Tag Archives: Syria

Fifteen Years After 9-11, The Free West Has Lost, and Islam Knows It.

US-ATTACKS-TOWER-RUBBLE

Darker, much darker days are coming.

Embracing a lie, embracing bigger lies, refusing to see a beast for what it is,  and then willfully and deliberately twisting the reality unfolding before their eyes while clinging to the Left’s insistent declarations about Islam has consigned our civilization to death.

ShariaRape

The West’s Cognitive Dissonance and fatal Case of Normalcy Bias regarding Islam was a suicide pact.  If you did not see this video in the previous blog entry from yesterday – watch it now and understand the point being made with this blog entry:

 

The essay below by Robert Spencer encapsulates vital truths that the video shows you in vivid detail.  We have committed suicide as a civilization and consigned our posterity to a horror of an existence.  All because we listened to Leftists who share an unholy Alliance with Islam for the sake of bulldozing everything they hate so they can build a utopia in our wake.

WTC-9-11

On this day, December 7, 1956

This war has gone on for a very long time, and today, in all the reminiscences, and eulogies, and encomia, and lamentations, virtually no one has explained why, for the simple reason that essentially no one among the political and media elites knows why. Yet even the most dire estimates of exactly how long this is going to take have fallen wide of the mark. General Petraeus said in 2010 that it could take another ten years to defeat the Afghan “insurgency.” Do you think the Taliban is likely to be disbanded and Afghan a stable, functioning republic in 2020? In 2007, Britain’s security chief, Admiral Lord Alan West, said it could take 30 years to defeat terrorism in the United Kingdom. Do you think that in 2037, Britain will be peaceful and free of jihad terrorists?

The very idea is preposterous, and it is preposterous for the same reason that here we are 15 years after the September 11, 2001 jihad attacks, and no one know why this strange war has lasted so long. West said in that 2007 interview that to defeat terrorism, “I now realise that we are talking about a generation — and by that I would say 30 years. That doesn’t mean necessarily that we are going to stay at a severe level of threat for all those years. But to be able to say one has absolutely changed the mind-set and thought of people IS going to take a generation.” Yet in reality, nothing, nothing whatsoever, is being done in Britain or anywhere else to change “the mind-set and thought of people.”

And that is precisely why, fifteen years now after 9/11, the West is weaker and more vulnerable than ever: the entire Western intelligentsia, the totality of our political and media elites, steadfastly refuses to acknowledge exactly what the “mind-set and thought” of the terrorists really is, and where it comes from. And because of that refusal, policies that don’t deal with the actual problem keep being applied and re-applied, at the cost of thousands of American lives, billions of American dollars, and nothing to show for all this expenditure but a sharp and continuing loss of American power and prestige. The jihadis who struck the U.S. on September 11, 2001 have made such immense advances since then not because they are strong, or clever, or capable, but because we are weak, short-sighted, and resolute not in fighting them but in maintaining our denial about who they are and what they want, to the extent that we have taken numerous steps not to stop them, but actually to enable them to achieve their goals — the billions to the Islamic Republic of Iran and the massive Muslim migrant influx being just two of the most recent examples.

And today, instead of stories about the jihad threat and how it can be defeated or at least contained, the media is full of articles that would give an uninformed observer the impression that 3,000 Muslims were killed in the 9/11 attacks: the media preoccupation today is almost entirely with Muslims as victims. “Muslim Americans still struggle with hate crimes, 15 years after 9/11,” claims AOL. “For many Muslims, especially those born after Sept. 11, Islamophobia seems to be a fact of life,” laments the Huffington Post. The Washington Post has a piece by Rep. Keith Ellison: “I’m the first Muslim in Congress. I believe America can beat Islamophobia. Fifteen years after 9/11, American Muslims have seen both progress and peril.”

Coming after Fort Hood, and Boston, and Garland, and Chattanooga, and San Bernardino, and Orlando, as well as Paris, Brussels, Nice, and so very many others, this myopia is ludicrous to the point of being grotesque. And it is one key reason why this war drags on, fifteen years after 9/11: millions passively and unthinkingly accept the dogma that to speak honestly and accurately about the jihadis’ motives and goals is to descend in “racism” and “bigotry,” and to endanger innocent Muslims. And so fifteen years after 9/11, it is still almost unheard-of for there to be an honest discussion of jihadi motives and goals in the mainstream.

Fifteen years after 9/11, the free West is dug in: wholeheartedly committed to denial, willful ignorance, and policies that are self-defeating to the point of suicidal. In light of that, the wonder is not that this war has lasted so long, but that we have held out so long. Unless the political landscape changes considerably and this denial is decisively rejected and discarded, darker, much darker, days are coming

2 Comments

Filed under War On Jihadists

Russian Airliner Likely Downed By MANPADS Run Out Of Benghazi By Obama And Hillary

BenghaziManpads

Similar to the Gunwalker scandal, Obama and Hillary were ‘running’ heavy weapons out of the Benghazi Consulate in Syria and it is likely one of those 30,000 MANPAD systems shot down that Russian Airliner.

Well, it has been confirmed by ISIS no less, that it used a MANPAD Surface-To-Air missile to shoot down that Russian civilian airliner full of tourists.  Those crazy Jihadists just love to advertise their mass murder:

Russia’s response may end-up being nuclear.

