Yes, You Better Believe It – Obama IS Coming For Your Guns

Obama said in Chicago Tuesday “I’m not going to “take everyone’s guns away”, which given his history – means he is about to employ policies to do just that.

History lesson of statements His Heinous Obama has made and what transpired shortly after he made those statements:

“I’m not gonna force you to buy health insurance”.

He did.

“I’m not gonna penalize you for not buying health insurance”.

He did.

“I’m not gonna take away your health insurance”.

He did.

“I’m not gonna take away your doctor”.

He did.

“I’m not gonna unilaterally rewrite immigration law”.

He did.

“I’m not gonna unilaterally ignore immigration law”.

He did.

And this past Tuesday he says “I’m not gonna take away our guns”.

You better believe he will.  And soon.

He always makes these statements, right before he employs a policy or action to do exactly aha the says he is not.

Breitbart’s John Nolte shares the proof.

WHEN OBAMA SAYS HE WON’T TAKE YOUR GUNS, HISTORY PROVES HE’S LYING

President Barack Obama is a serial-liar of the first order. That is not partisanship talking, that is history and science. And when Obama says, as he did Tuesday in Chicago, I’m not going to “take everyone’s guns away,” that means he’s coming for them.

Did I mention Barack Obama is a liar? Not only is Obama a liar, this “not gunna-gunna” ploy is a tactic the President has effectively used many times before. It’s a two-pronged assault that requires the cooperation of his DC Media allies.

1. By lying and saying he’s “not gunna,” Obama lulls his opponents into a false sense of security.
2. By lying and saying he’s “not gunna,” it allows Obama’s DC Media allies to attack as liars and extremists those who say Obama will take their guns.

Let’s look at the science, shall we?

 

I’m Not Gunna Force People To Buy Health Insurance

Obama’s “not gunna” lies started during the 2008 presidential campaign when he said he was “not gunna” force people to buy health insurance. Here’s video of a 2008 debatebetween Obama and Hillary Clinton where he criticizes, not just the mandate in her health care plan that forces people to purchase health insurance, but the fact that they are fined and therefore “worse off” if they don’t purchase insurance.

We don’t want to put on adults a situation where we are mandating them to purchase insurance and if the subsidies are inadequate the burden is on them and they will be penalized, and this is exactly what Senator Clinton’s plan does  … If healthcare is affordable you don’t need a mandate.

Except, from the mandate to the penalty, this is exactly what ObamaCare does.

I’m Not Gunna Take Away Your Health Insurance or Your Doctor

While he was trying to shove ObamaCare into law in 2009 and win re-election in 2012, dozens of times Obama said, I’m “not gunna” take away your health insurance and I’m “not gunna” take away your doctor.

Obama was lying.

Obama knew he was lying.

The DC Media knew he was lying.

And those of us who called out his lie were accused of racism by Obama and the DC Media.

By the time the fallout hit, millions and millions of people lost their insurance, and with it, their doctors.

The lie, and the DC Media’s willing complicity in covering up the lie, was necessary to get the monstrosity passed. Had the president told the truth, or the DC Media exposed what they knew was the truth, ObamaCare never would have passed.

I’m Not Gunna Sign Executive Orders Changing Immigration Law

More than 20 times President Obama reassured Americans he would not override Congress as a means to change or ignore immigration laws. Again and again, Obama told us he would not and could not unilaterally ignore or rewrite these laws.

He lied.

I’m Not Gunna Take Away Your Guns

“I believe in the Second Amendment. I believe in the people’s lawful right to bear arms. I will not take your shotgun away. I will not take your rifle away. I won’t take your handgun away.” — Then-Senator Obama, September 9, 2008.  

—

—

While running for president, Obama was desperate to wrist-flick away the gun issue knowing it could hurt him in the general election.

In 2008, Obama also voted in favor of an amendment that would prohibit the confiscation of guns, even during a national emergency.

This was all a lie.

