Obama’s Meaningless ISIL Speech: His Real Targets Are Not Islamic Terrorists

Obama’s speech about ISIS Jihadists last night was pathetic. Meanwhile the Government ratchets up a potential crackdown on Obama’s political opponents.

John hits another out of the park on analysis of Obama’s pathetic speech in light of what has been going on for the last few weeks in our government and has some words of warning to consider.

In a week that it was revealed that 5 other IRS agents under congressional subpoena regarding the IRS scandal ‘lost’ their e-mails and computer hard drives; on a day the IRS head Koskinen says to the investigative committee “we follow the law wherever we can” – and in the same timeframe we learn that yet another Conservative media outlet is under an open-ended IRS audit – we have more to fear from Obama and this federal government than we do from any terrorist organization anywhere on the planet.

 

Obama’s False Flag Speech Tonight

by John Galt
September 10, 2014 19:00 ET

Tonight, on the eve of another anniversary for 9-11, the current President of the United States will be giving a speech about the threat of ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria or IS for short) where a new American strategy for dealing with this terrorist army will be outlined after he stated several days ago that he didn’t have one. Several months ago in fact, the President called ISIS the “JV team” in one of his numerous infamous quotes and since that time they have carved out what amounts to a small nation in Eastern Syria and Western Iraq.

The issue of ISIS however, is not the key point to the speech tonight. If ISIS were truly a serious threat to US interests, aka, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, then our “allies” in the region would request that the United States position more troops into Kuwait and Jordan to protect those kingdoms and  to cut off any advance towards the House of Saud.  Meanwhile, many questions about this speech and American policy towards ISIS will not be answered by this administration nor our “allies” in the region:

1. If the United States is aware that ISIS is now in possession of approximately 30 M1 Abrams tanks, why have we not destroyed them with an air strike by now? Theoretically one would hope that the U.S. would install a “kill switch” such as those used by American rental car companies just in case a vehicle is stolen, or at least some type of GPS tracking at a minimum once the weapons were left for the Iraqi military.

2. Why are Western governments in Europe and including the United States announcing any types of sanctions for those countries aiding and abetting the ISIS cause? There is ample evidence within the mainstream media that Qatar is acting as the finance and banking arm for the Islamic State yet not one word has been uttered about cutting off trade or even a small threat of sanctions from any nation except for Saudi Arabia (see: Saudi threatens to block Qatar’s land, sea borders from this posting about Saudi-Qatari relations: Is Saudi Arabia Preparing to Invade Qatar?).

3. There is demonstrable evidence that Turkey, a NATO member nation, has also been arming and training ISIS forces yet the silence from Brussels, London, and Washington has been deafening. Will President Obama announce an initiative to cut off the supply of arms and soldiers migrating from Turkish territory into Iraq and Syria tonight? I seriously doubt it.

Thus one has to wonder if the real purpose of President Obama’s speech tonight is to provide the usual distraction and scare tactics to spook the American people with another CIA trained terrorism force. The headline on the Drudge Report this afternoon provides a most interesting insight into DHS’s mindset before Obama speaks tonight:

From the story at Drudge at the headline above from the Washington Times this evening:

Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said his department will be issuing new guidance to retailers this week giving them pointers on how to spot potential terrorists among their customers by looking at what they’re buying.

While saying the government cannot prohibit sales of some everyday materials, Mr. Johnson said retailers should be trained to look for anyone who buys a lot from what he described as a “long list of materials that could be used as explosive precursors.”

He said it was an extension of the “If you see something, say something” campaign launched by his predecessor, former Secretary Janet Napolitano, which tries to enlist average Americans to be aware of their immediate environment.

“We can’t and we shouldn’t prohibit the sale of a pressure cooker. We can sensitize retail businesses to be on guard for suspicious behavior by those who buy this kind of stuff,” Mr. Johnson said during a question-and-answer session after a speech at the Council on Foreign Relations.

In other words, if one buys gunpowder for use in black powder hunting or reloading of ammunition, ammunition in quantity of any caliber, or household chemicals which some individuals buy in bulk to save money for their home and businesses (multi-location use), odds are one might just find themselves on any number of Obama’s DHS “watch lists” as a possible domestic terrorist threat.