But we need to ask, against WHOM?  Facts that the American Praetorian Pravda media will NOT report, is that Obama and Hillary ended up supplying ISIS with those weapons.

I am thankful I am not alone in understanding what took place here.

I have the same supposition that Barnhardt writes about, and it ties everything that happened with Benghazi and the rise of ISIS by the hand of Obama himself.

In an effort to help establish the Islamic Caliphate; Obama used the  Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda Jihadists to overthrow the secular dictators in the Middle East, and replace them with Islamists.  The Praetorian media called it “The Arab Spring”.  This was Obama’s effort at “Fundamentally Transforming” the Middle East.  After Mubarak was ousted in Egypt, Obama lit the fuse in Libya to get Ghadaffi overthrown.  In the chaos, at the Benghazi Annex, The CIA under covert Obama orders were running heavy weapons to Syrian “rebels’ to overthrow Bashar Al Assad, and helped create ISIS in the process. Reports suggest perhaps 30,000 Surface-To-Air systems or MANPADS were run out of the Consulate in Benghazi.  That also helps supply a suggested motive as to why Ambassador Stevens was killed at Benghazi and why Obama and Hillary left him and the Americans to die there at the hands of Jihadists – whom were tipped off by the White House of Stevens’ itinerary and the ensuing stand-down orders given for any rescue.   As the Benghazi hearing pointed out a couple weeks ago – Hillary and the Obama regime orchestrated the blame for the ‘assassination’ of Steven’s  on a silly Youtube video IN ADVANCE of the attack itself, then disavowed it.

Then again, don’t forget Obama THANKED the Jihadists who were parading Stevens’ dead body through the streets for ‘taking him to the hospital’.

Obviously one of those ‘walked’ weapons systems was used by ISIS to shoot down the Russian Civilian airliner leaving Sharm el Sheikh in retaliation for Russia’s war on ISIS in Syria to prop up the Assad regime.

These are things that lead to global world wars, and perhaps nuclear ones.

Of course with Obama at the helm, a nuclear war will be very one-sided, and it is possible America may not dare retaliate or do anything but surrender.

Maybe that is all part of the plan.

MANPADs, Hillary, Benghazi, Chris Stevens and 224 Dead Russians

ISIS-shoot-down

{UPDATE: Here are the two main types of Surface-to-Air Missiles that have high altitude capability, per inquiries:

SA-75 Dvina, Soviet design, introduced in 1957, range to 82,000 feet altitude.

*****2K12 Kub / SA-6 Gainful, Soviet design, introduced late 1950s, range to 45,000 feet altitude.  Highly portable, fast set-up time. Is well-known in the Middle East since the Yom Kippur War.}

Do I think ISIS (the New Caliphate) probably shot down that Russian jet?  Yeah. I sure do.

Let’s review.  The Washington DC regime since the Obama usurpation has had as its goal the reforming and developing of a New Caliphate to use as its mercenary army.  Obama’s ties to islam are myriad, well-known and too numerous to mention.  Hillary Clinton’s consigliere and probable lesbian sex partner, Huma Abedin, is the daughter of top Muslim Brotherhood leader Syed Abedin, AND her mother Saleha Abedin, is the head of the “Ladies Auxillary” of the Muslim Brotherhood.  Huma Abedin herself worked for the Muslim Brotherhood’s propaganda arm for years.

Libya, one of the more stable musloid states before the Obama usurpation, was intentionally destabilized by the U.S. working in concert with the Muslim Brotherhood in order to depose Ghadaffi and leave Libya in chaos so that the Washington DC regime could establish a beachhead/weapons depot in order to arm the Muslim Brotherhood and al Qaeda. Anything and everything could have been delivered to the Caliphate through Benghazi – the situation in Libya was utter chaos, and nothing provides better cover and plausible deniability than chaos.

Ambassador Chris Stevens was a CIA operative whose primary function was the execution of this beachhead weapons depot smuggling operation.

One of the most tactically valuable munitions systems being run through Benghazi from the US to arm the New Caliphate were MANPADs.  Man-portable air defense systems.  These are guided, shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles.  And who knows what other missile systems they ran through Benghazi.

Chris Stevens, for whatever reason, was assassinated by his handlers in the White House. Clinton withdrew all of his security, tipped off the Muslim Brotherhood operating in Libya where he would be and his route, deployed a drone to provide a real-time video feed, and then directly ordered AFRICOM to stand down despite a distress call from a U.S. Ambassador carrying the same weight as a distress call from a 4-star general.  AFRICOM was not in a go-no go decision matrix.  A distress call from an ambassador is an automatic “go”, which can only be countervailed by a direct order from the White House.  As I wrote years ago, Stevens was just an “Expendable Faggot” who, one can only assume, knew too much, or had perhaps started to express hesitancy at the whole enterprise, and thus needed to be eliminated. And they watched his elimination in glorious, real-time high-def.

It is highly, highly probable that the Russian jetliner was shot down, and shot down with a missile system supplied to the New Caliphate by the Washington DC regime through the weapons depot at Benghazi in retaliation for Russia’s actions in Syria.

