Tag Archives: Tehran

Obama’s Secret Nuke Deal With Iran WILL NOT BE IN WRITING, Just A Handshake Of “Understanding”.

Handshake-Obamarlain

Without any written document on the top secret Iranian nuke deal – Obama will make it mean whatever he says it means.

Have you noticed that everything is always secret with Obama?

Bills written in secret and passed in the middle of the night.

Policy decrees implemented in secret by federal alphabets such as the secret takeover of the internet by the FCC and FEC where the rules were kept secret until long after they made it policy; the secret attempt for the ATF to ban .223 ammunition.  Even ObamaCare was drafted and passed in secret – without a single member of Congress reading the bill before voting on it. “We have to pass it so you can find out what is in it” was famously stated by Nancy Pelosi.  Now the policy seems to be that secret deals will be passed by a handshake and no one will be allowed to know what was actually in it, only what Obama and his regime say is in it.

Today we learn that the secret Iranian nuke deal whereby John Effing Kerry (who served in Vietnam) will hand Tehran’s Mullah’s nuclear weapons after their Supreme Ayatollah just chanted “Death to America” last Friday – IS A DEAL THAT WILL NOT BE WRITTEN DOWN OR SIGNED.

The birdcage liner known as the New York Times is reporting that there will be no written agreement, just a “framework of understanding”.

If an agreement to limit Iran’s nuclear capability is reached by deadline in the next seven days, one thing may be missing: an actual written accord, signed by the Iranians.

Over the past few weeks, Iran has increasingly resisted any kind of formal “framework” agreement at this stage in the negotiations, preferring a more general statement of “understanding”.

To counter the incredulity of some members of the Praetorian Media who questioned the wisdom of such a stupid course, Obama’s talking pet parrot Josh Earnest spewed memorized talking points in response, saying “the United States is seeking ‘concrete commitments’ from Iran in order to reach a nuclear deal that can be shown to the US Congressand public.

“We certainly would want, and expect, that if a deal is completed, it will include tangible, specific commitments that have been made by the Iranians,” White House press secretary Josh Earnest said.

How is that even remotely possible without a written accord that can be verified and pointed to if there are violations??  What is “concrete” about a handshake from Jihadists who chant for your death each Friday after prayers?  What is “tangible” about an “agreement” with nothing in writing???  It’s all stink – and no substance.  I mean, where’s the stool here?  At least crap is tangible – this deal Obama is pushing for at all speed, is not even verifiable enough for others to point out the poop.

That is by design.  Even though the air smells of excrement – there is no proof of it. Obama can insist what we actually smell is lilies and honeysuckle and we will be forced to take his word for it while he takes the word of the largest Islamic state supplier of Jihadists in the globe.   Obama will not take the word or phone calls from allies who warn about the stupidity and danger of this ‘deal’.

Obama is going to “trust” an Iran nuclear deal with a handshake, by the very people who shout ‘Death To America”.

I know what you would say, but Obama is not that stupid, even though true believer imbeciles like John Kerry certainly are.  Obama is pushing this “deal” so he can crow “Peace!  Peace!” – while arming Jihadists with nukes at the same exact time so that there will never be any peace.

Obama has nefarious intentions – short-term ‘legacy’ while aiding and comforting the emerging Islamic Caliphates – both Shia and Sunni which are the only fruits Obama can showcase in foreign policy.

Since this author believes Obama’s intentions are to destroy the United States of America, subjugating it to alien forms, powers and populations – a nuclear Iran by a handshake as official US policy is just par for Obama’s course.

Kerry Iran Givaway

Obama’s Iran Deal Probably Won’t Be In Writing

One might hope that a President of the United States would at least get a written agreement from the leader of a country that chants “Death to America” on any nuclear deal. But President Obama is not just any President of the United States. And his quest for a second term legacy accomplishment may just force America into a handshake agreement on Iran’s nuclear weapons program.