The article above from the Times in fact supports a story published by the Washington Free Beaconon August 29, 2014 (see: FBI National Domestic Threat Assessment Omits Islamist Terrorism ) where the alarming revelation of the omission of Islamist terror appears to be more insidious when this portion of Bill Gertz’s story is taken into consideration with the excerpt published above:

Instead, the internal FBI intelligence report concluded in its 2013 assessment published this month that the threat to U.S. internal security from extremists is limited to attacks and activities by eight types of domestic extremist movements—none motivated by radical Islam.

They include anti-government militia groups and white supremacy extremists, along with “sovereign citizen” nationalists, and anarchists. Other domestic threat groups outlined by the FBI assessment include violent animal rights and environmentalist extremists, black separatists, anti- and pro-abortion activists, and Puerto Rican nationalists.

“Domestic extremist violence continues to be unpredictable and, at times, severe,” the report states.

This appears to validate that the government might indeed be secretly concerned about ISIS and Islamist terrorism but the temptation to secretly allow a terror attack to occur, committed by radical Muslim militants falsely tied to the Patriot Movement, Tea Party, or other pro-Constitutional groups is no longer the realm of conspiracy theorists or websites.

One must take into consideration the long standing hostility of this regime towards its own citizens and the potential that tonight’s speech has nothing to do with ISIS or their actions overseas; instead it would appear a scare tactic to justify a brutal crackdown on all Americans who do not share the views of the predominate political parties and their elites, all in the name of protecting the people.

Beware my friends, as we now live in one of the most dangerous periods of our history where liberty’s light can be extinguished by the fictional assignment of guilt and national hysteria, much like other dictatorships and oligarchs have used to crush their citizens throughout history.

Why Libya Cover-Up: Obama Was Arming Al Qaeda & Islamists

Obama has been engaged in gun-walking on a massive scale. Equipping America’s enemies to wage global jihad.

In the aftermath of  9-11-2001, any American working to actively empower, aid, run weapons and guns to Osama Bin Laden, the Taliban or any Al Qaeda associated Jihadi groups would have been seen as having committed high treason against the United States, right?

Well that is EXACTLY what the 44th President, Barrack Hussein Obama, His Heinous – has been doing since he took office.  His regime was not limited to running weapons in Operation Fast & Furious’ gun-walking arming of Mexican drug cartels with American guns, as a way to abolish the Second Amendment and impose gun bans.  His regime was doing the same thing for Al Qaeda and associated Islamist groups in the Middle East to facilitate the “Arab Spring” uprising.

While Obama calls the Middle East uprisings against secular dictators a “fight for Democracy”, the fruit and fact is far from the truth.  In EVERY case that the Obama regime supported, encouraged and it appears now, ARMED the “rebels” against the likes of Libyan dictator Moammar Ghaddafi – actively supporting Al Qaeda Islamist fighters.  From Egypt, to Tunisia to Libya and Yemen – the wake of the “Arab Spring” has installed Islamic Jihadist Theocracies in all those nations.  Nations that were either benign or friendly to the United States and Israel, are now avowed Islamist enemies.  Christians that once existed in these nations, are being systematically exterminated or forced into Islamic conversion as the Copts of Egypt are suffering with reports of church burnings, gang rapes and mass crucifixions in front of Morsi’s presidential palace.

Looking at the FRUITS of whom Obama supported and continues to support in the Middle East, beginning at the outset with his 2009 Cairo speech to the Muslim world – looking back – Obama lit the fuse.  The pattern appears to be that Obama is helping to shape what Islamists are working for: a totalitarian Islamic Caliphate.  Perhaps there is something to the Shia Prophecy about a ‘tall black man’ acting like an Islamic John The Baptist, preparing the way for an Islamic takeover of the globe by dismantling the West from within, arming and empowering Jihadists to take power across the Middle East.  Obama has been instrumental in achieving this Islamist dream.

Obama is not yet done.  He has been working to arm a branch of Al Qaeda Jihadists inside Syria to overthrow the secular dictatorship of Bassar Assad, and that ties directly to the attacks on the Libyan Embassy and the killing of Ambassador Stevens, who was acting in the capacity of an Arms Dealer to Jihad groups in Libya and Syria.

Reports from the Washington Times and Business Insider detail the probable motive in the Libyan Embassy Cover-up that continues to this moment: Obama was engaged in arming Al Qaeda fighters in Syria and elsewhere in the Middle East.

The real reason behind Benghazigate

The evidence suggests that the Obama administration has not simply been engaging, legitimating, enriching and emboldening Islamists who have taken over or are ascendant in much of the Middle East. Starting in March 2011, when American diplomat J. Christopher Stevens was designated the liaison to the “opposition” in Libya, the Obama administration has been arming them, including jihadists like Abdelhakim Belhadj, leader of the al Qaeda franchise known as the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group.

