Obama Defiant. Will Continue To Import ISIS Jihadists Into America Under The Guise Of ‘Refugees’

Obama is hell-bent on importing the Islamic State’s Army into the United States and gets belligerent when facts showcase his complicity in treason.

Obama mocks Republicans – ‘afraid of widows and orphans’ and give yet another big middle finger, declaring those opposed to his plan are people filled with hysteria and “exaggeration of risks”.

Exaggeration of the risk????

Hey ARSEHOLE!  Is what happened here by ‘refugees’ in France an exaggeration????

Widows and orphans???

HOURS AFTER OBAMA TAUNTS GOP WITH ‘WIDOWS’ FEMALE SUICIDE BOMBER EXPLODES IN PARIS

But none of that matters to the Dictator in the White House who is busy once again trashing Americans from a foreign country.

Then he flips America yet another bird with this gem this morning attempting to create support for his national suicide campaign:

WHITE HOUSE LAUNCHES #REFUGEESWELCOME HASHTAG

The Obama administration launched a hashtag last night to promote the concept of welcoming Syrian refugees into the United States after a growing number of governors proposed halting the program after the terrorist attacks in Paris.

Like Stormtroopers marching in perfect unison,  the lying sacks of filth that make up Obama’s government are all in goose-step with Obama’s insistence that all refugees will be”properly vetted” and “screened”.

.

Yet the FBI director himself said that this is nonsense because this is a ‘different situation’ and we can only screen and vet Syrians that have once upon a time run across US officials.  THERE IS NO DATABASE from which to cross reference those who claim they need asylum inside the USA.

.

But it just doesn’t matter.  What Obama wants, Obama gets and his Praetorians are there to make sure of it.  Obama’s stooge Loretta Lynch insists that they can make their own databases and do interviews and essentially said the FBI was wrong.

.

So who are we going to trust?  Our Noble Leader Obama? Or your own lying eyes?

But it gets more insane.  The same day that Loretta Lynch says that we CAN properly vet every single Syrian refugee’ – Obama says HE WILL VETO ANY ATTEMPT TO IMPOSE STRICTER VETTING PROCESSES.

As the few remaining lawmakers with eyes to see in the United States work to contain Obama’s madness to import ISIS fighters hiding among ‘refugees’, Obama will hamstring those efforts and said today HE WOULD VETO ANY BILL THAT SCRUTINIZES THE REFUGEES.

President Barack Obama would veto a proposal from Republican lawmakers in the U.S. House of Representatives for additional scrutiny of refugees from Syria or Iraq, the White House said on Wednesday.

“This legislation would introduce unnecessary and impractical requirements that would unacceptably hamper our efforts to assist some of the most vulnerable people in the world,” the White House said in a statement.

Get that?  Understand?  OBAMA IS GOING TO VETO ANY ATTEMPT TO VERIFY AND SCRUTINIZE THESE ‘REFUGEES’.

As His Heinous throws down the gauntlet daring anyone to stop his importation of the Caliphate’s soldiers (62% of Syrian ‘refugees’ are military age men), ISIS fighters with fake passports pretending to be refugees are being caught attempting to get into the US.

Today Honduras arrested 5 Syrian “Refugees” and St. Maarten arrests 3 Syrian ‘Refugees’ with fake Greek passports attempting to get into the USA. on flights originating from from Haiti

BREAKING: Honduras Arrests Five Syrians With Fake Greek Passports Heading To U.S.A. – Three More Arrested In St. Maarten

But Obama and his storm trooping Marxist sycophants ignore this news and double-down on the ridicule and hatred against anyone who opposes Obama importing fighters from ISIS inside the US.

Not only this, but once these soldiers from ISIS arrive into the United States, Obama’s State Department says they can ‘Go wherever they want inside the USA’.

State Dept.: Refugees can go ‘wherever they want to go’

The State Department said Tuesday that it believes state governors have little say over whether they will house refugees from Syria or anywhere else in the world, and that once they arrive, refugees can choose to live in any state they want.

“They can ultimately choose wherever they want to go,” State Department spokesman Mark Toner told reporters.

While Obama demands to import Muslims – his regime is DEPORTING Christians and REFUSING to accept Christians who are being systematically slaughtered from the Mid-East:

No room in America for Christian refugees

America is about to accept 9000 Syrian Muslims, refugees of the brutal war between the Assad regime and its Sunni opposition, which includes ISIS, Al Qaeda, and various other militias. That number is predicted to increase each year.  There are no Christian refugees that will be admitted.

Why? Because the Department of State is adhering with all the rigidity of a Soviet era bureaucracy to the rule that only people at risk from massacres launched by the regime qualify for refugee status. The rapes of Christian women and the butchery of Christian children do not count. No matter how moved Americans were this Christmas season by the plight of their fellow Christ followers in Syria and Iraq, no matter how horrific the visuals of beheadings, enslavement, and mass murder, the Christians fleeing death do not engender the compassion of this president.

The Christians are being raped, tortured, and murdered by militias, not by the Syrian government. This technicality condemns them to continue to be victims without hope. And this technicality is being adhered to with all the tenacity with which President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s State Department manipulated quotas and created subterfuges  to keep out the Jews fleeing the oppression of Nazi Germany. Obama no more wants the Middle East’s Christian refugees than Roosevelt wanted Europe’s Jewish refugees.

We have seen in the last several weeks that President Obama has no difficulty using his “phone and his pen,” as he dramatically boasts, to circumvent the law. When it comes to immigration, he had no difficulty enacting an amnesty that a federal judge  subsequently ruled unconstitutional. He has had no problem circumventing Congress to change the relationship with Cuba. This president has shown that he will push back on the constraints of law when he wants to get something done.

But there are not even such constraints when it comes to the Middle East’s Christians fleeing the brutality of ISIS and Al Qaeda. The Department of State chooses to adhere to a definition of refugees as people persecuted by their own government. What difference does it make which army imperils the lives of innocent Christians?  Christians are still be slaughtered for being Christian, and their government is incapable of protecting them. Does some group have to come along—as Jewish groups did during the Holocaust—and sardonically guarantee that these are real human beings?

The Christians would barely have to be vetted for ties to terror organizations, which by their very nature do not take Christians. Meanwhile, there is the uncomfortable issue that among the Sunni refugees there are some in league with the Sunni terror militias. And beyond that there is the equally uncomfortable question of the acculturation of segments of the Muslim community.

When Obama threw his little hissy fit at the G-20 and declared that only accepting Christian refugees “Is not who we are” Obama applies Alinsky’s Rule to ridicule the truth to promote lies.

The turn is that Obama himself is REJECTING Syrian and Iraqi Christians from asylum or refugee status.

ISIS Genocide Victims Do Not Include Christians, the State Department Rules

Christians are to be excluded from an impending official United States government declaration of ISIS genocide. If true, it would reflect a familiar pattern within the administration of a politically correct bias that views Christians — even non-Western congregations such as those in Iraq and Syria — never as victims but always as Inquisition-style oppressors.

…Yazidis, according to the story by investigative reporter Michael Isikoff, are going to be officially recognized as genocide victims, and rightly so. Yet Christians, who are also among the most vulnerable religious minority groups that have been deliberately and mercilessly targeted for eradication by ISIS, are not. This is not an academic matter. A genocide designation would have significant policy implications for American efforts to restore property and lands taken from the minority groups and for offers of aid, asylum, and other protections to such victims. Worse, it would mean that, under the Genocide Convention, the United States and other governments would not be bound to act to suppress or even prevent the genocide of these Christians.