For anyone who has been following the negotiations between the Obama administration and the Ayatollah Khamenei regime, this minor “there will be no actual written agreement” detail should come as no surprise.

…So whatever the Obama administration announces in the coming days won’t be a real written binding agreement at all. Instead, it will just be a “political” document for domestic consumption here in the United States. In fact, the NYT reports, the Khamenei regime doesn’t even acknowledge that the March deadline exists.

…What the March deadline is all about is giving Obama the opportunity to declare victory on “ending” Iran’s nuclear before any actual deal is made. The liberal media can then all heap praise on Obama and accuse anyone who questions the deal of wanting war with Iran. Then by the time the actual agreement is signed in June, Obama’s legacy will be far too tied up in its “success” for any Democrat, even Hillary Clinton, to oppose it.

2 Comments

Filed under Obama Marxist Tyranny, War On Jihadists

Obama’s Petulant Hissy Fit Portends Dangerous Wrath For Those Who Dare Defy Him

AntiIsraelObama

Nothing more dangerous than a wannabe despotic tyrant scorned

Obama has fundamentally transformed America into a Marxist/Fascist police state, acting as a dictator to impose his will by decree while using federal alphabets to harass, intimidate and silence those his regime targets.  Obama employs bullying tactics, subterfuge and outright treason to impose punishments for the smallest slight to his gargantuan narcissism.

Obama has done this to American citizens with impunity.  Now, because the Israeli people have scorned His Heinous by rejecting Obama’s attempt to overthrow Benjamin Netanyahu, the petulant man-child turns to do the same to the tiny nation of Israel.  Obama drops the mask he wore to beguile the vast majority of Americans, and the true Islamist anti-semite that he and his regime are – is revealed.

Obama’s Chief of Staff at a J Street conference today referenced the State of Israel as “An occupation that has lasted almost 50 years must end.”

Must end?  The state of Israel exists because it defended itself against two massive Arab wars launched against it and the territory it gained is a bulwark to secure the tiny state from future attack.  But Obama has already made his intentions known long ago, at best – he will demand Israel surrender all the land it ‘occupies’ – back to the original borders it had in 1948.  At worst – he will join ISIS and Iran and silently support the annihilation of the State altogether.

So the Obama regime’s position is exactly the same as that of Iran, Hamas and Hezbollah – Jihad groups that have had incredible influence in the Obama government.  It is no wonder Obama has decided to wage his own personal jihad against Israel.

Obama To Cut Direct Ties With Netanyahu

Obama’s jihad on the Jews just became official policy.

President Obama is considering cutting all ties with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s YNet News reported on Friday. According to a source cited by the paper, the White House “is contemplating lowering its ties with Israel and putting Kerry as the sole liaison between the two states, as opposed to the open line Netanyahu once had with Obama.”

Not to diminish the impact of that expected snark from His Heinous – Michael Goodwin lets loose a litany of what we are enduring under this despot and what it portends now for Israel.   I just love the first four paragraphs of this Op-Ed.  Goodwin nails what the treasonous bastard has done to us right under our noses.  Let it sink in.

And now that the child-prince has been thwarted in Israel, he moves full-speed ahead to put nuclear weapons into the hands of the biggest state sponsor of Jihad in the world.  The Iranian regime that vowed to wipe Israel off the map and whose Supreme Leaders Ayatollah Khameni just said “Death to America’ on Friday.

No phone call for you Netanyahu – but nuclear weapons for Tehran Obama says.

Obama endorsed by Hamas

Beware Of Obama

First he comes for the banks and health care, uses the IRS to go after critics, politicizes the Justice Department, spies on journalists, tries to curb religious freedom, slashes the military, throws open the borders, doubles the debt and nationalizes the Internet.

He lies to the public, ignores the Constitution, inflames race relations and urges Latinos to punish Republican “enemies.” He abandons our ­allies, appeases tyrants, coddles ­adversaries and uses the Crusades as an excuse for inaction as Islamist terrorists slaughter their way across the Mideast.

Now he’s coming for Israel.