Once Moammar Gadhafi was overthrown, Stevens was appointed ambassador to the new Libya run by Mr. Belhadj and his friends. Not surprisingly, one of the most important priorities for someone in that position would be to try to find and secure the immense amount of armaments that had been cached by the dictator around the country and systematically looted during and after the revolution.

One of the places in Libya most awash with such weapons in the most dangerous of hands is Benghazi. It now appears that Stevens was there — on a particularly risky day, with no security to speak of and despite now copiously documented concerns about his own safety and that of his subordinates — for another priority mission: sending arms recovered from the former regime’s stocks to the “opposition” in Syria. As in Libya, the insurgents are known to include al Qaeda and other Shariah-supremacist groups, including none other than Abdelhakim Belhadj.

The report continues to detail that weapons to Al Qaeda included SA-7 MANPAD surface to air missiles – capable to taking down airliners and U.S. military aircraft.  But it is THIS pull quote that hits right to the point of this story:

What cries out for further investigation — and debate in the remaining days of this presidential election — is whether this shipment was part of a larger covert Obama effort to transfer weapons to our enemies that could make the Iran-Contra scandal, to say nothing of Operation Fast and Furious, pale by comparison.

The reasons for the Obama regime to lie, misdirect and re-catagorize what took place at Benghazi is the result of Christopher Stevens’ actual role as arms facilitator and Community Jihadist ‘organizer’ for insurgencies across the Middle East.  Stevens’ last official meeting earlier on the day he was murdered was said to be with an unidentified “Turkish diplomat.” Presumably, the conversation involved additional arms shipments to al Qaeda and its allies in Syria. It also may have involved getting more jihadist fighters into Syria.  According to sources in Egyptian security, Ambassador Stevens was playing a “central role in recruiting jihadists to fight Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria.”

Even Obama Apologist rag the NYT had to concede to the fact that Obama was engaged in arming militant Jihadists, branches of Al Qaeda to Syrian rebels.  As the Business Insider reported: US Weapons Are Going To Hard-Line Jihadists Fighting To Topple The Syrian Regime

Treason seems to be a word that no longer has any application to modern-day America unless the definition is applied to Right Wingers and Conservatives opposed to Obama and the Democrats.  Aiding and comforting Communists and Jihadists was described by the Obama media as improving America’s standing in the world.  Would anyone dare call arming Al Qaeda for use to overthrow regimes that at one time were friendly or benign to the United States, as treason?  No one can be stupid enough to think that arming these Jihadists will not result in those arms eventually being used on Americans – but like Operation Fast & Furious – it appears there is an ulterior motive behind running guns to enemies of there United States.

But run those weapons and aid to Al Qaeda and Jihad groups Obama did, and that appears to be the MOTIVE behind the cover-up of the Benghazi attack and the insistence of blaming the Youtube video for the murder of 4 Americans including Ambassador Stevens.

Obama has provided aid, comfort, funds, arms and impetus to revolution for the purpose of installing an Islamic Caliphate – a beast that no doubt would acquire and use Nuclear weapons with ally Iran against the Great and Little Satan, of whom Obama has worked as a Trojan Horse to tear down from within.

But there are no stones among anyone in Congress to hold such treason accountable to we, the American people.  We, who one day – are going to rue the day Obama betrayed us to our enemies.  How much blood and deaths will result in what Obama has done, is something future history books may put on par with the Holocaust.

Obama To Give Himself Sweeping Power To Control Internet Content

Executive Order granting the president sweeping power over the Internet is “close to completion.”

After the Congress repeatedly killed attempts to give power to Obama to regulate and control the internet, Obama has decided to ignore Congress and issue another decree – errrr Executive Order, granting himself the power to take over the internet and shut it down or regulate it in the name of ‘security’.

Obama had already signed an Executive Order back in July that granted him an “internet kill switch” in the event of a ‘crisis’ or ‘national emergency’ that he, himself will define.  But that was not enough power.  It is the CONTENT on the internet that Obama disagrees with, that he wants to shut down.

This new Executive Order, in conjunction with DHS and other Executive agencies – will grant Obama sweeping power and control over the internet and it’s content.  Given the fact the Obama regime continues to blame a YouTube video for the 9-11 attacks and Islamic uproar at United States Embassies in the Middle East, Obama appears he will use the crisis as a justification for his decree to put the internet and it’s content under his direct control.