Kids, there is going to be one hell of a big-ass war between two competing evil axes, and the government that you all are paying taxes to is the leader of one of those evil axes.  I’m sorry, but this Lee Greenwood Pollyanna shit has got to stop.  That country no longer exists.

Like I have said before, this psychopathic bitch doesn’t just need to be NOT “elected” “President” of the kabuki theater evil clownshow in Washington; she needs to be arrested, tried for Crimes Against Humanity and Crimes Against Peace, and upon conviction, be offered the sacraments and then put up against a wall and shot.  Her dead body should then be hoisted or hung for public display.

At this point, what difference does it make?

I dunno.  Ask the families of the Russian civilian tourists that were on that jet.  See if they can make you understand.

2 Comments

Filed under Obama Marxist Tyranny, War On Jihadists

Obama Ushers In New Era Of Christian Martyrdom & Persecution

Christians around the world, and now even in the USA under Barack Hussein Obama – are being systematically punished, persecuted and eradicated.

That His Heinous, Amerika’s first defacto-dictator: Barack Obama hates Christians and Jews is no secret.  He makes public policy statements attacking and demonizing Christians, he has enacted policies and actions that punish them while apologizing for Islam while arming ISIS and making sure Iran gets nuclear weapons –  self-evident facts to anyone who is honest with themselves.

Obama has made it policy to demonize devout Christians at nearly every opportunity.  Even as recently as this past Columbus Day – Obama could not help but continue his long-held disdain of Christians by suggesting devout Christians are racists, bigots and xenophobes:

“How do you reconcile the idea of faith being really important to you and you caring a lot about taking faith seriously with the fact that, at least in our democracy and our civic discourse, it seems as if folks who take religion the most seriously sometimes are also those who are suspicious of those not like them?”– Barack Hussein Obama I – 10-12-2015

What is more disconcerting is Obama has made it official government policy to treat Christians as domestic terrorists and warn Americans against joining evangelical Christian churches or Conservative groups while banning Christian exercise in our military and public spaces.

ten-commandments-oklahoma removedTen_commandments_monument_destroyed_in_O_2164660000_9321496_ver1.0_640_480

When a black madman massacres Christian students in Umpqua Oregon after asking them to renounce their faith in Christ or die, Obama says absolutely NOTHING about that.  Instead, Obama blames guns, and uses the massacre as a platform to launch his effort to ban the Second Amendment.

All of that taking place just in this nation that was once upon a time, the Christian home of the free and brave.  But the Obama Wrecking-ball has had even more destructive consequences elsewhere.  Christian persecution and misery is much worse for Brethren overseas.

Under Obama, his deliberate silence on Islamic Jihad against Christians is matched only by his outrageous actions against them.  Obama plans to bring a hundred thousand ‘Syrian refugees” into the USA after unleashing the crisis that has led to the overrunning of Eurabia.  At the same time, Obama deports true Christians refugees – that will result in their deaths.

Christians are being exterminated, slaughtered and massacred across the globe by the very Caliphate His Heinous Obama is aiding, comforting and arming.

What a legacy you have there Mr. Obama.  But then, you see yourself as the fulfillment of a Hadith that makes you the John The Baptist of your Islamic Mahdi.

GIRL crucified

U.S. LEADERSHIP USHERS NEW AGE OF CHRISTIAN MARTYRDOM 

Twelve Christians are publicly raped, beheaded, and crucified for refusing to renounce Christ in Syria.

Wherever U.S. leadership has helped Islamic jihadis topple secular autocrats in the name of “democracy and freedom,” indigenous Christian minorities are being forced to convert to Islam or die.

Many are accepting death.

Most recently, on August 28 near Aleppo, the Islamic State (IS or ISIS) tortured, mutilated, publicly raped, beheaded and crucified 12 Christians for saying “they would never renounce Christ” for Muhammad.

The jihadis took one group in front of a large crowd.  They cut off the fingertips of a 12-year-old boy, who steadfastly refused to submit to Islam.  They “severely beat him, telling his father they would stop the torture only if he, the father, returned to Islam.”  He refused, so they “also tortured and beat him and the two other ministry workers. The three men and the boy then met their deaths in crucifixion.”

According to a Christian leader associated with the martyrs, “They were left on their crosses for two days. No one was allowed to remove them.”  A sign saying “infidels” was placed next to their crosses.

The other eight Christians, including two women aged 29 and 33, were also ordered to renounce Christ and embrace Islam before a large crowd.  They refused:

The Islamic extremists then publicly raped the women, who continued to pray during the ordeal, leading the ISIS militants to beat them all the more furiously.

As the two women and the six men knelt before they were beheaded, they were all praying.

“Villagers said some were praying in the name of Jesus, others said some were praying the Lord’s prayer, and others said some of them lifted their heads to commend their spirits to Jesus,” the ministry director said. “One of the women looked up and seemed to be almost smiling as she said, ‘Jesus!’”

After they were beheaded, their bodies were hung on crosses, the ministry director said, his voice breaking.

The same is happening in the two other Arab nations where the U.S., under the pretext of “freedom and democracy,” overthrew the secular dictators who had long kept a lid on the jihadis: Iraq and Libya.