Barack Obama’s promise to transform America was too modest. He is transforming the whole world before our eyes. Do you see it yet?

Against the backdrop of the tsunami of trouble he has unleashed, Obama’s pledge to “reassess” America’s relationship with Israel cannot be taken lightly. Already paving the way for an Iranian nuke, he is hinting he’ll also let the other anti-Semites at Turtle Bay have their way. That could mean American support for punitive Security Council resolutions or for Palestinian statehood initiatives. It could mean both, or something worse.

Whatever form the punishment takes, it will aim to teach Bibi Netanyahu never again to upstage him. And to teach Israeli voters never again to elect somebody Obama doesn’t like.

Apologists and wishful thinkers, including some Jews, insist Obama real­izes that the special relationship between Israel and the United States must prevail and that allowing too much daylight between friends will encourage enemies.

Those people are slow learners, or, more dangerously, deny-ists.

If Obama’s six years in office teach us anything, it is that he is impervious to appeals to good sense. Quite the contrary. Even respectful suggestions from supporters that he behave in the traditions of American presidents fill him with angry determination to do it his way.

For Israel, the consequences will be intended. Those who make excuses for Obama’s policy failures — naive, bad advice, bad luck — have not come to grips with his dark impulses and deep-seated rage.

His visceral dislike for Netanyahu is genuine, but also serves as a convenient fig leaf for his visceral dislike of Israel. The fact that it’s personal with Netanyahu doesn’t explain six years of trying to bully Israelis into signing a suicide pact with Muslims bent on destroying them. Netanyahu’s only sin is that he puts his nation’s security first and refuses to knuckle ­under to Obama’s endless demands for unilateral concessions.

That refusal is now the excuse to act against Israel. Consider that, for all the upheaval around the world, the president rarely has a cross word for, let alone an open dispute with, any other foreign leader. He calls Great Britain’s David Cameron “bro” and praised Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood president, Mohammed Morsi, who had called Zionists “the descendants of apes and pigs.”

Obama asked Vladimir Putin for patience, promising “more flexibility” after the 2012 election, a genuflection that earned him Russian aggression. His Asian pivot was a head fake, and China is exploiting the vacuum. None of those leaders has gotten the Netanyahu treatment, which included his being forced to use the White House back door on one trip, and the cold shoulder on another.

It is a clear and glaring double standard.

Most troubling is Obama’s bended-knee deference to Iran’s Supreme Leader, which has been repaid with “Death to America” and “Death to Israel” demonstrations in Tehran and expanded Iranian military action in other countries.

The courtship reached the height of absurdity last week, when Obama wished Iranians a happy Persian new year by equating Republican critics of his nuclear deal with the resistance of theocratic hard-liners, saying both “oppose a diplomatic solution.” That is a damnable slur given that a top American military official estimates that Iranian weapons, proxies and trainers killed 1,500 US soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. Who in their right mind would trust such an evil regime with a nuke?

Yet Netanyahu, the leader of our only reliable ally in the region, is ­repeatedly singled out for abuse. He alone is the target of an orchestrated attempt to defeat him at the polls, with Obama political operatives, funded in part by American taxpayers, working to elect his opponent.

They failed and Netanyahu prevailed because Israelis see him as their best bet to protect them. Their choice was wise, but they’d better buckle up because it’s Israel’s turn to face the wrath of Obama.

5 Comments

Filed under Obama Marxist Tyranny, War On Jihadists

Ha-Ha! SUCKERS!! We Will Have Means To Destroy You,The Great Satan – Thanks To Your President!

ObamaflipsoffUSA

Iranian president Rouhani says a Final nuclear deal that Obama is pushing is possible, while Ayatollah Khamenei says ‘Death to America’.  France thinks Obama is out of his mind insane

We are being played for fools and the consequences will be world war if not our total annihilation thanks to the efforts of His Heinous Barack Hussein Obama who is greasing the gears of Iran’s nuke program while the Iranians vow to use them on us.

