Ron Paul Does Jane Fonda

The Iranian Mullahcracy absolutely loves Ron Paul, and for Iran’s propaganda war against the West – Ron Paul is a beloved ally of the Islamofascists in Tehran.

As I have consistently noted about Ron Paul, the enemies of the USA love to interview and quote him for their propaganda purposes against this country and the West of whom they seek to either destroy or subjugate to Sharia Law.

One of the major key reasons for my long opposition to this usurper-Republican running for the presidency for the 3rd time, is his absolutely insane and moronic positions regarding foreign policy, notwithstanding his anti-Jew conspiratorialist agenda and past racism that only now, some of his own former associates are beginning to bring to the public’s attention.

As further evidence of what I consider to be Jane Fona-esque treason, whether willful or by clueless idiocy, Ron Paul provides the enemies of the United States, his own anti-American platform and anti-semitic positions to arm themselves with ammunition to wage their own war against the infidel Great and Little Satan.

Ron Paul stated he would have never gone to war against the Nazis, so we can assume he would also not dare raise a hand against the Islamofascist’s in Iran either.  In fact, the Jihadist regime play video of Ron Paul justifying their “right” to make and have nuclear weapons.  This, after Ahmadinejad stated Iran had a right to USE nuclear weapons and promising Israel will be ‘wiped off the map’.  A more dangerous and clueless nut job cannot be found, excepting only that Hussein Obama II runs a close second to Paul’s dangerous insanity.

The enemies of America and the West have an ally in Ron Paul, and the current occupant of the White House.  For the Jihadists, their future seems bright.  God help us all, as blinding brightness may one day visit our cities if either of these two clowns continue in the chair at 1600 Pennsylvania.

Tehran TV Loves Ron Paul

The Iranian regime’s English language propaganda channel, PressTV, has discovered a new American idol: presidential contender Rep. Ron Paul.

PressTV has stepped up its coverage of Paul’s campaign to win the Republican presidential nomination in recent weeks, featuring hisanti-Israel rants, his claim that sanctions against Iran are “acts of war,” his approval of Iran’s nuclear ambitions, and much more.

The Iranian government channel portrays Ron Paul as an American hero, and brings on conspiracy theorists masquerading as political “analysts” to laud him for  “challenging the American establishment” and the “corporate neo-conservative Zionist consensus,” that cabal of Jews, banksters, and Reagan Democrats who in Tehran’s eyes (and in the eyes of these Ron Paul supporters) run the world.

It’s a script taken almost word-for-word from the infamous anti-Semitic forgery,The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Headlining one montage of Ron Paul sound bites denouncing U.S. support for Israel, PressTV reveals that President Obama has issued a “Ron Paul ‘kill order.’”

This dramatic claim was “revealed” in a “secret letter sent to Prime Minister Putin by Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda” released to the press by the Russian Federal Security Service, better known during Cold War days for wanton fabrications and disinformation campaigns.

The purported letter “contains a warning that United States President Barack Obama has issued an executive-level ‘kill order’ against U.S. Congressman Ron Paul over fears this charismatic politician, who many believe could capture the Republican Presidential 2012 nomination, is about to expose to all Americans what can only be described as the largest mass theft in human history,” PressTV breathlessly explains.

Of course, “‘kill order’ is a metaphor for silencing down Congressman Ron Paul in the mass media as if he doesn’t exist,” the network hastens to add.

No contemporary U.S. political leader has been so in sync with Tehran as Ron Paul. Here are just a few of the recent Ron Paul sound bites on Iran and U.S. policy toward Iran prominently featured by PressTV:

“Just think of how many nuclear weapons surround Iran. The Chinese are there, the Indians are there, the Pakistanis are there, the Israelis are there, the United States is there. All these countries—China has nuclear weapons! Wouldn’t it be natural that they might want a weapon? Internationally, they’d be given more respect… They have no evidence that they are working on a weapon. “Paul blasts US policy on Iran, Aug. 12, 2011.

“I think we’re looking for trouble because we put these horrendous sanctions on Iran… Sanctions against Iran are definite steps toward a US attack.” “Iran sanctions ‘acts of war’: Ron Paul,” Dec. 31, 2011; “Ron Paul raps US hostility toward Iran,” Jan. 7, 2012.

“Iran’s leader, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, had never mentioned any intention of wiping Israel off the map.” Quick Facts: Ron Paul on US Foreign Policy, Dec. 24, 2011.

“Iran is not a physical threat to us. They do not have capabilities. The stories you might hear about them being on the verge of a nuclear weapon is not true by our CIA and by the United Nations. They are not on the verge of it.” Quick Facts: Ron Paul on US Foreign Policy, Dec. 24, 2011.

“Who are they [Iran] going to bomb? If they had one or two bombs, they are going to bomb Israel? Israel has 300 of them! And our submarines all around there passing and everything else.” Quick Facts: Ron Paul on US Foreign Policy, Dec. 24, 2011.

“I think they’re acting in self-defense… That is a gross distortion of this debate that they’re on the verge of a nuclear weapon.” Ron Paul defends his anti-war policies, Dec. 16, 2011

“At least our leaders and Reagan talked to the Soviets. What is so terribly bad about this? Countries you put sanctions on, you are more likely to fight them. I say a policy of peace is free trade, stay out of their internal business. Do not get involved in these wars and bring our troops home.” Ron Paul blasts US policy on Iran, Aug. 12, 2011

A Google search of PressTV.com—their U.S. website—returned 349 stories about Ron Paul, the overwhelming majority of them from this past year. The network’s Iranian website, PressTV.ir, had more than 1,020 stories featuring Ron Paul.

A similar search of the U.S. website revealed significantly lower numbers for the other GOP candidates, with 242 hits for Mitt Romney, 211 for Newt Gingrich, 119 for Rick Santorum, 103 for Rick Perry, and 95 for Michele Bachmann.

By comparison, a Google search of “Hitler” got 509 hits on PressTV.com, while a search for “Barack Obama” got 3,600.

PressTV’s passion for Ron Paul also can be seen in their choice of headlines.

Paul’s anti-war call attracts GOP ears

Ron Paul ‘challenges US establishment’

Ron Paul’s surge

Iowa voters bring anti-war message into the mainstream

Ron Paul: “We don’t need Patriot Act”

Ron Paul holding Iowa lead in new PPP poll

This last entry publicizes a robo-call survey by Democratic Party polling outfit Public Policy Polling, which touts its “highly accurate polling across the country”on its website. Of course, that particular poll, conducted just days before the Iowa caucuses, was dramatically off, given that Ron Paul placed third after Romney and Santorum essentially tied for first.

By comparison, PressTV coverage of Newt Gingrich is almost  exclusively negative, with headlines such as these:

Newt Gingrich calls Mitt Romney “a liar”

Newt Gingrich: History of anti-Islam slurs

Watchdog files FEC complaint against Newt Gingrich

Occupy protesters heckle Newt Gingrich at Iowa event

Most of the other GOP candidates are given the Gingrich treatment by PressTV editors. Rick Santorum gets blasted for declaring “there is no Palestine,” Michele Bachmann for saying she would “bomb Iran,” and Perry for just about everything, most recently his debate pledge to “reinvade Iraq.”

This autumn, before the Republican field thinned out, PressTV aired an unsigned commentary titled “Romney, Cain or Perry nomination an absolute disaster for America” that featured a viciously satirical Mitt Romney flip-flopper video—two weeks before the Obama campaign released their own version!