Late last year, Andrew White, an Anglican priest known as the “Vicar of Baghdad,” recounted the horrific atrocities Christians in Iraq are suffering—including seeing their children chopped in half for refusing to embrace Islam.  One of his anecdotes follows:

ISIS turned up and they said to the [Christian] children, “You say the words [shehada, convert to Islam], that you will follow Muhammad.”  And the children, all under 15, four of them, they said, “No, we love Jesus.  We have always loved Jesus.  We have always followed Jesus.  Jesus has always been with us.”  They [ISIS] said, “Say the words!”  They [children] said, “No, we can’t.”  [White starts sobbing] They chopped all their heads off.  How do you respond to that?  You just cry.  They’re my children.   That is what we have been going through.  That is what we are going through.

It should be noted that the targeting of Christian children in Iraq goes back soon after the ousting of Saddam Hussein.  In June 2008, a Canadian parliamentary committee heard about how “militant Muslims” were crucifying Christian children: “Since the war began in 2003, about 12 children, many as young as 10, have been kidnapped and killed, then nailed to makeshift crosses near their homes to terrify and torment their parents.”

In one of his Facebook postings, White, who regularly posted pictures of Christian martyrs, wrote:

Today’s Pictures are too awful to show.  You know I love to show photos but the photo I was sent today was the most awful I have ever seen.  A family of 8 all shot through the face laying in a pool of blood with their Bible open on the couch. They would not convert it cost them their life.

White also told of how Islamic State members came to a Christian man saying, “Either you convert to Islam or we kill all your children.”  The desperate father declared the words, the shehada, that “There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is the messenger of Allah,” thus becoming a Muslim.

Contrite at heart, he phoned White crying, “Father, father, I said the words! Does that mean Jesus doesn’t love me anymore?  I’ve always loved Jesus but I said those words because I couldn’t see my children being killed!”

White responded: “No Elias, Jesus still loves you—he will always love you.”

Aside from the numerous historic accounts of Christians slaughtered for refusing to renounce Christ for Muhammad—whether 100,000 Georgians beheaded or burned alive, or a “mere” 813 Italians decapitated—even in the very details, precedents abound: for example, remorse at converting out of fear.  Consider the following account from Medieval Egypt:

In 1389, a great procession of Copts who had accepted Muhammad under fear of death, marched through Cairo.  Repenting of their apostasy, they now wished to atone for it by the inevitable consequence of returning to Christianity. So as they marched, they announced that they believed in Christ and renounced Muhammad. They were seized and all the men were beheaded one after another in an open square before the women. But this did not terrify the women; so they, too, were all martyred (Crucified Again, pgs. 113-114).

Speaking of Egyptian martyrs, we come to the third “liberated” Arab nation where Christians are now being put to the sword for refusing to renounce Christ: Libya.

Earlier this year, the Islamic State released a video depicting 21 Egyptian Christians being decapitated in Libya.  While holding their victims’ bodies down, Islamic State members shoved their fingers in the Christians’ eyes, craned their heads back, and sliced away at their throats with knives.  As with the recent public rape, beheading, and crucifixion of those 12 Christians near Aleppo, some of the Egyptian Copts were also seen praying to Christ.  One Coptic priest later described the scene as follows:

The name of Jesus was their last word….  With that name, whispered at the very last, their martyrdom was sealed.

Over one month before the video appeared, the BBC had falsely reported that the majority of those now slaughtered Copts were “released.”  Sadly, such downplaying of Muslim persecution of Christians is standard for the BBC.

When the Islamic State released another video in April of more Christians in Libya being massacred, a masked IS spokesman addressed “Christians everywhere”:

We say to Christians everywhere, the Islamic State will expand, with Allah’s permission.  And it will reach you even if you are in fortified strongholds. So whoever enters Islam will have security…. But whoever refuses will see nothing from us but the edge of a spear. The men will be killed and the children will be enslaved, and their wealth will be taken as booty. This is the judgment of Allah and His Messenger.

The next scene portrays captive Ethiopian Christians being shot in the back of the head or having their heads carved off.

The ongoing slaughter of Christians by the Islamic State and the destruction of churches and antiquities must be laid at the feet of those Western nations that, intentionally or unintentionally, paved the way for the Islamic State.

As Russian President Vladimir Putin recently said before the United Nations, while addressing those nations that supported the “Arab Spring,” chief among them America:

Instead of the triumph of democracy and progress, we got violence, poverty and social disaster — and nobody cares a bit about human rights, including the right to life.  I cannot help asking those who have forced that situation: Do you realize what you have done?