Get the picture of what Obama is doing yet folks?

Benedict Arnold or the Rosenbergs cannot hold a CANDLE to what Obama and his party are currently doing.

They are deliberately facilitating national suicide.

Obama and his entire cabinet need to be arrested and tried for treason.

The Genocidal Treason Of Barack Hussein Obama

The intent and legacy of America’s first defacto Muslim-Marxist dictator will be the deaths of millions orchestrated by his agenda.

Daniel Greenfield posts as blatantly an honest and truthful examination of the fruits of what Obama has set in motion as anything else I have read of late.

Where I differ with his analysis, is that Obama is not committing treason to satisfy some perverted idea that Iran will be rational with nuclear weapons.   Obama is committing treason in order set the stage for America’s “punishment”.  The Obamanation intends to make the USA desolate and then subjugated or destroyed.  He doesn’t care which.  Subjugated to Islam, subjugated to Mexico …or just plain obliterated, makes no difference so long as it’s white religious and Conservative inhabitants are exterminated in order for global authoritarianism to flourish.   Obama is all about the task of destroying and pulverizing into dust, the existing nation of America.  Whether or not the country is remade into a socialist paradise or a mass grave – makes no difference to the Pen and Phone dictator.  Fundamental transformation meant destroying what America was, in total.  Telling the nation that he has “laid a new foundation” was treason, when We The People did not authorize the nation to lay a ‘new foundation’ in despotic Socialism.

He thinks himself a god-king, and such mindsets of despotic leaders with utopianist visions have led to the greatest genocidal slaughters in history.  Yet America slumbers, thinking Obama and his agenda is just another election cycle, having no clue what has been done to them all, nor a care in the world about what is about to happen to the entire country.

And it is not only here in the USA that Obama will have the blood of millions on his hands.  He already has them soaked in the blood of tens of thousands of Libyans, Egyptians, Iraqi Christians and coalition partners in Iraq, and the genocide taking place in Syria.  Obama got the Jihadist Arab Spring upheaval started by making it policy to overthrow every single secular dictator in the Middle East and replacing them with Islamists hell-bent on establishing a Caliphate.  He and Hillary were running heavy weapons out of the Benghazi Consulate to what has become ISIS, aiding their rise and slaughter across the Levant and the MidEast. While Obama flies in tens of THOUSANDS of fighting-age Islamic men claiming to be Syrian “refugees”, Obama has rejected Yazidi and MIddle Eastern Christians who are on the verge of extermination, and is DEPORTING Iraqi Christians who are already in the United States BACK to ISIS in Iraq.

Obama has not only betrayed America – he has betrayed the entire Western civilization to it’s coming ruin and annihilation.  No wonder the Death Cult of Iranian Jihadists see Obama as the fulfillment of a 17th Century Hadith – the tall black man from the West who will bring the world to it’s knees for the coming Mahdi and the establishment of a global Islamic Caliphate.

OBAMA’S GENOCIDAL TREASON

Obama’s final legacy may be the death of millions of Americans.

By Daniel Greenfield.

No government has the blood of more American soldiers on its hands today than the government of Iran. From Lebanon to Afghanistan to Saudi Arabia to Iraq, Iran has been killing American soldiers for decades.

241 in Beirut. 19 at the Khobar Towers. Over 500 in Iraq and Afghanistan. The last time the United States officially fought Iran was under Reagan. But Iran has never stopped killing Americans. There is no reason to believe that it will stop once it has the nuclear weapons that Obama is helping its leaders obtain.

The last time left-wing radicals aided the nuclear program of an open enemy of the United States, they were put on trial for it. The sentencing judge at the time said that because “the nature of Russian terrorism is now self-evident” there was no further room for claims that no harm had been done.

“I believe your conduct in putting into the hands of the Russians the A-bomb years before our best scientists predicted Russia would perfect the bomb has already caused, in my opinion, the Communist aggression in Korea, with the resultant casualties exceeding 50,000 and who knows but that millions more of innocent people may pay the price of your treason. Indeed, by your betrayal you undoubtedly have altered the course of history to the disadvantage of our country,” Judge Kaufman stated.

These words of the Rosenberg verdict apply equally well to Obama’s betrayal on Iran. What the Rosenbergs did for Stalin, Obama did for the Ayatollah Khamenei.

Obama’s dirty nuclear deal with Iran has already sped along Iran’s aggression across the region. The more concessions Obama, Hillary Clinton and John Kerry made, the more aggressive Iran became. It’s now involved in wars across the region that have already dragged the United States into its reach.

If Iran is allowed to go nuclear, these wars will become much worse and much more devastating.

This isn’t just Chamberlain. It’s Vidkun Quisling and Philippe Pétain. It’s not bad judgment. It’s treason. Obama has not merely appeased Iran out of fear; he sympathizes with its anti-American grievances. As he told his negotiators, Iran’s rulers feel “vulnerable” because of how America “meddled” in “their democracy” and that its anti-Americanism is a “defensive” reaction to “avoid repeats of the past.”

Obama identifies with the anti-American resentments of Muslim terrorists instead of the suffering of their victims. His foreign policy has been based on empowering the enemies of the United States to turn their grievances into a “defense” against American influence and intervention. He has done it from Cuba to Iran, backing Communist and Muslim Brotherhood tyrants. But his Iranian deal is his bloodiest crime.

The nuclear deal will empower Iran to act out its resentments by killing millions.

The nuclear bomb isn’t just a weapon. It’s an instrument of genocide. It’s an existential threat to our civilization and our way of life. The spies who helped the USSR go nuclear weren’t just passing along information about a weapon; they transformed a military conflict into a permanent global crisis in which the very fate of humanity rested on the greed and power of brutal aging ideologues in Moscow.

By clearing Iran’s path to the bomb, Obama has transformed the slow conflicts of conventional terrorism into a catastrophic civilizational crisis. An Iranian nuclear bomb will not sneak up on us the way that the demographic crisis of Muslim migration and its accompanying terrorism have. It will not be an incremental problem. A nuclear arms race between Sunnis and Shiites in which terrorists on both sides wield nuclear weapons will make the entire structure of Western civilization unsustainable.

9/11 saw a few jets used to devastate a city. The next wave of weapons will kill millions, not thousands.

The traitors who turned the USSR into a power capable of destroying the world were motivated by the same hidden agenda as the proponents of the Iran nuclear deal. They believed that an American nuclear monopoly would lead to arrogance and warmongering. They were convinced that American power had to be checked by seeing to it that the Soviet Union could match Uncle Sam, nuke for nuke.

Those who have opened the nuclear gates to Tehran today believe that a nuclear Iran will be a deterrent against American imperialism in the region. Their number includes Barack Obama.

After having failed with the Muslim Brotherhood, Obama intends to make Iranian power into a deterrent against future military interventions by a Republican successor. If he can get “Tehran Joe” Biden, a notorious sympathizer of the Iran Lobby, to watch the store while Iran goes nuclear, Iran will dominate the region the way that the Soviet Union dominated Eastern Europe.

Obama’s terrorist treason gambles that Iran will be, “rational”, that its leaders will be Khrushchevs, willing to press where they sense weakness, rather than Stalins, who are willing to kill millions for power. Leftist appeasers of Iran, in and out of the administration, obsessively cling to the belief that the Islamic regime in Iran is rational because it allows them to evade the responsibility if the world burns.

They rationalize their treason by insisting that Iran’s leaders and fevered mobs don’t really mean it when they shriek, “Death to America”. If Iran’s leader did mean it, the Senate Democrats toeing the mad party line, the media leftists chattering White House talking points, the intellectuals who recall meeting Iranian diplomats at cocktail parties, and their leader, Obama, would all be accessories to genocide.

