Obama: ISIS Has “Legitimate Grievances” Biden: “Christians Commit Violence In The Name Of The Bible” Obama: “Islam Not Responsible For Terrorism”

Obama says terrorists need jobs and opportunities; America must “Lift up the voice of tolerance” adding “Muslims are unfairly targeted with suspicion”

The Trojan Horse Traitor in the White House doubled-down on his regime’s appeasement and support of Jihad terrorists including ISIS.  Obama once again turned all admonitions into his communist manifesto asserting that “violent extremists” (Jihad terrorists) need jobs and “opportunities” because “resentments fester” and “extremism grows when millions are impoverished”.   So in one speech Obama justifies ISIS and atrocities committed in the name of Islamic jihadists by saying they have ‘legitimate grievances’ while out of the other side of his mouth – says Islam has nothing to do with terrorism.

Obama insisted that ISIS is NOT ISLAMIC while at this very same event at the White House the day before, Joe Biden declared that “Extremists commit violence in the name of the bible”.

Obama warned that Muslims are unfairly regarded with suspicion, insisting “we must raise the voice of tolerance” in the US and beyond.  A dichotomy of the absurd since Obama himself equated the mass beheadings of Christians by ISIS with the Crusades , lecturing us that atrocities are committed in the Name of Christ at the National Prayer Breakfast two weeks ago.  Isn’t it interesting that Obama will easily state that violence is committed in the name of Jesus but will never utter the truth that terrorism is being committed in the name of Mohammed?  That is because Obama himself is aiding and abetting the rise of the two emerging Islamic Caliphates, whereupon all this insanity, appeasement and misdirection is intended to abolish any resolve to stand against the Islamic State’s march on the world.

So the official position of the United States is that Jihadists need jobs and economic opportunity or muslims will join a jihad.  In other words, we cannot judge what ISIS is doing with the beheadings and mass murder as evil because these jihadists have “legitimate grievances”.

As insane as that sounds, that is exactly what Obama meant, along with the subtle references that Christians and the Bible are the world’s REAL terrorists.

Obama’s ridiculous “White House Countering Violent Extremism Summit” circus, is simply a venue to publicly appease Jihadist Islam while bashing Christians and “Right Wing militias”.  At his “summit” Obama invited known Islamic Terrorists and supporters of Jihad to attend with group representatives having links to ISIS.  On this platform Obama loudly insisted that we will never be at war with Islam saying “These terrorists are desperate for legitimacy and all us have a responsibility to refute the notion that groups like ISIL somehow represent Islam”.  Except that ISIS itself is called “The ISLAMIC STATE” and is conquering territory for the EXPRESS PURPOSE of establishing an Islamic State that will wage jihad across the globe and impose Islam on the world at the edge of the sword.

It is becoming self-evident that Obama is an Apologist for Jihadists and given his words and actions, is potentially an agent for the Caliphate himself.

 

Obama says world should address ‘grievances’ that terrorists exploit

Obama defended his administration’s approach to the terror threat at a White House summit Wednesday, standing by claims that groups like the Islamic State do not represent Islam — as well as assertions that job creation could help combat extremism.

Obama, addressing the Washington audience on the second day of the summit, said the international community needs to address “grievances” that terrorists exploit, including economic and political issues.

…“We do have to address the grievances that terrorists exploit including economic grievances,” he said.

He also said no single religion was responsible for violence and terrorism, adding he wants to lift up the voice of tolerance in the United States and beyond.

…Obama also called on Muslim leaders to “do more to discredit the notion that our nations are determined to suppress Islam, that there is an inherent clash in civilizations.”

Obama acknowledged that some Muslim-Americans have concerns about working with the government, particularly law enforcement, and that their reluctance “is rooted in the objection to certain practices where Muslim-Americans feel they’ve been unfairly targeted.”

He said it was important it make sure that abuses stop and are not repeated and that “we do not stigmatize entire communities.” He also said it was vital that “no one is profiled or put under a cloud of suspicion simply because of their faith.”

Unless of course you are Christian.  Then this regime will slander the entire faith, and declare Christians to be extremists and terrorists.

 

 

 

Obama Declares War On ‘Extremism’ – Lists 72 ‘Extremists’ And Not A Single Mention Of Islam

Individuals and organizations that attempt to restore the values that our founders once believed in so strongly are regarded as dangerous “extremists” that need to be watched carefully

“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” – Barrack Hussein Obama

This is an update to a story that we first blogged on back in August of 2013. Given the recent events in France and Obama’s deliberate absence of any senior U.S. officials from the Unity against Islamic Terrorism March, that Obama declares ‘war’ on ‘violent extremism’ sets off alarm bells with those of us who understand who this government under Obama considers to actually be an ‘extremist’.