Whether they realize it or not, they continue to do it in Syria—with Christians paying the highest price.[i]

Raymond Ibrahim is of Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians

[i] Aside from the Islamic State’s slaughter of Christians who refuse to convert to Islam, Muslim individuals, mobs, terrorists, and governments all around the world have been known to try to force Christians to convert, sometimes on pain of death.  Some anecdotes follow:

  • Palestine: Christians in Gaza protested over the “kidnappings and forced conversions of some former believers to Islam.”  The ever-dwindling Christian community banged on a church bell while chanting, “With our spirit, with our blood we will sacrifice ourselves for you, Jesus.”
  • Pakistan:  In 2004, a-two-year old child was raped because her Christian father “refused to convert to Islam.”  Another “devoted Christian” was butchered by Muslim men “with multiple axe blows [24 per autopsy] for refusing to convert to Islam.” In April 2014, A Muslim security guard murdered a Christian worker who refused to convert to Islam.
  • Uganda: After a gang of Muslims brandishing machetes stormed a church during service, hacking one 18-year-old woman to death and leaving three others, including a one-year-old baby, injured, the pastor explained that the attackers belong to a local “group of Muslims” which seeks “to transform [Christian-majority] Uganda into an Islamic nation and would kill anyone who refused to convert.”
  • Nigeria: A Christian teenage girl told of how Boko Haram came to her household and slaughtered her father and brother because they refused to convert to Islam.  After abusing her, they tied her up and left her in a state of shock between the two corpses.
  • Bangladesh:  After shutting down the construction of a church, a local government official threatened Christians with eviction from their village unless they renounced their faith and embraced Islam.  Said one of the Christians: “Their threats chilled me to the bone. That is why I pretended to accept Islam, but faith in Christ is the wellspring of my life.” Another said: “The chairman is clipping the wings of our faith. I do not know how long we can grin and bear it. We want religious freedom. We want to practice our religion freely.”
  • Russia: In Tatarstan, a Muslim-majority republic in Russia, seven churches were burned and “increased pressure on Christians to convert to Islam” was widespread.
  • Uzbekistan: A 26-year-old Christian woman, partially paralyzed from youth, and her elderly mother were violently attacked by invaders who ransacked their home, confiscating “icons, Bibles, religious calendars, and prayer books.” At the police department, the paralyzed woman was “offered to convert to Islam.” She refused and was accordingly fined almost two years’ worth of her wages.

2 Comments

Filed under Obama Marxist Tyranny, War On Jihadists

Obama’s Meaningless ISIL Speech: His Real Targets Are Not Islamic Terrorists

obamaISIS-speech

Obama’s speech about ISIS Jihadists last night was pathetic. Meanwhile the Government ratchets up a potential crackdown on Obama’s political opponents.

John hits another out of the park on analysis of Obama’s pathetic speech in light of what has been going on for the last few weeks in our government and has some words of warning to consider.

In a week that it was revealed that 5 other IRS agents under congressional subpoena regarding the IRS scandal ‘lost’ their e-mails and computer hard drives; on a day the IRS head Koskinen says to the investigative committee “we follow the law wherever we can” – and in the same timeframe we learn that yet another Conservative media outlet is under an open-ended IRS audit – we have more to fear from Obama and this federal government than we do from any terrorist organization anywhere on the planet.

 

Obama’s False Flag Speech Tonight

by John Galt
September 10, 2014 19:00 ET

GULF_OF_TONKIN_tn

Tonight, on the eve of another anniversary for 9-11, the current President of the United States will be giving a speech about the threat of ISIS (Islamic State of Iraq and Syria or IS for short) where a new American strategy for dealing with this terrorist army will be outlined after he stated several days ago that he didn’t have one. Several months ago in fact, the President called ISIS the “JV team” in one of his numerous infamous quotes and since that time they have carved out what amounts to a small nation in Eastern Syria and Western Iraq.

The issue of ISIS however, is not the key point to the speech tonight. If ISIS were truly a serious threat to US interests, aka, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, then our “allies” in the region would request that the United States position more troops into Kuwait and Jordan to protect those kingdoms and  to cut off any advance towards the House of Saud.  Meanwhile, many questions about this speech and American policy towards ISIS will not be answered by this administration nor our “allies” in the region:

1. If the United States is aware that ISIS is now in possession of approximately 30 M1 Abrams tanks, why have we not destroyed them with an air strike by now? Theoretically one would hope that the U.S. would install a “kill switch” such as those used by American rental car companies just in case a vehicle is stolen, or at least some type of GPS tracking at a minimum once the weapons were left for the Iraqi military.

2. Why are Western governments in Europe and including the United States announcing any types of sanctions for those countries aiding and abetting the ISIS cause? There is ample evidence within the mainstream media that Qatar is acting as the finance and banking arm for the Islamic State yet not one word has been uttered about cutting off trade or even a small threat of sanctions from any nation except for Saudi Arabia (see: Saudi threatens to block Qatar’s land, sea borders from this posting about Saudi-Qatari relations: Is Saudi Arabia Preparing to Invade Qatar?).

3. There is demonstrable evidence that Turkey, a NATO member nation, has also been arming and training ISIS forces yet the silence from Brussels, London, and Washington has been deafening. Will President Obama announce an initiative to cut off the supply of arms and soldiers migrating from Turkish territory into Iraq and Syria tonight? I seriously doubt it.

Thus one has to wonder if the real purpose of President Obama’s speech tonight is to provide the usual distraction and scare tactics to spook the American people with another CIA trained terrorism force. The headline on the Drudge Report this afternoon provides a most interesting insight into DHS’s mindset before Obama speaks tonight:

DRUDGE_091014jgfla

From the story at Drudge at the headline above from the Washington Times this evening:

Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said his department will be issuing new guidance to retailers this week giving them pointers on how to spot potential terrorists among their customers by looking at what they’re buying.

