As Obama Lurches America Towards Civil Conflict, A Soldier’s Chilling Letter Describes His Fear For American Citizens

The hollowing-out and transformation of America’s military has rendered it incapable of standing with Americans against a tyrannical regime.

For many Americans wondering if the military will come in on the side of the citizens against a tyrannical regime from Washington, the answer sadly is “No”.   Homosexuals in the military.  Purging of the officer corps.  Betrayal and abandonment.  These things and a program of surveillance on “oath keeper” soldiers have created an environment of mistrust, while the rank and file have been infiltrated with Socialists and Marxists loyal to Obama or apathetic to anything happening outside of a paycheck.

Having friends and family in the military, I have heard similar sentiments that are attributed to this unnamed soldier.  There is indeed a climate of fear that already exists inside the military.  The abandonment of our troops in Benghazi is not lost on those in uniform who understand that their Commander In Chief would hang them out to die in no uncertain terms.

As many forum and blog conversations wonder aloud if the military would willingly fire on Americans resisting federal tyranny – the reality of what has happened inside the military answers the question in a way that does not bode well for liberty.

A SOLDIER’S CHILLING LETTER: “MY HEART BEATS FAST WHEN I THINK WHAT IS COMING TO OUR CITIZENS THAT I LOVE SO DEEPLY”

A soldier’s letter sheds light on a problem that is becoming more and more frightening everyday.  Some have wondered why the military doesn’t come to our aid against the tyrannical administration which is currently devastating our country.

This is one brave military man’s response to that question:

“Here’s the problem for us soldiers: we can’t trust each other, as there are those who are extreme liberals, socialists, and those who love the current administration.  We’re infiltrated with these traitors and we don’t know how to organize without others turning us in and sabotaging our plans.  That’s just one problem.  Outside of that, as an organization we have become plagued with disfunction, toxicity, illness, injuries, and betrayal.  It does not allow for a good foundation at the current moment for us to clean house for a country.  They know this.  They created the environment as it is right now.  We didn’t see it until it was too late.  Militants are forming, but in small pockets, and unable to fully unite and plan our strategies in secrecy.  And there are watch dogs out there watching us attempt to plan.  I’m sure every word I am typing right now is watched.  There is no privacy in which we can operate on our own soil.  Our best efforts will only be when they place us on orders against you.  That is when we will know what soldiers will bleed for you, and which are loyal to this regime.”

These words are extremely chilling coming from someone within the United States military.  We have a President who has literally divided the American people against themselves to the point where we are dangerously close to another Civil War.

Share this with your vigilant Conservative friends.  The liberal community will surely dismiss it as fanatical rightwing nonsense, or just consider it as more ammunition for their agenda.  If we do not stand up and do something about this socialist/communist/marxist movement within the government, McCarthy’s interrogations of suspected communist leaders and celebrities will be a foreshadowing of something even more dire in our future.  Can you imagine a day when they put Conservatives, Republicans, and the Tea Party on trial?  ”Are you now, or have you ever been a member of the Tea Party?”.  I promise you, that is not a radical thought.  It is a reality that we very well may have to face if we don’t begin to do something now.

Christians Face Culture of Fear, Intimidation in Obama’s Military Today

Obama regime “bound and determined to eradicate the military and its heritage of any references to our Christian heritage and Christian beliefs”.

“On Veterans Day, Family Research Council and the Restore Military Religious Freedom Coalition honor and pray for our troops, especially those who are being discriminated against for living out their faith,” said FRC President Tony Perkins. “More and more service members are facing harassment, demotion, and formal reprimands simply for being Bible-believing Christians.”

“They’ve been prohibited from sharing their faith, forbidden from praying publicly, and dismissed from duty for refusing to surrender their religious convictions,” Perkins said.

“Defending America’s freedom shouldn’t mean surrendering theirs,” he said, “especially given that the Constitution they have sworn to uphold guarantees religious liberty as all Americans’ ‘first freedom.’”

 

A Great Purge in America Is Now Underway

From the banning of Christian exercise in public places to the military classification of Christians and Conservatives as ‘domestic terrorists’ – sets the stage for what is next.

Evangelical Christians and members of the Tea Party are a threat to the nation and any soldier donating to those groups will be subject to punishment under the Uniform Code of Military Justice according to the U.S. Army under Obama.

A soldier who attended the Oct. 17th briefing told me the counter-intelligence agent in charge of the meeting spent nearly a half hour discussing how evangelical Christians and groups like the American Family Association were “tearing the country apart.”

Does Army Consider Christians, Tea Party, a Terror Threat?