Obama’s Iran pathway rationalized treason at every step, made every compromise seem inevitable and reasonable, minimized the final catastrophic betrayal by presenting his version of a nuclear Iran as the only possible alternative to a nuclear Iran. Like Benedict Arnold, he had whittled away all other options except defeat or treason so as to make the latter seem like the sensible and even the patriotic option.

Stalin’s nuclear traitors used the same logic, negotiating each betrayal as the only alternative to war, only to inflict the Cold War and the terror of nuclear annihilation on entire generations. After having spent so long denouncing the Cold War they had caused with their diplomatic, political and even military support for Stalin’s ambitions, they have finally arranged to bring back the Cold War.

And if it all goes wrong, the blame is meant to fall on the “right-wing warmongers” who alienated Iran, just as their predecessors had done to the USSR, not the leftist sympathizers who had endowed the enemies of civilization with the power to destroy civilization.

Obama has betrayed America. He has betrayed the American victims of Iranian terror. He has betrayed the American soldiers who were murdered, maimed and tortured by Iran’s terrorist armies. He has betrayed hundreds of millions of Americans in the homeland who will be forced to raise their children under the shadow of Iran’s nuclear terror.

His nuclear treason isn’t just a betrayal of America. For the first time since the end of the Cold War, it makes the mass murder of millions of Americans by a vicious enemy possible once again.

Obama has impoverished millions of Americans, he has the blood of soldiers and police officers on his hands, but his final legacy may be collaboration in an act of mass murder that would rival Adolf Hitler.

A Nuclear 9-11 Is Now Assured

Thanks to the traitors in the Obama Regime, the Democrat Party and the GOP Leadership under Mitch McConnell – on the eve of the 9-11 Anniversary, America surrenders to Islamists and secures Nukes for Iran

Need I say more?  McConnell orchestrated an Obama/Jihadist victory in what he SHOULD HAVE DEEMED A TREATY – but REFUSED to do so and fast-tracked Obama’s dictatorial “Executive agreement” a WEEK AHEAD OF SCHEDULE to ensure the Harry-Reid promised filibuster would kill any vote to ‘disapprove’ of Obama’s treason to the Iranian Ayatollah.

As usual, McConnell played wheeler-dealer and refused to abide by his oath to the Constitution and went right along with the usurpation of the Treaty Claus that will enact Obama’s plan to fund and green-light a path for Iran’s nuclear program that their leaders have said WILL BE USED against “The Great and Little Satan” (America and Israel).

McConnell and the Senate HAD NO AUTHORITY to surrender the Treaty Clause of the Constitution and rewrite the rules to allow what took place today – the very eve of the anniversary of 9-11.  He played to Obama’s wishes like a good little puppet.

Coincidence?

Only if you think like an ignorant imbecile that is totally clueless of what is going on, and/or you get all your news from the mainstream media.

Mark this date: 9-10-15, for it will be the date that Mitch McConnell, the GOP leadership enabled traitors in Washington D.C. to sow the seeds of our own annihilation, and the blood of millions will be on their hands and heads.

My prayer is that enough of the remnant will remember who was responsible for what horrors are to come, so that these treasonous bastards will be held swiftly to account.

Obama Has Made Treason The New Patriotism

Giving Iran nukes, aiding, arming and comforting Jihadists around the world is patriotism.  Oppose Obama and be declared a traitor as Obama’s Orwellian nightmare continues .

Yesterday, Obama removed Iran and it’s jihadist proxy Hezbollah from the list of terror threats to the USA.  In the process of unilaterally handing Iranian Mullahs a “deal” – Obama scrubs from official records that Iran and it’s Jihadist proxy army are terror threats.  This will now magically declare that Iran is a state that should be welcomed to have nuclear weapons (despite the fact it has sworn to wipe Israel off the face of the earth and chants ‘Death to America!’ every Friday after prayers).

I have already blogged on Obama’s treason, to circumvent Congress and impose treaties on his own power.  But Daniel Greenfield at the Sultan Knish blog – lays out Obama’s new Patriotism, which is nothing less than treason.  Treason that in Obama’s mind, is only treason if anyone dares oppose him.

 

Obama’s Treason is the New Patriotism

Posted by Daniel Greenfield @ the Sultan Knish blog

When Republicans complained that Obama refused to talk about Islamic terrorism, he accused them of playing into the hands of ISIS by demanding that he identify the enemy we’re fighting.

When they spoke out against his Iranian nuclear sellout, he accused them of “wanting to make common cause with the hardliners in Iran”. Those hardliners would presumably toe a harder line than Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei who responded to Obama’s outreach in his first term by saying, “The Islamic peoples all over the world chant ‘Death to America!’” and who stated last year that “This battle will only end when the society can get rid of the oppressors’ front with America at the head of it.”

(The Supreme Leader of a country which stones teenage rape victims and rapes teenage girls so that they don’t die as virgins, also claimed that “The European races are barbaric.”)

If the moderate Supreme Leader that Obama is dealing with wants Death to America, what could the real hardliners want for America that’s even worse than death? A third term of Obama?

Meanwhile Joe Biden, Obama’s number two, accused Republicans of undermining Obama. This would be the same Biden who threatened to impeach President Bush if he bombed Iran’s nuclear program and who blasted Bush and the idea of an Axis of Evil at a fundraiser in the home of a pro-Iran figure.

Biden undermined President Bush’s efforts to rein in Iran’s terrorism by voting against listing the Revolutionary Guard, which was supplying weapons to help the Taliban kill American soldiers, as a terrorist group (a position he shared with Kerry, Hagel and Obama) and berating Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice for not negotiating with Iran and Assad.

The toadying of “Tehran Joe” to Iran had already reached its absolute lowest point when Biden responded to the terrorist attacks of September 11 by suggesting, “Seems to me this would be a good time to send, no strings attached, a check for $200 million to Iran.”

The administration that Biden is part of has instead been releasing $490 million a month to Iran.

Biden, along with Kerry and Hagel, became notorious as the Tehran Trio during the Bush years for their advocacy for Iran and Assad, and their appearances at pro-Iranian lobbying groups and fundraisers despite criticism from Iranian democracy advocates. Biden, Kerry and Hagel, Obama’s VP, the Secretary of State and the former Secretary of Defense, all appeared at American-Iranian Council events, a group whose founder stated that he is “the Iranian lobby in the United States.”

Treason doesn’t get more treasonous than that.

Obama and Biden, along with their political allies, are trying to spin their shameless pandering to a terrorist state as patriotic and opposition to it as treasonous. The New York Daily News denounced senators opposed to an Obama deal giving Iran the ability to develop and deploy nuclear weapons as “Traitors”. The administration’s social media allies’ hashtag dubbed Republicans opposed to Iran’s nuclear weapons as #47Traitors.

Traitors oppose terrorists getting nuclear weapons. Patriots like Joe Biden not only support it, but they blast a president trying to stop it while collecting $30,000 at a pro-Iranian fundraiser.

“Treason doth never prosper: what’s the reason?” Sir John Harrington cynically observed. “Why, if it prosper, none dare call it treason.” But the Elizabethan courtier left out that when traitors rule, patriotism becomes treason. Obama commits treason and taunts his critics as traitors.

Republicans who want to see American leadership rise to the challenge of ISIS and Iran are accused of collaborating with ISIS and Iran by an administration that willfully lied and misrepresented the growth of ISIS for as long as it could and that is now doing the same thing for Iran’s nuclear threat.

