Federal Directive Authorizes Military To Engage Civilians: “To Quell Large-scale, Unexpected Civil Disturbances”
It’s not hard to connect the dots about what is about to be unleashed upon us by this regime in power.
After all, Obama announced to a crowd of clapping seals back in 2008 that he wanted a “civilian security force”.
So 6 years later and what picture are we seeing when you begin to connect the dots?
Military MRAPs & APCs for civilian police departments.
SWAT teams for every Federal department and agency, including the Department of Education.
Billions of rounds of hollow point ammunition for Federal agencies like the Weather Service, enough to fight 4 Iraq-sized wars for 10 years.
DHS and the federal government are deploying a program to put 30,000 drones over American soil
Then take what His Heinous, Barack Obama had to say to the graduating cadets at West Point this week. He did not discuss the strength of America and it’s military to keep the peace or outline a strategy to deter Red China, Putin’s Russia or Iran from expansionism and terror. Instead he discussed how our might should be used to combat ‘Climate Change”, not our enemies. Chillingly Obama noted to the cadets that Climate Change is “a creeping national security crisis that will help shape your time in uniform, as we’re called on to respond to refugee flows, natural disasters, and conflicts over water and food,”.
Refugee flows and conflicts over water and food? Sounds like he is expecting this ‘national security crisis’ to create war zone conditions.
Here’s a dot to connect.
Consider Directive No. 3025.18 – the “Defense Support of Civil Authorities,” which was issued Dec. 29, 2010 and is suddenly now making waves in the Conservative media. One of the statements it directs is that “federal military commanders have the authority, in extraordinary emergency circumstances where prior authorization by the president is impossible and duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situation, to engage temporarily in activities that are necessary to quell large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances”.
Perhaps refugee flows and conflicts over water and food? Those kinds of ‘unexpected civilian disturbances’?
Obviously Obama is priming his future military officers from West Point to accept combating Climate Change as a reason to wage war on the American people.
Now what could possibly cause an ‘unexpected civilian disturbance that Obama considers to be a national security threat?
Well, other dots to connect are that Obama has to expect some push-back at some point once he shuts down 68 coal-fired electricity plants in the country via the EPA in July, to be followed by hundreds of others within 6 months and at the same time his EPA is banning of wood cook stoves and other wood burning appliances to ‘combat climate change’. So not only will we have no affordable electricity to keep warm, we will not be allowed to use anything else that would be cheap to keep warm either.
These are the kinds of things that will incite and cause ‘unexpected civil disturbances’. And so we can rest easy knowing that Obama has already put in place, Directives to empower the military to crack down on a destitute and miserable people that this regime has created.
Obama just needs the excuse and he will use the ‘legal authority’ he created with his pen, to commit legal warfare upon the people.
This is how genocides are perpetrated…. legally.
I see the picture all these dots connect – and if you are wise – you will prepare for what is going to be seen as self-evident by those looking back on the last few years wondering how could an entire population completely miss what was about to be done to it by the MarxcoFascist leaders who perpetrated a velvet coup with their consent?
For years the government has been stockpiling weapons, ammunition, riot gear and armored vehicles. Military personnel have been training in tandem with federal and local police using everything from fully armed helicopters to tanks across America’s major cities in what appears to be a hybridization of domestic law enforcement agencies…..
…The armaments, training and anti-terror directives are not for use against terrorists in some far-off war zone like Afghanistan, but rather, are designed for American citizens right here at home.
Yes, you are the target.
And Obama has outlined for the future officers graduating West Point exactly what he has already prepared to use them for, under the guise of combating ‘Climate Change’ because Obama asserts there is going to be ‘refugee flows’ and ‘conflicts over water and food’. I suppose killing the economy and making energy unaffordable for middle class Americans while making alternatives ‘illegal’ will cause exactly what he says he will call men in uniform to ‘quell’.
The picture the dots connected make, is a picture of Soviet-style misery and eradication of those targets the regime decides it must get rid of.
Memo outlines Obama’s plan to use the military against citizens
A 2010 Pentagon directive on military support to civilian authorities details what critics say is a troubling policy that envisions the Obama administration’s potential use of military force against Americans.
…The troubling aspect of the directive outlines presidential authority for the use of military arms and forces, including unarmed drones, in operations against domestic unrest.
“This appears to be the latest step in the administration’s decision to use force within the United States against its citizens,” said a defense official opposed to the directive.
Directive No. 3025.18, “Defense Support of Civil Authorities,” was issued Dec. 29, 2010, and states that U.S. commanders “are provided emergency authority under this directive.”
…“Federal action, including the use of federal military forces, is authorized when necessary to protect the federal property or functions,” the directive states.
Military assistance can include loans of arms, ammunition, vessels and aircraft. The directive states clearly that it is for engaging civilians during times of unrest.
A U.S. official said the Obama administration considered but rejected deploying military force under the directive during the recent standoff with Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and his armed supporters.
Mr. Bundy is engaged in a legal battle with the federal Bureau of Land Management over unpaid grazing fees. Along with a group of protesters, Mr. Bundy in April confronted federal and local authorities in a standoff that ended when the authorities backed down.
More at link