After Obama addressed Iranians directly last week to speak of the door that his nuclear deal will open for them, and while John Effing Kerry  (who served in Vietnam) hails the progress of the nuke agreement, Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khameni affirms “Death to America!” on Friday in front of his faithful.

As we have come to expect from the “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction” emperor,  Obama will not condemn Islam or Muslims.  He will condemn Israel and Christians.  He will not meet with an Ally such as Israel’s Netanyahu, but he will meet with members of the Muslim Brotherhood.  He will not hold talks with Republican lawmakers, but he will hold talks with enemies and demand that Iran have nukes.

Obama insults our allies and sets them in opposition to himself while removing the greatest sponsor of state terrorism on the planet from the terror list.

Why would we expect otherwise?  The Obama’s White House said Friday there’s no indication the Islamic State group had any operational link to a string of suicide bombings in Yemen that killed at least 137 people.   Obama ignores Muslims doing suicide bombings while shouting Allah Ackbar! and so will his Praetorian media.  But Obama will be quick to point to the Crusades for examples of Christian ‘extremism’.  So when a tourist bus is bombed, it can’t be ISIS, it must be the Amish!   So as the blood dries on the pavement, America retreats it’s forces from possibly the last Muslim country it has a base of operations while Obama insists that all the ‘diverse’ groups in Yemen should return to a peaceful democratic process as a means to address the terror attack.

If Obama will absolve Jihadists for a terror attack – you can be certain he will absolve the Iranians from any nefarious intentions with nuclear weapons.

“It’s a fine irony that a French socialist government is the only thing between us and this debacle,” quipped the former UN ambassador John Bolton.

This is worse than Neville Chamberlain waving around that useless piece of paper, this is Obama who will be waving around a useless ‘agreement’ and instead of tanks into Poland a few weeks later – it may be nukes raining down on American and Israeli cities.

Nuclear-Obamarlain

Iranian president Rouhani: Final nuclear deal possible

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani on Saturday painted an optimistic picture of ongoing negotiations with world powers over his country’s nuclear program, saying there has been progress in the talks and that a final accord is possible.

…”I believe achieving a deal is possible. There is nothing that can’t be resolved. The other party to the talks also has to make a final decision,” he was quoted as saying.

Khamenei calls ‘Death to America’ as Kerry hails progress on nuke deal

Iran’s Supreme leader Ali Khamenei called for “Death to America” on Saturday, a day after President Barack Obama appealed to Iran to seize a “historic opportunity” for a nuclear deal and a better future, and as US Secretary of State John Kerry claimed substantial progress toward an accord.

France Takes Toughest Line at Iran Nuclear Talks

French diplomats have been publicly pressing the U.S. and other world powers not to give ground on key elements—particularly the speed of lifting U.N. sanctions and the pledge to constrain Iran’s nuclear research work—ahead of the March 31 target.

Paris also appears to be operating on a different diplomatic clock than Washington, arguing that the date is an “artificial” deadline and that global powers should be willing to wait Tehran out for a better deal if necessary.

…“Making the end of March an absolute deadline is counterproductive and dangerous,” France’s ambassador to the U.S., Gérard Araud, said via Twitter after the latest round of negotiations in Switzerland concluded Friday.

Obama-Golfs-WorldBurns

USA evacuates Yemen – all while His Heinous plays golf.

4 Comments

Filed under Obama Marxist Tyranny, War On Jihadists

GOP Outrage Over Obama’s Iran Nuke Deal? It’s All Kabuki Theater

GOP-Kabuki

Obama to use UN to impose Nuke Deal.   Senate was told about John Kerry’s approval of Obama’s plans to circumvent Congress on Iranian nukes at his Confirmation hearings back in 2013.  They rubber-stamped Kerry’s nomination anyway.

For all the public outrage over His Heinous Barack Obama’s Dictatorial end-run around Congress and ignoring the Constitutional requirement for treaties to be ratified in the Senate, the truth is that the very same people now speaking out against Obama’s unilateral nuke deal agreement with Tehran – VOTED TO CONFIRM the very man who told them he approved of Obama using that tactic back in 2013.