Obama lied and claimed that ISIS was no threat even when it was taking over entire cities. Only overt genocide by ISIS forced him into his current stumbling action against it. Now the same sports fan who dubbed ISIS a “Jayvee” team not worth bothering with accuses Republicans of playing into its hands.

Sensible people consider letting a terrorist group win to be “playing into its hands”. Left-wing apologists for terror however claim that fighting terrorists “plays into their hands”. In the same inverted worldview in which patriotism becomes treason and treason becomes patriotism, what terrorists want most is for you to bomb them to oblivion while what they fear most is that you’ll just stand there and let them kill you.

Now Obama suggests that critics of his Iran nuclear sellout are playing into the hands of some imaginary hardliners who want America to bomb its nuclear program. These imaginary hardliners, like the imaginary terrorists, want to sabotage their own efforts to achieve their goals. And only Obama stands between them and the failure of their terroristic and nuclear ambitions. That’s why he’s a patriot.

And if you can follow all that, you qualify for a gig as the State Department’s new spokesperson.

Ignoring terrorists is patriotic. Fighting them is unpatriotic. Dealing with their actual beliefs is unpatriotic. Pretending that they have no beliefs, no matter how impossible it makes it to predict their actions and fight them, is patriotic. Stopping Iran from getting nuclear weapons is unpatriotic. The patriotic thing to do is to cut a deal that will let Iran go the way of North Korea.

Through the intercession of Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton struck a non-binding agreement with North Korea on its nuclear weapons program. Like Obama’s Iran deal, the Senate never got to ratify it. Secretary of State Madeline Albright stated that “the framework agreement is one of the best things that the administration has done because it stopped a nuclear weapons program in North Korea.” It didn’t.

During his original campaign, Obama said, “We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon.” That should sound familiar. Bill Clinton said during his first term in office, “North Korea cannot be allowed to develop a nuclear bomb.” North Korea could and did. Bill Clinton knew all along that it could and would.

The rhetoric from back then also sounds familiar. Congressman Obey warned that Republicans dropping millions in fuel oil for North Korea was “mindbogglingly reckless.” The Honolulu Star-Bulletin urged “Stop GOP Meddling in Foreign Affairs.” Gore ranted that Republicans were “determined to wreck a presidency in order to recapture it” and accused them of “isolationism and defeatism”.

The Republicans were right. North Korea got the bomb and a lot of freebies from American taxpayers. The men and women responsible for supporting that disastrously treasonous policy slimed them for it. Now we’re in a repeat with many of the same politicians and pundits arguing that the only way to stop Iran from getting the bomb is by not doing anything to stop it from getting the bomb.

The first rule of treason is to call the other guy a traitor. Having aligned with everyone from Castro to the Supreme Leader of Iran, Obama has to make it seem as if it’s the Republicans who are the traitors.

An administration of political hacks who spent the Bush years undermining the White House in every way possible short of officially defecting to the enemy now claim that dissent from their policy is treason. And they top that by reversing the motives of Iran and ISIS so that instead of wanting to destroy America, they really want to be criticized by Republicans and prevented from getting nuclear weapons.

This gibberish shouldn’t be able to fool any thinking person, but the idea that Kim Jong-Il wanted food, not nuclear weapons, when his entire policy had been the exact opposite, shouldn’t have gotten by anyone with an elementary knowledge of history and at least a single living brain cell.

But it did.

No one wants to be a member of a party of traitors or of a government of traitors. Clinton and Obama didn’t accidentally stumble into their policies. They were guided by a deep rotten belief that the United States was always wrong and that the enemy, no matter how evil, had a legitimate grievance.

They can’t admit to this treasonous idea, even though they repeat it constantly in various forms, so their only defense is to claim that their treason is patriotism and that anyone who disagrees is a traitor.

 

 

White House Marxists Calls Republicans “Traitors” To Obama’s Iran Nuke Plan – Pot, Kettle, Black

Democrat Marxists go berserk over letter GOP Senators wrote to Iran in opposition to Obama’s unilateral plan to allow Iran to make nukes, ignoring their own history of sabotaging Presidents, Policies and Comforting Enemies of the United States.

The New York Daily News headlined its front page “traitors” in reference to Republicans who wrote a letter to the Iranian regime informing them about our Constitutional process so that whatever secret deals they make with Obama about their nukes – Congress will have a say in the ultimate decision.

The House Republicans had to take this position because Obama had already stated he was going to implement a nuclear agreement with the Jihadist Iranian regime CIRCUMVENTING CONGRESS – and acting in secret with Iranian’s Mullahs which will allow them to create nuclear weapons over time – a deal in which Obama has no such authority to make.  Essentially the Senate Republicans stated what their Constitutional roles and duties are according to the Supreme Law of our land, a statement that Leftist Moonbats and the Obama regime have said or implied is TREASON.  Not treason to the Constitution which their letter to Iran details – rather treason to Obama and a bastardization of an obscure act their party’s members have always skirted in their own historical aid and comfort of America’s enemies.

Obama went so far as to accuse them of what he, himself has been engaging in.  Obama accused the Republicans of aligning themselves with ‘Iran’s Hardliners” which could not be further from the truth, given the actual content of the letter itself – but the media narrative is what Obama’s narrative is, and the truth is whatever Obama says it is.

Leftists in the regime and their storm trooping “progressive” sycophants are demanding criminal charges be filed and arrests made against  these Republicans for violating The Logan Act.

A White House Petition to arrest and charge the Senate with treason has reached over 200,000 signatures – and it will be interesting to see if the Dictator will truly find his inner Che and do what Fidel would do to his political opposition by ridiculous re-interpretation of laws to benefit his sole intent to impose omnipresent authority.

It’s interesting that when Democrats have written, met with or used backchannels to undermine Nixon, Reagan and the Bushs’ foreign policies – such declarations of treason (and some of it decidedly was) were never made and pursued.  But Marxists are in this for their glorious complete revolution – and in keeping with their history – all Revolutionistas demand blood flow when their revolutions reach the absolute power stage.

Which is where we are nearly at.

Laugh this off at your own peril – these despots are deadly serious and they will not permit anyone to get in Obama’s way of handing our enemies the means to wipe us out of existence.

Showdown Between White House, Democrats and Republicans Over Iran Just Got Uglier

The showdown between the White House, Democrats and Republicans just got a whole lot uglier.

The latest clash comes after 47 Senators sent a letter directly to Iranian leaders yesterday explaining that the President of the United States doesn’t have unilateral authority to make a deal with the regime. They also warned if President Obama acts alone and doesn’t consult Congress before making a deal, the deal will be considered temporary.

…As a refresher, controversy between the White House and Republicans on Capitol Hill started in January when House Speaker John Boehner invited Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to address a joint session of Congress and to warn the world about the threat of a nuclear Iran. Boehner did this without first consulting the White House. After Netanyahu accepted the invitation and delivered his speech last week, former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi claimed she nearly cried because she was so offended. Leading up to the speech, White House National Security Advisor Susan Rice claimed Netanyahu’s speech would “tear at the fabric” of the U.S.-Israeli relationship while other White House officials warned his remarks could torpedo U.S. talks with Iran over a deal regarding their nuclear program.

“Biden wrote in a scathing letter: “The decision to undercut our President and circumvent our constitutional system offends me as a matter of principle. As a matter of policy, the letter and its authors have also offered no viable alternative to the diplomatic resolution with Iran that their letter seeks to undermine.”

Last night, President Obama accused Republicans of aligning themselves with Iranian “hardliners” for sending the letter.

