The REAL Motive for Hillary/Obama Blaming Youtube Video For Benghazi

Anti-Islam Youtube Video created by a patsy agent of Obama’s Justice Department, intended as a pretext to criminalize anything critical of Islam in the United States.

“Anti-Islam Rhetoric ‘Must Be Rejected’ By All Who Respect Our Common Humanity” – Barrack Obama, September 25, 2012

I blogged yesterday on the story about the Muslim agent pretending to be a Coptic Christian used by Obama’s Justice Department to create a Youtube Video insulting Islam.  In going back and reviewing statements both Obama and Hillary made in the wake of the Benghazi attack by an Al Qaeda offshoot that killed 4 Americans – I found an out-of-place insistent statement made by both of them; that the U.S. Government was NOT responsible for the video.

Why make and repeat that insistence out front without anyone making an insinuation??  No one accused them of doing so – yet both of them vociferously stated it.  WHY?

Well, I contend that Obama’s regime WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING THE VIDEO.  A stooge patsy Muslim, coerced into working for Obama’s Justice Department, portrayed himself as a Coptic Christian and made the video probably at the Behest of Obama – FOR THE PURPOSE OF CRIMINALIZING ANYTHING CRITICAL OF ISLAM.

Infamous ‘Muhammad-video’ filmmaker actually a Muslim agent for Obama admin

Snip:

It also turns out that the official terms of Nakoula’s parole in 2009 was bogus, and that the administration used his parole as leverage to help him with their agenda: To create a climate for non-Muslim governments to enact laws that make criticism of Islam a criminal offense.

Sound far fetched? Well then I guess you haven’t heard about the ‘Istanbul Process’ meetings Hillary went to in Turkey as Secretary of State that were designed to help facilitate the creation of a “climate for non-Muslim governments to enact laws that make criticism of Islam a criminal offense.”

But before Nakoula could get the video finished, Benghazi happened and the administration quickly blamed it on that video.

Here’s info about this ‘Instanbul Process’ Hillary sought to implement:

The United Nations, at the behest of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and with the support of the U.S. government, succeeded in passing Resolution 16/18, which requires Western democracies to enact legislation preventing the “defamation of religions”.

The summit meeting on July 15, 2011 between Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu in Istanbul launched what became known “Istanbul Process”. Mrs. Clinton committed the United States to a partnership with the Islamic world for the purpose of implementing the legislative results required by the agreement.

Shortly after the 9-11 attack in Benghazi, the Obama regime hosted a confab to address criminalizing speech and content critical of Islam:

State Dept. Official to Attend OIC Meeting Today on Banning ‘Defamation of Islam’

The headquarters of the General Secretariat of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation will host a symposium on “Defamation Acts against Islam: conflict dimensions and perspectives of co-existence between Islam and the West” on Monday 19/11/2012.

Word of this meeting got out as facts about Benghazi were emerging and the OIC scrubbed it’s website.

OIC Scrubs Website, Screenshot Added, Cover-Up Begins

The OIC has made no secret of its intentions to use the UN and international law to criminalize what they consider to be “defamation of Islam.”  But now, no more mention of Anne Casper attending today’s OIC session on banning “defamation of Islam.” Let the cover-up begin!

Are you shocked the Obama regime would attempt to create a situation to implement aspects of Sharia Law by restricting speech that is critical of Islam in the USA?   Consider this: Obama himself told the world that free speech should not apply to commentary that can be construed as ‘anti-Islamic’ by Muslims.  He did this IN FRONT of the UN in 2012 and essentially reiterated what the Instanbul Process demanded by the OIC:

So what you have here in this picture all the puzzle pieces make, is that Obama and his regime are CREATING pretexts via inciting violence to abolish the American Constitution and your Rights.  He did this with Operation Fast & Furious running guns to Mexican drug cartels in order to infringe on the Second Amendment.  Now we are learning he attempted it again – by creating a Youtube video insulting of Islam as a pretext for violence so as to implement the Instanbul Process.  Obama did this while he was running guns to Al Qaeda in Syria and ultimately intended to use it as an excuse to infringe and regulate the First Amendment that his regime blamed for Benghazi.

