Judge Rules Detroit’s Bankruptcy Filing ‘Unconstitutional’ – Says It “Dishonors Obama”

No it’s not satire, Ingham County Circuit judge ordered Friday that Detroit’s federal bankruptcy filing be withdrawn because it does not honor Obama.

Detroit’s Liberal Socialists spent Detroit into bankruptcy – which the city filed for this week.  Then a nitwit Judge without standing strikes the bankruptcy filing down and orders it withdrawn citing an erroneous state Constitutional provision.  What the judge asserts is that all of the taxpayers of Michigan (and even possibly the rest of the country)  should be forced to bail out Detroit, so the Union Lackeys of the MarxoFascists can get their pensions while Obama pilfers, raids and empties everyone else’s.

“It’s cheating, sir, and it’s cheating good people who work,” the judge told assistant Attorney General Brian Devlin. “It’s also not honoring the (United States) president, who took (Detroit’s auto companies) out of bankruptcy.”

Aquilina said she would make sure President Obama got a copy of her order.

“I know he’s watching this,” she said, predicting the president ultimately will have to take action to make sure existing pension commitments are honored.

“Watching this”?  Like he’s a god, watching over his minions.  Hmmm, and I thought Mao was dead.

Ace of Spades has a great analysis.

 

Sharia Implementation: Posting Anything “Mean” About Muslims, Is Now A Federal Criminal Act

The First Amendment is dead as U.S. Attorney says posting anything negative about Islam is a Federal violation of civil rights laws.

The hits from the Obama regime just keep on coming, and coming and coming.

Yesterday it was reported that Obama’s regime (with help from John McCain)  is committing treason by arming Al Qaeda-backed rebels in Syria who slaughtered an entire Christian village.

Members of the Free Syrian Army reportedly attacked the Christian-dominated al-Duvair village in Reef on the outskirts of Homs on Monday, where they massacred its citizens, including women and children…The U.S. and other Western governments that are backing the FSA have acknowledged the presence of jihadists but insist that they’re only a small part of the rebel movement. However, al-Qaeda and other Islamic extremist groups have been at the front of the rebel movement since day one of the Syrian war that began two years ago. According to German intelligence, 95 percent of the rebels aren’t even Syrian.

The slaughter was committed as an effort by the Jihadists to implement Sharia Law in Dictator Assad’s formerly secularist Syria.

Why is this issue of concern for us in America?  Well, aside from Obama helping to create an Islamic Caliphate in the Middle East, the Obama regime is implementing by default, Sharia right here as part of Federal Law.

U.S. Attorney for the Obama Federalies  asserts posting the truth about Jihadists and radical Islamists is now a violation of Federal law.  This is defacto implementation of Sharia Law under the guise of protecting ‘civil rights’ for Jihadists and radical Muslims.   Interestingly, that application of ‘civil rights laws’  does not extend to Christians.  Everyone, including Muslims are free to demonize, denounce and insult Christianity and Christians for their faith and no such criminal violation of  ‘civil rights laws’ will be applied or upheld.

Well, I for one will continue to post the TRUTH about Jihadists and radical Muslims until I am forced to stop.  And you can be sure, this regime is going to attempt to force us to shut up.

Why do you think they obtained all that data and collected all those e-mails, cell numbers and texts from the press corps?

You need to be asking yourself, ‘how long before speaking ill of homosexuals, or the Democrats or Obama will be made a Federal crime?’  My guess is soon now.  This regime has reached the point of power that it believes it can do whatever it wants to do without any consequences.   Obama and the MarxoFascist war on the First Amendment and the press has reached the bombardment phase.

Think Hitler versus the Munich Post in the 30’s.  Think Soviet, because that is where we have arrived.

From Breitbart today.

US Attorney Bill Killian: Posting Something Mean About Muslims on Social Media Might Be a Criminal Action Under Federal Civil Rights Laws

The First Amendment served us well for a time, but now it’s outdated.

Remember reading that England had arrested a guy for anti-Muslim Twitter postings in the aftermath of the Woolrich slaughter? And remember thinking, “Well, this is America, that can’t happen here”?
Oh yes it can. Obama’s Attorney for the Eastern district of Tennessee wants you to know that if you say something untoward about Muslims, the Federal government may imprison you.

Killian and Moore will provide input on how civil rights can be violated by those who post inflammatory documents targeted at Muslims on social media. “This is an educational effort with civil rights laws as they play into freedom of religion and exercising freedom of religion,” Killian told The News Monday. “This is also to inform the public what federal laws are in effect and what the consequences are.” … Killian said Internet postings that violate civil rights are subject to federal jurisdiction.

The posting he offers as a “for instance” is an egregious one. And yet this country has long protected, absolutely, egregious speech, such as hardcore pornography, for a simple reason: Either you are at liberty to say what you will or you are not. If you are constantly double-thinking every word you might say, for fear of being prosecuted, you are self-censoring, in anticipation of a possible prosecution by the government.

Rather than having a system in which people were constantly worried about imprisonment for speech, our country has evolved a simple bright-line code: Speech of all kinds, with a few exceptions that can be counted on three fingers, is absolutely protected.

Remember, the importance of this bright-line, no-exceptions rule of free speech was preached to us, even when some of us might not have liked it so much, as when hardcore pornography was afforded absolute protection under the First Amendment. In the case of hardcore pornography, it was argued — successfully — that having each artist weigh the possibility of an obscenity prosecution was too much of a burden on his free speech rights, and would have, unavoidably, a chilling effect on speech.

That was the rule then, and that was the rationale.

