Tag Archives: Chemical weapons

Obama: The Liar-In-Chief

Pinocchio-Obama

UPDATED 9-10 11:40

Obama says he is responsible for nothing.  Yet he is about to jumpstart WWIII and give his Sunni Jihadist allies a hand overthrowing Syria. With a boldfaced liar for President, we the people have no clue whom to believe anymore; our enemies or our leaders and their media.

The fruits of Barack Obama are these:

“in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.” —Adolf Hitler , Mein Kampf, vol. I, ch. X

i.e.: “Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it ”.

A psychological profile of Adolf Hitler by the U.S. government at the end of WWII reads like a current psychological profile of Barack Obama.  See if you can discern a difference.  It stated this about Hitler:

His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it. –  A Psychological Analysis of Adolph Hitler. His Life and Legend by Walter C. Langer. Office of Strategic Services (OSS) Washington, D.C. With the collaboration of Prof. Henry A. Murr, Harvard Psychological Clinic, Dr. Ernst Kris, New School for Social Research, Dr. Bertram D. Lawin, New York Psychoanalytic Institute. p. 219

Like Hitler, Obama blames everyone else for what goes wrong and NEVER admits to any faults or wrong.

See it for yourself in this one example:

So Obama and his regime is attempting to convince the American people of the absolute need to bomb Syria – and the so-called evidence of whom used the chemical weapons is one that follows Obama’s record of telling the big lie, and repeating it often.

The fruits of Obama showcase that it is not Chemical Weapons use that Obama is concerned with – but rather it is helping the Sunni Jihadists loyal to Al Qaeda from being defeated by Bashar Assad’s forces.  It is to empower the Sunni Muslims to establish their Caliphate over that of the Shiite or Alawite Muslims in the Middle East.

What Happens When You Can’t Believe A Thing The President Says?

*snip*

With respect to Syria, the president tells us there will be no U.S. boots on the ground.  Um, would that be like:

  • Health insurance premiums for a family would be $2,500 lower by the end of his first term in office.  They were actually about $3,000 higher.
  • The Obama administration was not responsible for proposing the budget sequester idea.Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward challenged this claim and forced the administration to backtrack.
  • Money from the nearly $800 billion stimulus package would be spent on “shovel-ready projects” and unemployment would drop to 5.3 percent by the end of his first term.  The president later conceded the projects weren’t as shovel ready as he had hoped andunemployment was 7.9 percent.
  • There was nothing Obama could do about Benghazi.  Subsequent revelations and congressional testimony have shown just how disengaged or disinterested the administration was.
  • The Justice Department told a judge that Fox Newsreporter James Rosen was a “co-conspirator” and a security threat?  The DOJ later apologized and tried to make amends with Washington reporters.
  • That Attorney General Eric Holder didn’t know about the Fast and Furious gun-running program?  Investigators have found documents confirming that he did have knowledge.

Or how about when Obama told Fox News host Bill O’Reilly that he hadn’t raised taxes when there were 21 new or increased taxes in ObamaCare alone.  Or when he claimed that he didn’t draw the “red line” with respect to Syria, the international community did, when it is very obvious from his taped statements that he alone drew the line.

And when Obama or his team aren’t asserting something that is demonstrably false, they are frequently making claims that might be technically true, but are intended to mislead.

…some of those same skeptics now defend Obama’s claim that U.S. troops will not be used in Syria.  Would that be like his absolute denial to Russert?  Maybe Obama means it, or maybe he’ll change his mind.  No one can know for sure.

The country needs to be able to trust a president and his staff and believe what they say.  But that’s not the case anymore.

*end snip*

More at link.

When you have a Liar-in-chief for President as we do, the world ends up laughing itself silly at the boldfaced lies, and it does as it pleases to advantage themselves against the United States.  We The People have no clue whom to believe anymore – enemies of the United State, or Obama and his sycophants in the media.

UPDATE: John Kerry gaffe for Syria to surrender it’s chemical weapons  is accepted by Russia and Assad.  Obama and his propaganda media suddenly claim credit for ‘brilliant strategy’ to diffuse military action against Syria on behalf of Al Qaeda rebels.