 

 

 

 

Benghazi YouTube Patsy: An Agent Provocateur From Obama’s Justice Department

He was NEVER a Coptic Christian, rather the producer of the anti-Muhammad video the Obama administration blamed for the Benghazi attacks, is actually an agent of Eric Holder’s Justice Department.

Anyone remember the intent behind the Fast & Furious Gunwalker scandal?  That was where Obama and Eric Holder ‘walked’ guns into the hands of Mexican drug lords in the hopes they would incite deaths that would galvanize the American public into accepting draconian infringements on the Second Amendment given the damage American guns were said to have caused?

Now imagine that same methodology being used by ‘walking’ that anti-Muhammed  Youtube video as the ‘patsy’ for the Benghazi attack which was a cover to eliminate the evidence of Obama running heavy weapons to Al Qaeda Rebels in Syria.  The SAME Al Qaeda Jihadists who now have conquered much of Northern Iraq.  The video would serve as a pretext for the ‘need’ for Obama to restrict and regulate internet content given the ‘damage’ it was said to have caused.

It’s a connect-the-dots kind of week as it refers to Obama’s aid and comfort to the Jihadist terrorists in the world for the purpose of dismantling things at home.

In one day – news breaks in the blog from yesterday that the LEADER of the Jihadist group ISIS – WAS SET FREE FROM US CUSTODY in 2009 by Obama.  At nearly the same time, news breaks that Obama is “quietly” releasing Jihadist prisoners in Afghanistan.  This of course follows Obama releasing FIVE Taliban Generals for ONE slime ball deserter/traitor of the US Army; Bowe Bergdahl.

See a pattern there?

NEFARIOUS can hardly define what is taking place.

At the same time all that news was breaking, Walid Shoebat – a former Jihadist himself – unloaded a trove of evidence both revealed and circumstantial that Filmmaker Yousef/Nakoula not only admitted being Muslim, but was working for the Obama Justice Department.  The entire anti-Islamic video was crafted to be a pasty – as a Provocateur for both covering up for the Benghazi operation – and giving the Obama regime an excuse to restrict and regulate the internet.

Tom Clancy couldn’t have written all the intrigue, double-dealing and nefarious invention that Shoebat and Keith Davies have uncovered as it all relates to the crafting IN ADVANCE of the scapegoat video apparently created for the purpose to cover for Obama gun-running weapons to ISIS in Syria and as a two-birds-with-one-stone bonus of justifying content restrictions on the internet.

Bombshell: Benghazi Filmmaker CONFIRMED To Be An Agent Of Eric Holder Justice Department

Earlier this week, we brought you news about the producer of the film that was at the heart of the Obama administration talking points on Benghaziadmitting to being a Muslim, not a Coptic Christian as he had been portrayed to America. Now Walid Shoebat, Ben Barrack and Keith Davies confirm he is an agent of Eric Holder’s Justice Department.

The damning trail of evidence begins when a fictitious narrative was concocted by the FBI to lure the courts that Nakoula (the Filmmaker, aka Yousef) was supposed to help the FBI catch Eiad Salameh, his partner in crimes for many years. Yet, the deal was never fulfilled and Eiad was let go by the Feds in 2011 asShoebat.com revealed in a firsthand account never before reported, including a recorded conversation between Nakoula and Shoebat.com in which the filmmaker defended Eiad, the very man he was supposed to help the FEDS catch!

Bolstering the case (aside from the Feds letting two criminals go) is how the filmmaker became an agent of Eric Holder. After Nakoula’s arrest, there was a very curious development at the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California, which was handling his case through an Assistant U.S. Attorney who suddenly was pulled off the case and replaced by a full bird –  Chief of the office’s Criminal Division, Robert Dugdale. 