While saying the government cannot prohibit sales of some everyday materials, Mr. Johnson said retailers should be trained to look for anyone who buys a lot from what he described as a “long list of materials that could be used as explosive precursors.”

He said it was an extension of the “If you see something, say something” campaign launched by his predecessor, former Secretary Janet Napolitano, which tries to enlist average Americans to be aware of their immediate environment.

“We can’t and we shouldn’t prohibit the sale of a pressure cooker. We can sensitize retail businesses to be on guard for suspicious behavior by those who buy this kind of stuff,” Mr. Johnson said during a question-and-answer session after a speech at the Council on Foreign Relations.

In other words, if one buys gunpowder for use in black powder hunting or reloading of ammunition, ammunition in quantity of any caliber, or household chemicals which some individuals buy in bulk to save money for their home and businesses (multi-location use), odds are one might just find themselves on any number of Obama’s DHS “watch lists” as a possible domestic terrorist threat.

The article above from the Times in fact supports a story published by the Washington Free Beaconon August 29, 2014 (see: FBI National Domestic Threat Assessment Omits Islamist Terrorism ) where the alarming revelation of the omission of Islamist terror appears to be more insidious when this portion of Bill Gertz’s story is taken into consideration with the excerpt published above:

Instead, the internal FBI intelligence report concluded in its 2013 assessment published this month that the threat to U.S. internal security from extremists is limited to attacks and activities by eight types of domestic extremist movements—none motivated by radical Islam.

They include anti-government militia groups and white supremacy extremists, along with “sovereign citizen” nationalists, and anarchists. Other domestic threat groups outlined by the FBI assessment include violent animal rights and environmentalist extremists, black separatists, anti- and pro-abortion activists, and Puerto Rican nationalists.

“Domestic extremist violence continues to be unpredictable and, at times, severe,” the report states.

This appears to validate that the government might indeed be secretly concerned about ISIS and Islamist terrorism but the temptation to secretly allow a terror attack to occur, committed by radical Muslim militants falsely tied to the Patriot Movement, Tea Party, or other pro-Constitutional groups is no longer the realm of conspiracy theorists or websites.

One must take into consideration the long standing hostility of this regime towards its own citizens and the potential that tonight’s speech has nothing to do with ISIS or their actions overseas; instead it would appear a scare tactic to justify a brutal crackdown on all Americans who do not share the views of the predominate political parties and their elites, all in the name of protecting the people.

Beware my friends, as we now live in one of the most dangerous periods of our history where liberty’s light can be extinguished by the fictional assignment of guilt and national hysteria, much like other dictatorships and oligarchs have used to crush their citizens throughout history.

3 Comments

Filed under Obama Marxist Tyranny, War On Jihadists

Obama Was and Is, A REAL Imperial President

For all the hatred of Richard Nixon as the worst criminal to inhabit the White House over his cover-up of a second-rate burglary, Obama has him beaten in spades.

A political cartoon is worth a thousand word essay:

The Crook

Leave a comment

Filed under Obama Marxist Tyranny

Obama: The Liar-In-Chief

Pinocchio-Obama

UPDATED 9-10 11:40

Obama says he is responsible for nothing.  Yet he is about to jumpstart WWIII and give his Sunni Jihadist allies a hand overthrowing Syria. With a boldfaced liar for President, we the people have no clue whom to believe anymore; our enemies or our leaders and their media.

The fruits of Barack Obama are these:

“in the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying.” —Adolf Hitler , Mein Kampf, vol. I, ch. X

i.e.: “Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it ”.

A psychological profile of Adolf Hitler by the U.S. government at the end of WWII reads like a current psychological profile of Barack Obama.  See if you can discern a difference.  It stated this about Hitler:

His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it. –  A Psychological Analysis of Adolph Hitler. His Life and Legend by Walter C. Langer. Office of Strategic Services (OSS) Washington, D.C. With the collaboration of Prof. Henry A. Murr, Harvard Psychological Clinic, Dr. Ernst Kris, New School for Social Research, Dr. Bertram D. Lawin, New York Psychoanalytic Institute. p. 219

Like Hitler, Obama blames everyone else for what goes wrong and NEVER admits to any faults or wrong.

See it for yourself in this one example:

So Obama and his regime is attempting to convince the American people of the absolute need to bomb Syria – and the so-called evidence of whom used the chemical weapons is one that follows Obama’s record of telling the big lie, and repeating it often.

The fruits of Obama showcase that it is not Chemical Weapons use that Obama is concerned with – but rather it is helping the Sunni Jihadists loyal to Al Qaeda from being defeated by Bashar Assad’s forces.  It is to empower the Sunni Muslims to establish their Caliphate over that of the Shiite or Alawite Muslims in the Middle East.

What Happens When You Can’t Believe A Thing The President Says?