In the immediate aftermath of the Jihad attacks in France, the US and Leftist global media has been going through bizarre contortions of logic to strip any reference of Islam from the attack, and literally go on to compare the French massacre with the ‘justified riots’ in Ferguson Missouri, or blame wholesale  the victims themselves, the French, politics,  America, George Bush, Gun Owners, and everything except the very people who are waging jihad in the name of Islam.  Instead our own government declares that those who claim to be acting in the name of Islam, are NOT really Muslim, DESPITE what the attackers themselves have said and have declared themselves.

I’m literally watching the scriptural curses God warned His People would come upon them for forgetting their God come to pass in another fulfillment right before our eyes:

The Lord will cause you to be defeated before your enemies. You will come at them from one direction but flee from them in seven, and you will become a thing of horror to all the kingdoms on earth. Your carcasses will be food for all the birds and the wild animals, and there will be no one to frighten them away… The Lord will afflict you with madness, blindness and confusion of mind. –  Deuteronomy 28:25-28

Is there any doubt that this nation is full of madness, blindness and confusion of mind from it’s leadership on down?  The madness of refusing to utter the plain truth of the war being waged by Jihadist Islam?  The willful blindness that insists and pretends Islam is not a threat to life, security and peace?  The absolute confusion of mind that is presented by the media as ‘fact’ in this upside down nation?

Clearly, it’s not Islamic Jihadists that the American regime is preparing to go to war against, but rather, patriotic Americans who still ‘cling’ to what we once were and whom do not share the Leftist/”progressive/Marxist view of the world.  The truth of whom this government under Obama sees as the true threat and enemy ought to frighten every American right out of their socks, because it is YOU the Obama regime has already targeted as an ‘extremist’ in official government documents.

Obama Declares War On “Extremism” – Are You An “Extremist”?

Do you know what an “extremist” is?  In the wake of the horrible terror attacks on the offices of Charlie Hebdo in France, Barack Obama is speaking very boldly about the need to win the war against “extremists”, and he has announced plans to host a major global summit on “extremism” next month.  And on the surface that sounds great.  But precisely how are we supposed to determine whether someone is an “extremist” or not?  What criteria should we use? 

As you will see below, your definition of an “extremist” may be far, far different from the definition that Barack Obama is using.  When you do a Google search, you will find that an “extremist” is defined as “a person who holds extreme or fanatical political or religious views, especially one who resorts to or advocates extreme action.”  According to Wikipedia, “extremism” is “an ideology (particularly in politics or religion), considered to be far outside the mainstream attitudes of a society or to violate common moral standards.  Extremism can take many forms, including political, religious and economic.”  Please notice that neither of those definitions uses the word violence.  In this day and age, you can be considered an “extremist” simply based on what you believe, and as you will see later in this article there are now tens of millions of Americans that are considered to be “extremists” and “potential terrorists” according to official U.S. government documents.

When you use the word “extremist”, you may have in your mind a picture of ISIS fighters or the terrorists from the Charlie Hebdo massacre.

But for elitists such as Barack Obama, the word “extremist” has a much broader meaning.  In recent years, it has become a code word for those that do not have an “enlightened” view of the world.  If your views on politics, religion or social issues are extremely different from the liberal, progressive views of “the mainstream” (as defined by the mainstream media and by “mainstream” politicians such as Barack Obama), then they consider you to be an extremist.

Early in the presidency of George W. Bush, we were told that Islamic terrorists were the enemy.  And so most of the country got behind the idea of the War on Terrorism.  But over the years that has morphed into a War on Extremism.  In fact, the Obama administration has gone so far as to remove almost all references to Islam from government terror training materials…

Deputy U.S. Attorney General James Cole confirmed on Wednesday that the Obama administration was pulling back all training materials used for the law enforcement and national security communities, in order to eliminate all references to Islam that some Muslim groups have claimed are offensive.

“I recently directed all components of the Department of Justice to re-evaluate their training efforts in a range of areas, from community outreach to national security,” Cole told a panel at the George Washington University law school.

Now, much of the focus in law enforcement training materials is on “domestic extremists”.  We are being told that “domestic extremism” is just as great a threat to our national security as terror groups overseas are.

But exactly who are these “domestic extremists”?

Well, the truth is that you may be one of them.