But now comes the Obama Administration to tell you that Yes, you just might be imprisoned for something you say online, so you’d better Watch What You Say.

Remember when Ari Fleischer said that, without suggesting any kind of legal penalties? Remember how the media freaked out?

But now comes the US Attorney for the Eastern district of Tennessee explicitly telling you that you may be imprisoned if a political appointee decides your political speech has crossed a line.

Somehow, I don’t think Tim Robbins will be portentously howling us that a “chill wind” is blowing across our rights of free expression this week.

More from Flopping Aces, who dug up video of Obama “joking” about using the IRS to punish those who he does not like to make the point that much of what Obama ‘joked’ about or made mention of during 2008-2009 – is being IMPLEMENTED.

Obama: Islam Trumps First Amendment

“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam”. – Barackus Obamanus I

“This is to inform the public what federal laws are in effect and what the consequences are…Internet postings that violate civil rights are subject to federal jurisdiction. That’s what everybody needs to understand,” – Bill Killian Federal U.S. Attorney on behalf of Obama DOJ

Ditch The Plan! You Ruling Class Lying Sacks!

I absolutely have to turn your attentions to as succinct and to-the-point blog essay by Truman North over at Ace of Spades, of this Debt Ceiling charade being played and the lies the Ruling Class Elites, including Boehner are trying to play us all for saps.

As I’m analyzing this insane argumentative game the Ruling Class is playing – they are posturing this whole deal to either grant NerObama Dictatorial power, or make it look like the GOP fought for the best deal it could and we get Obama’s plan via Harry Reid that will be entitled the “Boehner Plan”.   The first option of granting a dictatorship comes from  McConnell’s original plan to grant Obama a blank check to raise the debt ceiling himself, this has been followed by recent catcalls from Obama’s stooges calling for him to invoke the 14th Amendment and raise the debt ceiling on his own authority anyway.  The second analysis is simply the shell game the Ruling Class likes to play while they lie their arses off to us while showcasing great theater.

The TEA Party members of the Freshmen class need to dig in and hold the line.  Ditch any plan unless it CUTS more than 10 TRILLION in spending.  Truman North explains why – pay attention:

Boehner’s a Liar. Ditch the Plan.

The current Boehner  (2.0) deal is less than meaningless. It’s an insult to you. Boehner is grabbing your daughter, spitting in her mouth, and then burning your house down. All the while talking about how he’s all about doing the right thing.

Let me reiterate, as I have been for the last day or so on each of these threads:

The CBO does some stupid things. Like assuming an approximate 7% increase in federal spending year over year as normal, even without any new programs or departments. Like making 10-year budgets, when only one year really matters, because it’s impossible for one Congress to bind another.

Let me give you some small idea of how screwed up Washington math is, and how much it favors those who are in power over those of us who foot the bill with our blood and treasure:

If we JUST CAPPED SPENDING– spent the same amount next FY as we did this FY,

the CBO would score that as a $9.5 trillion dollar cut.

So before anyone can claim we’re “cutting” anything, the number they are talking about has to exceed $9.5 trillion.

The Boehner plan, with all its actuarial tomfoolery, claims to cut something in the neighborhood of $850 billion.

And only $20 billion of that is this year.

So John Boehner is saying to you that spending $20 billion less thanObama’s opening offer is worth giving him a blank check for a trillion and more.

As long as we’re going to go on playing for the “long game” it’s meaningless to even try to put together a plan. Just let the Democrats do what they want to, since the difference between what they’re going to do and Republicans’ counteroffer is less than a rounding error.

My point is, either we fight for this, or we die like dogs. What the House is doing is not fighting.

The elite Washington Republican insiders have a very tough tightrope to walk: They have to make you believe that they’re fighting for your interests, while making damn sure that they’re not fighting for your interests. Because your interests are directly opposed to their interests.Money is power. The power to tax is the power to rule. Not represent, butrule.

And now we’re seeing just how representative our government is. The conservative movement achieved a nationwide landslide for the GOP. And what did we get for it? $352M in allocated spending de-allocated during the asinine CR (and don’t get me started on those filthy bipartisan statist backslappers passing a continuing resolution rather than stating their priorities in a budget document), and $20 billion unspent in exchange for an extra trillion borrowed. Unless, you know, Harry Reid says we get less and we like it.

Pretty awesome work for eight months in office, TEA movement Representatives! You just saved us… about 54 hours of government borrowing. Not spending, just the borrowing we do in 54 hours.

How much time and money did you spend getting these schmucks elected? Hours? Thousands? However much it was, that’s time and money you could have spent with your family that you will never get back. And our kids and grandkids are not only still slaves, but the Congress is forging new links on their chains as we speak.

Mr. Speaker, the only rational position for a reasonable man acting prudently to take is to honor those who made his rule possible and not raise the debt ceiling. It is politically rational because the House hasalready given the Senate and the President a choice: Do it like Americans want you to do it, or leave the debt limit where it is. Not only is it politically rational, it is the only choice that obeys the laws of economics: There. Is. No. More. Money. Somebody already spent it.

Drop the act, Boehner. Send the House home.

UPDATE: Boehner now reworks his plan into 3.0 with demand for Balanced Budget Amendment into legislation.  Harry Reid says this bill “worse” than Cut, Cap, Balance – and says this new House bill is D.O.A.

Meanwhile, Harry Reid is crafting his own plan – (which is unConstitutional as all revenue bills must originate in the House), by probably gutting Boehner’s bill and rewriting the entire thing bill to match what NerObama wants: credit limit debt ceiling raise through the elections.