HomoFascist Left: Abolish The First Amendment For Christians

Your freedom of speech, religion and association are only permitted if you support the Homosexual and Leftist agenda. Principles contrary to that are to be deemed criminal.

The right to religious freedom and it’s exercise if you are Christian looks like it will no longer be permitted in a culture that has decided Homosexuality is a superior morality.  The BIG LIE and Narrative the Praetorian media is fostering every hour on the hour, is that Christian religious liberty and free speech is automatic discrimination against homosexuals or whatever group they choose to apply the smear.

Today, listening to the sheer hysteria, apparently the First Amendment applies only to those whom agree with and speak the Leftist/Homosexual agenda.  The right to freedom of speech, belief and religious exercise should be restricted, regulated or abolished altogether if it does not follow the cultural zeitgeist .  Indeed, some animals are more equal than others in this twisted Liberal Leftist utopia from hell.

The narrative in America right now is that if you are a biblical Christian, and you think aberrant sexual behavior is sin, your faith is discriminatory and therefore criminal. You are deemed a threat to the well-being of the public.  This meme is reaching fevered pitch and being repeated on social media; Christians who hold to biblical faith and refuse to accept behaviors they consider sinful, are evil and worse than Nazis.

In response to the Indiana Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which protects businesses from lawsuits intended to put them out of business for refusing service to agendas and behaviors contrary to their religious beliefs, Labor Department employee Elizabeth Ashack took to Twitter and wrote “People in the red states vote for nazis to govern, and then call themselves Christian, it will not end well for them. #BoycottIndiana,”

So she says Christian Conservatives are Nazis, which , is a growing belief in this country.  Her tweet was captured by SooperMexican.com before it was deleted.  She now denies she sent the tweet, and claims her account was hacked.  How convenient.  She obviously attended the same class Hillary Clinton did on what to do about your social media correspondence. The sentiments of accusatory discrimination heaped on Christians are being stoked and repeated ad nauseum everywhere.

Note Ashack’s comment that it will not end well for Christians in Red States. Leftists are always stoking for that violent revolution or final solution for those people the Leftists hate and want eliminated.  This seems to be the path this country is on, and apparently we cannot avoid that inevitability anymore.

To the Gay Leftist Revolutionists, Religious liberty laws are an act of discrimination by Christians and therefore, an act of war. That the act also protects Muslims and Hindus in their businesses is not an issue of consideration.  The sole focus of rage is against Christians who benefit from the protection that these religious freedom acts enshrine.

To some of us Christians who are awake – we recognize where this kind of mob mentality always leads.   The hatred of God and His Christ is visited upon those who follow Him, and that hatred is rising in the United States.  Sadly for Christians in America, the majority of them are fast asleep or quick to compromise their faith and principles so as to avoid ‘persecution’.

History teaches where the kind of radical zeitgeist being preached by Leftists always leads.  Truth is a lie.  Lies are truth.  Good is now evil, and evil is now good.  Woe to us all in this country.

In the interest of engaging in a revolutionary act by telling the truth in an age of universal deceit, Ben Shapiro lays out the lies and myths that the media, lobbying agendas and government are laying upon various RFRA laws across the country.

INDIANA BACKLASH SHOWS LEFT’S HATRED FOR FIRST AMENDMENT

In the wake of the Indiana Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the media have been stacking myth upon myth in order to drive the narrative that right-wingers desperately want to harm gays and lesbians. Nothing could be further from the truth. Conservatives merely want to protect a basic notion of freedom from the tyranny of the left: the notion that individual rights, even those exercised in ways we would not always like, are still rights. Those rights extend to your conduct of your own business, given that there are no externalities – and refusal to engage in a voluntary transaction does not amount to an externality. That is the essence of liberty.

Here are the top myths pushed by the media left in the wake of the RFRA:

RFRA Discriminates Against Gays. No, the RFRA does not. The RFRA is explicitly designed to protect practice of any religion. It says that “a governmental entity may not substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion, even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability.” That can be overridden if the government’s action “is in furtherance of a compelling government interest” and is also “the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling government interest.” If government does act against someone in violation of their religious principles, that person or entity can assert that violation “as a claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding.” So, if you are a Muslim, and you want to wear a beard while a police officer, the RFRA protects you. If you are a Jehovah’s Witness and you don’t want to get a blood transfusion in violation of law, the RFRA protects you.

The reason many on the left believe the RFRA discriminates against homosexuals is because homosexuals have sued private religious businessowners for refusing to service same-sex weddings. The RFRA protects such religious businessowners from antidiscrimination laws – although Indiana has no such antidiscrimination laws with regard to sexual orientation anyway. So Indiana’s law has not even changed one iota with regard to private businessowners’ treatment of homosexuals, let alone gay marriage (refusing to service a same-sex wedding is not the same as refusing to serve someone gay, by the way).