It’s not like the Senate and the GOP did not know that Obama was planning to negotiate a deal with Iran without them. They knew!   John Effing Kerry TOLD them during his confirmation hearing in 2013 that HE SUPPORTED OBAMA ENACTING SUCH A DEAL BY HIMSELF and using methods outside of the ‘ideological restraint’ of Congress!!!!  Here’s excerpts from the transcript of his confirmation hearing:

SENATOR JAMES RISCH (R-ID)

There are a lot of us that are becoming increasingly concerned about all this talk regarding executive agreements as opposed to treaties that are negotiated by the executive branch as contemplated by the Founding Fathers and ratified, if appropriate, by this committee and eventually by the full Senate. Can you give us your view on matters regarding executive agreements? How do you feel about that and the bypassing of the committee?

SEN. KERRY: Well, it would depend — I would say to you, Senator, that it would depend on what the subject matter is and what the sort of scope is and whether or not it falls under a traditional treaty purview or it falls under executive agreement purview.

I can’t — I don’t want to be commenting in some prophylactic way one side or the other without the specific situation in front of me. But I’m confident the president is committed to upholding the Constitution. He’s — I don’t think he’s — you know, and I think — and I’ll say this to all of you.

There’s no better way to guarantee that whatever concerns you have about the president’s desire to move on an executive agreement would be greatly, you know, nullified or mollified if we could find a way to cooperate on a treaty or on the broader issues that face the nation. But you know, I think — I think there’s a lot of frustration out there that some of the automatic ideological restraint here that prevents the majority from being able to express their voice has restrained people and pushed people in a way where they’ve got to consider some other ways of getting things done.

SEN. RISCH: Well, and that’s exactly what concerns us, Senator Kerry, is the fact that it’s OK to do this through the regular order if it gets done, but if it’s not going to get done, then it’s — the ends justify the means; it’s OK to end-run around the Constitution.

So even when Kerry confirmed to these Senators that he was going to support an end-run around the Constitution in regards to Obama enacting treaties outside of Congress – these same Senators voted to confirm him as Secretary of State ANYWAY.

It’s all kabuki theater.

They say they oppose ObamaCare – the GOP FUNDS IT.  They say they oppose Obama’s Executive Amnesty and automatic citizenship for illegals – THE GOP FULLY FUNDS IT.  They say they oppose Obama’s usurpation of power and using the ATF, the FCC, FEC and other alphabets to impose “Law” by decree – they not only FULLY FUND IT – they refuse to use the tools the Constitution provides them to defund and oppose what Obama is implementing.

Kabuki.

These same GOP leaders will no doubt feign outrage over upcoming dictatorial decrees and usurpations by Obama and his Executive branch – yet they will no doubt confirm radical Loretta Lynch to replace Eric Holder at the Justice Department, even after she told them she approves of Obama making law outside the Constitution and handing rights to illegal aliens in preference over American citizens.

The Constitution is irrelevant to this regime now, and the GOP refuses to uphold it – or their oaths to support and defend it.

Obama will cut out Congress and take his Iran ‘deal’ to give the Mullah’s nukes to the UN Security Council, and this letter will be about the only effort they employ to assuage an outraged and bewildered American people.

 

Senate Was Warned About Obama’s End Run on Iran

Congress is struggling to thwart President Obama’s attempt to strike a nuclear deal with Iran on his own, in violation of the Constitution. Lawmakers are taking unprecedented measures — the invitation to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Corker-Menendez bill and even a letter to Tehran to stop it. None of this would be necessary if the U.S. Senate had done its job instead of rubber-stamping John Kerry’s nomination as secretary of state.