“I think it’s somewhat ironic to see some members for Congress wanting to make common cause with the hard-liners in Iran,” Obama said. “It’s an unusual coalition.”

The White House has been clear that any deal with Iran will not be a treaty and therefore will not require ratification from Congress.

Meanwhile the Iranians who fund the world’s largest terror organization, Hezbollah, continue their nuclear secrecy and goals of wiping Israel off the map.

 

7 TIMES DEMOCRATS ADVISED AMERICA’S ENEMIES TO OPPOSE THE PRESIDENT

On Monday, 47 United States Senators sent an open letter to the Iranian regime warning that any deal cut by President Obama could be revoked by Congress.

“The next president,” the letter stated, “could revoke such an executive agreement with the stroke of a pen, and future Congresses could modify the terms of the agreement at any time.”

This sent the Obama administration and its media allies into a tizzy of rage. After all, it is one thing for the president of the United States to send secret love letters to the ayatollahs; it is quite another for GOP members of the Senate to warn the Iranians that they will not abide by a bad deal.

Vice President Joe Biden said that the Republican letter was “beneath the dignity of an institution I revere,” adding, “In thirty-six years in the United States Senate, I cannot recall another instance in which Senators wrote directly to advise another country – much less a longtime foreign adversary – that the President does not have the constitutional authority to reach a meaningful understanding with them.” Josh Earnest of the White House said that the letter was “a continuation of a partisan strategy to undermine the president’s ability to conduct foreign policy and advance our national security interests around the globe.”

The New York Daily News headlined its front page “traitors.”

Jon Lovett, former White House speechwriter and current failed TV sitcom writer, tweeted, “SHAME is the best medicine for these 47 Republicans. And they shall have it!” Other Democrats in the media said that Republicans were pushing war as an alternative to peace.

This is sheer nonsense. It was the Obama administration that suggested no deal was better than a bad deal. But given the false dichotomy between any deal and war, that suggestion was obviously a ruse.

Nonetheless, several Republicans declined to sign. Senator Bob Corker (R-TN), ever one to solicit the love of the mainstream media, said he wouldn’t sign onto the letter because “it was probably not something that was going to be helpful in that effort, for me to be involved in it.” Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) also declined to sign on, as did Senator Jeff Flake (R-AZ), who said that the letter was not “necessary.” Others who did not sign included Lamar Alexander (R-TN), Dan Coats (R-IN), Thad Cochran (R-MS), and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK).

Democrats have said that the letter may violate the Logan Act, which states:

Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

Legally speaking, charges under the Logan Act would be unwarranted. The Logan Act has never actually been used for prosecution, nor has its Constitutionality been seriously reviewed in two hundred years.

And if Republicans supposedly violated the Logan Act, so did these Democrats:

Senators John Sparkman (D-AL) and George McGovern (D-SD). The two Senators visited Cuba and met with government actors there in 1975. They said that they did not act on behalf of the United States, so the State Department ignored their activity.

Senator Teddy Kennedy (D-MA). In 1983, Teddy Kennedy sent emissaries to the Soviets to undermine Ronald Reagan’s foreign policy. According to a memo finally released in 1991 from head of the KGB Victor Chebrikov to then-Soviet leader Yuri Andropov:

On 9-10 May of this year, Sen. Edward Kennedy’s close friend and trusted confidant [John] Tunney was in Moscow. The senator charged Tunney to convey the following message, through confidential contacts, to the General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Y. Andropov.

What was the message? That Teddy would help stifle Reagan’s anti-Soviet foreign policy if the Soviets would help Teddy run against Reagan in 1984. Kennedy offered to visit Moscow to “arm Soviet officials with explanations regarding problems of nuclear disarmament so they may be better prepared and more convincing during appearances in the USA.” Then he said that he would set up interviews with Andropov in the United States. “Kennedy and his friends will bring about suitable steps to have representatives of the largest television companies in the USA contact Y.V. Andropov for an invitation to Moscow for the interviews…Like other rational people, [Kennedy] is very troubled by the current state of Soviet-American relations,” the letter explained. The memo concluded:

Tunney remarked that the senator wants to run for president in 1988. Kennedy does not discount that during the 1984 campaign, the Democratic Party may officially turn to him to lead the fight against the Republicans and elect their candidate president.

House Speaker Jim Wright (D-TX). In 1984, 10 Democrats sent a letter to Daniel Ortega Saavedra, the head of the military dictatorship in Nicaragua, praising Saavedra for “taking steps to open up the political process in your country.” House Speaker Jim Wright signed the letter.

In 1987, Wright worked out a deal to bring Ortega to the United States to visit with lawmakers. As The New York Times reported:

There were times when the White House seemed left out of the peace process, uninformed, irritated. ”We don’t have any idea what’s going on,” an Administration official said Thursday. And there was a bizarre atmosphere to the motion and commotion: the leftist Mr. Ortega, one of President Reagan’s arch enemies, heads a Government that the Administration has been trying to overthrow by helping to finance a war that has killed thousands of Nicaraguans on both sides. Yet he was freely moving around Washington, visiting Mr. Wright in his Capitol Hill office, arguing his case in Congress and at heavily covered televised news conferences. He criticized President Reagan; he recalled that the United States, whose troops intervened in Nicaragua several times between 1909 and 1933, had supported the Somoza family dictatorship which lasted for 43 years until the Sandinistas overthrew it in 1979.

Ortega then sat next to Wright as he presented a “detailed cease-fire proposal.” The New York Times said, “Mr. Ortega seemed delighted to turn to Mr. Wright.”

Senator John Kerry (D-MA). Kerry jumped into the pro-Sandanista pool himself in 1985, when he traveled to Nicaragua to negotiate with the regime. He wasn’t alone; Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) joined him. The Christian Science Monitor reported that the two senators “brought back word that Mr. Ortega would be willing to accept a cease-fire if Congress rejected aid to the rebels…That week the House initially voted down aid to the contras, and Mr. Ortega made an immediate trip to Moscow.” Kerry then shilled on behalf of the Ortega government:

We are still trying to overthrow the politics of another country in contravention of international law, against the Organization of American States charter. We negotiated with North Vietnam. Why can we not negotiate with a country smaller than North Carolina and with half the population of Massachusetts? It’s beyond me. And the reason is that they just want to get rid of them [the Sandinistas], they want to throw them out, they don’t want to talk to them.

Representatives Jim McDermott (D-WA), David Bonior (D-MI), and Mike Thompson (D-CA). In 2002, the three Congressmen visited Baghdad to play defense for Saddam Hussein’s regime. There, McDermott laid the groundwork for the Democratic Party’s later rip on President George W. Bush, stating, “the president of the United States will lie to the American people in order to get us into this war.” McDermott, along with his colleagues, suggested that the American administration give the Iraqi regime “due process” and “take the Iraqis on their face value.” Bonior said openly he was acting on behalf of the government:

The purpose of our trip was to make it very clear, as I said in my opening statement, to the officials in Iraq how serious we–the United States is about going to war and that they will have war unless these inspections are allowed to go unconditionally and unfettered and open. And that was our point. And that was in the best interest of not only Iraq, but the American citizens and our troops. And that’s what we were emphasizing. That was our primary concern–that and looking at the humanitarian situation.

Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV). In 2002, Rockefeller told Fox News’ Chris Wallace, “I took a trip by myself in January of 2002 to Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Syria, and I told each of the heads of state that it was my view that George Bush had already made up his mind to go to war against Iraq, that that was a predetermined set course which had taken shape shortly after 9/11.” That would have given Saddam Hussein fourteen months in which to prepare for war.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). In April 2007, as the Bush administration pursued pressure against Syrian dictator Bashar Assad, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi went to visit him. There, according to The New York Times, the two “discussed a variety of Middle Eastern issues, including the situations in Iraq and Lebanon and the prospect of peace talks between Syria and Israel.” Pelosi was accompanied by Reps. Henry Waxman (D-CA), Tom Lantos (D-CA), Louise M. Slaughter (D-NY), Nick J. Rahall II (D-WV), and Keith Ellison (D-MN). Zaid Haider, Damascus bureau chief for Al Safir, reportedly said, ‘There is a feeling now that change is going on in American policy – even if it’s being led by the opposition.”

The Constitution of the United States delegates commander-in-chief power to the president of the United States. Section 2 clearly states, “He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur…” As Professor Jack Goldsmith of Harvard Law School writes, Senators have a good argument that “the President lacks the authority under the U.S. Constitution to negotiate a pure Executive agreement in this context.  Almost all major arms control agreements have been made as treaties that needed Senate consent, and the one major exception, the Salt I treaty, was a congressional-executive agreement.”

One who might agree: former Senator Joe Biden, whose White House profile explains, “then-Senator Biden played a pivotal role in shaping US foreign policy.” Among other elements of that role: decrying President George W. Bush’s surge in Iraq as “a tragic mistake” and vowing, “I will do everything in my power to stop it.” As Tom Cotton said this morning, “If Joe Biden respects the dignity of the institution of the Senate, he should be insisting that the President submit any deal to approval of the Senate, which is exactly what he did on numerous deals during his time in Senate.”

Anyone See The Treason Yet? Iraq Al Qaeda Leader Was Released By Obama In 2009.

Handing 5 Jihadist Generals on over to Islamists for traitor Bergdahl is nothing new for Obama.  He released the Al Qaeda ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi in 2009

The hits just keep coming.

An Islamic maniac and point-man for Osama Bin Laden’s Al Qaeda, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi also known as Abu Dua – was once held by the U.S. at Camp Bucca.  He was mysteriously released for unknown reasons in 2009 – right after Obama took office.  Camp Bucca was the prison camp for the most hardened of Al Qaeda’s operators, but The Obama regime shut down the Bucca prison camp and released its prisoners, including Abu Dua in 2009.

Now we learn that this animal, who often pronounced sentence on his enemies and publicly executed them by beheading, is the leader of ISIS – the Islamic State In Syria And Iraq, the Jihadist group that has conquered Mosul and Tikrit and now threatens to move on Baghdad.

This is also suspected to the be leader of the Jihadist Syrian Rebels against Basher Assad in Syria, a group Obama has been deliberately supporting and funding.

So – connect the dots: this Al Qaeda Jihadist released with others in 2009 on Obama’s orders (because he is the CINC – this would NOT have happened without his direct order), which is in keeping with Obama releasing 5 – count-’em – FIVE– Jihadist Taliban GENERALS for 1 (ONE) traitor and deserter Bowe Bergdahl.

BUT WAIT!    Just now Reuters is reporting that Obama is doing the SAME RELEASING AND ‘REPATRIATING’ Of Jihadist Prisoners in Afghanistan that he did in Iraq!!!!!

U.S. quietly moves detainees out of secretive Afghanistan prison

The Obama administration has quietly repatriated a dozen detainees from a small U.S. military prison in Afghanistan, moving a modest step closer toward winding down the United States’ controversial post-9/11 detainee system.

 

Does anyone yet see the treason being done here by Obama?  Is NO ONE of any importance willing to call Obama out for what he is and what he is doing???

There may be nothing left of this country by the time Obama is no longer in power.

And that I believe, is the plan.

ISIS Terror Leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi Was Released By Obama from Camp Bucca in 2009

…Well-organised and utterly ruthless, the ex-preacher is the driving force behind al-Qaeda’s resurgence throughout Syria and Iraq, putting it at the forefront of the war to topple President Bashar al-Assad and starting a fresh campaign of mayhem against the Western-backed government in Baghdad.

On Tuesday, his forces achieved their biggest coup in Iraq to date, seizing control of government buildings in Mosul, the country’s third biggest city. Coming on top of similar operations in January that planted the black jihadi flag in the towns of Fallujah and Ramadi, it gives al-Qaeda control of large swathes of the north and west of the country, and poses the biggest security crisis since the US pull-out two years ago…

…“This guy was a Salafi (a follower of a fundamentalist brand of Islam), and Saddam’s regime would have kept a close eye on him,” said Dr Michael Knights, an Iraq expert at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

“He was also in Camp Bucca for several years, which suggests he was already considered a serious threat when he went in there.”

That theory seems backed by US intelligence reports from 2005, which describe him as al-Qaeda’s point man in Qaim, a fly-blown town in Iraq’s western desert.

“Abu Duaa was connected to the intimidation, torture and murder of local civilians in Qaim”, says a Pentagon document. “He would kidnap individuals or entire families, accuse them, pronounce sentence and then publicly execute them.”

Why such a ferocious individual was deemed fit for release in 2009 is not known. One possible explanation is that he was one of thousands of suspected insurgents granted amnesty as the US began its draw down in Iraq.

Bergdahl Sharia Tweet: “Democracy is a cult in the West”

Like Father, Like Son, Like Obama – together they hate America, love and apologize for Islam

Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl had left a note for his comrades that said he did not want to fight for America any more, was RENOUNCING HIS CITIZENSHIP and was leaving to start a new life.  His Muslim Convert Papa apparently share’s his son’s anti-American sentiments.

BOB BERGDAHL Joined Code Pink in Campaign Against US Drone Attacks in Pakistan

The hatred of America that Bergdahl has can be found in two tweets that were attempted to be deleted but were captured by the magic of the internet.

And for those who insist this was an isolated incident or for the purpose of trying to secure his son’s release – THIS tweet appeared from Bergdahl Sr. this morning:

 

So, ‘Democracy is a cult’ according to Bergdahl insinuating Sharia Law is preferable to ‘secular man-centric’ laws.

But His Heinous, the Imperial President Obama celebrated Bergdahl while his Regime works the news media to insist that Bergdahl “served with honor and distinction”.

That is about as believable as the Youtube video was responsible for the Benghazi attack that this same imbecile insisted upon:

The truth is:   Bergdahl deserted his men and should face the firing squad

But Obama and his regime revel in their treason while the Jihadists and enemies of the world rejoice at the absolute surrender of America to the idiot Boy King’s dismantling of the country.

 

Obama Commits High Treason

His Heinous Secretly Releases 5 Jihad Commanders to the Taliban in exchange for a Deserter who went AWOL.

Then we find out that this AWOL deserter is to be PROMOTED to Staff Sergeant.

The list of high crimes and misdemeanors agains this Imperial Dictator now ruling us continues to mount.

In this particular case Obama committed Statutory Violation of the Defense Authorization Act by providing felony materiel support to terrorism by returning 5 Command Personnel to the Taliban.  There is no exemption for the CINC for that provision of Federal law but Obama asserts he has the authority to do so at his own discretion.

Once again Obama has chosen to ignore a law he does not like in order to create his own law.  The law he ignored makes it a felony crime to give any money, materiel or personnel to terrorist organizations.  Obama just provided the Taliban with 5 high-ranking Command personnel we had detained.  Obama has no legal power to do this, but asserts his CINC status gives him such authority, which is a crock.  By violating the DAA he committed high treason in doing so, making up a cockamamie story almost as believable as an anti-Islamic YouTube video inciting the 2012 Egyptian riots by claiming that Bergdahl’s health was in serious condition.