In recent weeks, however, their coverage of Romney has become more factual and less charged, perhaps because Iran’s leaders expect him to win the GOP nomination and possibly become president of the United States.

While PressTV gives some coverage to economic issues—especially any factoid suggesting that poverty is on the rise in the United States—it frequently highlights Ron Paul’s refusal to see the Islamic regime in Iran as a potential threat, his pledge to bring American troops home from overseas, and especially his anti-Israel stance.

PressTV editors introduce a montage of Ron Paul debate clips with the ominous onscreen title, “Do you know why the Israel lobby and Neocons hate US Congressman Ron Paul?”

“We’ve been at war in Iran a lot longer than 1979. We started it in 1953, when we sent in a coup and installed the Shah in a coup, and the blowback’s been going on ever since 1979 because we just plain don’t mind our own business. That’s the problem,” Paul says in one of these clips.

“We don’t even have a treaty with Israel. Why do we have this automatic commitment that we’re going to send our kids and our money endlessly?” he says in another.

Anti-Israel theme:

The Tehran regime owns PressTV and controls its content, so its emphasis on finding politicians and “experts” who oppose any form of pressure on Iran is understandable. Some readers, however, may find its proclivity for airing anti-Semitic and anti-Israel rants more troublesome.

Many of Ron Paul’s talking points get repeated by the pro-Tehran conspiracy theorists who populate the PressTV airwaves. In the oxygen-free reaches they appear to inhabit, Ron Paul would become the next president of the United States if only the “Zionist lobby” would let him win.

“Paul is pulling around second in Iowa and is being considered a very serious contender by many,” a PressTV anchorwoman says. Then in all seriousness, she asks Mark Dankof, a self-declared political analyst, “Will the Zionist lobby let him win?”

Dankof, who is a frequent guest on PressTV shows, explains that Ron Paul will lose because of the Jews. “If Paul should be successful early on in a couple of primaries or a couple of caucuses then I think the shrill voices in the Israeli-controlled American media will begin to become more aggressive in attacking him,” he says. Zionist lobbies demonizing Ron Paul, Dec. 3, 2011

PressTV touts Dankof as a “former U.S. Senate candidate,” a “political commentator,” or “political analyst” as a way of plumping his resumé. The subterfuge is typical, and Dankof is reliably pro-Tehran, pro-Ron Paul and anti-American—lumping Barack Obama in the same basket as George W. Bush.

But what about his credential as a former U.S. Senate candidate? Dankof claims on his website that he was the “nominated candidate of the Constitution party” in Delaware in 2000. It turns out, however, that the Constitution Party never held a formal nominating process or a party primary, and that Dankof essentially nominated himself to run in that year’s U.S. Senate race.

“Anybody can be a candidate just by filing the forms,” said Howard Phillips, Conservative Party founder and long-time standard bearer. “Mark was never anointed by the Constitution Party; he decided to run by himself.”

Dankof is typical of the type of rabidly anti-Israel, borderline anti-Semitic commentators PressTV relies on. Other regulars include the likes of Philip Giraldi, an ex-CIA officer who regularly denounces Israeli policies as “manifestly evil;” Paul Sheldon Foote, who promotes Holocaust deniers; and a bevy of left-wing, “anti-war” bloggers and 9/11 “truthers.”

Nisa Islam Mohammad, a staff writer for the Nation of Islam’s Final Call newspaper and a member of the Washington Association of Black Journalists, devoted an entire 25-minute segment of her “American Dream” magazine show to the Zionist lobby effort to “destroy” Ron Paul.

“Texas Congressman Ron Paul is campaigning to become the president of America,” she starts off. “But you might not know that if you just watch mainstream media. Why is he omitted? Why wasn’t he invited to the Republican Jewish Coalition’s forum for presidential candidates?”

The answers, of course, can be found in the title of her show. Why Israel lobby and neocons hate Ron Paul, Dec. 26, 2011

To Tehran’s conspiracy-minded political leaders, Ron Paul is a natural ally.

Why We Fight – 9-11 Remembered/Meet My Little Friend

On the 10th Anniversary of the 9-11 Attacks, I decided to link to a video done back in 2007 in gratitude for brothers fighting on the front lines, as our own political discourse in the USA became muddled with the anti-war/Code Pink/Ron Paul protesters. The morale of our troops was dispiriting when they read what was happening back home.  My impetus was to give them a boost and let them know there are plenty of us who understand why they are there fighting, how long Islam has been waging war on the USA, and how much we are praying for their mission, and their safe return home after destroying the enemy.

Obama Surrenders U.S. to UN

 

Obama’s continues his America Sucks Apology Tour.  Yesterday’s sickening slam of the U.S. and our Allies by Obama in front of the collection of misfits, dictators and terrorists (UN World body ) left patriotic Americans stunned and our enemies applauding.  Obama was truly in his element and seemed to be positioning himself as leader of the world and not just the U.S.

Never before has a leader of a free nation, lofted himself in full grandiose pomposity and hubris, while denouncing his own nation at the same time he praises himself.

The collection of outright lies, insults, demagoguery, insanity and ridiculous stupidity uttered by this President in front of the UN was beyond the pale.  Of all the accounts of the speech, I found David Horowitz’s condensed analysis of the main impact of this speech to be dead on balls accurate.

Obama Attacks U.S.

The U.S. President began his speech to an audience that included Ahmadinejad, Qadhafi andHugo Chavez by explaining, somewhat apologetically, that it is his responsibility to defend the interests of his nation.

But since Barack Obama never opens his mouth without  speaking out of both sides of it, you have to wait for the punch line to see what he really means.

Did he point out to the assembled dictators and terrorists that for 9 years America has been leading the war against terrorism in Afghanistan and Iraq and thereby protecting not only its own interests but those of all people who love their freedom? No. He used the UN podium first to give a partisan political speech continually attacking the Bush Administration and then announced with pride what he had done in only 9 months in office: stop American torturers, close America’s torture chambers on Guantanamo, and leave Iraq (as though we were there for blood and oil). And top it off, under Obama we had joined Qadhafi and Ahmadinejad and Fidel Castro on the UN’s evil “Human Rights Council” which has issued hundreds of condmnations of Israel and none of Hizbollah, Iran and Hamas.

Behold, in other words, “the new United States” — as Fox reported it. And of course following his attacks on the United States and Bush were attacks on Israel, the nation on the front lines of the war against terror. Palestinians, the President said, should stop their “volatile incitements” against Israel, while Israel should recognize the legitimate rights of the Palestinans (as though it doen’t) and “end the occupation that began in 1967″ — the occupation that resulted from an unprovoked Arab war of aggression against Israel followed by an Arab refusal to sign a peace treaty in exchange for Israeli withdrawal.

As an American and a Jew I found the President’s speech an offensive betrayal of America’s interests. The rest of the speech was dangerous hot air about the world cooperating. “The yearning for peace is univrersal” Obama said. Oh no it is isn’t. Tell that that to Ahmadinejad, Qaddafi,  and Chavez.

While Horowitz won’t say it – I will:  Obama surrendered America in the altar of Marx and Despots – saying in essence that America is no longer a Superpower, and no longer a great nation, suggesting we are no better than a third world cesspool, and will no longer be there as an aid and helper to nations yearning to breathe the air of freedom.  Yet he lauds himself as savior and asked the world parliament not to judge our nation of our past accomplishments – but on HIS own accomplishments in the last 7 months.

Nuclear detonations could not do the amount of damage to our nation that Obama himself is wreaking upon us.