Twice this year, although the DC Media ignores this in order to protect him, Obama has said that he backs Australia’s gun laws, the spine of which is outright confiscation. Democrats and the DC Media always lie about Australia’s government-mandated confiscation by couching it as a buyback program — which it most certainly was not. Sure, the Australian government paid people for their guns but they were forced to turn them in. A buyback program is voluntary.

In June of 2014, Obama praised the Australia law:

—

—

In June of 2015, Obama again praised the Australia law.

—

In summation, Obama said…

I’m not gunna force you to buy health insurance. He did.

I’m not gunna penalize you for not buying health insurance. He did.

I’m not gunna take away your health insurance. He did.

I’m not gunna take away your doctor. He did.

I’m not gunna unilaterally rewrite immigration law. He did.

I’m not gunna unilaterally ignore immigration law. He did.

And now we’re supposed to trust him when he says he’s not gunna take away our guns.

P.S. The DC Media is also covering up Hillary’s endorsement of Australia’s gun laws.  

Obama Is Sorry America Was Stupid Enough To Believe Him

Obama’s so-called apology for his lie that you could keep your health insurance, reveals the narcissist who is not sorry for deceiving you… he is sorry you cannot grasp his genius in attempting to save you from yourself.

Obama is sorry Americans aren’t smart enough to grasp what he really meant

Oh, puh-leeze.

President Obama carefully apologized for something Thursday. (See video below.) But not for lying.

Attempting to staunch the growing furor over his countless misrepresentations about Americans keeping their existing health plan under ObamaCare, the Democrat granted an exclusive interview to NBC News’ Chuck Todd.

“Exclusive” is what politicians grant 1) to get extra oomph from their interview with one media outlet and 2) to avoid the news conference’s reportorial feeding-frenzy that accompanies the scent of political blood in the water.

First, what Obama didn’t do. He didn’t apologize for misleading the entire country for three-plus years by saying without qualification dozens of times that if Americans like their existing health insurance plan, they can keep it. “Period.” The Real Good Talker didn’t admit any mistake there, not even an inadvertent one based on his enthusiasm for what he believes is best for his countrymen.

Such bald statements, which documents show he knew were false in mid-2010, played a key role in calming latent fears about his massive federal government plan to reshape nearly a fifth of the country’s economy.

That soothing claim also helped convince the majority Democrats in both houses of Congress to pass the bill in 2010 without a single Republican vote. Obama showed no sympathy when early ObamaCare opposition overwhelmingly turned the House over to the GOP that year.

With their Senate margin of control slim heading into the 2014 midterm balloting, Obama now hears worried Democrats whining about polls showing voter opposition threatening their reelections. Why should he care? As Obama told the Russian president last year, 2012 was his’ final election.’

In his NBC interview Obama, who like Congress is exempt from ObamaCare’s provisions, said the usual feel-good non-specifics about asking “my team” to examine ways to ameliorate the pain for millions of Americans losing their existing plan.

And he even emphasized his belief that ultimately the new forced policies would be upgrades. No sedative now for anyone saying goodbye to their existing, affordable plan, unable to shop on Obama’s crippled, half-billion-dollar website, facing much higher prices for plans including options they don’t want and facing federal financial penalties for non-compliance.

“I am sorry,” Obama said, “that they are finding themselves in this situation based on assurances they got from me.”

No explanation for how his “team” could have allowed the faulty website to go live Oct. 1 despite tardy and failed tests.

Obama: I’m Sorry You Believed Me

OBAMA:  I regret very much that what we intended to do, which is to make sure that everybody is moving into better plans because they want ’em as opposed to because they’re forced into it, that, you know, uh, we weren’t as clear as we needed to be in terms of the changes that were taking place.  Even though it’s a small percentage of folks who may be disadvantaged, you know, it means a lot to them and it’s scary to them.  Uh, and I am sorry that they, uhh, you know, are finding themselves in this situation based on assurances they got from me.”

 ….You know, when I heard that he was gonna go on NBC and apologize, I knew what he was gonna do.  He was gonna set himself up as a victim.  He is victim number one, by the way, in this country.  He sets himself up as an outsider. He’s not really governing and all these other people are gonna have screwed something up.  Damn it.  He’s as excited as anybody is to get it fixed. He’s as mad as anybody is that it went wrong.

