Tag Archives: Democrat Left

Morons Hack Into Palin’s E-mail – Sends It To The Media Who Then Publish It

Rest of Media Ignore Story or Spin It To Blame Palin For Using a Public E-Mail Account.

Anyone remember Watergate?  A second-rate burglary of Democratic Party Offices that resulted in the resignation of Richard Nixon??

Well that is so 1974 ago.

This week, we had a second rate hack of Sarah Palin’s e-mail account by mental midgets of a mischievous forum board, who then stole private messages, pictures, phone numbers and zip codes and handed them to the AP to publish, which they did with exceeding speed.

Not only did the AP publish Sarah Palin’s e-mail account (a Federal felony), but also published that of her husband and children, messages, birthdates and license plates.


Left-wing internet hackers have been credited for illegally breaking into GOP vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin’s email.

Members of what has been described as the “cyber vigilante” group Anonymous broke into Palin’s personal Yahoo email account and uploaded stolen information to the Internet. Gawker.com, a highly trafficked gossip site, took five screenshots of the stolen cache and promoted it on their site.

The screenshots included two full emails and Palin’s inbox list. In one email Palin was critical of a talk radio host who was giving her Lt. Governor, who is currently running against Don Young for Congress, a hard time over tax issues. In the other, a woman who Palin named to the state’s drug and alcohol advisory board sent prayers to Palin and told her not to let the “negative press wear you down.”

Personal family information was obtained as well. A photo of baby Trig Palin was found in the email cache, uploaded from daughter Bristol Palin’s cell phone and sent to her mother’s email account. Bloggers at Gawker lifted Bristol’s cellphone number from the emails and called it to confirm it was hers. They recorded audio of Bristol’s voicemail and promoted it on their site. Gawker bloggers also reprinted Palin’s husband Todd’s and son Track’s personal email addresses.

Left-wing operatives have been seeking Palin’s personal emails in relation to the “Troopergate” controversy, in which Palin’s foes believed she abused her power as Alaskan Governor to fire one of her political appointees. Palin recently released official email communication, but has refused to make her private emails publicly available to the chagrin of those seeking to bring her down in the inquiry.

Nothing in the emails appears to be politically damaging to Palin.

McCain-Palin 2008 Campaign Manager Rick Davis issued a statement calling the email hackery “a shocking invasion of the Governor’s privacy and a violation of law.” He expressed hope that “anyone in possession of these emails will destroy them.”

Federal law strictly prohibits anyone from accessing email without proper authorization, but is unclear how those would be treated who make those emails publicly available.

Gawker knows full well the information was illegally obtained and stands by their blog posts. “Here are the screenshots of the emails saved before the account went dark, along with the contact list. It’s newsworthy and we will not be taking it down!” the site said.

In their effort to do the dirty work for Barrack The Hussein Obama – when the Secret Service contacted the Associated Press asking for copies of the leaked e-mails that they had obtained – they refused and did not comply with the request.

Obviously the media likes to play the Fair Use rule when it suits themselves, and use it as a bludgeon against those they ideologically oppose.  Since the hacked info has gone viral on the internet – the AP played the game of plausible deniability and claim someone else put the information out first.

But my – isn’t it CONVEEENIENT for them to have done so.

The question is going to become – what did the AP know, and when did they know it??

Michelle Malkin has details of how the hack went down HERE.

All in all, it appears that any and every effort will be made to get Palin to quit or to destroy her before the election.

1 Comment

Filed under News, Politics

The Disgusting Left and the Media Demand Palin Get Paternity Test

The Leftists and their Media Operatives and sycophants in the press have demanded of the McCain Campaign, a paternity test because they are insisting that Palin’s Down Syndrome Baby is really her daughter’s.


Top Aide Says News Organizations Are ‘on a Mission to Destroy’ PalinSen. John McCain‘s top campaign strategist accused the news media Tuesday of being “on a mission to destroy” Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin by displaying “a level of viciousness and scurrilousness” in pursuing questions about her personal life.

In an extraordinary and emotional interview, Steve Schmidt said his campaign feels “under siege” by wave after wave of news inquiries that have questioned whether Palin is really the mother of a 4-month-old baby, whether her amniotic fluid had been tested and whether she would submit to a DNA test to establish the child’s parentage.