America Retreats Into Irrelevance As Our Enemies Rejoice

From Scrapping Europe’s Ballistic Missile Shield, To Slashing the U.S. Nuclear Arsenal  – Obama’s foreign policy has destroyed our standing among friends, and is relegating our security to be dependent on the civility of hostile strangers.

In the Name of ‘rebuilding America’s image in the world’ – The Obama regime is on a crusade of systematically destroying American influence and power in the world.  Obama has hung our allies out to dry by leaving them defenseless while at the same time, making America defenseless by ordering the Pentagon to slash our own defenses. This happening before his call next week for the UN Security council to pass a unanimous resolution of a ‘Nuclear-Free world’ of which America will be expected to destroy our nuclear weapons first, as a demonstration of our commitment.   Obama of course doing all of this after  he has prostrated America before our enemies and denounced the country on foreign soil.   He will again feed his narcissism as king of the world by chairing the UN Security Council this week.

America’s enemies are laughing at our stupidity and rejoicing at the prospects the vacuum we create will provide for them.

And as happened when Rome collapsed, the world went into the Dark Ages.  Of course when the President reads “The Post American World”,

it’s not hard to surmise that these policies are deliberate and calculated – and not because he is a bumbling fool.

During Obama’s “America Sucks” world tour back in the Spring, Obama apologized  to the Communist and Muslim world.  His Cairo speech if anything was intended as a signal to Jihadists and supporting regimes that they had a ‘friend’ in the White House just as Obama signaled to the Communists of the world that they had a ‘friend’ in the White House.

Think that statement absurd?

Consider these statements by our avowed enemies AFTER Obama’s incessant pandering to our enemies:

“With Obama we can talk, we are almost from the same generation, one can’t deny that Obama is different. He’s intelligent, he has good intentions and we have to help him.” Venezuela’s Communist Dictator Hugo Chavez

Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez said on Tuesday that he and Cuban ally Fidel Castro risk being more conservative than U.S. President Barack Obama

The exiled leader of the Palestinian Islamist movement Hamas … hailed the “new lexicon” being used by US President Barack Obama towards foreign policy issues the Middle East.

America’s allies will no longer trust us, and anyone seeking the air of freedom inside tyrannical regimes will have to look elsewhere for someone to support freedom.  It is self-evident that the  Obama regime rejects liberty for the preference of Communist dictators and tyrants.

Consider:

Obama left Iranian protesters to die in the streets by the hand of Apocalyptic Jihadist Leader Mamoud Ahmedinejad, and was silent in the face of the iron fisted brutality of the Islamic regime that again Friday vowed to “confront the Zionist regime” while insisting that Israel “Has no future”.  No surprise from Jihadists like Ahmadinejad on a crusade to Islamize the world – while Marxist allies in this country call for Obama to shoot down Israeli Jets if they try to stop Iran from doing as they promise.

Obama said nothing while Iranian people are being beaten in their streets, forcibly removed from their homes, and murdered.

voices.washingtonpost.com/livecoverage/2009/06/report_nedas_family_forced_o…

www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/06/22/iran.protest.stories/index.html

kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/06/16/the-violence-in-iran/

Then Obama offers credibility to the totalitarian regime that is responsible for these atrocities in the name of keeping America from being blamed. But Iran blamed the U.S. anyway.

www.boston.com/news/world/middleeast/articles/2009/05/30/iran_blames_us_for…

While Obama was silent on freedom-seeking Iranians being massacred, he was very quick to jump in and condemn Honduras from upholding it’s Constitution when fellow Marxist leader Mel Zelaya decided to follow in Hugo Chavez’ footsteps and declare himself president for life.

Obama goes and sanctions Honduras President and Ally because he refused a Marxist coup supported by Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez:

“Zelaya, who took office in 2006 and is limited by the constitution to a four-year term that ends in early 2010, had angered the army, courts and Congress by pushing for an unofficial public vote on Sunday to gauge support for his plan to hold a November referendum on allowing presidential re-election.”

Chavez, Castro and Ortega have all condemned the arrest and removal of the Honduran President Zelaya.

www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/07/01/2613101.htm?section=justin

Obama says in regards to Iran that we don’t want to appear to be meddling in the affairs of sovereign nations. So he remains quiet as innocent people, protesting a stolen election are beaten and murdered.

Then, when a Latin American Marxist wants to be able to stay in office indefinitely and tries to do something that violates his country’s constitution, he is arrested and removed from office by his own government. And what does our, “we don’t want to appear to meddle in the affairs of other countries” President do? He makes a public announcement condemning the arrest and removal of Zelaya and then BANS the Democratic President from entry to America to attend the UN summit – but grants Ahmadinejad and Chavez seats of honor.

Ahmadinejad, Chavez, Gaddafi, Castro Allowed Into US For UN General Assembly But Honduran Leader Banned

Obama stands with tyrants

The consequences of these deliberate TREASONOUS acts by the Obama regime, herald what humorist Mark Steyn has entitled ‘The Long Retreat”.

His conclusion is not only frightening to consider, but a marker of where we actually have arrived – or shall I say – declined to:

In a sense, the health-care debate and the foreign-policy debacle are two sides of the same coin: For Britain and other great powers, the decision to build a hugely expensive welfare state at home entailed inevitably a long retreat from responsibilities abroad, with a thousand small betrayals of peripheral allies along the way. A few years ago, the great scholar Bernard Lewis warned, during the debate on withdrawal from Iraq, that America risked being seen as “harmless as an enemy and treacherous as a friend.”

If perception is reality – then it is no wonder that every enemy of our nation – from Communists to Jihadists are rejoicing at America’s retreat into irrelevance.

How To Kill 100,000 Iranians

By John Galt 

 

From the Iranian Protests

Care to wonder how this will happen?

I’ve seen this movie before and as a student of this region, let me warn you:

The crowds did EXACTLY what the mullahs wanted them to do. To provide a wee bit of perspective, let us flip back to 1989 in world history. Does everyone remember this guy?

No, that’s not former General Motors Chairman Rick Wagoner standing in front of Obama’s anti-capitalist armored division. That is one of the most famous pictures in history of a Chinese soul about to get pancaked by the iron boot of Communist forces. The students and others who assembled in Tienanmen Square had their moment in the sun, letting the “world” know that they were there and against the repression of the Communist Party hierarchy in China. The result?

You got it. A crushing oppressive blow to the freedom movement and worse, the United States just paid lip service, which realistically is all it could do and the people felt somewhat betrayed that after the eight years of Reagan and the crushing of the Soviet Bear that the best we could do is lodge protests and proclaim that “engagement” was the best approach to this regime.

Funny while the Chinese were slaughtering those yearning for democracy in their nation in 1989, the tyranny of the Ayatollah Khomeini was coming to an end with his passing. A council of Mullahs emerged to dominate the political landscape and from this the oppression continued up until the modern day. The regimes may have changed faces with deceivingly evil ‘moderates’ appearing at random occasions at the whim of the religious dictatorship to open relations with oblivious western powers and Sheikdoms in the Persian Gulf weary of having a large hostile Islamic nation in their midst. During this entire period of time from 1979 to 2009 the United States has paid a tepid amount of attention to changing the landscape of Iranian politics even though President George H.W. Bush considered direct aid to the underground movement at the end of his term. There was no follow through since that time and President George W. Bush had the opportunity to do the same but again passed, indicating to the masses that the only support they would receive is a poorly run radio broadcast outlet from the United States Information Agency.

