Gun Confiscation Is Coming. Civil War An Acceptable Cost Towards ‘Fundamental Transformation’

Obama & Hillary Clinton’s recent references to Australian-style gun confiscation reveals the next step in the fundamental transformation of America into a totalitarian state.

I blogged on this last week, and the rumbling meme from Mordor On The Potomac and their Orc-media acolytes that continues ought to make us aware and mindful that the attempt to ban, register and then confiscate our arms is indeed a policy that is now being fast-tracked through the media.

That Obama denies he is going to confiscate and Hillary laughs as the concerns, nails the truth that is indeed exactly what they are in the process of doing.

A main propaganda arm of the White House and the Democrat Marxists reveals this plan and laments the existence of the Second Amendment and acknowledge the cost of confiscation:

YES, They Want To Take Your Guns Away

…If federal agents came to round up firearms, many gun owners would be prepared to shoot back. Clinton can joke all she likes about Americans fearing “black helicopters” taking their guns away, but it is no exaggeration to suggest that civil war could erupt on American soil were the U.S. government to attempt anything remotely resembling what was done in Australia.

And so Americans are condemned to engage endlessly in futile argument—futile thanks to the legal enshrinement of private gun ownership in our founding document, as well as to a refusal to state clearly our mutually exclusive convictions: that the intrinsic cost of this right is tens of thousands of unwanted deaths and that the only way to stop these deaths is outright gun confiscation.

Perhaps, in a perfect world, the United States would never have had the Second Amendment.

While it is argued that the media is just engaging in wishful-thinking, Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke tells us that this plan for gun confiscation IS POLICY and it is being advocated and war-gamed throughout law enforcement groups by the efforts of Obama’s White House.

SHERIFF DAVID CLARKE: OBAMA IS ON A ‘GUN CONFISCATION MISSION’

Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke:

I was extremely disappointed when I heard that my fellow law enforcement executive colleagues had gotten into bed with Obama and his gun confiscation mission. That’s really what it’s about. It’s not about reducing violence, it’s not about reducing mass murder or suicides. The real intent of Obama and these gun groups is gun confiscation and they know they are going to have to do it step by step. They’re not going to be able to go after that today, as there would be fierce blowback. So they are doing it in stealth ways and this IACP meeting is one of those ways.

More at link.

OBAMA, HILLARY TOYING WITH ‘CIVIL WAR’ OVER GUN CONFISCATION

The Daily Beast theoretically agreed that “confiscation on a massive scale” may be “the only way to solve American gun violence,” but they pointed out that it was not realistic and suggested Hillary risks causing irreparable divisions by talking about confiscation then mocking gun owners as conspiracy theorists waiting for “black helicopters” to come take their guns away.

Amerika’s Firearm Foolishness

 

More Amerikan Firearms Foolishness

By Bernard Carmen

As our government continues to prove themselves unworthy of governance in our “land of the free” through their disobedience of its Constitutional limitations, I will continue to become more vocal about not only the unalienable right to Petition for Redress of Grievances, guaranteed by the First Amendment, but also the unalienable right to bear arms, guaranteed by the Second Amendment.

 

The logic is fairly simple.  As far as I understand, We the People have 3 ways of control over our government:

1. The Ballot Box — as demonstrated, this has become corrupted through duopoly partisan ballot access legislation and the plurality voting system;

2. Petitioning for Redress of Grievances via the LAW — by its own example, the Federal Government, via the Judicial, Legislative, and Executive branches, have decided it does not have to obey the LAW, and because the majority of Americans live in fear of their government, they have not the will to withhold ALL monies claimed due to the State (which is the founders’ advice for peaceful resolution to tyranny);

3. Physical Resistance — when all else fails and tyranny oppresses a free people, the last resort is physical resistance.  This is why the founders placed the guarantor of the unalienable right of a free person to bear arms as #2 in the Bill of Rights, directly after the ‘accountability clause’ of the 1st Amendment.

Knowing that control provisions #1 & #2 over the State are both failing due to blatant corruption, the only other recourse to tyranny besides running (and to where?) is to defend our personal liberties through armed resistance.

I hope and pray it never comes to that, but at this point in this state of tyranny where the State can pretty much do whatever it wills with NO consideration for the LAW, then how long before it all comes tumbling down?

I am certainly not going to rely on our Police & Sheriff departments to protect myself and my loved ones — it is up to We the People to maintain our freedom!

Apparently the mayor of Seattle disagrees with this concept, as he attempts to reduce violence through additional gun control.

“Following a shooting that injured three people at the Folklife Festival on May 24, Mayor Greg Nickels directed all City of Seattle departments to study the adoption and enforcement of policies, rules and contractual agreements which would prohibit the possession of dangerous weapons, including firearms on city property.”

Has it escaped the Seattle Mayor’s office attention about the recent terrorist attacks on unarmed civilians in India?  I understand that government authorities are confused about the solution to thwart such random acts of terrorism.

CONFUSED?  What’s there to be confused about?  The answer is SIMPLE!

If we as concerned humans desire less acts of terrorism, and to decrease criminal violence in general, ARM THE CITIZENSHIP!

It’s really quite a simple equation.  The facts are clear:  the less the citizenship is armed, the more criminal activity persists.

I leave you with some quotes from some VERY anti-American quotes:

“This year will go down in history. For the first time a civilized nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future.” — Adolf Hitler, 1935

 

“Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeed when those who would resist us have been totally disarmed.” — Sara Brady, Chairman, Handgun Control (to Sen. Howard Metzanbaum, The National Educator, January 1994, Page 3)

Gun registration is not enough…Waiting periods are only a step. Registration is only a step. The prohibition of firearms is the goal. — Attorney-General Janet Reno, December 10th, 1993 (Associated Press)

 

Our ultimate goal- total control of handguns in the United States- is going to take time…The first problem is to slow down the increasing number of handguns being produced…The second problem is to get handguns registered. And the final problem is to make the possession of handguns and all handgun ammunition- except for the military, policemen, licensed security guards, licensed sporting clubs, and licensed gun collectors- totally illegal.  — Nelson Shields (Sarah Brady’s predecessor at HCI), New Yorker Magazine 7/26/76 p.53

 

Our goal is to not allow anybody to buy a handgun… The stated goal of the most active supporters of restrictions, aside from the “moderate” goals they often espouse in the heat of legislative battle, is to abolish gun ownership totally.” — Micheal K. Beard, President, Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, Washington Times, December 9, 1993