Nakoula got high-profile attention.
In an article that appeared in the Washington Times, Kerry Picket wrote:

What is curious, though, is the fact that the original Asst. U.S. Atty. Jennifer Williams, who helped prosecute Mr. Yousef’s [Nakoula] bank fraud conviction, is not the attorney Mr. Yousef’s lawyers would eventually deal with. Mr. Yousef’s probation violation case, for no explained reason, was kicked up to Chief Criminal Division prosecutor Asst. U.S. Atty. Robert Dugdale. Dugdale is second in the chain of command below U.S. Atty. Andre Birotte of the Central District of California.

Picket was suspicious, she attempted to get answers from the office’s spokesman, Thom Mrozek:

When I pointed out that AUSA Dugdale was not part of the team of attorneys who did prosecute Yousef’s case and asked why the case was kicked up the chain to AUSA Dugdale, Mr. Mrozek responded, “I don’t comment on staffing decisions.”

The U.S. Attorney over Dugdale – Andre Birotte, Jr. became the local caretaker of a very high profile and high stakes case the Obama administration wanted to control very closely and later was nominated by Obama to be U.S. District Judge for California’s Central District.

Eiad Salameh, Nakoula’s partner in crimes – also beholden to the administration – obtained special favors from doing the Justice Department’s bidding. According to a report by The Smoking Gun just days after the Benghazi attacks, charges against Eiad (who has a proven rap sheet) were dropped in the same year that Canadian authorities picked him up:

It is unclear whether Salameh, whose whereabouts are unknown, has been charged in connection with the bank fraud. Salameh was named in a 2006 federal criminal complaint charging him with felony fraud. That complaint–filed under one of Salameh’s many aliases–was dismissed last year by federal prosecutors. A court docket shows that no filings were made after the initial complaint, likely indicating that Salameh was never apprehended.

But the last sentence is incorrect; Salameh was apprehended.

Jeffrey Mason of the Canadian Peel Police picked Salameh up in January of 2011!

At that time, he should have been wanted in connection with both the 2006 and 2009 cases, assuming he was involved in the Nakoula bank fraud case. Yet, the 2006 case was dropped in either the same month Eiad was arrested or in the months that followed.

Shoebat.com has learned from one retired FBI agent that this doesn’t just happen unless Eiad was providing the Feds with something in return for such treatment.

As Shoebat.com has reported, a timeline provides further evidence that the Obama Administration was in cahoots with these figures in the summer of 2011, during the July-August time frame.

1.) Secretary of State Hillary Clinton co-chaired a meeting in Istanbul, Turkey with the head of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). It was to be the first of several meetings that would become known as “The Istanbul Process”. One of the objectives of the OIC has been and remains, to pressure non-Muslim countries to censor speech critical of Islam.

2.) Nakoula began casting for his video.

3.) Eiad Salameh was put on a plane back to Palestine by the Canadians after Eric Holder’s FBI refused to have him extradited and charged.

Eiad was clearly on the hook with the U.S. Justice Department if his 2006 case was dismissed.

FBI’s Benghazi Investigation
When UN Ambassador Susan Rice blamed Nakoula’s video for the Benghazi attacks during her five Sunday talk show appearances on September 16, 2012, it served to anger the president of Libya, who shortly before Rice, had identified the attack as an act of terrorism. Last year, State Department whistle blower Gregory Hicks, the Deputy Chief of Mission in Libya at the time of the attacks, testified about this and said Rice’s comments prevented the FBI from getting to the site of the attacks for weeks.

Based on the FBI’s relationship with Nakoula and Eiad, the longer it took to get to the scene of the Benghazi attacks, the more compromised that scene would become. A compromised crime scene would have served to aid the perpetuation of the video narrative.

Silencing Skeptics
Is it unusual for the U.S. Government to empower informants to engage in a massive scheme and criminal enterprise for the purpose of creating a political climate to help push an agenda? Hardly. In much the same way that the Obama State Department championed the “Istanbul Process” as a vehicle to assault the first amendment, a gunwalking operation was used to assault the second amendment.