Along comes President Obama in 2009, with messages of hope and outreach to the Islamic masses in the hope of bridging the differences between the radicals and the people to establish a new Pax Americana in the region, a foolish endeavor marked by decades of inconsistencies by the American Department of State. To think that we could change a mindset centuries old that obstructed and frustrated empires from all regions of the world is typical of the arrogance we are portrayed to display to the rest of the world and the election results in Iran this past weekend are no exception.

On Friday, June 12, 2009, President Obama proclaimed:

“We are excited to see what appears to be a robust debate taking place in Iran, and obviously after the speech that I made in Cairo, we tried to send a clear message that we think there is the possibility of change.

Ultimately, the election is for the Iranians to decide. But just as has been true in Lebanon, what can be true in Iran as well, is that you’re seeing people looking at new possibilities and whoever ends up winning the election in Iran, the fact that there has been a robust debate hopefully will help advance our ability to engage them in new ways.”

Unfortunately for the rank amateurs running our foreign policy, again, at the State Department, Obama is used to dealing with and attempting friendships with tyrannical socialist to Marxist dictatorships and not Islamist zealots nor those sworn to destroy America. Iran’s mullahs have quickly and swiftly elected to eradicate the problem by first making a mockery of President Obama in the eyes of the citizens there and by extension, degrading or causing him to lose face on the Arab and Islamic street. While Hezbollah might have been defeated in Lebanon, the ideals of religious puritanism under the flag of Islam is still quite popular with the average Muslim and that is the miscalculation that every American President has made in the past twenty years. The mistakes of the past continue because the same group of clowns that run State are still there some thirty years later, incapable of changing their Woodstock ideological tunnel vision views of the world. These mistakes are about to cost thousands, perhaps tens of thousands Iranian citizens their lives.

In an authoritarian regime, the primary concerns of the leadership is not to “save face” as so many members of the mainstream media here incorrectly perceive. In fact the willing dupes of our mainstream media, both on the proverbial left and right, play into the desires of mullahs and dictators the world over, acting as honey to the flies, also called the oppressed citizens seeking freedom. The belief of these brave souls who marched much like their Chinese counterparts in 1989 was that America stood for something, Europe had any kind of a backbone, and that the rest of the world would lodge numerous protests and broadcast program after program proclaiming their point of view on the elections and that anyone would sacrifice their nation’s needs to help them.

Poppycock.

The reality of the dictatorship is coming home again, a point the naive left and right in our nation will never accept because ideology always blinds them to reality. In the months ahead all of the video and audio created during these protests will be screened by the MOIS (Ministry of Intelligence and Security aka Vezarat-e Ettela’at va Amniat-e Keshvar – VEVAK) and roundups will begin on campuses nationwide. Instead of providing material support from the United States as they expected or helping these students, most will perish in work camps or simply be executed, along with their families banished or assassinated per the standard operating procedures of the Islamic state. The issue that most Americans can not perceive, along with those ignorant career bureaucrats in our government, is that within a structured Islamic state any attack on the government and its leadership, justified or not, is an attack on Islam and violates the holy tenants of the Koran as interpreted by the state. This powerful point is used to suppress the less educated and insure that compliance is total. By reducing the population of protesters and eliminating potential future disturbances the mullahs can insure their political survival for another decade as another naive American President flails about considering how to deal with their obstinacy.

Unfortunately for President Obama, America will get the blame for upwards of 100,000 Iranians dying at the hands of the Iranian government.

And not one round of Israeli or American ammunition will be used during the slaughter.

The Cognitive Dissonance of the “Realists” in the West Towards Jihadists

The Realist Fantasy

Caroline Glick

 

Both Iran and its Hamas proxy in Gaza have been busy this Christmas week showing Christendom just what they think of it. But no one seems to have noticed.

On Tuesday, Hamas legislators marked the Christmas season by passing a Shari’a criminal code for the Palestinian Authority. Among other things, it legalizes crucifixion.

Hamas’s endorsement of nailing enemies of Islam to crosses came at the same time it renewed its jihad. Here, too, Hamas wanted to make sure that Christians didn’t feel neglected as its fighters launched missiles at Jewish day care centers and schools. So on Wednesday, Hamas lobbed a mortar shell at the Erez crossing point into Israel just as a group of Gazan Christians were standing on line waiting to travel to Bethlehem forChristmas.

While Hamas joyously renewed its jihad against Jews and Christians, its overlords in Iran also basked in jihadist triumphalism. The source of Teheran’s sense of ascendancy this week was Britain’s Channel 4 network’s decision to request that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad give a special Christmas Day address to the British people. Ahmadinejad’s speech was supposed to be a response to Queen Elizabeth II’s traditional Christmas Day address to her subjects. That is, Channel 4 presented his message as a reasonable counterpoint to the Christmas greetings of the head of the Church of England.

Channel 4 justified its move by proclaiming that it was providing a public service. As a spokesman told The Jerusalem Post, “We’re offering [Ahmadinejad] the chance to speak for himself, which people in the West don’t often get the chance to see.”

While that sounds reasonable, the fact is that Westerners see Ahmadinejad speaking for himself all the time. They saw him at the UN two years in a row as he called for thecountries of the world to submit to Islam; claimed that Iran’s nuclear weapons program is divinely inspired; and castigated Jews as subhuman menaces to humanity.

They saw him gather leading anti-Semites from all over the world at his Holocaust denial conference.

They heard him speak in his own words when he called for Israel to be “wiped off the map.”

And of course, over the years Ahmadinejad has often communicated directly to the British people. For instance, in 2007 he received unlimited airtime on UK television as he paraded kidnapped British sailors and marines in front of television cameras; forced them to make videotaped “confessions” of their “crime” of entering Iranian territorial waters; and compelled them to grovel at his knee and thank him for “forgiving” them.

The British people listened to Ahmadinejad as he condemned Britain as a warmongering nation after its leaders had surrendered Basra to Iranian proxies. They heard him – speaking in his own voice – when he announced that in a gesture of Islamic mercy, he was freeing their humiliated sailors and marines in honor of Muhammad’s birthday and Easter, and then called on all Britons to convert to Islam.

Yet as far as Channel 4 is concerned, Ahmadinejad is still an unknown quantity for most Britons. So they asked him to address the nation on Christmas. And not surprisingly, in his address, he attacked their way of life and co-opted their Jewish savior, Jesus, saying, “If Christ was on earth today, undoubtedly he would stand with the people in opposition to bullying, ill-tempered and expansionist powers.”

He then reiterated his call for non-Muslims to convert to Islam saying, “The solution to today’s problems can be found in a return to the call of the divine prophets.”

THE FACT of the matter is that Channel 4 is right. There is a great deal of ignorance in the West about what the likes of Ahmadinejad and his colleagues in Iran, Syria, Hizbullah and Hamas stand for. But this isn’t their fault. They tell us every day that they seek the destruction of the Jews and the domination of the West in the name of Islam. And every day they take actions that they believe advance their goals.

The reason that the West remains ignorant of the views and goals of the likes of Hamas and Iran is not that the latter have hidden their views and goals. It is because the leading political leaders and foreign policy practitioners in the West refuse to listen to them and deny the significance of their actions.

As far as the West’s leaders are concerned, Iran and its allies are unimportant. They are not actors, but objects. As far as the West’s leading foreign policy “experts” and decision-makers are concerned, the only true actors on the global stage are Western powers. They alone have the power to shape reality and the world. Oddly enough, this dominant political philosophy, which is based on denying the existence of non-Western actors on the world stage, is referred to as political “realism.”