Arguing that the media queries are being fueled by “every rumor and smear” posted on left-wing Web sites, Schmidt said mainstream journalists are giving “closer scrutiny” to McCain’s little-known running mate than to Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama.


Why is it that these scumbags on the Left did not ask or make the same demand of John Edward’s or the baby his mistress had during their affair while he was running for President and his wife was battling cancer??


John Edwards Affair

John Edward's Affair


Is it not also interesting that the press deliberately SAT ON that story for over a year and refused to report it – but with Sarah Palin, hordes of media barbarians are scouring every corner of the Palin’s life and making ridiculous Daily Kos Kook-style attacks in order to sink her nomination.

It’s called leftist hypocrisy.

The media knows no bounds of decency, and have revealed in this election cycle even to the casual observer, is that they are now nothing but the propaganda arm of the Democrat Party.  The media has absolutely no credibility or objectivity as this campaign cycle has clearly demonstrated.


US Magazine showcases the absolute bias that exists in the media

US Magazine showcases the absolute bias that exists in the media



Chris Matthews last evening went on to report bogus accusations that Palin was tied to a pitchfork secessionist in Alaska even AFTER proof to the contrary was presented.

It is clear that we are at war with not only the hard-core Marxist and Godless Left, but the media and the Establishment in Washington.

An evil three-headed dragon that needs slaying.


Filed under Culture War, Politics

Temple Created For man-god Obama Speech

He is the self-proclaimed messiah of change.

The One we have been waiting for.  The One we are told that God has sent to rescue us.

A “citizen of the world”.

“A leader that God has blessed us with at this time.” says Nancy Pelosi

The man whose very presence will stop the Earth from warming, the oceans from rising.

The man who thinks he is the fulfillment of Martin Luther King’s “I Have A Dream” speech.

We learn today, that hubris has entered a new level of the stratosphere in the Obamanation campaign.

A temple is being erected for him on the occasion of his speech Thursday night.

Having been lofted to man-god status by his worshipping masses that have bought his gospel of Marxist Change – Obama will take the next step in trying to convince the country that he, the One – is our deliverer. He will give his Acceptance Speech for the Democrat party Presidential Nomination in front of a Greek or Roman temple set.

Yes, Denver’s Invesco Field looks to be transformed into some kind of temple for Barrack The Hussein Obama.  Could the symbolism be any more indicative of the propaganda attempts to not only portray Obama as a god, but the father of Democracy as well?  

Am I being too presumptive?

If I were being generous, I might suspect they are attempting to recreate the Lincoln Memorial as Thursday is the anniversary of MLK’s “I have a dream” speech.   In either case, the set plays into the abject hubris the man-child messiah and his worshipping masses think the country needs to see of Obama.

History teaches us to be alarmed and wary of men who either of their own ambition or those pushing ideologues that loft arrogant men with delusions of grandeur into positions of power.  When the cries and salutes and cheering finally convinces such men that they are a tool of the divine, misery and woe befall the world.


The careful propaganda and orchestration of such power-mad people always shows up in the attempts to capture history while they rewrite themselves into it.  Whether a Greek Temple to try some foolhardy manipulation that Obama stands for Democracy (even though America was Founded as a Republic), or the attempted imagery of Obama in front of the Lincoln Memorial being the fulfillment of King’s dream, what America will be treated to Thursday night is nothing but sophistry to disguise his Anti-American Marxism.

Obama’s campaign has been full of image over substance.  His rally in Berlin in the shadow of the Brandenburg Gate and the worshipping throngs brought to bear memories of another Socialist Propagandist, not the former Presidents he sought to give us the impression he was emulating.

Obama has more in common with the radical madmen who sought to “change” the world to fit it into their own twisted image.  Obama has all the traits of a hubris madman; he remade the Presidential Seal and the Latin inscription for his own; he sought to use the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin as the backdrop for his “I am a citizen of the world” speech ; he asserted his election would finally “provide care for the sick, jobs for the jobless; that the moment of his election will cause the rise of the oceans wold slow and our planet began to heal”.; and that his job is to be so persuasive that “a light will shine through that window, a beam of light will come down upon you, you will experience an epiphany … and you will suddenly realize that you must go to the polls and vote for Obama“.