He’s as mad as anybody is that what he said isn’t true, and somebody’s gonna pay the price. He’s gonna get somebody’s gonna pay for this, and that’s just the way he does it.  He claimed he’s a victim.  He even said, “Look, I was burned by a website.  I was burned by a website.”  The president of the United States is saying, “I was burned by a website,” meaning, “Everything in this plan’s cool! It’s the greatest thing under the sun. It’s just the stupid website doesn’t work.

“I got burned by a website.  I’m only here having to apologize because of that stupid website.” But most of all, he acts like he didn’t have anything to do with the situation that people are, quote, “finding themselves in.”  Yes, he didn’t have anything to do with it. It’s your problem.  He’s really sorry that you believed him.  It’s like all these athletes that get caught.  They say, “That’s not me.  You know, the person that stole that car and ran it into the bridge abutment with an alcohol level of 5.7, that’s not who I am.”

More cogent analysis at link.

Obama: The Liar-In-Chief

UPDATED 9-10 11:40

Obama says he is responsible for nothing.  Yet he is about to jumpstart WWIII and give his Sunni Jihadist allies a hand overthrowing Syria. With a boldfaced liar for President, we the people have no clue whom to believe anymore; our enemies or our leaders and their media.

The fruits of Barack Obama are these:

“in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.” —Adolf Hitler , Mein Kampf, vol. I, ch. X

i.e.: “Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it ”.

A psychological profile of Adolf Hitler by the U.S. government at the end of WWII reads like a current psychological profile of Barack Obama.  See if you can discern a difference.  It stated this about Hitler:

His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it. –  A Psychological Analysis of Adolph Hitler. His Life and Legend by Walter C. Langer. Office of Strategic Services (OSS) Washington, D.C. With the collaboration of Prof. Henry A. Murr, Harvard Psychological Clinic, Dr. Ernst Kris, New School for Social Research, Dr. Bertram D. Lawin, New York Psychoanalytic Institute. p. 219

Like Hitler, Obama blames everyone else for what goes wrong and NEVER admits to any faults or wrong.

See it for yourself in this one example:

So Obama and his regime is attempting to convince the American people of the absolute need to bomb Syria – and the so-called evidence of whom used the chemical weapons is one that follows Obama’s record of telling the big lie, and repeating it often.

The fruits of Obama showcase that it is not Chemical Weapons use that Obama is concerned with – but rather it is helping the Sunni Jihadists loyal to Al Qaeda from being defeated by Bashar Assad’s forces.  It is to empower the Sunni Muslims to establish their Caliphate over that of the Shiite or Alawite Muslims in the Middle East.

What Happens When You Can’t Believe A Thing The President Says?

*snip*

With respect to Syria, the president tells us there will be no U.S. boots on the ground.  Um, would that be like:

• If you like your health coverage you can keep it. Most people won’t be able to.

• Health insurance premiums for a family would be $2,500 lower by the end of his first term in office.  They were actually about $3,000 higher.

• The Obama administration was not responsible for proposing the budget sequester idea.Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward challenged this claim and forced the administration to backtrack.

• Money from the nearly $800 billion stimulus package would be spent on “shovel-ready projects” and unemployment would drop to 5.3 percent by the end of his first term.  The president later conceded the projects weren’t as shovel ready as he had hoped andunemployment was 7.9 percent.

• There was nothing Obama could do about Benghazi.  Subsequent revelations and congressional testimony have shown just how disengaged or disinterested the administration was.

• The Justice Department told a judge that Fox Newsreporter James Rosen was a “co-conspirator” and a security threat?  The DOJ later apologized and tried to make amends with Washington reporters.

• That Attorney General Eric Holder didn’t know about the Fast and Furious gun-running program?  Investigators have found documents confirming that he did have knowledge.

Or how about when Obama told Fox News host Bill O’Reilly that he hadn’t raised taxes when there were 21 new or increased taxes in ObamaCare alone.  Or when he claimed that he didn’t draw the “red line” with respect to Syria, the international community did, when it is very obvious from his taped statements that he alone drew the line.