The “realist” view was given clear expression this week by one of the “realist” clique’s most prominent members. In an op-ed published Tuesday in Canada’s Globe and Mailtitled, “We must talk Iran out of the bomb,” Richard Haass, the president of the Council on Foreign Relations, argued that given the dangers of a nuclear-armed Iran and the dangers of a US or Israeli strike against Iran’s nuclear installations, the incoming Obama administration must hold direct negotiations with the mullahs to convince them to end their nuclear weapons program.

In making this argument, Haass ignores the fact that this has been the Bush administration’s policy for the past five years. He also ignores the fact that President George W. Bush adopted this policy at the urging of Haass’s “realist” colleagues and at the urging of Haass himself.

Moreover, Haass bizarrely contends that in negotiating with the mullahs, the Obama administration should offer Iran the same package of economic and political payoffs that the Bush administration and the EU have been offering, and Teheran has been rejecting, since 2003.

Even more disturbingly, Haass ignores the fact that Teheran made its greatest leaps forward in its uranium enrichment capabilities while it was engaged in these talks with the West.

So in making his recommendation to the Obama administration – which has already announced its intention to negotiate with the mullahs – Haass has chosen to ignore Iran’s statements, its actions, and known facts about the West’s inability to steer it from its course of war by showering it with pay-offs.

Haass and his colleagues in the US, Europe and on the Israeli Left are similarly unwilling to pay attention to Hamas. In an article in the current edition of Foreign Affairs, Haass and his colleague Martin Indyk from the Brookings Institute call on the Obamaadministration to either ignore Hamas, or, if it abides by a cease-fire with Israel, they suggest that the Obama administration should support a joint Hamas-Fatah government and “authorize low-level contact between US officials and Hamas.” The fact that Hamas itself is wholly dedicated to Israel’s destruction and Islamic global domination is irrelevant.

Similarly, Haass and Indyk assume that Damascus can be appeased into abandoning its support for Hizbullah and Hamas, and its strategic alliance with Iran. Syrian President Bashar Assad’s views of how his interests are best served are unimportant. Both Assad’s statements of eternal friendship with Iran and his active involvement in Iran’s war effort against the US and its allies in Israel, Iraq and Lebanon are meaningless. The “realists” know what he really wants.

MUSLIMS AREN’T the only ones whose views and actions are dismissed as irrelevant by these foreign policy wise men. The “realists” ignore just about every non-Western actor. Take Iran’s principal Asian ally, North Korea, for example.

This week North Korea’s official news agency threatened to destroy South Korea in a “sea of fire,” and “reduce everything treacherous and anti-reunification to debris and build an independent, reunified country on it,” if any country dares to attack its nuclear installations.

North Korea made its threat two weeks after Kim Jung Il’s regime disengaged from its fraudulent disarmament talks with the Bush administration. Those talks – the brainchild offoreign policy “realists” Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Assistant Secretary Christopher Hill – were based on the “realist” belief that the US can appease North Korea into giving up its nuclear arsenal. (That would be the same nuclear arsenal that the North Koreans built while engaged in fraudulent disarmament talks with the Clinton administration.)

After Pyongyang agreed in February 2007 to eventually come clean on its plutonium installations (but not its uranium enrichment programs), and to account for its nuclear arsenal (but not for its proliferation activities), Rice convinced President Bush to remove North Korea from the State Department’s list of state sponsors of terror and to end its subjection to the US’s Trading with the Enemy Act this past October. And then, after securing those massive US concessions, on December 11 Pyongyang renounced its commitments, walked away from the table and now threatens to destroy South Korea if anyone takes any action against it.

North Korea’s behavior is of no interest to the “realists,” however. As far as they are concerned, the US has no option other than to continue the failed appeasement policy that has enabled North Korea to develop and proliferate nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles. As the Council on Foreign Relations’ Gary Samore said, “I think we’re sort of condemned to that process, because we don’t really have any alternative.”

Samore and his colleagues believe there are no other options because all other options involve placing responsibility for contending with North Korea on non-Western powers like China, South Korea and Japan. More radically, they involve holding North Korea accountable for its actions and making it pay a price for its poor behavior.

As the “realists” claim that the US has no option other than their failed appeasement policies, back in the real world, this week military officials from the US’s Pacific Command warned that North Korea may supply Iran with intercontinental ballistic missiles. These warnings are credible given that North Korea has been the primary supplier of ballistic missiles and missile technology to Iran and Syria and has played a major role in both countries’ nuclear weapons programs.

Defending Channel 4’s invitation to Ahmadinejad, Dorothy Byrne, the network’s head of news and current affairs, said, “As the leader of one of the most powerful states in the Middle East, President Ahmadinejad’s views are enormously influential. As we approach a critical time in international relations, we are offering our viewers an insight into an alternative world view.”

When you think about it, broadcasting Ahmadinejad really would have been a public service if Byrne or any of the delusional “realists” calling the shots were remotely interested in listening to what he has to say. But they aren’t. So far from a public servicefor Britain, it was a service for those who, unbeknownst to most Britons, are dedicated to destroying their country.

 

Mark Steyn adds to this “Reality” with his column today:

A couple of days after Hamas voted to restore crucifixion to the Holy Land, their patron in Teheran (and their primary source of “aid”) put in an appearance on British TV. As multicultural “balance” to Her Majesty The Queen’s traditional Christmas message, the TV network Channel 4 invited President Ahmadinejad to give an alternative Yuletide address on the grounds that it was a valuable public service to let viewers hear him “speak for himself, which people in the west don’t often get the chance to see”. In fact, as Caroline Glick pointed out in The Jerusalem Post, the great man “speaks for himself” all the time — when he’s at the UN, calling on all countries to submit to Islam; when he’s presiding over his international conference of Holocaust deniers; when he’s calling for Israel to be “wiped off the map” — or (in his more “moderate” moments) relocated to a couple of provinces of Germany and Austria. Caroline Glick forbore to mention that, according to President Ahmadinejad’s chief adviser Hassan Abbassi, his geopolitical strategy is based on the premise that “Britain is the mother of all evils” — the evils being America, Australia, Israel, the Gulf states, Canada, and New Zealand, all of which are the malign progeny of the British Empire. “We have established a department that will take care of England,” said Mr. Abbassi in 2005. “England’s demise is on our agenda.”

So when Channel 4 says that we don’t get the chance to see these fellows speak for themselves, it would be more accurate to say that they speak for themselves incessantly but the louder they speak the more we put our hands over our ears and go “Nya nya, can’t hear you.” We do this in part because, if you’re as invested as most western elites are in the idea that all anyone wants is to go to university, get a steady job and settle down in a nice house in the suburbs, a statement such as “England’s demise is on our agenda” becomes almost literally untranslatable. When President Ahmadinejad threatens to wipe Israel off the face of the map, we deplore him as a genocidal fantasist. But maybe he’s a genocidal realist — look at the threads linking North Korea to Iran and to Iran’s clients in Syria, Lebanon, and Gaza — and we’re the fantasists.

 

Iran “Predicts” Jihad Terrorists Will Get Nukes

I think Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is not “predicting” as much as he is PROMISING what Iran will do as it becomes a nuclear-armed Islamic state: they will arm Jihad terrorists.

Given the pronouncements of Iran’s president Ahmadinejad last week that the “Countdown to [America’s] annihilation has begun”, I have to state that Iran is far more forthcoming in their desires for Israel, the United States and the world than Hitler ever was in his designs for Europe.

Yet here we sit, deaf, mute and neutered.  Loathing ourselves and completely waring against or discounting the threat that Jihadist Islam is asserting itself in the world.