He has the audacity of hubris to move his acceptance speech from the Pepsi Center DNC convention hall itself, to Invesco Stadium, where he is busy selling tickets and demanding favors for tickets to a sell-out crowd of Obamacons all chanting “Obama!” or, to put it in proper historical paradigms: “Seig heil!” in Aryan. 

Obama wants to be divine emperor of the world.

Thursday night’s speech in front of a Greek temple set just solidifies our fears.

The One, his messiahship will simply relay his divine will for us little people to fill our tires with the proper air pressure before we go and cling to our religion and our guns.

Sing his praises, all hail Barrack The Hussein Obama.


Filed under Media Bias, Politics

’68 Radicals – Coming Full Circle With Anti-Americanism

The anti-American Left, longing for the glitter of days gone by, will gleefully try and recreate their heyday of conflict and radicalism of 40 years ago from the 1968 Democrat Convention in Chicago.

Of course, instead of fond nostalgia that most Americans have for their pertinent days of youth – the angry radical Leftists of the 1960’s, never grew out of their destructive ideas, or went away.  Their dreams of a Marxist Utopia has not subsided with age and wisdom, instead it has became a movement of stealth that has infiltrated much of American learning, media and entertainment.  Having solidified their hold on Academia and in the mainstream media, the radical Leftists,  disguised as ‘compassionate progressives’, have pushed themselves into the leadership of the Democrat Party itself.  Now that their annointed Messiah, Barrack The Hussein Obama is the presumptive nominee, who himself embodies all of their destructive and Hate America ideologies, they are coming out of a 40 year closet of self-imposed quasi exile to boldly denounce the country and “CHANGE” us into something the Founding Fathers never intended us to be.

With the takeover of the Democratic party by these Alinsky Marxists, there is no longer a need to hide their corrosive ideology behind emotional rhetoric and platitudes.  Hate America radicals and terrorists who have the ear of the Obama Messiah, such as Weather Undergound bomber William Ayers and the hate sermons of Jeremiah ‘G_d Damn America’ Wright – are poised for cabinet positions and influence in the new direction the old 68 radicals are pressing for.

For 40 years the Marxist Radicals now running the Democrat Party would have everyone think it has been a long road of oppression endured, but what they have actually achieved is nothing short of a coup – and the once shared patriotism for America by both major parties  has devolved into the clear line between Hate America Radical Marxists, and the rest of us “little people”, who still love the country and the liberties our Founders established for us.

The culture war continues, now threatening to go much more violent and hot than the periods between the last Democrat Convention fiasco and the one next week.


Forty Years after the Death of a Party

By Bruce Walker

Forty years ago, in the third week of August 1968, something horrible happened to the American Left and to its host, the Democratic Party.  We have been living with this horror ever since.  Democrats once embraced patriotism.  Scoop Jackson, a true liberal on domestic issues, was as passionate a supporter of America against our enemies as any other politician in America.  JFK, in his 1960 campaigned against Nixon in 1960, argued that the Eisenhower Administration had neglected national defense and he promised to defend freedom anywhere.   Harry Truman was wrong on many things, but he defended the Republic of Korea, he ordered the Berlin Airlift, and he pushed the Truman Plan and the Marshall Plan.   Once Democrats, liberal Democrats, were genuine patriots who opposed our totalitarian enemies.