Testifying before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, Janet Napolitano said that the order is still “being drafted” and vetted by various high-level bureaucrats. But she also indicated that it would be issued as soon as a “few issues” were resolved. Assuming control of the nation’s Internet infrastructure is a DHS responsibility, Napolitano added.

Once Barack Obama signs his name to this edict and assuming compliance with its mandates changes from voluntary to involuntary, he will possess powers only dreamed about by the most ambitious dictators of history.

“In the wake of Congressional inaction and Republican stall tactics, unfortunately, we will continue to be hamstrung by outdated and inadequate statutory authorities that the legislation would have fixed. Moving forward, the President is determined to do absolutely everything we can to better protect our nation against today’s cyber threats and we will do that,” White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said in an email reported by The Hill.

It is the hallmark of all Marxist dictatorships to control the flow of information.  In the name of security the Obama regime is assigning itself control over the flow of information.  This should frighten every American, especially considering his regime is repeating the suggestion that offending Islam is not freedom of speech, and is become a national security issue.  Therefore – under that pretext, Obama will justify his dictatorial action.

The Obama Administration Is A Trojan Horse for Jihadist Islam and Enemies of America

Barrack Hussein The Obama is a nothing less than a Manchurian candidate for America’s most devout and deadly enemies.

By INVAR

Let’s play connect-the-dots.

After the Jihad attack at Fort Hood by Nidal Hasan, Obama’s Administration and the media went immediately to work to squelch the fact that Nidal was a Jihadist committing an act of terrorism. Almost immediately, the FBI was dismissing the attack as “not terror related” while the media went into overdrive to conceal, under report the facts about Nidal’s actions and even make excuses for it.  Later of course the media did backflips along with Obama’s own Justice Department to conceal Hasan’s ties to Jihad groups and his military service red flags before his wanton attack on fellow unarmed military personnel.  Obama that afternoon was quick to insist of the American people not to: ” jump to conclusions”.   What a contrast to the same man who within hours of the killing of abortion doctor George Tiller, ordered his Administration to send Federal Marshals and National Guard units to protect abortion clinics after his cronies were instant in declaring the killing of the doctor as “terrorism”.  

What has Obama done to protect U.S. military bases in the wake of the Jihad terrorist attack?

Nothing.  No alerts.  No guards being sent.  He and his propaganda machine continue to insist that it was not Islamic terrorism, but racism or anti-war pressure, or stress that brought a self-admitted Islamic Extremist to do Jihad on Americans at Fort Hood.  Obama’s Patriarch, Mob Boss Mayor Richard Daley even surmised in a fit of illustrative stupidity – “It’s the evil gun’s fault”.

Of course Obama’s Department of Homeland Security Idiot Janet Napalitano went immediately on the offensive to pre-emptively denounce any “Muslim backlash” – insinuating that even calling Hasan a Jihadist or Islamic Extremist was ‘racism’.  Funny that, coming from the same Marxist ideologue who released the April 2009 DHS Terror Assessment report that pre-emptively named Right Wing Christians, anti-abortion activists, gun owners, returning vets and Constitutionalists as “Extremists” and “Terrorists“.

Even now, Obama is stonewalling Congress’ inquiry into the failures that permitted Nidal Hasan to remain at his post WITH a promotion, even after the Army knew he was in contact with Al Qaeda. Obama is refusing to cooperate with the Congressional Committee’s inquiries for the White House to provide a list of witnesses that ignored or turned a blind eye to the many warnings the Forth Hood Jihadist had made.  Why does Obama stonewall the investigation of this Jihadist?  Perhaps the fact that Nidal Hasan was involved with Obama’s Transition Team might have something to do with it?

How much did Obama know of this Jihadist’s intentions, and when did he know it?  Perhaps that will help explain Obama’s current denials to cooperate with Congress.

I see a pattern with this Obama regime.  A pattern that would, upon consideration of his actions and statements,  indicate that Obama is working as an operative for Islamic Jihadists and America’s Communist enemies.  Rather than working to defend America’s allies, interests and Constitution, Obama and his regime are working daily to dismantle American Security – while providing every avenue and excuse for Islamic Jihadists to continue to wage their war against the West .  