 

Iran’s Supreme Leader Predicts Terrorists Will Get Nukes

CNSNews.com) – Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who as Iran’s supreme leader is commander in chief of the Iranian military, predicted last week that terrorists would acquire nuclear weapons and “take away security from all the tyrants of the world.”

In his speech at the tomb of his predecessor, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, Khamenei made it clear that he understood America to be the leader among “the tyrants of the world.”

Khamenei gave the speech to mark the 19th anniversary of the death of Ayatollah Khomeini, who died on June 3, 1989, ten years after he sparked a revolution in Iran that overthrew the regime of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, a U.S. ally, and instituted a Shiite Islamic theocracy.

Khamenei’s speech was presented as a review of the lessons that Ayatollah Khomeini taught in his “last will and testament.”

While predicting that terrorists would obtain nuclear weapons, Khamenei claimed Iran was not interested in obtaining nuclear weapons itself, but only wanted to develop nuclear energy.

At one point during Khamenei’s speech, according to a translated transcript published by the BBC, the crowd at the mausoleum chanted: “Death to Israel.” At other points, it chanted: “Palestine is victorious, Israel is defeated,” and “Nuclear energy, our absolute right.”

Khamenei’s virulent attacks on Israel appeared to echo the rhetoric of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has said that “Israel should be wiped off the map.” 

At Khomeini’s tomb on Tuesday, Khamenei, who holds more power than Ahmadinejad under Iran’s Islamic revolutionary constitution, lashed out at both America and “Arabic nations” for allowing Israel to “stand on its feet.”

“Other nations, just like the Iranian nation, consider Israel as a false and imposed regime in the region,” said Khamenei, according to the BBC translation. “The Zionist regime has no power by itself and cannot stand on its own feet. Today, two factors have helped the Zionist regime stand on its feet. First, the unconditional and despicable support of America for this decadent regime, and second is lack of support of Islamic and Arabic nations for the Palestinian people.”

Khamenei claimed Iran was not interested in pursuing nuclear weapons because they are against “Islamic beliefs,” but said that terrorists would get nuclear weapons. 

“The Iranian nation is against such weapons based on its religious and Islamic beliefs as well as based on logic and wisdom. Nuclear weapons have no benefit but high costs to manufacture and keep them,” he said, according to the BBC translation. “Nuclear weapons do not bring power to a nation because they are not applicable. Nuclear weapons cannot be used.”

A moment later he added, “Before long, the world’s terrorists will have access to nuclear weapons and take away security from all the tyrants of the world and all the nations of the world.”

Khamenei told the chanting crowd at the mausoleum that the late Ayatollah Khomeini’s advice to them was to resist America, and — in a probable allusion to the Iranian-backed Mahdi Army in Iraq — said that some Iranians even now were following Khomeini’s advice. 

Citing Khomeini’s last will and testament, Khamenei also predicted that Iran’s Islamic revolution would spread around the world as people elsewhere were inspired by the things it had done for Iran.

“The spread of revolution amongst nations is through presenting a blueprint for an Islamic Republic … when the nations see this blueprint they become so overjoyed that they would follow it,” he said.

Gen. David Petraeus, who has been nominated to head the U.S. Central Command, warned the Senate Armed Services Committee two weeks about Iran’s pursuit of nuclear technology and its persistence in fighting “proxy wars” across the Middle East.

“It persists in its non-transparent pursuit of nuclear technology and continues to fund, train and arm dangerous militia organizations,” Petraeus told the committee. “Iran’s activities have been particularly harmful in Iraq, Lebanon, the Palestinian territories and Afghanistan. In each location, Tehran has, to varying degrees, fueled proxy wars in an effort to increase its influence and pursue its regional ambitions.”

France Says NIE Report Bogus; Has Evidence Iran Seeking Nukes

As America turns harder to the Left, we are beset with stupidity, foolishness, outrageous lies, scandals, and endless political folly to our own detriment.

We are become like the Melba toast European Socialists and strive to be more like them. Even today, presumptive Liberal Republican nominee John McCain has suggested that America “listen to the views and respect the collective will of our democratic allies”. I don’t know what could be more stupid. If we listened” to these “democratic allies” Mr. McDufus – we would NOT be in Iraq OR Afghanistan taking the war to the Jihadists. We would be cowering with one appeasement policy after another while we are turned into a Muslim state from within as it is in Europe.

America has obviously lost it’s gonads as well as it’s brains and McCain might as well be John Kerry, Clinton or Obama, because they all state the same imbecillic nonsense in once capacity or another.

Meanwhile, the country Americans love to denounce; France – has suddenly jumped into the realm of common sense that America has abandoned, in order to state what many of us already knew the day the bogus NIE report was released by the CIA last December.

The French newspaper “Le Monde” says that it has documentation that Iran is still seeking to possess nuclear weapons and that last December’s NIW report that stated that Iran abandoned that quest – is bogus, and that it was a politically motivated report that did not give a true picture of the present nuclear program of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Duh. Those of us in America with a brain left already figured that out the day the bogus report was released.

They say the documents detail discussions between top Iranian officials about their ongoing nuclear program.

The article is translated through Babelfish:

THE WORLD

At the time the Security Council of UNO recently adopted a third series of sanctions intended to force Iran to stop his nuclear program, (Le Monde) had access to documents attesting that Teheran continued a military nuclear program after 2003, as opposed to what a report/ratio of the national direction of the American information affirmed, published on December 3, 2007.

February 25, the assistant general manager of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the Finn Olli Heinonen, had presented evidence of the existence of this Iranian nuclear military program. A letter addressed during 2004 Gholam Reza Aghazadeh, to vice-president of the Organization of the atomic energy of Iran (AEOI), by engineer Mahdi Khaniki, one of the principal interlocutors of the IAEA and former ambassador of Iran in Syria, confirms its charges.

This document draws up an inventory of fixtures of the relations between Teheran and the inspectors of the agency of Vienna. Mahdi Khaniki recalls in particular that the inspectors of the IAEA – who act under the direction of Mr. Heinonen – required to see the contracts relating to the acquisition of spare parts entering the development of the centrifugal machines. Assembled in “cascade”, these centrifugal machines make it possible to enrich uranium, possibly until obtaining a military quality.

“At a meeting which proceeded on January 31, 2004 in the presence of Dr. Rohani (Hassan Rohani, principal negotiator of the Iranian nuclear program until the end of 2005), this one decided that these contracts were to be prepared formedlies to the wishes of the AEOI, so that they are ready to be provided with the IAEA.” “It is necessary to note, adds it, that the representative of the ministry for defense and assistance to the mées rearforces indicated at this meeting that the contracts had been written for a presentation (with the IAEA).”

“But, Mahdi Khaniki continues, of the parts of these contracts, which I myself saw with the ministry for defense, were crossed out black lines and the quantities did not appear; it thus seems that these contracts will cause more questions than those which should (normally) be presented at Agency (IAEA).” And to conclude: “Naturally, I asked as a preliminary to engineer Mohamadi to prepare the number necessary of contracts (corrected) and I hope that it already did it.”

For the specialists in the Iranian file, this letter represents an obvious proof of the implication of the Iranian ministry for defense in the nuclear file. What consolidates the suspicions on the military character of this program, while attesting efforts of the Iranians to dissimulate nature of it.

According to sources’ close to a service of information, this mail lies within the scope of the “Project 13”, whose heading is “project for the disappearance of the threats”.

Given what Ahmadinejad’s rhetoric has been in the past, is “project for the disappearance of the threats” in reference to his call for the annihilation of Israel and the punishment of America? The intents of Iran are clearly made, and I’m amazed at the deliberate level of ignorance we wish to place on this problem as the shouts grow louder against any kind of military action against Iran.

