Tag Archives: 9-11 attack in Egypt and Libya

Obama Declares At UN: The Future Must Not Belong to Practicing Christians

“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam”. -Barrack Obama 9-25-12

Since all Islam demands everyone recognize Mohammed as God’s true prophet – for the Salafists, sufis and shia – anyone who does not acknowledge the prophet is considered not only an infidel – but slander the prophet by their refusal to submit to him.

Obama knows this having been raised a Muslim in Indonesia.  His speech at the UN was an all-out assault on not only freedom of speech, but of faith.  In cleverly cloaked words to deceive ignorant Americans, key phrases ping the ears that the Muslim world will understand what Obama really means.  While the media will parrot that Obama was condemning ‘extremism’, the fact remains that Islam itself is extremism.  His words paint a target on the First Amendment, Free Speech and right to religious exercise – all targets of Obama AND Sharia Law proponents.

As Kevin DuJan notes at Hillbuzz

Today, Obama spoke out against free speech and wished for a world where those who criticize Islam will be punished (or even executed) worldwide. 

Let’s be really clear about this, folks:  the man sitting in the Oval Office thinks it’s a good idea for global blasphemy laws to be enacted to serve a worldwide state religion, ISLAM.

As DuJan rightfully notes, Obama had published in his ‘memoirs’ ‘Dreams From My Father’, that if the political winds shifted against Islam, he would stand with Muslims.  That is more than apparent since Obama enabled the Jihadist Islamists to take power in Libya, Egypt, Tunisia and other places in the Mid East and has done NOTHING to punish the Islamists who attacked our embassies and killed the U.S. Ambassador to Libya and 4 other Americans.

Instead, Obama slammed Free Speech rights in the US, blamed a video on Youtube and apologized to the Muslim world in TV ads running in Pakistan and elsewhere.

I cannot state it any better than Erick Erickson did at Red State.

The Future Must Not Belong to Practicing Christians

In his speech to the United Nations General Assembly today the President of the United States declared that the future does not belong to practicing Christians. Already, the media and the left are in full denial, probably based on their general lack of understanding of theology. This would have been a gaffe had Mitt Romney said it. But with Barack Obama, he’s just speaking bold truths. His bold truth declares that the future does not belong to practicing Christians.

Pay careful attention to what he says.

The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. Yet to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated, churches are destroyed, or the Holocaust is denied. Let us condemn incitement against Sufi Muslims, and Shiite pilgrims. It is time to heed the words of Gandhi: “Intolerance is itself a form of violence and an obstacle to the growth of a true democratic spirit.” Together, we must work towards a world where we are strengthened by our differences, and not defined by them. That is what America embodies, and that is the vision we will support.

Now, that’s the full paragraph so no one can claim I took him out of context.

But consider this.

It is an orthodox Christian belief that Mohammed is not a prophet. Actual Christians, as opposed to many of the supposed Christians put up by the mainstream media, believe that Christ is the only way to salvation. Believing that is slandering Mohammed. That’s just a fact. If you don’t believe me, you go into the MIddle East and proclaim Christ is the way, the truth, and the life and see what happens to your life.

Then Barack Obama went on to say “Yet to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see when the image of Jesus Christ is desecrated, churches are destroyed, or the Holocaust is denied.” Note he says we cannot “slander the prophet of Islam” but it’s only the image of Christ in the next sentence — not actually Christ himself desecrated. If this is so, why does Barack Obama’s government continue funding the National Endowment for the Arts, which funds Christ in piss, the Virgin Mary painted in dung, etc.?

Now, in point of fact, this is a major difference between Islam and Christianity. Christ came to this world as an enemy of the world and expected to be impugned. He also tells his followers that they should expect to be impugned. There is joy in being persecuted for following the Risen Lord. In Islam, if you impugn Mohammed, you get a fatwa on your butt.

And then there is the first amendment. The President of the United States tried to have it both ways in his speech.

I know there are some who ask why we don’t just ban such a video. The answer is enshrined in our laws: our Constitution protects the right to practice free speech. Here in the United States, countless publications provoke offense. Like me, the majority of Americans are Christian, and yet we do not ban blasphemy against our most sacred beliefs. Moreover, as President of our country, and Commander-in-Chief of our military, I accept that people are going to call me awful things every day, and I will always defend their right to do so. Americans have fought and died around the globe to protect the right of all people to express their views – even views that we disagree with.

We do so not because we support hateful speech, but because our Founders understood that without such protections, the capacity of each individual to express their own views, and practice their own faith, may be threatened. We do so because in a diverse society, efforts to restrict speech can become a tool to silence critics, or oppress minorities. We do so because given the power of faith in our lives, and the passion that religious differences can inflame, the strongest weapon against hateful speech is not repression, it is more speech – the voices of tolerance that rally against bigotry and blasphemy, and lift up the values of understanding and mutual respect.

I know that not all countries in this body share this understanding of the protection of free speech. Yet in 2012, at a time when anyone with a cell phone can spread offensive views around the world with the click of a button, the notion that we can control the flow of information is obsolete. The question, then, is how we respond. And on this we must agree: there is no speech that justifies mindless violence.

Just words, Mr. President? You say “there is no speech that justifies mindless violence,” but all last week you condemned a ridiculous video trailer for a movie that does not exist. Your government ran advertisements in Pakistan denouncing the video. What of free speech, Mr. President? Last week you were saying the violence was understandable given the offensive film and this week you are trying to claim it was mindless.