And when Obama or his team aren’t asserting something that is demonstrably false, they are frequently making claims that might be technically true, but are intended to mislead.

…some of those same skeptics now defend Obama’s claim that U.S. troops will not be used in Syria.  Would that be like his absolute denial to Russert?  Maybe Obama means it, or maybe he’ll change his mind.  No one can know for sure.

The country needs to be able to trust a president and his staff and believe what they say.  But that’s not the case anymore.

*end snip*

More at link.

When you have a Liar-in-chief for President as we do, the world ends up laughing itself silly at the boldfaced lies, and it does as it pleases to advantage themselves against the United States.  We The People have no clue whom to believe anymore – enemies of the United State, or Obama and his sycophants in the media.

UPDATE: John Kerry gaffe for Syria to surrender it’s chemical weapons  is accepted by Russia and Assad.  Obama and his propaganda media suddenly claim credit for ‘brilliant strategy’ to diffuse military action against Syria on behalf of Al Qaeda rebels.

Kerry now claims credit for Syria weapons proposal

Secretary of State John Kerry’s seemingly casual proposal for the Assad regime to turn over its chemical weapons has within 24 hours become the de facto policy of the Obama administration, and is now being heralded by Kerry as the “ideal way” to defuse the stand-off between the United States and Syria.

But a look at the administration’s statements shows that the plan has undergone an incredible evolution.

Just one day ago, Kerry mentioned the idea in response to a question about what Bashar Assad could do to avert an attack

“He could turn over every single bit of his chemical weapons to the international community in the next week,” Kerry said. He then immediately splashed water on the notion: “But he isn’t about to do it, and it can’t be done, obviously.”

His aides swiftly set about to walking the remark back, describing Kerry’s comment as merely a “rhetorical argument.”

Yet on Tuesday morning — after the Russians had co-opted the idea and formally presented it to the Syrian government — Kerry was claiming full credit for the plan during testimony before the House Armed Services Committee.

This is what happens when the President is a liar and surrounds himself with ideological Leftists who also use the Big Lie to further their agenda.  Our enemies then seize on their immorality and use it against us.

RUSSIAN PARLIAMENT GLOATS AS PUTIN CHECKMATES OBAMA OVER SYRIA

Monday morning, Secretary of State John Kerry made what an administration official called a “major goof” with a never-going-to-happen hypothetical that suggested Syria could avoid American airstrikes by surrendering their chemical weapons. Even the State Department walked Kerry’s statement back. But Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov immediately seized upon Kerry’s flub, and now a member of the Russian parliament is gloating over Putin’s checkmate of Obama.

Watching one administration bungle after another unfurl, Alexi Pushkov , the chairman of the Parliamentary Foreign Affairs Committee, is publicly mocking Obama. Via Twitter, Pushkov wrote that this mess “knocks the ground out from under Obama’s plans for a military strike.”

Kerry’s flub played right into the Russians hands; and by breaking weak, stepping back from his own red line, and embracing Kerry’s hypothetical proposal during a round-robin of network interviews Monday night, President Obama chose to repeat Kerry’s mistake.

Obama Lied; Lied; Lied – While Americans Died

Emails to White House prove Obama was informed the Libyan Embassy Attack was the work of Jihadists TWO HOURS after attacks began.

The lies began from the moment the 6 hour attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi had claimed the lives of 4 Americans and continues in various forms right up to this moment.  From the Outset – His Heinous Obama and his regime,  thrust an obscure Youtube Video as the cause for two embassy attacks on the anniversary of 9-11.

The Won has wavered little from that stance, ranting in the days and weeks after the attack about the video being the cause of a spontaneous riot whose blame was on free speech in America.  The State Department had Hillary Clinton running television ads in Pakistan apologizing for the Youtube video and disavowing any government involvement with the video.  Even during the debates, Obama tried to ‘school’ Romney that he acted on the information that he had available ‘at the time’, which up until now – Obama has asserted was the responsibility of the video that caused an unforeseen circumstance they had ‘no control over’.