Of course the evidence that Obama knew he was going to commit treason is the fact he did not notify Congress of this decision to act, even though HE SAID LAST YEAR he would not make any deals with the Taliban to swap terrorists for Bergdahl until he notified Congress:

Carney said. “As we have long said, however, we would not make any decisions about transfer of any detainees without consulting with Congress and without doing so in accordance with U.S. law.”

The White House admitted that they were aware of the fact there was a law that required them to notify Congress – but that was so 2013 ago.  Times have changed.  Obama is now dictator and is able to pick and choose what laws he will uphold and follow.  In addition,  The Taliban are no longer a terror group according to Obama, which he says would EXEMPT this action he took.  So now they are called ‘enemy combatants’ – as if we were fighting a nation-state instead of terrorists.  This gives the ‘legal cover’ for Obama to supposedly act as he did.

So he returns 5 Jihadist COMMANDERS to an ‘enemy’ who IS STILL CARRYING OUT OFFENSIVE OPERATIONS Against Americans FOR ONE AWOL soldier.  That is BEYOND a dereliction of duty, that is outright aid, comfort and personnel provision to an enemy during a time of war.  But NONE dare call it TREASON.

But to add insult to injury after throwing salt in our wounds,  a SENIOR Defense official confirmed tonight that the AWOL soldier is going to be PROMOTED to STAFF SERGEANT!  This AFTER  the U.S. concluded in 2010 that Bergdahl walked away.

On whose orders is an AWOL Deserter who was hapless enough to be ‘captured’, who cost the life of 14 Americans who went looking for him GET PROMOTED???

Still America slumbers as this Trojan Horse continues to dismantle us from the highest office in the land.

Anyone recall that Obama wrote in his version of Mein Kampf that “he would stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift into an ugly direction?”

But Congress under the leadership of Boehner and McConnell pop out minor snippets to the media of their concern but in truth will DO NOTHING but be complicit in this treason.

SOLDIER WHO SERVED WITH BERGDAHL: HE’S AT BEST A DESERTER, AT WORST A TRAITOR

U.S. Army Sgt. Josh Korder joined Tapper under the threat of possible repercussions from the military to discuss Bergdahl’s behavior while they served together in Blackfoot company, second platoon in Afghanistan.

“He is at best a deserter, and at worst a traitor,” Korder said of Bergdahl.

 

Negotiating With Terrorists: Inside the Capture and Release of Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl

…For more than 200 years, the United States has had a policy of not trading prisoners for American hostages.  That policy has been shredded and international travel to even cities like London, Paris, and Amsterdam will now pose an exceptional danger for Americans.

And as Americans, we must all ask: at what price was Sgt. Bergdahl’s freedom purchased?

According to reports, Sgt. Bergdahl was under the influence when he walked off his base in Paktika Province, Afghanistan and into the arms of the Haqqani terrorism network.

It is important to note that the Haqqanis are not the same thing as the Afghan Taliban.  The two are different groups.  They each have their own distinct and separate leadership council, or “Shura” that they report to.  The Haqqanis are heavily tied to both Al Qaeda (providing them safe passage and support) and the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence agency, also known as the ISI.  The Haqqanis are a heavily criminal enterprise sowing and feeding off of the chaos in the Afghanistan/Pakistan region.  Envision Al Qaeda crossed with the Sopranos and you begin to get the picture of what these thugs are like…

And Obama traded FIVE Jihad terrorists in our custody for ONE Deserter who caused the death of 14 Americans who were sent looking for him or suffered from Taliban attacks with insufficient resources that were redirected to hunt for the AWOL Bergdahl.

How many Americans are these 5 released TALIBAN COMMANDERS going to kill?

168 TIMES RELEASED GITMO DETAINEES RETURNED TO TERROR

 UPDATE: Obama defends his unilateral and illegal action.  Says “Absolutely a risk in freeing the Taliban inmates” but defends the surrender.

The deal to release Bergdahl in exchange for five senior Taliban members even though the Army and Bergdahl’s former colleagues have stated the fact that Bergdahl was a deserter, is irrelevant according to Obama.

Obama said the question isn’t relevant: “Regardless of the circumstances, we still get an American soldier back if he’s held in captivity,” Obama said. “Period. Full stop.”

REGARDLESS of the circumstances????  For all we know Bergdahl defected to the Taliban and was HELPING them kill Americans!

THIS IS INSANE!  Where was the King’s concern the night of Benghazi when four Americans were slaughtered, INCLUDING the American Ambassador???? ? All of a sudden he’s concerned about a single deserter?

This was TREASON, plain and simple.  But since His Heinous has declared himself defacto dictator, I guess only his word matters anymore.

 

 

The Obama Support and Arming of Al Qaeda

Al Qaeda operatives hijacked 4 jetliners and obliterated the World Trade Center and the Pentagon 12 years ago – but today, Obama’s regime supports Al Qaeda in Syria.

With help from the Leftist Propaganda Mainstream Media, Americans were made fuzzy on who attacked us on 9-11.  Almost immediately while the dust was still settling over Manhattan, the Left began screaming ‘Why do they hate us??’ ,  and in subsequent weeks insisted that we ‘provoked them’ somehow.  Over the last 12 years, we have been lectured by the Left about the bigotry of America, and that we are harming ‘moderate’ Muslims’ when we focus on the Jihadists.  Since Obama took office, all references to militant Islam have been scrubbed from official policies and instead the focus has been put upon white Christian American patriots.

Obama from the start of his regime, began to pander and support Sunni’s Muslims.  Who can forget his infamous low bow to the Saudi prince?

His Cairo speech to the Muslim world?  His proxy wars on secular dictators in Libya, Egypt and Tunisia – surplanting them with Muslim Brotherhood Jihadists – the Father of Al Qaeda.

So this week we were minutes to midnight in an Obama-push to attack Basher Assad’s Syrian forces as punishment for allegedly using chemical weapons, an attack that would have quickly involved Russia and escalated into a regional conflict that has the potential to jumpstart WWIII.  There is no definitive proof that Assad’s forces used the weapons on his own people. Rather evidence is mounting that Obama’s Al Qaeda-loyal Islamist Rebels have used the weapons for the purpose of blaming them on Assad so as to have military help from Obama to give them an advantage over Assad’s regime so as to install a Sunni Islamist Theocracy as was attempted in Egypt.

On this Twelf Anniversary of the horrific attack by Al Qaeda Islamists on America, we should be mindful of the fact that the Obama regime is aiding, comforting, arming and funding Al Qaeda-loyal Islamist rebels in Syria.

We can assume the word treason does not apply to the Obama regime anymore than the word responsibility does.

Obama’s Rebel Friends – al Qaeda

It seems appropriate today being September 11 to take a look at who our president’s new friends are.  I’m referring to the Syrian rebels.  So many things to cover…

Last week in Congressional hearings Secretary of State John Kerry testified that Islamic extremists are just marginal players in the Syrian civil war and are unlikely to benefit much from any bombing done by the United States.  Rep. Michael T. McCaul (R-TX) disagreed with Kerry, saying that the classified briefings he received as chairman of the House Committee on Homeland Security indicated that “the majority now of these rebel forces – and I say majority now – are radical Islamists pouring in from all over the world to come to Syria for the fight.”

A Catholic nun who lives in the St. James Monastery in Qara, Syria has been reporting what has actually been happening in Syria and she had some not so complimentary things to say about the rebels.