RFRA Is a Republican Plot. No, it is not. The original federal RFRA was passed in 1993, signed by Bill Clinton, and passed with overwhelming bipartisan support. The bill passed the United States House of Representatives unanimously, and the Senate 97-3. It was co-sponsored by probable incoming Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY). In 1998, then-State Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) voted for a similar law. It passed unanimously 56-0.

This Is Like Jim Crow. No, it is not. Jim Crow was a mandatory set of regulations springing from the government – the same government the left now wants to use to discriminate against religious people for failing their tolerance test. Alabama’s Jim Crow law explicitly prevented private businessowners from serving blacks at its lunch counters:

It shall be unlawful to conduct a restaurant or other place for the serving of food in the city, at which white and colored people are served in the same room, unless such white and colored persons are effectually separated by a solid partition extending from the floor upward to a distance of seven feet or higher, and unless a separate entrance from the street is provided for each compartment.

The same homosexual advocates and allies who want to use the government as a club to beat those who engage in certain voluntary conduct were surely against that tactic when the government was discriminating against homosexual conduct.

This Will Allow Discrimination Against Blacks, Too. No, it won’t. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prevents such discrimination. The supremacy clause means the Civil Rights Act trumps state law. It is worth noting that the Constitution itself should not permit the federal government to intervene with regard to private businesses involved in making judgments about whether to engage in certain voluntary transactions, no matter the excuse for that refusal. Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) used to rightly oppose that aspect of the Civil Rights Act, but has since backed away from that libertarian position.

In a free society, we understand that societal disapproval of activity does not, on its own, justify violation of individual rights. But not the left, which is happy to bring a gun to the party, just so long as it is the party wielding the gun.

Homo-Mafia Shuts Down Christian-Owned Bakery – Plans to Disrupt Olympics

Homosexual Activists armed with mob-tactics and using the government and the courts are targeting Christian businesses while setting sights to disrupt the Russian Olympics

Before they lay down, the men of the city, the men of Sodom, both old and young, from every quarter, surrounded the house. And they called to Lot and said to him, “Where are the men who came to your house tonight? Bring them out to us that we may have sex with them”.  So Lot went out to them through the doorway, shut the door behind him, and said, “Please, my brethren, do not do such wickedness! See now, I have two daughters who are virgins; please, let me bring them out to you, and you may do to them as you wish; only do nothing to these men (my guests), since this is the reason they have come under the shadow of my roof.”

And they said, “Stand back!” Then they said, “[he is an outsider], and he keeps acting as a judge; now we will deal worse with you than with them.” So they pressed hard against the man Lot, and came near to break down the door. – Genesis 19:4-9

I am often baffled at the American Christian proclivity to be so willing to attack other Christians over differences in doctrine – but steadfastly REFUSE to stand together against societal sin and abominations being forced upon the people by a hedonistic mob and an immoral government and court system.  So often I read of lukewarm Christianity folding and surrendering to sin and wickedness in order to be perceived as ‘tolerant’ in an increasingly evil society.

Christians have bought a lie fed to them by demons and the unGodly that they are not to resist or fight or go to war against evil, but rather turn the other cheek, and indeed – even lie back and enjoy the rape.  Often, the threat of the loss of revenue or income will cause many churches and Christian institutions to ‘modify’ and/or soften their doctrinal stances in order to capitulate to the hedonistic mob’s demands.  Like Lot, Christians will offer their own children to the ravenous mob demanding to rape and pillage their places of business and worship if that threatens the money train or the courts and government are brought to bear against them.

If Christians read their bible, they would know that the nature of the abomination of homosexuality is one that will force itself upon those who resist it.  Like all sin, homosexuality is NEVER content with the demand for ‘equality’ – because equality is not the agenda nor the goal.  The agenda of such sin is to FORCE ITSELF upon everyone, to make their wickedness acceptable and preferable.  As we read in Genesis, there is no satisfying such a mob of wickedness.  They surrounded Lot’s house and were on the verge of breaking down his door to force themselves upon him and his guests.  God refers to homosexuality as an abomination for a reason; it’s nature is abhorrent to the natural order of creation.  It defies the intent and purpose of sex.  It stands in direct opposition to God and required The Lord to visit vaporized mass extermination upon two cities that were filled with it.

Therefore, it is refreshing and uplifting to read of Christians who WILL stand on their faith in America – even if it means they lose their business and income.  The Kleins may be one the early statistics of a government and societal push to persecute and punish Christians who refuse to accept a vile new morality being forced upon us all.  They deserve our prayers, and perhaps God will open doors for their talents to be utilized elsewhere.