In Operation Fast and Furious, multiple federal agencies worked together as part of an Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF). The stated purpose of the operation was to track guns that were being trafficked into Mexico, arrest the bad guys, and confiscate the guns. In reality, as has been clearly demonstrated, the actual purpose was to allow the guns to “walk” into Mexico and make their way into the hands of drug cartels after the ATF – an arm of the Justice Department – mandated U.S. gun store owners sell the guns to bad guys.

The guns would be picked up at crime scenes and American gun store owners would be blamed in a blood libel (sound familiar?). The cover of that operation was blown after the death of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. An ATF whistle blower named John Dodson came forward and the scandal was exposed.

If blood libel and the collateral damage of innocent human lives in the interest of pushing an agenda like gun control was used to launch an assault on the second amendment, why would it be beyond plausibility to envision the same administration launching an assault on the first amendment using to create the climate for speech control?

Ironically – and perhaps not so coincidentally – the man in charge of the Criminal Division involved in both Fast and Furious and the post-Benghazi prosecution of Nakoula was Lanny Breuer.

….In conclusion, cutting a deal with one criminal to help them catch another it didn’t want brings legitimate questions about how Nakoula’s case was handled by Holder’s Criminal Division, where the possible monies obtained for the film, led at the time nationally by a figure whose claim to infamy is that he wound up as a central figure in the Operation Fast and Furious gunwalking scandal – Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer. Along with Holder, Breuer, Dugdale, Birotte should all be deposed by the House Select Committee on Benghazi.

So should Nakoula and Eiad.

The question should be: Why did the law enforcement bureau Holder led refuse to pick up Eiad when offered on a silver platter by Canadian authorities in 2011. What was the source of the monies spent on the movie? Why was Nakoula given a lesser prison sentence to help the FBI arrest someone it didn’t want, thereby making the plea deal about something else?

In the days after the Benghazi attacks, Nakoula was arrested for violating the terms of his probation. The optics, coupled with the Obama administration’s attempts to blame the video for the deaths, clearly communicated that he was being punished for producing a “crude and disgusting video” that was critical of Islam. Unfortunately, the outrage Nakoula’s arrest generated in conservative circles actually played to the Obama administration’s advantage creating a distraction from the devastating truth.

Based on this explosive development, enough probable cause exists to investigate whether or not Eiad was involved in financing Nakoula’s video production. In this ABC News story filed just two days after the Benghazi attacks, it was revealed that the cost of the video was between $50,000 – $60,000 financed by his family in Egypt.

Just two weeks after Benghazi, Shoebat.com published a report about the claim by Nakoula that his “family” provided him with the funds to produce the video. As we wrote then, this “family” has not been located:

…if an Egyptian by the name of Nakoula Bacile Nakoula is blamed for angering over a billion Muslims, it would not be that difficult to find the entire family in Egypt, to include brothers, cousins, aunts, siblings wife, wives, ex-wives, mistresses, and pets, et. al., especially since the riots that spanned across 30 nations were sparked in Egypt.

In the Middle East, you are known by your clan. Yet, Egypt cannot produce neither this man’s family or his background?

Was Eiad the source of the $50,000 – $60,000? The Feds clearly couldn’t have their fingerprints on the money but two informants who were beholden to the Justice Department could. Is this why he wasn’t taken into custody when the Canadians offered him up?

Providing even further evidence that Nakoula’s video was about agitprop and blood libel are his initial claims about the source of his funding. According to the ABC News report above, Nakoula attempted to say the video cost $5 Million and was funded by a consortium of wealthy Jewish friends. This was clearly lie.

In a Shoebat.com exclusive, we learned that Nakoula recently told one of the actresses in his video – Cindy Lee Garcia – that he is a Muslim after being confronted by Garcia. This claim is bolstered by the mere partnership of Nakoula and Eiad.