*snip*

With respect to Syria, the president tells us there will be no U.S. boots on the ground.  Um, would that be like:

  • Health insurance premiums for a family would be $2,500 lower by the end of his first term in office.  They were actually about $3,000 higher.
  • The Obama administration was not responsible for proposing the budget sequester idea.Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward challenged this claim and forced the administration to backtrack.
  • Money from the nearly $800 billion stimulus package would be spent on “shovel-ready projects” and unemployment would drop to 5.3 percent by the end of his first term.  The president later conceded the projects weren’t as shovel ready as he had hoped andunemployment was 7.9 percent.
  • There was nothing Obama could do about Benghazi.  Subsequent revelations and congressional testimony have shown just how disengaged or disinterested the administration was.
  • The Justice Department told a judge that Fox Newsreporter James Rosen was a “co-conspirator” and a security threat?  The DOJ later apologized and tried to make amends with Washington reporters.
  • That Attorney General Eric Holder didn’t know about the Fast and Furious gun-running program?  Investigators have found documents confirming that he did have knowledge.

Or how about when Obama told Fox News host Bill O’Reilly that he hadn’t raised taxes when there were 21 new or increased taxes in ObamaCare alone.  Or when he claimed that he didn’t draw the “red line” with respect to Syria, the international community did, when it is very obvious from his taped statements that he alone drew the line.

And when Obama or his team aren’t asserting something that is demonstrably false, they are frequently making claims that might be technically true, but are intended to mislead.

…some of those same skeptics now defend Obama’s claim that U.S. troops will not be used in Syria.  Would that be like his absolute denial to Russert?  Maybe Obama means it, or maybe he’ll change his mind.  No one can know for sure.

The country needs to be able to trust a president and his staff and believe what they say.  But that’s not the case anymore.

*end snip*

More at link.

When you have a Liar-in-chief for President as we do, the world ends up laughing itself silly at the boldfaced lies, and it does as it pleases to advantage themselves against the United States.  We The People have no clue whom to believe anymore – enemies of the United State, or Obama and his sycophants in the media.

UPDATE: John Kerry gaffe for Syria to surrender it’s chemical weapons  is accepted by Russia and Assad.  Obama and his propaganda media suddenly claim credit for ‘brilliant strategy’ to diffuse military action against Syria on behalf of Al Qaeda rebels.

Kerry now claims credit for Syria weapons proposal

Secretary of State John Kerry’s seemingly casual proposal for the Assad regime to turn over its chemical weapons has within 24 hours become the de facto policy of the Obama administration, and is now being heralded by Kerry as the “ideal way” to defuse the stand-off between the United States and Syria.

But a look at the administration’s statements shows that the plan has undergone an incredible evolution.

Just one day ago, Kerry mentioned the idea in response to a question about what Bashar Assad could do to avert an attack

“He could turn over every single bit of his chemical weapons to the international community in the next week,” Kerry said. He then immediately splashed water on the notion: “But he isn’t about to do it, and it can’t be done, obviously.”

His aides swiftly set about to walking the remark back, describing Kerry’s comment as merely a “rhetorical argument.”

Yet on Tuesday morning — after the Russians had co-opted the idea and formally presented it to the Syrian government — Kerry was claiming full credit for the plan during testimony before the House Armed Services Committee.

This is what happens when the President is a liar and surrounds himself with ideological Leftists who also use the Big Lie to further their agenda.  Our enemies then seize on their immorality and use it against us.

RUSSIAN PARLIAMENT GLOATS AS PUTIN CHECKMATES OBAMA OVER SYRIA

Monday morning, Secretary of State John Kerry made what an administration official called a “major goof” with a never-going-to-happen hypothetical that suggested Syria could avoid American airstrikes by surrendering their chemical weapons. Even the State Department walked Kerry’s statement back. But Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov immediately seized upon Kerry’s flub, and now a member of the Russian parliament is gloating over Putin’s checkmate of Obama.

Watching one administration bungle after another unfurl, Alexi Pushkov , the chairman of the Parliamentary Foreign Affairs Committee, is publicly mocking Obama. Via Twitter, Pushkov wrote that this mess “knocks the ground out from under Obama’s plans for a military strike.”

Kerry’s flub played right into the Russians hands; and by breaking weak, stepping back from his own red line, and embracing Kerry’s hypothetical proposal during a round-robin of network interviews Monday night, President Obama chose to repeat Kerry’s mistake.

Leave a comment

Filed under Obama Marxist Tyranny, Uncategorized

Source: Obama Is A Member of the Muslim Brotherhood

Muslim-Brotherhood-Obama

Obama records message for Muslim Brotherhood group saying “my administration is proud to be your partner”, Egyptian source says Obama is a member of the Brotherhood.

So why is Obama, the ‘anti-war’ candidate in 2008, the vocal opponent of the war on Jihadists from Iraq to Afghanistan – so intent now upon going to war in Syria?  Why was he so intent on overthrowing secular dictators in the middle East from Egypt and Libya to Tunisia and now Syria?  Why is he supporting Al Qaeda-backed Islamists in Syria?  Why arm them?  Why ship arms to them from Benghazi?  Why is he so insistent on supporting the radical Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt?  Why back Mohammed Morsi?  Why issue official White House warnings to Egypt’s military to reinstate Morsi as ruler?