Oh wait, you did it again in the same speech where you said “there is no speech that justifies mindless violence”:

At times, the conflicts arise along the fault lines of faith, race or tribe; and often they arise from the difficulties of reconciling tradition and faith with the diversity and interdependence of the modern world. In every country, there are those who find different religious beliefs threatening; in every culture, those who love freedom for themselves must ask how much they are willing to tolerate freedom for others.

That is what we saw play out the last two weeks, as a crude and disgusting video sparked outrage throughout the Muslim world.

Time and again the President of the United States tries to have it both ways.

But are they just words?

The fact is, many religions do not recognize Mohammed as a prophet. In the widest swath of Islam, that denial is, in and of itself, slander. So what exactly are you saying Mr. President?

As an exit point, with all of President Obama’s statements on tolerance in his speech, we should remember that tolerance is really not a Christian virtue. As Archbishop Chaput of Philadelphia noted, “We need to remember that tolerance is not a Christian virtue. Charity, justice, mercy, prudence, honesty — these are Christian virtues. And obviously, in a diverse community, tolerance is an important working principle. But it’s never an end itself.” The Archbishop also noted that evil preaches tolerance until it is dominate and then it seeks to silence good. That’s not a statement that the President is evil in any way, shape, or form, but we should be mindful when the secular world demands tolerance for all, tolerance for all means we cannot have standards of faith to live by, because those standards obviously require we be intolerant of sins this world has embraced.

6 Comments

Filed under Obama Marxist Tyranny, War On Jihadists

Jihad Egyptian President Issues Conditions for American Surrender To Islam

Obama to release Gitmo Jihadists, then condemn American Christian before the UN, while Egyptian President issues more demands on America.

In the wake of a media-ignored week of worldwide American castration by Jihadist Islam, the punches from the Trojan Horse that is the Obama regime keep on coming.

Breitbart reports that Obama will release 55 Jihad terrorists from Guantanamo Bay this week:

Obama is about to release or transfer 55 Gitmo prisoners, despite reports that the Libyan believed to be behind the killing of US Ambassador Christopher Stevens was a former Guantanamo inmate transferred to Libyan custody.

Breitbart also reports Obama will condemn an American Christian before the world and denounce his supposed film ‘Innocence of Muslims” at the UN this week.  John Nolte reports:

Not only are we seeing the White House and State Department call more attention to the Mohammed-mocking “Innocence of Muslims” than any terrorist network ever could’ve hoped for, but the President’s indefensible scapegoating of the film and filmmaker to draw attention and blame away from U.S. security failures apparently knows no bounds.

On top of all that, Flopping Aces does an ace job – of tying together all  the existing and confirmed news stories to piece together the fact that the Muslim Brotherhood Egyptian President, is issuing demands for American capitulation and surrender to Islam – that Obama himself is making possible.

They note the story that Obama is now taking defacto orders from Morsi of Egypt as the Islamist spells out terms for US/Arab relations.

Egypt’s new Islamist president, Mohamed Morsi said the United States needed to fundamentally change its approach to the Arab world, showing greater respect for its values and helping build a Palestinian state, if it hoped to overcome decades of pent-up anger.

A former leader of the Muslim Brotherhood and Egypt’s first democratically elected president, Mr. Morsi sought in a 90-minute interview with The New York Times to introduce himself to the American public and to revise the terms of relations between his country and the United States after the ouster of Hosni Mubarak, an autocratic but reliable ally.

Flopping Aces notes that the overall pattern from Egypt is to 1.) demand the US accept Islam as its own rule, 2.) calling for the suspension of free speech in the US and to put on trial anyone who offends them. 3.) Egyptian Cleric Safwat Higazi states: ‘One Of The Tenets Of The Muslim Brotherhood… Is The Islamic Caliphate And The Ruling Of The World… The Day Will Come When We Will Be The Masters Of The World’

Obama’s response to these demands given his actions this past week and this coming week appears to be unconditional surrender, complete with bow.  Obama is stretching all our necks to the sword of Jihadist Islam.

DELIBERATELY.

1 Comment

Filed under Obama Marxist Tyranny, War On Jihadists

U.S. Ambassador Reportedly Raped & Sodomized Before Being Killed

Mob of Libyans that Obama praised for taking Ambassador Stevens to the Hospital, raped him before dragging his body through the streets.

“Libyans acted responsibly by carrying Steven’s body to the hospital…” – Barack Hussein Obama, 9-12-12

If the foreign news reports from the Middle East are correct, the Libyans whom Obama praised for “acting responsibly” before taking his body to a hospital, reportedly raped him before he was killed.

The Washington Times picked up a story from Lebanon’s Tayyar  news organization from an AFP source that states that murdered Ambassador Christopher Stevens, was raped by his captors before being killed.  The Libyan Free Press also televised the story:

UPDATE: Hmmmm – how convenient for Youtube to yank the Libyan TV video from their site.  Wonder if Youtube got a call from the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff like American pastor Terry Jones did, and was “asked” to take down potentially offensive (and truthful) material?

Obama’s State Department earlier on Wednesday apologized to Muslims that they were offended by ‘irresponsible” Americans exercising their right to free speech, as the ’cause’ of the attacks is reported to have been due outrage over a Youtube video that insults the Prophet Mohammed.  That spin does not hold water when it is being learned that these attacks were planned well in advance and the video being used as cover to suggest the attacks were spontaneous.  Also learned was that the same Libyan Security forces that Obama praised so highly in his short address, gave up consulate personnel including Stephens, to the Islamists who ended up murdering them.

All of this happened nearly at the same time Obama was giving an address to salute the Arab Forum on 9-11 Tuesday.

What can be said better than the following picture that best describes the last few days with Obama?

18 Comments

Filed under Obama Marxist Tyranny, War On Jihadists