Kerry now claims credit for Syria weapons proposal

Secretary of State John Kerry’s seemingly casual proposal for the Assad regime to turn over its chemical weapons has within 24 hours become the de facto policy of the Obama administration, and is now being heralded by Kerry as the “ideal way” to defuse the stand-off between the United States and Syria.

But a look at the administration’s statements shows that the plan has undergone an incredible evolution.

Just one day ago, Kerry mentioned the idea in response to a question about what Bashar Assad could do to avert an attack

“He could turn over every single bit of his chemical weapons to the international community in the next week,” Kerry said. He then immediately splashed water on the notion: “But he isn’t about to do it, and it can’t be done, obviously.”

His aides swiftly set about to walking the remark back, describing Kerry’s comment as merely a “rhetorical argument.”

Yet on Tuesday morning — after the Russians had co-opted the idea and formally presented it to the Syrian government — Kerry was claiming full credit for the plan during testimony before the House Armed Services Committee.

This is what happens when the President is a liar and surrounds himself with ideological Leftists who also use the Big Lie to further their agenda.  Our enemies then seize on their immorality and use it against us.

RUSSIAN PARLIAMENT GLOATS AS PUTIN CHECKMATES OBAMA OVER SYRIA

Monday morning, Secretary of State John Kerry made what an administration official called a “major goof” with a never-going-to-happen hypothetical that suggested Syria could avoid American airstrikes by surrendering their chemical weapons. Even the State Department walked Kerry’s statement back. But Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov immediately seized upon Kerry’s flub, and now a member of the Russian parliament is gloating over Putin’s checkmate of Obama.

Watching one administration bungle after another unfurl, Alexi Pushkov , the chairman of the Parliamentary Foreign Affairs Committee, is publicly mocking Obama. Via Twitter, Pushkov wrote that this mess “knocks the ground out from under Obama’s plans for a military strike.”

Kerry’s flub played right into the Russians hands; and by breaking weak, stepping back from his own red line, and embracing Kerry’s hypothetical proposal during a round-robin of network interviews Monday night, President Obama chose to repeat Kerry’s mistake.

Leave a comment

Filed under Obama Marxist Tyranny, Uncategorized

Obama On His Own Stated Syrian ‘Red Line’ : “The World Drew That, Not Me”

Obama's-red-line

Obama blames the world for his self-designated Syrian ‘red line’.  Claims he is not responsible for drawing the line, but says we must go to war.   Will use U.S. military to hand Syria to Al Qaeda on a silver platter.

It’s amazing, Obama is never responsible for ANYTHING he says or does if it is seen as a negative.  Nothing.  Not the miserable economy, not the pain of ObamaCare, not the use of the IRS to attack and intimidate Conservative groups, not domestic spying on American citizens, not his support for Egyptian Islamists – not a thing it seems is this MarxoFascist responsible for.

Maybe because Obama thinks he was on the golf course and not responsible for the day-to-day things that go on.

I submit it’s because he is counting on enough of the American people to be stupid, uninformed and/or goose-stepping to his every wish.

He is the messiah for the Left, and as such, because he’s black – the media and his sycophants will insist he is without sin, or fallibility.

Even when video evidence is there to prove what Obama says, he will deny it – and blame someone else.

Even if it means blaming the rest of the world.

H/T Michelle Malkin

Obama on Syria ‘red line’: The world drew that, not me

**Written by Doug Powers

About a year ago, President Obama said “a red line for us” — presumably meaning his administration — would be Syria moving around or utilizing chemical weapons:

From a transcript that appears on the White House website, here’s a White House official on a background call about the Syria situation from April of this year (via The Weekly Standard):

And the people in Syria and the Assad regime should know that the President means what he says when he set that red line. And keep in mind, he is the one who laid down that marker. He’s the one who directed that we provide this information to the public. And he’s the one who directed that we do everything we can to further investigate this information so that we can establish in credible, corroborated, factual basis what exactly took place.

Jay Carney in July of this year: [The president] is not bluffing on the red line:

Fast forward to today in Sweden. Obama denied personally setting a red line, claiming that “the world” set the red line:

In the parlance of the overly flatulent, that is known as “blaming the dog.”

Meanwhile, John McCain might support Obama’s call for an attack on Syria, but Maverick really has his poker face on for this debate.

2 Comments

Filed under Obama Marxist Tyranny, War On Jihadists