This project would have vocation to mislead the inspectors of the IAEA. The Research center in physics (PHRC) of Lavizan Shian was thus renamed “AMAD”, and its “departments” became “projects”, in order to scramble the tracks. In the second time, probably in 2006, name “AMAD” was also removed. Since, it is more made mention only of the “Center” to indicate the management of the military nuclear program.

The American services of information collected, in mid-December 2006, a conversation between two not identified civils servant held with the ministry for defense in Teheran and making state of divergences between persons in charge for the AEOI and the ministry for defense. One of the two interlocutors refers to the “Center” and underlines: “the AEOI was occupied of its interests, and its policy was at 180 degrees of ours. Currently, as for the CTBTO (Organization of the treaty of complete prohibition of the nuclear tests), I think that the ministry of defense must have the last word, parce that they (leaders of the AEOI) know that with the end of the account we intend to lead tests.” The doubt remains on the nature of these “tests”, but this reference reinforces the suspicions.

The information made public by Olli Heinonen, in February, in Vienna, contradicts a part of the conclusions of the report of the American services in December 2007. To explain this inconsistency, certain French diplomats evoke a “major dysfunction” within the American administration.

Other sources advance that, during 2007, the American services of information, as well as the Pentagon, worried about the climate sabre-rattler which reigned then in Washington, and about the risk to see president George Bush opening a new military face against Iran. The purpose of the report/ratio of December would then have been to cross short to the temptation of the American executive to resort to the force.

In other words, the purpose of the NIE report that was celebrated by every Democrat and mainstream media source in America, was to short circuit and circumvent any attack and war plans that were on the boards at the White House and Pentagon to deal with the Iranian nuclear threat.

I would call that treason, but Americans no longer like that word, unless someone dares question Global Warming – then it’s treason. But to undermine the country in favor of those who are sworn to our destruction – is today called patriotism by those that have racist pastors asking for God to damn the country or claim they were shot at by snipers in Bosnia.

Even the Treason Rag of Record, the New York Times is finding that it has to tapdance backwards on their celebration fo the NIE report they so loudly cheered and toasted.

NY Times Backpedaling on Iran NIE

March 7, 2008 – by Craig Karpel

The other day a friend who’s a distinguished journalist emailed me, “How about the New York Times’ FURIOUS backpedaling on the National Intelligence Estimate? They could have done the same analysis when it was released!”

At the gathering of ambassadors and arms-control experts at the International Atomic Energy Agency’s Vienna headquarters, newly obtained and declassified documents were revealed that are “not consistent with any application other than the development of a nuclear weapon.”

“France’s ambassador, François-Xavier Deniau,” the Times reported, “said questions raised by the Vienna meeting had opened a ‘new chapter’ in the West’s effort to keep Iran from acquiring nuclear arms.” The Times explained:

This confrontation is different from the long-running American-led campaign. Gone are the veiled threats of military action from the White House. The wind largely went out of that effort in December, when American intelligence officials surprised Western allies — and angered Bush administration hawks — with a report saying Iran had halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003.

Ah, so this confrontation was different, because the French, with their savoir faire, their joi de vivre, their déja vu all over again, were at last convinced that Iran — which has a space program whose covert goal is to put into orbit satellites capable of dropping nuclear weapons on any city on earth, such as Paris — must be subjected to a higher level of inaction, such as the toothless additional sanctions the Security Council authorized this week.

…But the NIE says Iran put an end to its secret nuclear weapons program, no?

Well, no.

Virtually all commentators have either misunderstood or misrepresented the NIE’s “We judge with high confidence that in fall 2003, Tehran halted its nuclear weapons program.”

The NIE goes on to say, “We assess with moderate confidence Tehran had not restarted its nuclear weapons program as of mid-2007, but we do not know whether it currently intends to develop nuclear weapons.”

So “Tehran halted its nuclear weapons program” doesn’t mean “Tehran ended its nuclear weapons program.” It means the program was suspended.

It inconceivable to me that the word “halted” wasn’t deliberately chosen as an alternative — misleading because of its ambiguity — to the unmistakably clear word that should have been used. The intelligence official(s) who signed off on using “halted” instead of “suspended” in that life-and-death sentence should be found and fired.

Moderate confidence — I wish I had that much confidence in our intelligence agencies.

….The Times has found itself in a position where it needs to account for having neglected to report last December that — as to the intelligence community’s assessment of when our most virulent and implacable enemy will be able to make nuclear weapons — between the 2005 NIE and the 2007 NIE “basically nothing had changed.” Is the paper of record now pleading myopia?

It will probably utilize the Hillary Clinton Method: “Those are what our memories of it are” defense and say they ‘mis-spoke’.

Or…they can employ the Obama Defense and simply deny their assertions were ever made to the contrary, and then throw their reporters under the bus to join Obama’s grandmother.

But actions speak louder than words, and France is acting on the belief that Iran is on the verge of nuclear weapons that it will use on it’s enemies. This has resulted in Tehran getting angry and issuing a warning to French President Sarkozy.

I think that speaks to the truth of Iran’s ready-to-premiere nuclear weapons ability.

Iran Declares NIE Report An American Surrender

This is why I hate the anti-war movement and the zombies of Ron Paul. They tout the NIE report as vindication of their cause to paint America and Bush as the bullies and HAND Jihadist madmen like Iran’s Ahmadinejad and mullahs who are preparing the Muslim world for the conquest of the Great and Little Satan, victory.

Iran says U.S. report a “declaration of surrender”

TEHRAN (Reuters) – Iran’s president said on Sunday the publication of a U.S. intelligence report saying Iran had halted a nuclear weapons program in 2003 amounted to a “declaration of surrender” by Washington in its row with Tehran.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad also dismissed in an interview with state television the prospect of new U.N. sanctions against Iran over its refusal to halt sensitive atomic work.

“It is too far-fetched,” he said when asked whether he expected the U.N. Security Council to impose fresh sanctions on Iran following two such resolutions since last December.

Ahmadinejad, who often rails against the West, told a rally earlier this month that the December 3 publication of the U.S. National Intelligence Estimate was a “victory” for Iran.

He said on Sunday: “It was in fact a declaration of surrender … It was a positive action by the U.S. administration to change their attitude and it was a correct move.”

Washington is still pushing for more sanctions on Iran despite the U.S. intelligence report, which also said Tehran was continuing to master skills needed to make nuclear weapons. U.S. President George W. Bush said Iran was still a danger.

An exiled opposition group, the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), last week said Iran shut down its nuclear weapons program in 2003 but said restarted it a year later, dispersing equipment to thwart international inspectors.

Iran insists its nuclear program is peaceful and designed to make electricity. It says it has never had a nuclear weapons program.

“It would be beneficial for both Iran and them (the West) to cooperate with Iran,” Ahmadinejad said. “Of course it would be more to their benefit than Iran’s.”

Iran regularly calls for a change in behavior from the United States, which cut diplomatic ties with Iran in 1980 after radical students seized the U.S. embassy and took diplomats hostage during the 1979 Islamic revolution.

America Embraces Defeat, As It Hands Victory On Over To Jihadists

Triumph in any contest requires resolve. Without the will to win, without the resolve – it is impossible to overcome an opponent, no matter the overwhelming advantage one might have.

Despite the horror of the surprise attack at Pearl Harbor in 1941, and a string of defeats against the Imperial Navy in the Pacific, America never lost the resolve or determinaton to see justice done, and unconditional surrender achieved. Victory was determined by our willpower.