Soldiers attending a pre-deployment briefing at Fort Hood say they were told that evangelical Christians and members of the Tea Party were a threat to the nation and that any soldier donating to those groups would be subjected to punishment under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

…“The American public should be outraged that the U.S. Army is teaching our troops that evangelical Christians and Tea Party members are enemies of America, and that they can be punished for supporting or participating in those groups,” said Berry, a former Marine Corps JAG officer.“These statements about evangelicals being domestic enemies are a serious charge.”

The soldier told me he fears reprisals and asked not to be identified. He said there was a blanket statement that donating to any groups that were considered a threat to the military and government was punishable under military regulations.

“My first concern was if I was going to be in trouble going to church,” the evangelical Christian soldier told me. “Can I tithe? Can I donate to Christian charities? What if I donate to a politician who is a part of the Tea Party movement?”

…“Why is the Army engaged in these anti-Christian training propaganda briefings?” asked Perkins, himself a veteran of the Marine Corps. “The only explanation is that this is a deliberate effort of the Obama administration to intimidate and separate soldiers from Christian groups that they support and that support them.”

This is not an isolated incident – but POLICY being administered by the Obama regime.  Policy in WRITING:

Training Document Defines Christians As ‘Extremists’ and ‘Terrorists’

Just days ago, soldiers at Camp Shelby in Mississippi were instructed that the Christian conservative American Family Association is a domestic hate group. A month earlier, a security presentation portrayed the Founding Fathers as extremists. Before that, Breitbart News reported on a Christian chaplain who was officially censored by military commanders for talking about the importance of religious faith. And several months before that, Lt. Col. Jack Rich at Ft. Campbell, Kentucky, instructed soldiers that traditional Christian beliefs are incompatible with “Army values.”

All this started in April, when Breitbart News broke the story of top Pentagon brass meeting with an anti-Christian activist calling for court-martialing observant Christians who share the gospel of Jesus Christ with others in the military. This activist calls them “fundamentalist monsters” who are “enemies of the Constitution” and should be punished for “sedition and treason.”

All along, the nation was told these were a series of isolated incidents, not authorized by military leadership. Now military documents suggest otherwise. Judicial Watch used a FOIA request (Freedom of Information Act) to obtain a document from the Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute (DEOMI), which is part of the Department of Defense (DOD). In this 133-page training document, entitled “Extremism,” on pages 32-33, under “Lesson Emphasis,” it claims to:

provide[s] information that describes sources of extremism information, definitions, recruitment of DoD personnel, common themes in extremist ideologies, common characteristics of extremist organizations, DoD policies, and command functions regarding extremist activities.

In addition – the Obama regime has ORDERED the removal of arm patches and references to the Gadsden/Navy Jack flag worn by SEALs because the Obama regime says the flag is “too closely associated with radical groups.”

SEALs ordered to remove ‘don’t tread on me’ Navy Jack from uniforms

An e-mail to SEAL Commanders dated October 22, reads:

ALL:

WARCOM and GROUP TWO/ONE have pushed out the uniform policy for NWU III and any patches worn on the sleeve.

All personnel are only authorized to wear the matching “AOR” American Flag patch on the right shoulder.  You are no longer authorized to wear the “Don’t Tread On Me” patch.

Again the only patch authorized for wear is the American flag on the right shoulder. Please pass the word to all

Thanks

Senior Enlisted Advisor

[Name Redacted]

When a friend of mine asked his leadership the same question, he was told, “The Jack is too closely associated with radical groups.” We must assume that this thought policeman embedded in the SEAL community is speaking of the Tea Party, whose flag (which also dates from the American Revolution) depicts a snake with the same defiant slogan as The Navy Jack.

This begs yet another question: Who defines “radical group”? The last time I checked, all military personnel are under oath to “support and defend the constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” The Tea Party stands for constitutional rights and founding principles of civil liberties and limited government. Radical? Not unless you’re a leftist hell-bent on destroying the foundations of our country. Or as the President has stated as the objective of his presidency, “to fundamentally transform” America.

TSHTF’s commentary on this incident is not only accurate to the intents by this regime, but ought to raise your awareness to what is about to happen as the Obama regime slams down an iron fist of tyranny.

In 2009 the Missouri Information Analysis Center released an analysis of militias and revolutionary movements operating within the continental United States. It was dubbed the MIAC report, and detailed specific signs indicative of those who may have a proclivity towards domestic terrorism or rebellion.

The Gadsden flag, which closely mirrors the Navy Jack and shares the same motto, and which was also used during the American Revolutionary War, was identified as political paraphernalia often used by radical extremist groups in the United States.

The report called for law enforcement officials on the local, state and Federal level tobe on the look-out for those displaying variations of the Gadsden flag, as well as bumper stickers supporting the U.S. Constitution and third-party candidates like Ron Paul.