Eiad Salameh is a Muslim fundamentalist who hates Coptic Christians. If Nakoula was a Copt, why would Salameh partner with him? The answer is that Nakoula is a Muslim who used agitprop and blood libel as an agent of the Obama administration and its Justice Department.

Source: Obama Is A Member of the Muslim Brotherhood

Obama records message for Muslim Brotherhood group saying “my administration is proud to be your partner”, Egyptian source says Obama is a member of the Brotherhood.

So why is Obama, the ‘anti-war’ candidate in 2008, the vocal opponent of the war on Jihadists from Iraq to Afghanistan – so intent now upon going to war in Syria?  Why was he so intent on overthrowing secular dictators in the middle East from Egypt and Libya to Tunisia and now Syria?  Why is he supporting Al Qaeda-backed Islamists in Syria?  Why arm them?  Why ship arms to them from Benghazi?  Why is he so insistent on supporting the radical Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt?  Why back Mohammed Morsi?  Why issue official White House warnings to Egypt’s military to reinstate Morsi as ruler?

The ‘why’ may be found in Obama’s allegiance and effort to assist the Islamists seeking to create a Sunni Caliphate in the Middle East.

In fact, Obama’s foreign policies makes sense if you consider that Obama is supporting the radical Islamists because HE IS A RADICAL ISLAMIST himself.

An Egyptian source claims Obama is a MEMBER OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD.

If true – it explains Obama’s entire foreign policy since he took office, doesn’t it?

I think the fruits speak to the accusation – and I for believe it to be true.

Consider the fact Obama stated in his autobiography ‘the Audacity of Hope’  that he will stand with Muslims.

The Right Scoop notes the alarming evidence of Obama’s support of radical Islamists:

It was reported that Mohamed Magid, the president of ISNA, is working directly with the White House as well as sitting on a Homeland Security committee that deals with ‘extremism’. If you haven’t seen that report you should go there now. It explains, in part, how the leaders of the Holy Land Foundation were convicted of funding terrorism, specifically the Islamic terror group Hamas whose goal is to destroy Israel, and that this Holy Land Foundation was spun off of a US Muslim Brotherhood group called ISNA. Because the US government wanted to indict the leaders of the Holy Land Foundation, ISNA was put on a list of unindicted co-conspirators of the Holy Land Foundation to be prosecuted at a later time. And they would have been had that not come at the end of the Bush administration.

So considering all of that, you wouldn’t think an American president would be in bed with a group who is responsible for funding a terror group who wants to destroy Israel, our greatest ally and the only Western power in the Middle East. But he is. Here is a message he sent to ISNA just the other day:

Egyptian Claims Obama Is A Member Of The Muslim Brotherhood…if true, suddenly everything from Obama’s involvements in the “Arab Spring” to the Benghazi massacre to bombing Syria suddenly makes perfect sense.

Unlikely Figure helps to out Obama as Muslim Brotherhood

by Shoebat Foundation on September 3, 2013 in Blog, General

Al-Jazeera is reporting on two tweets from a man named Shadi Hamid. The first tweet is a reference to an Egyptian newspaper that identifies Barack Obama as a member of the International Muslim Brotherhood:Shadi Hamid: Tweets claims from Egyptian newspaper that Obama a Muslim Brotherhood memberNine minutes later, Hamid tweeted an image of the newspaper article, which features a photo of Obama (Walid will be doing additional research on this in the coming days):

Hamid: Egyptian newspaper says Obama Muslim Brotherhood leader

Did you catch that part about the “son of MB leader threatened Obama w- release of ‘papers’”? That is an apparent reference to Saad al-Shater, the son of former Muslim Brotherhood presidential candidate, Khairat al-Shater. We direct you to Addendum F of our “Ironclad” report on Egypt’s involvement in the Benghazi attack. Multiple reports from Arabic sources indicated that Saad had said his father had documents that were incredibly damaging to Barack Obama.