This anti-totalitarian Left insisted that communism would implode from within.  Contain communism, liberal Democrats once said, and it would fall.  Implicit in this interpretation of world events was the idea that this ghastly expression of Leftism totalitarianism was rotten to the core.  Implicit in this also was the belief that modern war was too awful a nightmare even to be used to roll back communism.  Both Left and Right agreed about the final goal — the end of the Soviet empire — but disagreed about tactics.  This, at least, had been true since 1945.
In 1968, America, largely alone, was fighting communism in Southeast Asia.  Good men still debate the wisdom of that war.  Was trying to stop communism in Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos worth the sacrifice of American blood?  Should we have fought a war when our SEATO allies, Britain and France, ignored their treaty obligations and traded with the enemy? Should we have fought a war with ground troops that might have been fought with fewer losses by sea and air power?  Should we have fought a war hamstrung by civilian bureaucrats in Washington?  What few liberal Democrats once questioned was the morality of defending imperfect, partially free allies from totalitarian conquest.
That changed dramatically forty years ago.  At the Democratic Convention in Chicago, the pent-up animus against America, simmering on college campuses for years, blossomed into an anti-war movement which was not anti-war at all, but which was rather anti-America and anti-freedom.  Banners celebrated brutal thugs like Ho Chi Minh and defined America as “Amerika.” The protesters who carried these banners called openly for violence, not peace.  The object of this movement was, quite simply, the triumph of evil. 
Serious debates about the prudence and effectiveness of policies — Was Southeast Asia worth defending?  Were the operations and tactics employed wise? — were replaced by fundamental questions about the morality of our nation.  Communist dictators like Castro were celebrated.  Mega-murderers like Mao were lionized.   This was something new and hideous in American political discussion.
Many Americans supported isolationism before the Second World War, but these Americans did not say that our nation was a pox; they did not champion the wicked regimes in Germany, Italy, and Japan; they did not yearn that America become more like the world.  Rather, these America Firsters thought that the world should become more like America.
No major political movement that despised America could have survived in America in 1940.  Indeed, no major political movement can survive in a democracy which despises its homeland — except in America.   Forty years ago, the Democratic Party became an anomaly in the history of democracies:  It assumed a posture of contempt towards the very nation which it sought to govern.   Why?  The principle reason was that a sated generation deprived of God thrashed about for purpose and, finding none, embraced the nihilism of Marxism and loathed the hopeful life that America had given to so many peoples from so many lands.  My wife’s parents, Holocaust survivors, loved America for the manifest goodness that it was.  They understood totalitarianism and then they understood America.  Life taught them the nature of good and of evil. 
The anti-American students at the Chicago Democratic Convention, charter members of the most pampered generation in human history, assumed that goodness was imperfection and that evil was nirvana.   Empty souls assumed that emptiness was the normal condition of the human soul.  Marx, the father not only of Lenin, Stalin, and Mao, but also the father of Mussolini and Hitler, was the adopted father of these angry, spoiled children.
Even when Marx was a circus clown, these orphans of conscience hailed Ho and Mao and Che.  And the very week that students fought in the streets for Marx, events on the other side of the world showed how utterly futile trust in Marx would be.  The communist incarnation of Marx always had an ugly face.  The prettiness of Bolshevism was always over the horizon.  In 1968, some communists demanded a happy life now, not in some misty Marxian future paradise.  These communists in Czechoslovakia gave their materialist religion a human face.  Dissent was allowed by these communist rulers.  Czechs acted like free people.  Dubcek, General Secretary of the Czechoslovakian Communist Party, did not reject the tenets of Marx; he simply thought that a police state was not essential to Marx.  Dubcek was wrong.
Days before students rioted at the Democratic Convention in Chicago (these students who saw no profit in trying to influence the Republican Convention in Miami), tanks from Warsaw Pact “allies” entered Czechoslovakia to re-impose rule, not Marxist rule — Marxists were governing Czechoslovakia already — but totalitarian rule.   It was now clear, if it ever been unclear, that Marxism could never be anything but brutal oppression.  The crushing of the Prague Spring, the brief and fragile flowering of human liberty under Marxism, proved that. 
While Marxist armies patrolled the streets of newly occupied Prague, apologists and defenders of Marx in Chicago demanded that their vehicle of political expression, the Democratic Party, abandon resistance to Marxism throughout the world.  These protesters won their war long after the convention.  Although Hubert Humphrey won the party’s nomination, he would be the last Democrat who truly defended America against totalitarian enemies to carry the banner of the party of JFK, Scoop Jackson, or Harry Truman. 
Jackson, a hero to labor and a liberal in domestic politics, was crushed in the 1972 nomination run specifically because he was so staunch a defender of his country.  McGovern won that 1972 nomination, guided by a medley of groups committed to the practical surrender of American power.  Carter, who professed surprise at communist evil when the Soviets invaded Afghanistan, was one of the two Democrats to win the White House since 1968.  The other was Clinton, the draft dodger who traveled to Moscow during the Vietnam War.   Obama, whose pastor openly damned America, will be the Democrats’ nominee this year.
Incredibly, a political party largely reconstructed around the notion that its own nation is evil and its own citizens are dupes or worse, has survived and thrived in America.  Its party leaders more or less openly root for the defeat of American soldiers in war.  Its party bigwigs hobnob with America-haters like Michael Moore at national conventions.  Its party faithful, according to public opinion polls, listen seriously to arguments that the American government planned war upon its own people. 
The descent from a reasonable, serious political party into a gaggle of anti-patriots began forty years ago this month, just as the case for winning the Cold War was made most emphatically in the streets of Prague.  It is not accidental that a former Democrat turned Republican, Ronald Reagan, won that Cold War over the constant squawking of Democrats. 
The students of Chicago streets are now the old men of the Democrat Party.   They blame America, somehow, for Russian tanks in Georgia, just as they blamed America, if they blamed anyone, for Soviet tanks in Czechoslovakia.  Frozen in time, immune to reality, they tear and claw at the nation which gave them everything.    They lived as they lived in 1968 — reveling in the bloodying of America, chanting praises of Marxist monsters, pummeling anyone within their party who did not toe the party line. 