But what I would like to point out – is that the nature of the insidious homosexual agenda is something we can read about in the bible.  The homo mob will surround your house – your business – and your church to demand that you capitulate to their demands.  And their agenda will not be satisfied with whatever we might sacrifice to appease them.  They will push against our doors and attempt to force themselves upon us – using the courts, the government, extortion or their fists.

Just one bit of evidence for this factual assertion is this group on Facebook that wants to FORCE Homosexual marriage upon normal/straight men and women, under the auspices of ‘understanding’.

• Forced Gay Marriage

• About

• Open GroupOpen Group

• We are here to support the idea of “forced” gay marriage for the general public. It would be semi-randomized and applied to hetero-sexuals as well as homo-sexuals as a way of promoting understanding of the issues involved.

  Please, we are all one nation. Let’s try to understand each other.

So the Homosexual mafia will attempt to shut down Christian businesses and churches, force themselves upon heterosexual people and go berserk against the Russians by attempting to disrupt the Sochi Olympics.  One might ask why don’t they go attempt to shut down Muslim businesses or protest in Saudi Arabia or other Islamic theocracy that outlaws homosexuality?

It’s because they hate the God of the bible, and because they know Muslims will stand and fight back against any affronts to their faith, even to the point of mass killing.

The Gay Mafia understand that most Christians will not stand and fight against any affront to their faith.  They bought the Satanic lies that taught them not to judge good from evil, sin from righteousness.  So instead they too call evil good, and good, evil – in the hopes that the Homosexual Mafia will not break down their doors.

Witness the ‘Crocodile will eat us last’ syndrome.

 

Christian bakery closes after LGBT threats, protests

A family-owned Christian bakery, under investigation for refusing to bake a wedding cake for a lesbian couple, has been forced to close its doors after a vicious boycott by militant homosexual activists.

Sweet Cakes By Melissa posted a message on its Facebook page alerting customers that their Gresham, Ore. retail store would be shut down after months of harassment from pro-gay marriage forces.

“Better is a poor man who walks in integrity than a rich man who is crooked in his ways,” read a posting from Proverbs on the bakery’s Facebook page.

“It’s a sad day for Christian business owners and it’s a sad day for the First Amendment,” owner Aaron Klein told me. “The LGBT attacks are the reason we are shutting down the shop. They have killed our business through mob tactics.”

Last January, Aaron and Melissa Klein made national headlines when they refused to bake a wedding cake for a lesbian couple.

Klein tells me he has nothing against homosexuals — but because of their religious faith, the family simply cannot take part in gay wedding events.

“I believe marriage is between a man and a woman,” he said. “I don’t want to help somebody celebrate a commitment to a lifetime of sin.”

The lesbian couple filed a discrimination with the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries and told their story to local newspapers and television statements.

Within days, militant homosexuals groups launched protests and boycotts. Klein told me he received messages threatening to kill his family. They hoped his children would die.

The LGBT protestors then turned on other wedding vendors around the community. They threatened to boycott any florists, wedding planners or other vendors that did business with Sweet Cakes By Melissa.

“That tipped the scales,” Klein said. “The LGBT activists inundated them with phone calls and threatened them. They would tell our vendors, ‘If you don’t stop doing business with Sweet Cakes By Melissa, we will shut you down.’”

To make matters worse, the Oregon’s Bureau of Labor and Industries announced last month they had launched a formal discrimination investigation against the Christian family.

Commissioner Brad Avakian told The Oregonian that he was committed to a fair and thorough investigation to determine whether the bakery discriminated against the lesbians.

“Everybody is entitled to their own beliefs, but that doesn’t mean that folks have the right to discriminate,” he told the newspaper. “The goal is to rehabilitate. For those who do violate the law, we want them to learn from that experience and have a good, successful business in Oregon.”

In other words, Christians who live and work in Oregon must follow man’s law instead of God’s law. But in a show of benevolence, the state is willing to rehabilitate and reeducate Christian business owners like the Kleins.

Klein said the closing of their retail store was a small price to pay for standing up for their religious beliefs.

“As a man of faith, I am in good spirits,” he said. “I’m happy to be serving the Lord and standing up for what’s right.”

Klein said what’s happened to Sweet Cakes By Melissa should be a warning to other Christians across the nation.

“This is a fight that’s been coming for a while,” he said. “Be prepared to take a stand. Hopefully, the church will wake up and understand that we are under attack right now.”

Just last month, New Mexico’s Supreme Court ruled that two Christian photographers who declined to photograph a same-sex union violated the state’s Human Rights Act. One justice said the photographers were “compelled by law to compromise the very religious beliefs that inspire their lives.”

Denver baker Jack Phillips is facing possible jail time for refusing to bake a cake for a gay wedding.