The suspicion of cover-up and lies by this entire regime on up to Obama himself has finally reached a point that Obama’s media cannot cover for him any longer.  A set of internal emails have surfaced that declare that the group Ansar al Sharia claimed responsibility of the attack in Benghazi in real-time virtually as the raid played out on September 11^th.  Obama knew at minimum TWO HOURS after the attack began that it was an Al Qaeda-linked Jihadist attack on our embassy.

So why did Obama let those Americans die?  They were watching the attacks in real-time via a drone that hovered above the embassy, yet did not call in assets from anywhere to assist in saving the Ambassador and American staff.  They watched this attack take place over the 7 hour siege.  They let them die, then almost immediately – began blaming the video for the attacks.  Obama strode out and THANKED the Libyans for doing the “right thing by taking the Ambassador to the hospital” when video and testimony suggest Stevens had been gang-raped, choked to death and then his body was dragged through the streets by thugs shouting ‘Allu Ackbar!”.

This is beyond incompetence, it appears nearly deliberate, a sacrifice on the altar of militant Jihadists whom Obama backed in the overthrow of Libyan dictator Moammar Gaddafi.

At minimum, the dereliction of duty from Obama on down through Hillary Clinton’s State Department should be cause for impeachment or resignation.  At worst – this entire fiasco and cover-up story was for the purpose of Obama attempting to create a fictional narrative – citing the ‘video’ as a way to keep the  attackers unawares of Obama’s hunt for them – and wala!  ‘October Surprise’ attack on the Al Qaeda-linked group to bolster his sinking poll numbers and diffuse the scandal.

Now the scandal breaks even wider and more pointed, depending on whether the rest of Obama’s media lackeys will continue to cover for him or try to salvage what little is left of their integrity as Fox News and others run with the story that Obama KNEW it was Jihadists within two hours of the six hour attack.

Now we know what and when he knew it. The only thing left to guess is WHY he let it happen and WHY he lied about it – boldfaced for over a month.

White House told of militant claim two hours after Libya attack: emails

and

Emails show the Obama administration knew Ansar al Sharia was behind the attack in Benghazi

Fox has obtained a set of internal emails which declare that the group Ansar al Sharia claimed responsibility of the attack in Benghazi virtually as the raid played out on September 11^th.

Ansar al Sharia has been declared by the State Department to be a an al Qaeda affiliated group. The emails were sent by the State Department to across a variety of redacted national security platforms including the White House Situation room, the Pentagon, the FBI, the Director of National Intelligence and the State Department. Fox is told that approximately 300-400 national security figures received these emails in real time almost as the raid was playing out and concluding. Fox is told that figures directly receiving these emails work directly underneath the nation’s top national security, military and diplomatic officials.

The first email indicates that Ambassador Chris Stevens and other personnel were “in the compound safe haven.”

The timestamps on the emails are all eastern time and often include the subheading SBU…which is shorthand for “Sensitive But Unclassified.”

The redacted email address @nss.eop.gov is the White House Situation address. The email address extension @dni.gov is the an extension that goes to figures working under the Director of National Intelligence.

The first email was sent at 4:05 pm et with the subject line “U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi Under Attack (SBU).”
It goes on to say “The Regional Security Officer reports the diplomatic mission is under attack. Embassy Tripoli reports approximately 20 armed people fired shots; explosions have been heard as well. Ambassador Stevens, who is currently in Benghazi, and four COM personnel are in the compound safe haven. The 17^th of February militia is providing security support.

The operations Center will provide updates as available.”

The second email came at 4:54 pm.

The subject line is “Update 1: U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi (SBU)

“(SBU) Embassy Tripoli reports the firing at the U.S. Diplomatic Mission in Benghazi has stopped and the compound has been cleared. A response team is on site attempting to locate COM personnel.”

The third email came at 6:07 pm and was sent to a different email list, but still includes the White House Situation room address.

This email contains the key subject line that reads “Update 2: Ansar al-Sharia Claims Responsibility for Benghazi Attack (SBU).”

This is the link to the al Qaeda-affiliated organization.