In the village of Estreba they massacred all the  residents and burnt down their houses. In the village of  al-Khratta almost all the 37 locals were killed. Only ten people were able to escape. 

A total of twelve Alawite villages were subjected to this horrendous attack. That was a true slaughterhouse. People were mutilated and beheaded. There is even a video that shows a girl  being dismembered alive – alive! – by a frame saw. The final death toll exceeded 400, with 150 to 200 people taken hostage.  Later some of the hostages were killed, their deaths  filmed.

The Mail Online has reported what happened when the rebels ‘liberated’ a village.

One Maaloula resident said the rebels, many of whom had beards and shouted ‘Allahu Akbar’ (God is great), attacked Christian homes and churches shortly after moving into the village. 

‘They shot and killed people. I heard gunshots and then I saw three bodies lying in the middle of a street in the old quarters of the village. Where is President Obama to see what has befallen  us?’

Another Christian resident said: ‘I saw the militants grabbing five villagers and threatening them and saying, “Either you convert to Islam, or you will be beheaded”.’

Another said one church had been torched, and gunmen stormed into two other churches and robbed them.

Business Insider has a report that Saudi Arabia sent 1,200 death row inmates to fight against Assad in Syria. The inmates were given a choice of decapitation or going to Syria to join the rebels.  A leaked memo had the details of the arrangement.

We have reached an agreement with them that they will be exempted from the death sentence and given a monthly salary to their families and loved ones, who will be prevented from traveling outside Saudi Arabia in return for rehabilitation of the accused and their training in order to send them to Jihad in Syria.

The New American has reported that one of the most prominent and powerful rebel groups fighting in Syria has formally announced that it was merging with al Qaeda in Iraq.  Pictures posted on the internet show the rebels displaying black al Qaeda flags and heaven weaponry.  Two days before the announcement, al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri called on all Islamic fighters in Syria to join and fight together to oust Assad and seize power. He told them, “Do all you can to ensure that the fruit of your struggle, God willing, is an Islamic state.”

And who can forget the rebels executing captured Syrian soldiers as they stood over their kneeling captives?  The New York Times has the story.

The Syrian rebels posed casually, standing over their prisoners with firearms pointed down at the shirtless and terrified men.  The prisoners, seven in all, were captured Syrian soldiers. Five were trussed, their backs marked with red welts. They kept their faces pressed to the dirt as the rebels’ commander recited a bitter revolutionary verse.       

“For fifty years, they are companions to corruption,” he said. “We swear to the Lord of the Throne, that this is our oath: We will take revenge.”       

The moment the poem ended, the commander, known as “the Uncle,” fired a bullet into the back of the first prisoner’s head. His gunmen followed suit, promptly killing all the men at their feet.

These are the people President Obama wants us to support with our military?  These are the people to whom we have been covertly supplying weaponry?  These are the people who would be running Syria if Assad was overthrown?  These are our new friends?  People who either belong to or have joined up with the group responsible for the image below?

These may be the people Obama wants to call ‘friends’ but the American people will never support this.  In his speech to the nation last night Obama made the comparison between Assad using gas and Hitler gassing the Jews.  I disagree wholeheartedly with the comparison and consider it an insult to Jews.  Obama would have the American public believe the people he wants to help are being led to the slaughter by the evil Syrian forces.  From what I have read there is slaughter happening on both sides.  I see no reason at all to put one American soldier in jeopardy or spend even one dollar of our defense budget to help any of these people, on either side.  We have not one friend there.  But apparently, the al-Qaeda supported rebels do have a friend in our White House.  And any friend of theirs is no friend to the American people.

Obama Media: It’s Time To Abolish The “Evil” Constitution

While still drumming up a zeitgeist against guns and the 2nd Amendment, Obama’s media says it is time to abandon and abolish the Constitution because it is old, archaic and ‘downright evil’.

The masks and pretenses are off.  So too I assume will be the gloves in the not too distant future.  The MarxoFascists/Progressives in the Regime and it’s media are now bold suggesting treason as a matter of intellectual superiority.  The NY Times published an Op-ed 3 weeks ago – being repeated on CBS this weekend – that the Constitution has outlived it’s usefulness and should be abandoned and/or abolished altogether.  As the gun control debate rages, look for this meme to be repeated more often by Obama’s stooges in the media to counter the advocates and “cultists’ who champion the 2nd Amendment.

Constitutional law professor at Georgetown Michael Seidman, who teaches our kids about the Constitution – blames all the woes of our failed government and regime on the Constitution itself.  He calls our Foundational law ‘archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil’.  He suggests ‘disobedience’ to the Constitution, meaning Obama and the Left should simply ignore it and only give it a passing acknowledgment when it comes to free speech, and only do so out of respect – not obligation.

Seidman seeds the meme that Obama himself has subtly suggested over the years; that the Constitution induces bondage and has made us slaves.  Indeed Obama himself stated that the Constitution “Is a charter of NEGATIVE liberties”, lamenting the provisions that restrict government’s power and suggested that it should be rewritten so it can tell government what to do on behalf of the people.

To me, this published advocation of treason reveals the actual intent at work by Obama and the MarxoFascists.

Now we know why and how it is, that this regime in power via fraud ignores the Constitution so willingly – and works tirelessly to infringe and abolish those parts of the law they disagree and hate.  This same media now calls anyone advocating gun rights as a ‘2nd Amendment Cultist’ – and that same disdain for the rest of the Constitution is now in our faces and was just sworn in to high office.

Let’s Give Up on the Constitution

By LOUIS MICHAEL SEIDMAN

Link to Op-Ed article allowed only.

CBS actually gives this treason advocate a platform in which to spew this suggestion, as the meme and forced zeitgeist of propagandists for the MarxoFascists now openly sow the seeds for the push to disregard and abolish the Constitution and MSNBC has followed.

For those who do not wish to poison their ears listening to this treason – here’s just a snippet of what this ‘professor’ is teaching our kids at Georgetown:

I’ve got a simple idea: Let’s give up on the Constitution. I know, it sounds radical, but it’s really not. Constitutional disobedience is as American as apple pie. For example, most of our greatest Presidents — Jefferson, Lincoln, Wilson, and both Roosevelts — had doubts about the Constitution, and many of them disobeyed it when it got in their way.

To be clear, I don’t think we should give up on everything in the Constitution. The Constitution has many important and inspiring provisions, but we should obey these because they are important and inspiring, not because a bunch of people who are now long-dead favored them two centuries ago. Unfortunately, the Constitution also contains some provisions that are not so inspiring. For example, one allows a presidential candidate who is rejected by a majority of the American people to assume office. Suppose that Barack Obama really wasn’t a natural-born citizen. So what? Constitutional obedience has a pernicious impact on our political culture. Take the recent debate about gun control. None of my friends can believe it, but I happen to be skeptical of most forms of gun control. I understand, though, that’s not everyone’s view, and I’m eager to talk with people who disagree.

But what happens when the issue gets Constitutional-ized? Then we turn the question over to lawyers, and lawyers do with it what lawyers do. So instead of talking about whether gun control makes sense in our country, we talk about what people thought of it two centuries ago. Worse yet, talking about gun control in terms of constitutional obligation needlessly raises the temperature of political discussion. Instead of a question on policy, about which reasonable people can disagree, it becomes a test of one’s commitment to our foundational document and, so, to America itself.

This is our country. We live in it, and we have a right to the kind of country we want. We would not allow the French or the United Nations to rule us, and neither should we allow people who died over two centuries ago and knew nothing of our country as it exists today. If we are to take back our own country, we have to start making decisions for ourselves, and stop deferring to an ancient and outdated document.