I want to share with you a list that I have shared in a couple of previous articles.  It is a list of 72 types of Americans that are considered to be “extremists” or “potential terrorists” in official U.S. government documents.  This list will really give you a good idea of what Barack Obama means when he uses the word “extremist”.  Each of these 72 items is linked, so if you would like to go see the original source document for yourself, just click on the link.  As you can see, this list potentially includes most of the country…

1.Those that talk about “individual liberties”

2.Those that advocate for states’ rights

3.Those that want “to make the world a better place”

4.“The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule”

5.Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists”

6.Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations”

7. Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful,or undesirable”

8.Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”

9.Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals”

10.“Anti-Gay”

11.“Anti-Immigrant”

12.“Anti-Muslim”

13.“The Patriot Movement”

14.“Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”

15.Members of the Family Research Council

16.Members of the American Family Association

17.Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union’”

18.Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol

19.Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform

20.Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition

21.Members of the Christian Action Network

22.Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”

23.Anyone that is engaged in “conspiracy theorizing”

24.Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21

25.Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps

26.Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations”

27.The militia movement

28.The sovereign citizen movement

29.Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”

30.Anyone that “complains about bias”

31.Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”

32.Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies”

33.Anyone that “visits extremist websites/blogs” 

34. Anyone that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views”

35.Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes”

36.Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance”

37.Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”

38. Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons”

39.Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”

40.“Militia or unorganized militia”

41.“General right-wing extremist”

42.Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.

43.Those that refer to an “Army of God”

44.Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”

45.Those that are “anti-global”

46.Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”

47.Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”

48.Those that “believe in conspiracy theories”

49.Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack”

50.Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”

51.Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”

52.Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”

53.Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”

54.Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”

55.Anyone that is “anti-abortion”

56.Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”

57.Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”

58.“Rightwing extremists”

59.“Returning veterans”

60.Those concerned about “illegal immigration”

61.Those that “believe in the right to bear arms”

62.Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling”

63.Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes”

64.“Anti-abortion activists”

65.Those that are against illegal immigration

66.Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner

67.Those that have a negative view of the United Nations

68.Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes”

69.Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr

70.Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”)

71.Those that believe in “end times” prophecies

72.Evangelical Christians

Do you fit into any of those categories?

Personally, I fit into a couple dozen of them.

That is why alarm bells should go off whenever Barack Obama speaks of the need to crack down on “extremism”.

If Barack Obama wants to denounce Islamic terror, he should do so.  But because of his extreme political correctness, he goes out of his way to avoid any connection between Islam and terror.  Instead, he speaks of the need to recognize “Islam’s role in advancing justice, progress, tolerance, and the dignity of all human beings” and he insists that “the future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”

Meanwhile, our liberties and freedoms are being eroded a little bit more with each passing day.  In the name of fighting “terrorism” or “extremism”, our government is constructing a Big Brother police state control grid all around us.  I like the way that Ron Paul described what is happening to us just the other day…

If Americans were honest with themselves they would acknowledge that the Republic is no more. We now live in a police state. If we do not recognize and resist this development, freedom and prosperity for all Americans will continue to deteriorate. All liberties in America today are under siege.

It didn’t happen overnight. It took many years of neglect for our liberties to be given away so casually for a promise of security from the politicians. The tragic part is that the more security was promised — physical and economic — the less liberty was protected.

With cradle-to-grave welfare protecting all citizens from any mistakes and a perpetual global war on terrorism, which a majority of Americans were convinced was absolutely necessary for our survival, our security and prosperity has been sacrificed.

It was all based on lies and ignorance. Many came to believe that their best interests were served by giving up a little freedom now and then to gain a better life.

The trap was set. At the beginning of a cycle that systematically undermines liberty with delusions of easy prosperity, the change may actually seem to be beneficial to a few. But to me that’s like excusing embezzlement as a road to leisure and wealth — eventually payment and punishment always come due. One cannot escape the fact that a society’s wealth cannot be sustained or increased without work and productive effort. Yes, some criminal elements can benefit for a while, but reality always sets in.

Reality is now setting in for America and for that matter for most of the world. The piper will get his due even if “the children” have to suffer. The deception of promising “success” has lasted for quite a while. It was accomplished by ever-increasing taxes, deficits, borrowing, and printing press money. In the meantime the policing powers of the federal government were systematically and significantly expanded. No one cared much, as there seemed to be enough “gravy” for the rich, the poor, the politicians, and the bureaucrats.

The country that our forefathers founded is dying.

Now, individuals and organizations that attempt to restore the values that our founders once believed in so strongly are regarded as dangerous “extremists” that need to be watched carefully.

Sadly, most Americans don’t even realize what is happening to this nation.  As long as they are fed a constant diet of mindless entertainment, most Americans are perfectly content to let “the experts” do their thinking for them.

We are steamrolling toward oblivion, and most of the country is dead asleep.

So is there any hope for us?

The Weak Jesus of Modern Churchianity

“Judge not, lest you be judged”;  “Compassion and tolerance”; “Meekness”; “love”; “Never a harsh word”.