When people sense the sickness of American politics and government, what they sense is something missing for forty years from our national dialog:  Sincere and patriotic partisan debate.  There should be two political parties, both committed to the American Dream, both in love with their nation, both proud to defend her.  Instead, one party has accepted the lies told about America on the streets of Chicago in 1968.  Too rich, too powerful, too confident, too comfortable — this is what the rioters in Chicago thought of America then; this is what the heart of the Democratic Party thinks now, forty years after their political party died. 


Filed under Culture War, Politics

Giving Thanks in An Unthankful World


This week, Americans hopefully will give sincere thanks for this nation and the blessings we have taken for granted over the last 50 plus years of relative peace and plenty on our shores. In fact, when you consider the beastly empires of men for the nearly 6,000 years of recorded human history – America is an anomoly in the course of world empires and cultures.

As the world grows darker, and our own economic, cultural and moral problems threaten the stability of the only way of life we have ever known – it is good to give Almighty God our sincerest thanks for our abundant blessings while He may be found – for the world seriously wishes to return to the normal that America has disrupted by our existence.

It would be good for the world to give thanks for America. I know the current self-loathing of the Democrat Left and Blame America Firsters like Ron Paul, poop on such an idea. They are more comfortable with justifying the world’s hatred of us and trying to convince the rest of America how much of a bane we are to the globe. But before we let the Anti-war/Global Warming preachers fire another salvo to diminish our resolve and national self esteem, take a moment to read this essay from Mark Steyn:

The World should give thanks for America

Syndicated columnist

Speaking as a misfit unassimilated foreigner, I think of Thanksgiving as the most American of holidays.

Christmas is celebrated elsewhere, even if there are significant local variations: In Continental Europe, naughty children get left rods to be flayed with and lumps of coal; in Britain, Christmas lasts from Dec. 22 to mid-January and celebrates the ancient cultural traditions of massive alcohol intake and watching the telly till you pass out in a pool of your own vomit. All part of the rich diversity of our world.

But Thanksgiving (excepting the premature and somewhat undernourished Canadian version) is unique to America. “What’s it about?” an Irish visitor asked me a couple of years back. “Everyone sits around giving thanks all day? Thanks for what? George bloody Bush?”

Well, Americans have a lot to be thankful for.

Europeans think of this country as “the New World” in part because it has an eternal newness, which is noisy and distracting. Who would ever have thought you could have ready-to-eat pizza faxed directly from your iPod?

And just when you think you’re on top of the general trend of novelty, it veers off in an entirely different direction: Continentals who grew up on Hollywood movies where the guy tells the waitress “Gimme a cuppa joe” and slides over a nickel return to New York a year or two later and find the coffee now costs $5.75, takes 25 minutes and requires an agonizing choice between the cinnamon-gingerbread-persimmon latte with coxcomb sprinkles and the decaf venti pepperoni-Eurasian-milfoil macchiato.

Who would have foreseen that the nation that inflicted fast food and drive-thru restaurants on the planet would then take the fastest menu item of all and turn it into a Kabuki-paced performance art? What mad genius!

But Americans aren’t novelty junkies on the important things. The New World is one of the oldest settled constitutional democracies on Earth, to a degree the Old World can barely comprehend. Where it counts, Americans are traditionalists.