In January 2013, Kerry plainly warned Senate Foreign Relations Committee members — the same people now leading the charge against the Iran deal — that he intended to support Obama’s end run around the Constitution because “they’ve got to consider some other ways of getting things done.” Sens. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., Robert Menendez, D-N.J., and John McCain, R-Ariz., all heard Kerry’s statement first-hand, ignored it and voted for him, offering effusive praise for their former Senate buddy. Now they are getting what they should have seen coming.

Too bad the U.S. Senate abdicated its responsibility. It has final say on presidential appointments, but our senators would rather go along and get along than make sure nominees will follow the Constitution.

Have the senators learned their lesson? This month, the U.S. Senate is expected to vote on the nomination of Loretta Lynch as the next attorney general — the nation’s top law enforcement official. During a Judiciary Committee hearing in January, Lynch indicated she thought Obama’s executive actions to rewrite immigration laws were “reasonable.” Texas Sen. Ted Cruz calls her views “disqualifying” and says the Senate has a choice: defend the rule of law or “confirm an attorney general who has candidly admitted she will impose no limits on the president whatsoever.” Ensuring that top government officials are committed to the U.S. Constitution, it’s a no-brainer.

That’s what Sen. Jim Risch, R-Idaho, tried to do at Kerry’s confirmation hearing. The U.S. Constitution requires that treaties be ratified by a two-thirds vote of the Senate, something Obama foresees he cannot get. Obama calls the possible deal with Iran an “agreement.” Presidents have always made “agreements” without Senate approval, but none of the importance and duration of the Iran deal. “To allege that this doesn’t have all of the marks of a treaty is an insult to everybody’s intelligence,” says McCain now. But at the hearing, McCain was mum about the point.

Only Risch pressed Kerry, insisting that calling it an agreement, not a treaty, amounted to an “end run around the Constitution” that reflected a dangerous “ends justify the means” mentality. With masterful obfuscation, Kerry said maybe things could get done in “the regular order” — meaning constitutionally — but he wouldn’t guarantee it. “It would depend.”

Fast-forward to February 24, 2015, when Kerry returned to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for a budget hearing. When Menendez and Corker pressed him for information about the Iran negotiations, he stonewalled. “I’m not going to go into the details of where we are and what we’re doing.”

Worse, Kerry said there should be no “formal approval process” by Congress. “This is the president’s prerogative.” Kerry threw the senators a few crumbs, conceding that though the president can suspend sanctions against Iran, permanently removing them would require a vote in Congress.

A vote, but not the two-thirds majority of the Senate that the Constitution requires for treaty approval. That is why the Senate’s effort at curbing the president — the Corker-Menendez bill — is a shameful retreat. The bill says Obama must submit a final Iran arms deal to Congress within 60 days for hearings and a vote, and bars the president from suspending sanctions against Iran in the meantime. This puts the burden on Congress to cobble together a veto-proof majority, instead of the president having to win over two-thirds of senators. That’s not what the founders intended.

The Senate failed to do its job during Kerry’s confirmation hearings, and now the nation faces the prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran. Senators treat these hearings as media opportunities and quibble about getting their 10 minutes on camera instead of asking tough questions. In fact, they request that answers be kept short so as not to infringe on their own time. It’s hardly the deliberative body the framers envisioned to provide “advice and consent” on critical issues.

obama-rips Constitution

Would the White House really try to get around the Constitution?

bizarre as it may seem — is that the administration would go to the United Nations Security Council to pass the Iran agreement and thereby boost its status as enforceable international law.

…the State Department refused to rule out the end run around the Senate and the Constitution. (“State Department spokesperson Jen Psaki said on Tuesday: ‘I’m just not going to get ahead of how this would be implemented at this point in time.’”)

There are multiple, serious problems with such an approach. For one thing, Secretary of State John Kerry confirmed in testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that it was a non-binding deal that the next president could demolish with “a stroke of the pen.” Was he misleading the Senate, or is he willing to rule out the end run around the Senate?

Second, the entire legal theory is dubious at best. To believe it could work is to assert the president can unilaterally supersede the dictates of the Constitution.

2 Comments

Filed under Obama Marxist Tyranny, Politics