Those are a sampling of the scriptures and sentiments used to render Christianity  in this country and the West – impotent and of no power.  Modern Christianity has constructed an entirely new Jesus for itself.  A Jesus whom would never utter an angry word of condemnation, would never fight or go to war, who does not condemn sin or expect His followers to overcome sin.  Churchianity has decided to make those tenets it’s primary doctrine rather than to transform the world by encouraging repentance.  That teaches instead that we are to be “tolerant” of the sinful world and not to “judge the world” by condemning sin. Because it is now said that to condemn the sin is to condemn the sinner, because the sin defines who the sinner truly is.  And they say, Jesus would not judge someone for who they are.

Christianity, once a bulwark to the oppressive unGodliness and tyranny of men, has become conformed to the world, in order to believe a deception that there is nothing in this world Jesus would fight or stand against.

This sentiment, plaguing the Christian church is one of the major reasons Christianity is being shoved out of the culture and into the closet by secular hedonists.  Christians are no longer standing, they are bowing down and surrendering the culture without a fight because they have been deceived into thinking being Christian means loving and accepting everything under the doctrine of tolerance.  Praying for our enemies now means we should accommodate and make exceptions for our enemies to oppress us.  Doing so is the highest form of Christian tolerance.

But Satan is NOT tolerant, and this secular culture that has replaced the Christian culture is the most INTOLERANT of any dissent, belief or practice outside of Islam itself.

The weak Jesus of modern Churchianity is being steamrolled and crushed by secularism, debauchery and  political apathy.  It is no wonder why Islam is conquering the globe while Secularists apologize for and are allied with them in their shared quest to rid the world of Christianity.

So who is the real Jesus?  The meek and lowly waif and figure of modern abandonment theology that only loves and forgives and pours out blessings?  Or is there something modern Christians are missing?

The Real Jesus

By Jim O’Brien

I don’t know exactly when it was that I looked at the picture behind the preacher on Sunday morning and said to myself “That picture is a fake!” but I do remember saying it in Sunday School class.  It didn’t earn any gold stars.
 
Maybe it was after reading Paul’s statement that “nature itself teaches you that long hair on a man is a disgrace” (1 Cor. 11:14 GNB) I couldn’t envision the Apostle Paul saying that if Jesus had sported long hair.
 
Nor was he handsome. In fact Isaiah’s description of the Messiah says “there was nothing attractive about him, nothing that would draw us to him.” (Isaiah 53:2 GNB)
 
It could have been when I first realized that any man who had grown up working in construction during the 1st Century A.D. would of necessity be a brawny guy. The picture just didn’t look very tough.
 
The picture on the wall did not look like the Christ who will return to the earth to make war described in Revelation 19:11-16.
 
“And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war.  His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns
 
And the armies which were in heaven followed him upon white horses.  And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.
 
And he hath on his vesture and on his thigh a name written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS.” 
 
The typical picture of Jesus often overlooks the account of Jesus throwing out the moneychangers from the temple. (Matt. 21:12) How many moneychangers where there?  The Bible doesn’t say.  But it was a large area so one could reasonably expect it to be several, maybe a score or more.  No wimpy man could physically throw out that many men and turn over their means of doing business.  That was my kind of guy.
 
There is the Jesus that painted a verbal picture of carnality and said  “for after all these things do the Gentiles seek.” (Matt. 6:32 KJV)  

Jesus was too strong to be confined by politically correct speech. As in the time when he called the political and religious leaders of his day a bunch of snakes the children of snakes and asked how they could escape hell. (Matt. 23:33) That’s the kind of statement that makes the heart of an Irishman beat strong.
 
It’s also the kind of statement that makes me think something has been lost from mainstream Christianity.
 
The other day some news analysts were discussing the recent revelation of the sins of Tiger Woods, the golf phenom. It’s hard to pass a check out counter at the super market without reading about his loss of income and speculation about an impending divorce. So someone asked if Tiger can make an emotional recovery from the sins of the past. Brit Hume replied:  

“The extent to which he can recover, it seems to me, depends on his faith. He is said to be a Buddhist. I don’t think that faith offers the kind of forgiveness and redemption that is offered by the Christian faith. So, my message to Tiger would be, ‘Tiger, turn to the Christian faith and you can make a total recovery and be a great example to the world.”
 
The reaction to Hume’s statement was predictable. A writer for the Washington Post demanded that Hume apologize because he had offended about half a billion Buddhists. Funny, there are over two billion Christians on the earth and multiple thousands being persecuted, some martyred almost on a daily basis around the world by Buddhists, Hindus and Muslims yet the American press seems strangely unconcerned about the offense caused to Christians.
 
Maybe the reason is that mainstream Christians resemble more the picture on the wall at the front of church than they do the man who stood alone against a mob intent on stoning a woman taken in adultery.
 
Maybe Christianity needs an infusion of the real Jesus, not the picture on the wall.