We know Eastern Europe was a totalitarian prison until the Nineties, but we forget that Mediterranean Europe (Greece, Spain, Portugal) has democratic roots going all the way back until, oh, the mid-Seventies; France and Germany’s constitutions date back barely half a century, Italy’s only to the 1940s, and Belgium’s goes back about 20 minutes, and currently it’s not clear whether even that latest rewrite remains operative. The U.S. Constitution is not only older than France’s, Germany’s, Italy’s or Spain’s constitution, it’s older than all of them put together.

Americans think of Europe as Goethe and Mozart and 12th century castles and 6th century churches, but the Continent’s governing mechanisms are no more ancient than the Partridge Family. Aside from the Anglophone democracies, most of the nation-states in the West have been conspicuous failures at sustaining peaceful political evolution from one generation to the next, which is why they’re so susceptible to the siren song of Big Ideas – communism, fascism, European Union.

If you’re going to be novelty-crazed, better the zebra-mussel cappuccino than the Third Reich.

Even in a supposedly 50/50 nation, you’re struck by the assumed stability underpinning even fundamental disputes. If you go into a bookstore, the display shelves offer a smorgasbord of leftist anti-Bush tracts claiming that he and Cheney have trashed, mangled, gutted, raped and tortured, sliced ‘n’ diced the Constitution, put it in a cement overcoat and lowered it into the East River. Yet even this argument presupposes a shared veneration for tradition unknown to most Western political cultures: When Tony Blair wanted to abolish, in effect, the upper house of the national legislature, he just got on and did it.

I don’t believe the U.S. Constitution includes a right to abortion or gay marriage or a zillion other things the Left claims to detect emanating from the penumbra, but I find it sweetly touching that in America even political radicalism has to be framed as an appeal to constitutional tradition from the powdered-wig era.

In Europe, by contrast, one reason why there’s no politically significant pro-life movement is because, in a world where constitutions have the life expectancy of an Oldsmobile, great questions are just seen as part of the general tide, the way things are going, no sense trying to fight it. And, by the time you realize you have to, the tide’s usually up to your neck.

So Americans should be thankful they have one of the last functioning nation-states. Europeans, because they’ve been so inept at exercising it, no longer believe in national sovereignty, whereas it would never occur to Americans not to. This profoundly different attitude to the nation-state underpins, in turn, Euro-American attitudes to transnational institutions such as the United Nations.

But on this Thanksgiving the rest of the world ought to give thanks to American national sovereignty, too. When something terrible and destructive happens – a tsunami hits Indonesia, an earthquake devastates Pakistan – the United States can project itself anywhere on the planet within hours and start saving lives, setting up hospitals and restoring the water supply.

Aside from Britain and France, the Europeans cannot project power in any meaningful way anywhere. When they sign on to an enterprise they claim to believe in – shoring up Afghanistan’s fledgling post-Taliban democracy – most of them send token forces under constrained rules of engagement that prevent them doing anything more than manning the photocopier back at the base.

If America were to follow the Europeans and maintain only shriveled attenuated residual military capacity, the world would very quickly be nastier and bloodier, and far more unstable. It’s not just Americans and Iraqis and Afghans who owe a debt of thanks to the U.S. soldier but all the Europeans grown plump and prosperous in a globalized economy guaranteed by the most benign hegemon in history.
That said, Thanksgiving isn’t about the big geopolitical picture, but about the blessings closer to home. Last week, the state of Oklahoma celebrated its centennial, accompanied by rousing performances of Rodgers and Hammerstein’s eponymous anthem:

“We know we belong to the land
And the land we belong to is grand!”
Which isn’t a bad theme song for the first Thanksgiving, either.

Three hundred and 14 years ago, the Pilgrims thanked God because there was a place for them in this land, and it was indeed grand. The land is grander today, and that, too, is remarkable: France has lurched from Second Empires to Fifth Republics struggling to devise a lasting constitutional settlement for the same smallish chunk of real estate, but the principles that united a baker’s dozen of East Coast colonies were resilient enough to expand across a continent and halfway around the globe to Hawaii.
Americans should, as always, be thankful this Thanksgiving, but they should also understand just how rare in human history their blessings are.

Leave a comment

Filed under Chrisitan Viewpoint, Culture War