Defeat however, is a certainty when one doubts their abilities or very presence in a contest.

America’s Leftists and Anti-war pollyannas have shown the world that enough of it’s people doubt our just presence in the contest against Jihadist Islam and has lost it’s resolve to not only win, but has lost it’s willingness to even recognize that we are IN a contest. We have heard the mantras of of everything from “This is Bush’s War” to “If we did not make muslims mad at us, they would not be attacking us”, to The government orchestrated 9-11, Jihadists are no threat to us”.

Since America decided to strike back after the horror of 9-11, the detractors of American foreign policy began their work to undermine the efforts. As the anti-war movement and the Communists in North Vietnam discovered in the 1960’s – enemies of America can lose every military engagement against us – and still win an entire war, causing America to retreat in shame into itself by opening a propaganda front at home among the American populace.

The efforts to defeat a radical ideology waging war on us unanswered since the late 1970’s, has been met with almost continuous opposition from political opportunists at home who adopted the pacifistic ideal of “love begetting love” and have fought with growing determination to sabotage our resolve and even our recognition of the enemy, to instead focus on ourselves as the instigators of jihadists. There is far more hatred and vitriol directed at supporters of the efforts in A’stan and Iraq, than for those who chant for our deaths in the streets of Tehran and other Islamic states every Friday after Prayers at the mosque.

Sympathisers of the radical Islamic movment began to use our political correctness as a weapon against us, and since political warfare is the highest calling of the Leftists in America – they suddenly found themselves unwitting allies with Jihadists, and aid their cause by disguising themselves in the mantle of humanists bent on compassion towards a movement bent on submitting the world to Sharia Law.

Having sown self-loathing, doubt, and sabotaging of our resolve with a misguided sense of morality, they are handing victory on a silver platter on over to Jihadists. From Ahmadinejad to Bin Laden, militant Mulsims worldwide sense America’s imminent defeat in a war that they began on the West decades ago. Perception is reality among Jihadists and those of evil intent in this world, and they see our weakness. Like a predator able to sense weak and sick prey, Jihadists are excited that victory is very near for them to realize their most hoped-for dreams, and their leaders are capitalizing on this moment to redirect the momentum America was gaining against Jihadists.

Like the Tet Offensive, this NIE report may very well become the turning point of victory for Jihadists seeking a global caliphate by the defeat and annihilation they seek for American infidels.

Iran Declares Victory After NIE Report

TEHRAN (Reuters) – Iran’s president declared victory over the United States on Wednesday and the head of a U.N. watchdog said Iran had been “somewhat vindicated” by a U.S. report that it halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003.

But Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Iran would press ahead with its nuclear program which the Islamic Republic says has only peaceful civilian aims.

“Today, the Iranian nation is victorious but you (the United States) are empty-handed,” Ahmadinejad said in a televised speech to a rally in the western Iranian city of Ilam.

Ahmadinejad Declares Victory

Iran’s president declares victory over the United States and other world powers in the dispute about Tehran’s nuclear ambitions.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad wasted no time in declaring victory.

Speaking to crowds in western Iran, he vowed Iran would stand firm behind its right to obtain nuclear technology and would not retreat one iota.

Arab and Persian TV is abuzz with the latest news of the economic fallout from the credit collapse; the NIE report; Congress’ waffling on funding the troops; and the SCOTUS decision to decide whether or not to grant the Jihadist combatants at Guantanamo Bay, Constitutional Rights and access to America’s legal system at American taxpayer expense.

All of those news stories are chum, that are being dumped into the waters of the militant Islamic movement to stir the teeming muslim masses into a frenzy for Jihad. They might be well afraid of our military forces in Iraq, who have quelled the Insurgency and sent Al Qaeda running back into Afghanistan to regroup – but they know, as Bin Laden had predicted, that America would defeat itself from within – and that all they would need to do is wait…and be patient.

The NIE report and the efforts to close Guantanamo Bay have lifted the spirits of an enemy that would otherwise be crushed. The political rhetoric from pacifistic Isolationists like Ron Paul, Dennis Kuccinich and the entirety of the anti-war Democratic field will galvanize Jihadists and breathe new life into future efforts they have to wage the ultimate Jihad on Satan’s nation. Driving us from Babylon and burning our cities to the ground before their messiah comes to lead all of Islam to victory in establishing a global Caliphate, as the adherants to Quranic prophecy like Ahmadinejad say is their divine mission.

Americans do not sense or have any willful understanding of the absolute danger that we have now put ourselves into.

Already, the fallout from the bogus NIE report has stymied U.S. efforts to isolate and force sanctions on a defiant Iran that has boasted more than 3,000 working centrifuges to weaponize uranium. Ahmadinejad has stated in the past to crowds in Tehran that America and the West will never be able to stop the Islamic republic from obtaining and using nukes. I would imagine it is because he, like Bin Laden, understand the politcal war taking place within, and the lack of any resolve a war-weary American public has for another front against the rising Islamic juggernaut.

But Iran is wasting no time making use of the victory America is handing to Jihadist Islam’s expansion. As of this writing, Iran’s Mohamed Khatami, ex- agent chief executive of the Islamic Republic of Iran is meeting with Mexican President President Felipe Calderón, to discuss a “Pacific Co-existence” between Iran and Mexico(Babelfish or fluency to translate Spanish required) or the same story at this link – Mexico and Iran dialogue in Tenochtitlan.

Mexican president Felipe Calderon met yesterday with Mohamed Khatami at Los Pinos. Dr. Khatami is the former president of the Islamic Republic of Iran who was succeeded by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

The meeting at Los Pinos is part of a growing alliance between Mexico, South America and Islam. The purpose of the meeting was to establish better communications between the Iranian and Mexican peoples.

There has been great worry around the globe concerning the war-mongering policies of the Bush Administration and its Zionist cohorts. Recently, President George Bush threaten to start World War III and accused Iran of making “nuclear bombs” . The accusation was refuted by a recently released National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) report.

In addition, President Calderon has been worried about the growing racist hostility against Mexicans and Mexican-Americans in the USA. In mid-November approximately 568 US leaders of Mexican descent met in Mexico City to dialogue with the Mexican Congress on ways to combat the anti-Mexican actions of US xenophobes. One proposal was to stop all Pemex oil exports across the border and instead sell the oil to China. Another proposal was to totally repudiate Mexico’s external debt to the Zionist controlled World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. The interest alone on the external debt is sucking the blood of many Mexican families and forcing them to migrate across the border.

The visit of Dr. Mohamed Khatami to Mexico City may signal the beginning of a new international alignment that may bring into reality what Patrick Buchanan wrote in his new book, “Day of Reckoning.” A Bolivarian/Islamic front would be very difficult to defeat.

Iran is playing chess, and hardball poker with nuclear ambitions at the same time. America is busy playing PC footsie and pretending we have nothing to fear from an Iran determined to head a Caliphate with nuclear capabilities. Overtures of Iran to Communist Dictator Hugo Chavez, and now to Mexico – pinpoint at least to this mind, that Iran is setting up a strategic showdown with allies that will allow it to strike America by proxy, and fulfill the Quranic prophecies Ahmadinejad so often has proclaimed is their divine mission.

There was a reason that Iran and Noth Korea were referred to as an Axis of Evil. Add South America and Mexico to that list of Iranian allies, combined with their allies here at home and it is possible our near future will become more interesting than China would ever wish for us.

And America will have served that possibility up on a silver platter with the course offered to Jihadists this week.