What should be clear from the government’s latest move to wipe away any official association with the Gadsden rattlesnake and motto is that those supporting any movement not 100% in line with official narrative are to be considered potential terrorists.

In today’s America, supporting the wrong cause, wearing the wrong clothes, pasting the wrong bumper sticker on your car, or saying the wrong thing on the internet can very easily lead to you being added to one of the government’s many red lists and identifying you as an enemy of the state.

They may not be rounding people up just yet for their transgressions against the state, but orders can be given at anytime under the banner of Patriot Act and the National Defense Authorization Act to detain those who could pose a threat to the greater good.

So the narrative is set and as I have been warning, history teaches that WITHOUT EXCEPTION every single time a government and a ruling class demonize and castigate a group of people, that group is ALWAYS exterminated and purged.  No exceptions to that historical fact, and it’s now underway.

OBAMA PURGING MILITARY COMMANDERS

Nine senior commanding generals have been fired by the Obama administration this year, leading to speculation by active and retired members of the military that a purge of its commanders is underway.

Retired generals and current senior commanders that have spoken with TheBlaze say the administration is not only purging the military of commanders they don’t agree with, but is striking fear in the hearts of those still serving.

“Obama will not purge a civilian or political appointee because they have bought into Obama’s ideology,” Vallely said. “The White House protects their own. That’s why they stalled on the investigation into fast and furious, Benghazi and Obamacare. He’s intentionally weakening and gutting our military, Pentagon and reducing us as a superpower, and anyone in the ranks who disagrees or speaks out is being purged.”

Once men with a moral foundation are removed from positions of leadership in the military, the military can and will be used to follow orders that are immoral.

Think  oppressive police state.  Think genocide.

It’s underway, right in front of your face.

Obama The Traitor: “Victory Not Necessarily The Goal In Afghanistan”

The treason to our troops and the security of our nation at war with Jihadists and the Taliban is self evident in Obama’s latest comments:

President Obama has put securing Afghanistan near the top of his foreign policy agenda, but “victory” in the war-torn country isn’t necessarily the United States’ goal, he said Thursday in a TV interview.

“I’m always worried about using the word ‘victory,’ because, you know, it invokes this notion of Emperor Hirohito coming down and signing a surrender to MacArthur,” Obama told ABC News.

First of all, this idiot Obama is an imbecile regarding history.  Hirohito did not come down to sign the surrender on the USS Missouri – Foreign Minister Mamoru Shigemitsu and General Yoshijiro Umezu, Chief of the Army General Staff did.

Secondly, obviously the idea of an American victory is apalling to this America-hating usurper-In-Chief.

Murtha Says America “Cannot Win Militarily”

This guy is a Subversive Traitor.

John Murtha, DEMOCRAT – hoping and praying for American defeat and humiliation in Iraq and Afghanistan is the best freind Osama Bin Laden and the Jihadists could ever hope for in Congress.

The good news and progress coming out of Iraq is simply dismissed by the man who decrees Marines in Haditha were “guilty” of mass murder despite their exhoneration in court. He makes no apologies for smearing, castigating and demeaning our troops and their mission, all for the push to gain political victory for himself and his party.

It’s time to call the dishonorable congresscritter what he is – A FAT TREASONOUS CREEP!

Our military has performed maginficently and wins engagements hands down.

Like his insistance that our Marines were mass murderers, he will continue to insist that America cannot win – and therefore – must lose.

And in his fat rotgut head – that means we have to run away like the yellow coward he himself is. It’s sad he wants to project that cowardice on our military for his own political gain.

Murtha: ‘We can’t win militarily’
By S.A. Miller
November 20, 2007

House Democrats’ point man in the war-funding showdown with the White House today dismissed U.S. military gains in Iraq and vowed to tighten the purse strings until President Bush accepts a pullout plan.

“Look at all the people that have been displaced, all the [lost] oil production, unemployment, all those type of things,” said Rep. John P. Murtha, chairman of Appropriations defense subcommittee. “We can’t win militarily.”

The Pennsylvania Democrat conceded violence was down dramatically and some normalcy restored on Iraq’s streets, but he said U.S. victory remains unattainable as long as Baghdad fails to pass national reconciliation laws.

“To change the political law, it doesn’t seem to me you need the military stability,” Mr. Murtha told reporters on Capitol Hill.

The dim view of U.S. military progress in Iraq and a resolve to force a pullout have been echoed by the two top Democrats on Capitol Hill — Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California.

The funding standoff will force the Pentagon to make budget cuts at bases in the U.S. to cover the costs of the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, including sending furlough notices to as many as 100,000 civilian employees, White House Press Secretary Dana Perino said.