The ‘why’ may be found in Obama’s allegiance and effort to assist the Islamists seeking to create a Sunni Caliphate in the Middle East.
In fact, Obama’s foreign policies makes sense if you consider that Obama is supporting the radical Islamists because HE IS A RADICAL ISLAMIST himself.
If true – it explains Obama’s entire foreign policy since he took office, doesn’t it?
I think the fruits speak to the accusation – and I for believe it to be true.
Consider the fact Obama stated in his autobiography ‘the Audacity of Hope’  that he will stand with Muslims.
obama-stand-with-muslims

The Right Scoop notes the alarming evidence of Obama’s support of radical Islamists:

It was reported that Mohamed Magid, the president of ISNA, is working directly with the White House as well as sitting on a Homeland Security committee that deals with ‘extremism’. If you haven’t seen that report you should go there now. It explains, in part, how the leaders of the Holy Land Foundation were convicted of funding terrorism, specifically the Islamic terror group Hamas whose goal is to destroy Israel, and that this Holy Land Foundation was spun off of a US Muslim Brotherhood group called ISNA. Because the US government wanted to indict the leaders of the Holy Land Foundation, ISNA was put on a list of unindicted co-conspirators of the Holy Land Foundation to be prosecuted at a later time. And they would have been had that not come at the end of the Bush administration.

So considering all of that, you wouldn’t think an American president would be in bed with a group who is responsible for funding a terror group who wants to destroy Israel, our greatest ally and the only Western power in the Middle East. But he is. Here is a message he sent to ISNA just the other day:

Egyptian Claims Obama Is A Member Of The Muslim Brotherhood…if true, suddenly everything from Obama’s involvements in the “Arab Spring” to the Benghazi massacre to bombing Syria suddenly makes perfect sense.

Unlikely Figure helps to out Obama as Muslim Brotherhood

by  on September 3, 2013 in BlogGeneral
Al-Jazeera is reporting on two tweets from a man named Shadi Hamid. The first tweet is a reference to an Egyptian newspaper that identifies Barack Obama as a member of the International Muslim Brotherhood:Shadi Hamid: Tweets claims from Egyptian newspaper that Obama a Muslim Brotherhood memberShadi Hamid: Tweets claims from Egyptian newspaper that Obama a Muslim Brotherhood memberNine minutes later, Hamid tweeted an image of the newspaper article, which features a photo of Obama (Walid will be doing additional research on this in the coming days):

Hamid: Egyptian newspaper says Obama Muslim Brotherhood leader

Hamid: Egyptian newspaper says Obama Muslim Brotherhood leader

Did you catch that part about the “son of MB leader threatened Obama w- release of ‘papers’”? That is an apparent reference to Saad al-Shater, the son of former Muslim Brotherhood presidential candidate, Khairat al-Shater. We direct you to Addendum F of our “Ironclad” report on Egypt’s involvement in the Benghazi attack. Multiple reports from Arabic sources indicated that Saad had said his father had documents that were incredibly damaging to Barack Obama.

A couple of weeks later, Saad was arrested. A Fox News / AP report indicated that one of the reasons for the younger al-Shater’s arrest had to do with Obama:

It was not immediately clear why police detained el-Shater’s 23-year-old son. Officials only said Wednesday that police had arrested Saad el-Shater and that he had threatened to release documents allegedly showing ties between his father and U.S. President Barack Obama. Officials did not elaborate.

Based on what we know about Shadi Hamid, it’s worth asking why he would so willingly pass along information that is damaging to President Obama. The Al-Jazeera article identifies him as a “Director of Research at the Brookings Doha Center”.

That in itself is interesting because in June of this year, Hamid was listed as a participant in theU.S.-Islamic World Forum (US-IWF) in Doha, Qatar.

Hamid: Attended Muslim Brotherhood forum in June.

Hamid: Attended Muslim Brotherhood forum in June.

As we have reported previously, this forum was a who’s who of Muslim Brotherhood members, apparatchiks, and sympathizers. This list included:

Thomas Pickering: Chairman of the Accountability Review Board (ARB) that investigated security lapses in Benghazi prior to the 9/11/12 attack.
Nihad Awad: National Executive Director of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), a Muslim Brotherhood group in America.
Rashad Hussain: Obama administration’s envoy to Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) with Muslim Brotherhood ties.
John Esposito: Georgetown University Professor and strong Muslim Brotherhood apologist.
Dalia Mogahed: Muslim and close colleague of Esposito. Also a Muslim Brotherhood apologist.
Mohamed Magid: President of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), a Muslim Brotherhood group.
Mouaz Moustafa: Executive Director of the Syrian Emergency Task Force (SETF); works in D.C. and lobbies Congress on behalf of Syrian (Muslim Brotherhood) rebels.
Josh Rogin: Daily Beast writer who referred to Abedin’s familial ties to the Muslim Brotherhood as a “conspiracy theor(y)”.
Rabbi David Saperstein: A purveyor of interfaith dialogue who vouched for both Abedin and Magid.

Of course, the question that needs to be answered is: Why would someone like Hamid – an apparent Muslim Brotherhood sympathizer – choose to help push a narrative that Barack Obama is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood?

Is he trying to get out in front of Saad’s claims or is there another motive?

It is indeed interesting that just days after Khairat Al-Shater’s son – who allegedly claimed his father had information on Obama that would land the U.S. President in jail – is arrested, an apparent friendly to the Obama administration is tweeting out this article.

 

2 Comments

Filed under Obama Marxist Tyranny, Uncategorized, War On Jihadists