A couple of weeks later, Saad was arrested. A Fox News / AP report indicated that one of the reasons for the younger al-Shater’s arrest had to do with Obama:

It was not immediately clear why police detained el-Shater’s 23-year-old son. Officials only said Wednesday that police had arrested Saad el-Shater and that he had threatened to release documents allegedly showing ties between his father and U.S. President Barack Obama. Officials did not elaborate.

Based on what we know about Shadi Hamid, it’s worth asking why he would so willingly pass along information that is damaging to President Obama. The Al-Jazeera article identifies him as a “Director of Research at the Brookings Doha Center”.

That in itself is interesting because in June of this year, Hamid was listed as a participant in theU.S.-Islamic World Forum (US-IWF) in Doha, Qatar.

Hamid: Attended Muslim Brotherhood forum in June.

As we have reported previously, this forum was a who’s who of Muslim Brotherhood members, apparatchiks, and sympathizers. This list included:

Thomas Pickering: Chairman of the Accountability Review Board (ARB) that investigated security lapses in Benghazi prior to the 9/11/12 attack.
Nihad Awad: National Executive Director of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), a Muslim Brotherhood group in America.
Rashad Hussain: Obama administration’s envoy to Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) with Muslim Brotherhood ties.
John Esposito: Georgetown University Professor and strong Muslim Brotherhood apologist.
Dalia Mogahed: Muslim and close colleague of Esposito. Also a Muslim Brotherhood apologist.
Mohamed Magid: President of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), a Muslim Brotherhood group.
Mouaz Moustafa: Executive Director of the Syrian Emergency Task Force (SETF); works in D.C. and lobbies Congress on behalf of Syrian (Muslim Brotherhood) rebels.
Josh Rogin: Daily Beast writer who referred to Abedin’s familial ties to the Muslim Brotherhood as a “conspiracy theor(y)”.
Rabbi David Saperstein: A purveyor of interfaith dialogue who vouched for both Abedin and Magid.

Of course, the question that needs to be answered is: Why would someone like Hamid – an apparent Muslim Brotherhood sympathizer – choose to help push a narrative that Barack Obama is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood?

Is he trying to get out in front of Saad’s claims or is there another motive?

It is indeed interesting that just days after Khairat Al-Shater’s son – who allegedly claimed his father had information on Obama that would land the U.S. President in jail – is arrested, an apparent friendly to the Obama administration is tweeting out this article.

 

Video: Gunmen Attacking Embassy Shouting They Were Sent By Islamist Egyptian President

Video raises the possibility that the attacks on American Embassies in Libya and Egypt were planned and coordinated with Egypt’s Government

Walid Shoebat reports from an Arabic video that Egyptian TV broadcast, that gunmen attacking the U.S. embassy were shouting to Egyptian security staff defending the embassy that they were sent by Egyptian President Mursi, the Muslim Brotherood’s newly ‘elected’ president that Obama helped put into power.

Shoebat.com states the following:

There have been questions raised about whether the attack on the U.S. Embassy in Libya was done in conjunction with the attacks on the Embassy in Cairo. This video brings us closer to answering that question. In fact, it not only points to the same attackers but possibly to Egyptian President Mohamed Mursi himself.

Fast forward to the 1:15 mark in this video (if you don’t understand Arabic). Watch as the raw footage of a firefight in Benghazi is taking place. The news report loops the relevant portion of an exchange between gunmen, in which one can be heard, saying, ‘Don’t Shoot us! We were sent by Mursi’!

Obviously, that would mean at least two separate groups of gunmen in Libya are loyal to the President of Egypt.

All this with news that the Marines guarding the embassies were forbidden to possess live ammunition – a horrifying picture is emerging about what is taking place in the Middle East: Obama is enabling and providing help and cover to Jihadists and Muslim militants taking over the Middle East.

Obama certainly looks to fulfill the Shiite prophecy that states a tall black man would be instrumental in helping to destroy the West.