Adding insult to injury of course is the decision by Obama to bring Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other top al-Qaeda terrorists to New York City for a civilian trial.  The insanity and absolute outrage of this act alone should convince all Americans that Barrack Hussein The Obama is a nothing less than a Manchurian candidate for America’s most devout and deadly enemies.

Consider a few things not routinely covered by anyone in the State Run Media,  it clearly showcases a disturbing pattern;

Obama is quick to dismiss Jihadists as terrorists, even going so far as to strike the use of the word “terrorism” in conjunction with Islamic extremists, in favor of the more nebulous “man-made disaster” sidestep intended to whitewash what his Muslim brothers are actually doing in their own war against the Christian Capitalist West.  Interestingly, it was the task force that Nidal Hasan himself attended that suggested the lexicon change from “terrorism” to “disaster” Obama has adopted.

Obama is always glowing about Islam in his references – even to the point of always referring to the Koran as “holy” (no such prefix used in reference to the Bible).  Obama can quote the Koran, but rarely quotes the Bible. Obama glows about Islam  while he is silent, dismissive or denouncing of Christianity and Judaism.

He has hosted several dinners on high Muslim holy days and issued several global addresses to Muslim’s worldwide, but said nothing to Christians or Jews on their holy days or made similar video addresses.

Obama’s regime and supporters have made it clear that his enemies are Conservative Americans, America’s Christian and Judaic Heritage and Foundations, Constitutionally protected liberties and restraints on government.  It is no coincidence that Obama’s enemies are also the same targets of Islamic Jihadists.

Obama is going to great lengths to injure our relations with allies and make them vulnerable by abandoning them, while at the same time, excusing, apologizing and embracing avowed enemies. Obama has made it policy to “reach out” to Islam and has appointed devout Muslims to high security posts in the DHS.  Obama personally swore-in Muslim Activist and Syrian-born Kareem Shora to the Homeland Security Advisory Council just days after the Fort Hood massacre.

But Obama does not just stop there.

Here, Obama is adopting terror group Hamas’ demands of expelling Israel from it’s own land and making it official United States Foreign Policy:

US Goal to Expel Jews in ‘Occupied’ Israeli Lands

 A top State Department official spelled out on Tuesday that the goal of the United States in its negotiations in the Middle East is to pressure Israel into expelling Jews from Judea and Samaria in order to “end the occupation that began in 1967.”

William J. Burns, Under Secretary for Political Affairs, said in his address to the Middle East Institute Tuesday that he sees the U.S.mandate as one of “determined leadership” and that American must be straightforward about its intentions. 

Although he made no mention of any demands upon the PA in order to achieve its goal of establishing a new Arab state within Israel’s current borders, Burns was blunt about America’s expectations of Israel.

“We do not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements; we consider the Israeli offer to restrain settlement activity to be a potentially important step, but it obviously falls short of the continuing Roadmap obligation for a full settlement freeze,” he said.

Further, he said, “We seek to deepen international support for the Palestinian Authority’s impressive plan to build over the next couple years the institutions that a responsible Palestinian state requires. And we also seek progress toward peace between Israel and Syria, and Israel and Lebanon, as part of a broader peace among Israel and all of its neighbors.”

While nearly at the same time, this same buffoon following the directives of his boss, makes an official policy statement in support of a Jihadist regime hell-bent on destroying Israel and the United States (the Great and Little Satans) with the right to have nukes:

U.S. Recognizes Iran’s “Right” to Nukes

U.S. Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs William Burns told the Middle East Institute in Washington on Tuesday that the U.S. recognizes the Iranian regime’s “right” to nuclear power, does not seek regime change and is ready for more talks with Iran.

“We seek a relationship with the Islamic Republic of Iran based upon mutual interest and mutual respect. We do not seek regime change. We have condemned terrorist attacks against Iran. We have recognized Iran’s international right to peaceful nuclear power. With our partners in the international community, we have demonstrated our willingness to take creative confidence-building steps, including our support for the IAEA’s offer of fuel for the Tehran research reactor.”

Coincicence?  Inexperience?  Collective insanity?

I don’t think so.

As with everything from this regime, it’s all deliberate and purposeful – with a clever masquerade that these ‘missteps’ and ‘apologies’ are for a misguided sense of good.

Because Jihadists are allowed to lie to infidels taquiyya – in deliberate fashion if it brings about their destruction or conversion to Islam.

And Obama lies repeatedly and egregiously and always has.

Obama is a Trojan Horse for a Marxists and Jihadists and the enemies of America.