not mean ammunition designed to defeat body armor — that would be too simple. It means, most broadly, ammunition that could defeat the soft body armor of the sort that was cutting edge in the 1980s. But banning all such ammunition as “armor-piercing” would have meant a ban on practically all hunting rifles…

…So, “armor-piercing” came to mean ammunition made of certain materials (tungsten alloys, steel, etc.) that could defeat certain kinds of body armor and that could be fired from a handgun. …It’s almost as though the agency is reasoning toward some specific, predetermined goal, isn’t it?

…The upshot of all this maneuvering is that the ATF intends to revoke the sporting exemption for certain popular kinds of .223 ammunition, allowing it to be reclassified as armor-piercing and therefore banned, even though it is not designed as armor-piecing ammunition and has no special armor-piercing characteristics. …But the fact that there is a multi-shot handgun commercially available for those non-lead .223 rounds means that such ammunition can be banned as armor-piercing, even though it is not armor-piercing ammunition, by use or by design.

So, everybody goes back to lead, right?

Wrong. Environmental groups have been pressuring the EPA to begin regulating — or to ban outright — lead ammunition under the Toxic Substances Control Act. They lost their most recent round when the D.C. Court of Appeals ruled that the EPA lacks statutory authority to regulate lead ammunition, but when has statutory authority stopped the Obama administration? The FCC has no statutory authority to enact net-neutrality rules — that’s why it has reached back to a 1930s, New Deal–era law for justification. You can be sure that the campaign to use the EPA or other federal agencies to ban lead ammunition is far from over. The U.S. Humane Society already is petitioning the Interior Department to ban lead ammunition on public lands.

What gun-rights advocates fear — not without reason — is that this is the beginning of a pincer movement, with the ATF banning non-lead ammunition as a threat to armor-wearing police officers and the EPA banning lead ammunition as a toxin.

…In a sense, the gun-grabbers were telling the truth when they said that they had no designs on our sporting rifles. But the ammunition for those rifles is another story.