The Colorado Attorney General’s office filed a formal complaint against Phillips, the owner of Masterpiece Cake Shop. A hearing before the state’s civil rights commission is set for later this month.

In Indianapolis, a family-owned cookie shop faced a discrimination investigation after they refused to make rainbow cookies for National Coming Out Day.

A T-shirt company in Lexington, Ky. found itself at the center of a Human Rights Commission investigation after they refused to make T-shirts for a local gay rights organization.

Klein said it’s becoming clear that Christians do not have the “right to believe what we believe.”

In other words, gay rights trump religious rights.

Aaron and Melissa Klein tell me they will continue to bake wedding cakes from their home. He’s already taken a full-time job to pay the bills and feed their five children.

Mrs. Klein told television station KPTV her philosophy remains unchanged by recent events.

“The Bible tells us to flee from sin,” she said. “I don’t think making a cake for it helps. I guess in my mind I thought we lived in a lot nicer of a world where everybody tolerated everybody.”

The plight of the Klein family exposes the true nature of the left. Those who preach tolerance and diversity are the least tolerant and the least diverse of all.

And then there’s the plan to disrupt the Olympics by the same agenda.

‘GAY’ PLAN TO DISRUPT OLYMPICS REVEALED

An organization that previously documented how state officials in Massachusetts gave children graphic instructions in bizarre homosexual sex actsand has documented the advance of alternative sexual lifestyles now is reporting on a plan by “gay” activists to disrupt the coming Olympics in Sochi, Russia.

…Russian officials have banned the public promotion of homosexuality and Burke, co-founder of the You Can Play Project, which purports to work to “end homophobia in sports,” confirmed that’s a lot going on with planning.

The 2014 Winter Games will be in Sochi Feb. 7-23, and facing homosexual activists will be a decision by Russia’s parliament that bans the promotion of “non-traditional sexual relations” to minors.

“The Russian government has made it clear that the ban also covers participants and attendees of the 2014 Olympics,” MassResistance said in its report.

…We are talking about utilizing diplomatic channels to get things into the country.”

“There’s a lot going on behind the scenes that will frustrate people because it won’t be made public until you see an athlete on a medal stand or at closing ceremonies . . .”

Obama To End “Discrimination” Of White Wealthy Neighborhoods With New HUD Policy

The Department of Housing and Urban Development is imposing a new rule that tracks diversity in America’s neighborhoods and then pushes policies to change those neighborhoods it deems discriminatory. 

This entry is an Update to the essay I posted on July 22nd on Obama’s plan to eliminate the “geospacial discrimination” of White and wealthy suburbs and force integration of inner city welfare minorities into their neighborhoods.

Meet your new neighbors:

This is just more of Obama’s”Spread the wealth around” Marxism.  His Heinous figures that redistributing wealth from the rich to his welfare minorities needs to include redistributing our property by penalty and force too.

Don’t be surprised at this when it finally is implemented in your neighborhood.  Obama has written and said everything he is doing to us, we only listened to what we wanted to hear, or what the Marxist media told us.

Interestingly, Hitler wrote everything he was going to do to his country and the Jews in his book ‘Mein Kampf” some decades before he was in power to implement his ideology.  No one outside of his fanatical followers actually believed what he wrote would ever happen.  Not even the Jews.

History is repeating.  Obama told us what he intended to do in his books on his struggles “Dreams From My Father” and “The Audacity of Hope” along with various and myriad interviews long before he crowned himself king. From his war on coal, to electricity prices, to siding with the Muslim extremists in any conflicts.  We weren’t listening.

I’ll ask the supposition again – how long before Obama’s Government resorts to doing this to us?  Don’t think for a second this regime won’t do so.  It will use arbitrary regulations, rules and forfeitures until they decide the end of a gun works more efficiently.  Then again, every federal agent of every bureaucracy (including the NOAA weather service)  is apparently armed to the teeth.  Is this picture our future?

 

Obama is a Marxist, and Marxism operates under this principle: FROM EACH ACCORDING TO HIS ABILITY, TO EACH ACCORDING TO HIS NEED.  Obama sees a need to take from you your neighborhoods and homes, so he can give them to those he has decreed are in need of what you have.

Fox News reports and adds additional information.

Obama administration using housing department in effort to diversify neighborhoods

In a move some claim is tantamount to social engineering, the Department of Housing and Urban Development is imposing a new rule that would allow the feds to track diversity in America’s neighborhoods and then push policies to change those it deems discriminatory.

The policy is called, “Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing.” It will require HUD to gather data on segregation and discrimination in every single neighborhood and try to remedy it.

…

Data from this discrimination database would be used with zoning laws, housing finance policy, infrastructure planning and transportation to alleviate alleged discrimination and segregation.

More at link.